Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 50

Thread: What are the benchmarks for crysis so far?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,284

    What are the benchmarks for crysis so far?

    Whats the possibility of playing crysis with an 8800 gts 320 with all settings on high/directx10 at 1280x1024 with good frame rates?

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    589
    That's what the developper said... now let's see if it's true in the final version
    i7 2600K @ 4.6GHz/Maximus IV Extreme
    2x 4GB Corsair Vengeance 1866
    HD5870 1GB PCS+/OCZ Vertex 120GB +
    WD Caviar Black 1TB
    Corsair HX850/HAF 932/Acer GD235HZ
    Auzentech X-Fi Forte/Sennheiser PC-350 + Corsair SP2500

  3. #3
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    IMO though for us 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 guys we'll need next gen cards to run the game properly.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tilburg, the Netherlands
    Posts
    489
    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie3dfx View Post
    Whats the possibility of playing crysis with an 8800 gts 320 with all settings on high/directx10 at 1280x1024 with good frame rates?
    That is precisely the same question as i have!
    my upgrade:

    amd x2 5200+
    2gb ocz pc6400
    8800gts 320mb
    m2n-sli deluxe

    question: will it perform with more than 30 fps av. on 1280x1024?

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USSR
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by dnb# View Post

    question: will it perform with more than 30 fps av. on 1280x1024?


    We simply don't know as of yet... and remember the beta is not necessarily like the final retail version

  6. #6
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,284
    It doesn't run that smooth on my quad running at 3.5 and gts overclocked.
    I don't even have it on the super high settings but the high ones at 1280x1024.
    I'll wait for the final to come out to make a full conclusion

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    894
    IMO though for us 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 guys we'll need next gen cards to run the game properly.
    good one! crysis will definitely prove it

    i thing comparing to the 1080p consoles, u can't benchmark crysis on non less the 1050 and of course 1200 resolutions!

    1920*1200 for me
    Gaming: SaberThooth X79,3930k,Asus6970DCII_Xfire,32gb,120OCZV3MaxIOPS, ThermaTake Chaser MK1
    HTPC:AMD630,ATI5750,4gb,3TB,ThermalTake DH103
    Server: E4500,4GB,5TB
    Netbook: Dell Vostro 1440

  8. #8
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,284
    whats the exact res for 1080i?

  9. #9
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    894
    1920*1080

    pc lcd has few more lines so 1920*1200



    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1080i
    Gaming: SaberThooth X79,3930k,Asus6970DCII_Xfire,32gb,120OCZV3MaxIOPS, ThermaTake Chaser MK1
    HTPC:AMD630,ATI5750,4gb,3TB,ThermalTake DH103
    Server: E4500,4GB,5TB
    Netbook: Dell Vostro 1440

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tilburg, the Netherlands
    Posts
    489
    Quote Originally Posted by Den Leiw View Post
    We simply don't know as of yet... and remember the beta is not necessarily like the final retail version
    Yep, you're right at that point but I just like to know how the beta demo runs at that setup/specs! Is there anybody who got 8800gts / dual core / 2gig and vista?

    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie3dfx View Post
    It doesn't run that smooth on my quad running at 3.5 and gts overclocked.
    I don't even have it on the super high settings but the high ones at 1280x1024.
    I'll wait for the final to come out to make a full conclusion
    Give me more info please like: high settings, 1280x1024, 8800gts 320mb, aa/af, processor, 2gig

    question: does a quadcore mean it runs that much smoother or is a dual core (like the 5200@2.6) enough for crysis? Crysis said you really need a 8800ultra a quadcore and 3 GB to run it at high settings SMOOTH.
    My general question is: is a 8800gts 320mb, dualcore, 2gig @ vista enough for high settings(not very high)(you can put your settings to very high in cfg) @ 1280x1024 @ bèta demo (the full version can only be better i think?)

    somebody with an reasonable answer to those questions?
    Because i'm not going to make a budget upgrade if it's not, than I'm going to wait another month or so!

    thanks in advance!

  11. #11
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,284
    Where do I start lol. I'm assuming there are multiple copies of crysis betas out there, because some were able to select "directx10" and they mentioned that it ran about 12-15fps faster.. (in xp, obviously it's not really directx10 since it's in xp, but it did improve their frame rates.I don't have that button/option, so that must be in a different version. Also, I don't have any icelevels or single player mode, only multiplayer mode.. Very High settings are disabled on mine and I can only select high settings.
    My system is a 3.5quad with a 8800gts overclocked. I know that the beta version does not have quad support, so therefore I'm assuming anyone with a duo core should have the same exact results.
    When applying 8x antialiasing, the settings are slow. In battleplay, you can get anywhere from 24-32fps, but then it can creep down to as low as 4-12fps.
    Inside before you go out it is higher.. 38-42fps.. outside around 22-30fps. It's not a constant though, since the fps jump a lot.
    It's not smooth and does not look as nice as the demos I have seen. I can put the settings at 2x anti-aliasing but the truth is that this game is so buggy at the moment, that I can't make a real judgement to what the final Game will be like. Maybe they will fix the bugs and the game will run at 40+fps on a gts in very high settings under directx10.. you never know
    I'm assuming those are directx10 version.. Mine is running at 1280x1024 resolution
    (x3210 3.5oc, 2gigs 1066crucial ballistix, 680i, gts 320 (688/1620/1010memory)
    Last edited by Eddie3dfx; 09-24-2007 at 07:06 PM.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tilburg, the Netherlands
    Posts
    489
    Eddie3dfx,

