1333 FSB Mod, Confirmed To Be Working By Me.

[Ace-a-Rue]

easy to do a continuity check with a meter to see if it has no resistance.

[ediflorianus]

do you know how to unlock the extra 2mb on Alandale ? or the multiplyer ? witch ar the pins ? or maybe a 400 mhz fsb (i'm just asking.... i think it's posible... but don't know how.)

[Neon Biker]

It's impossible.

[bassie]

Is it possible to go from L to H by isolating the pad? Or is it the other way arround?

[caligula]

do you know how to unlock the extra 2mb on Alandale ? or the multiplyer ? witch ar the pins ? or maybe a 400 mhz fsb (i'm just asking.... i think it's posible... but don't know how.)

It would be much easier to transform a Dacia into a Bentley.
At least you won't need to fuse back micron-size blown logic gates or to add extra 2MBs of L2 cache (newer cores are no longer cache-crippled Conroes).
Nevertheless, you're free to dream about it, it's in your rights.

[Nuckin_Futs]

What are the stepping codes or box numbers to look for in a good overclocker for the E6300 or E6600 if I was to go out today and get one? I here a lot of people talking about new revisions not OC'n as high. Will this pin mod do anything for that as well?

Also for overclocking on ASUS I have the older P5W-DH w/ 4pin ATX +12v but wondered if the P5B Deluxe w/ 8 pin EATX +12v is any more stable for high FSB OC of Core 2's.

Any input please!!!

[laziepig]

Hello!

I've done the 333 mod with a graphite paint on my E6400 (wall @ ~510, under DI ~520 so I hoped it will help even a little) and nothing happened - Commando was recognising 266 all the time {1001 & 803 BIOSes used, unfortunately shortly before BIOS 1302 was shown I removed the mod}.

Here is the picture:


I want to try again, with Celly 420 this time , so I suppose I can do the 200 => 266 mod then maybe the 266 => 333 mod - I will try.
My question is what do You think about that graphite paint - maybe I must use something different?
From what I've read about that graphite it shall do well but the result was far from my expectations...

Edit: Now the picture is working

Nothing happen to my E6300 too :I eventho I redo it 2 times... My P5K still show 266fsb... I've tried resetting cmos and even let it dry for few hrs... same result... Will test my conductive paint when I got time...

[bassie]

Is it possible to go from L to H by isolating the pad? Or is it the other way arround?

Someone? Really want to know, but i don't have the hardware to test it right now

[megatron]

If you are using graphite instead of conductive paint, that may be the problem. Conductive paint is a short and graphite would be a resistance.

[RAW-Raptor22]

If you are using graphite instead of conductive paint, that may be the problem. Conductive paint is a short and graphite would be a resistance.

What kind of paint is conductive? Where can you buy it?

[o2bme]

What kind of paint is conductive? Where can you buy it?

Circuit Writer (I got mine from radioshack.com)

[megatron]

Also a repair kit for heated rear windows in a car, its called a defogger repair kit where I come from.

[Kunaak]

1333 Mod works just fine on the Asus P5K Deluxe.

tested it today with my Q6600 and E6300.
it boots everytime, at 1333.

[laziepig]

1333 Mod works just fine on the Asus P5K Deluxe.

tested it today with my Q6600 and E6300.
it boots everytime, at 1333.

Kunaak do you need to reset the cmos? I've test my conductive paint and it's working... Something is wrong with my chip...

[NightRaven]

do test for continuity once applied as well guys

[Ace-a-Rue]

1333 Mod works just fine on the Asus P5K Deluxe.

tested it today with my Q6600 and E6300.
it boots everytime, at 1333.

a question begs to be answered now...does it help any with the overclock on the P5K...i understood on a previous board you were able to raise your FSB by 16 