    I've heard you can put your settings to very high in your cfg. file, if you do that you have some extra details like: sunrays between the trees and much more nicer and smoother grass and explosions with better lightning.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,284
    sunrays no.. There is some weird rainbow that makes the water turn weird colors.. looks horrible.
    The nuclear explosion looks like an ms paint programs lol.
    I will have to try editing the cfg.. But I'll have to wait until my evga 680i rma comes in ;(

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tilburg, the Netherlands
    Posts
    489
    Eddie3dfx,

    this settings in config are for the highest settings + sunrays (they do exist) :

    [default]
    ; default of this CVarGroup
    = 4

    r_PostProcessEffects=1
    r_DepthOfField=1
    r_MotionBlur=1
    r_sunshafts=1
    r_UseEdgeAA=1
    r_Flares=1
    r_Coronas=1

    [1]
    r_DepthOfField=0
    r_MotionBlur=0
    r_Flares=0
    r_Coronas=0
    r_UseEdgeAA=0
    r_sunshafts=0

    [2]
    r_DepthOfField=1
    r_sunshafts=0
    r_MotionBlur=0
    r_UseEdgeAA=0

    [3]
    r_DepthOfField=1
    r_sunshafts=1

  15. #15
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    3,284
    awesome, thanks.
    The 2nd I get my 680i back I'll give a full review along with single 8800gts vs sli

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tilburg, the Netherlands
    Posts
    489
    A Thanks! you're awesome!

  17. #17
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The Sacred birth place of Watercooling
    Posts
    4,689
    i'm hoping my rig can run it smoothly @ 1680 by 1050
    Quote Originally Posted by skinnee View Post
    No, I think he had a date tonight...

    He and his EK Supreme are out for a night on the town!

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    448
    I am running it alright on vista with my 320 8800gts but I am waiting until the demo before I judge it further
    Intel Core i7 2600K~stock for now
    ASUS P8Z68 Deluxe
    2x4GB Patriot Viper@DDR3 1600
    MSI Twin Frozr II GTX 570~stock for now
    OCZ GameXStream 700W PSU
    Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
    Logitech G15 & MX518
    Thermaltake Armor Series
    SPDIF out (optical) --> Headroom 2005 DAC --> Little Dot II++ --> Senn HD595s

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    89
    The game is playable for me at 1280x1024 high settings
    Amd athlon X2 3800+ @ 2.5ghz
    Corsair Value Select 2GB @ 208mhz 3-3-3-8 1t
    Asus A8N-E
    XFX 7800gt
    1x160gb sata
    17" samsung lcd

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tilburg, the Netherlands
    Posts
    489
    What do you think of this ugrade I'm going to buy this week for running crysis and future games?

    I already have an 8800gts and a zalman hp600 psu

    My upgrade: intel 6750, msi p35 platinum, 2GB ocz reaper pc6400

    Do you think it will run smoothly enough at high settings on a 1280x1024 screen?

  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast Gunslinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Decatur, AL
    Posts
    938
    Anyone tried 2560 X 1600 yet?
    Quote Originally Posted by chuchnit View Post
    Why do you always have to bring two sockets into everything?
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Because a one socket system is only 1/2 a system..
    You got two balls don't you?
    I rest my case!


    http://www.usdebtclock.org/

  22. #22
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    The Sacred birth place of Watercooling
    Posts
    4,689
    Anyone tried 2560 X 1600 yet?
    LOL who has the kinda power to run @ that res?? your rig looks stacked how come you havent tried it?

    what are you gtx's running @?
    Quote Originally Posted by skinnee View Post
    No, I think he had a date tonight...

    He and his EK Supreme are out for a night on the town!

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    894
    i don't think that right now there is such a rig that will run this res on average 45-60 fps.
    Gaming: SaberThooth X79,3930k,Asus6970DCII_Xfire,32gb,120OCZV3MaxIOPS, ThermaTake Chaser MK1
    HTPC:AMD630,ATI5750,4gb,3TB,ThermalTake DH103
    Server: E4500,4GB,5TB
    Netbook: Dell Vostro 1440

  24. #24
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by disruptfam View Post
    i'm hoping my rig can run it smoothly @ 1680 by 1050
    I have similar specs and run it at that resolution at 35-55fps. Of course the game will run much better at release.
    System Specs
    Asus P5K Deluxe
    EVGA 8800gtx
    PC P&C Silencer 750
    E6600 (3.6Ghz @ 1.4875Vcore)
    WD RE 250 x2 (Raid 0)
    Tuniq Tower 120
    Lite-On CD/DVD-RW Sata
    Ballistix Tracer pc6400 (800Mhz 4-4-4-12, 2.2v)
    CM Stacker 832
    Vista 64

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    25
    Many people will be running the game with the same results. According to Crytek, the beta is far from optimized and the final version will run much, much smoother.

    I'm getting ~30FPS on all high @ 1650x1050

    System:
    C2Q 6600 @ 3.4GHz
    Single 8800GTX OC'ed
    Vista Ult. 64bit
    4GB RAM

    Again, beta is not optimized - The SP demo will be MUCH better for comparison/benching.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •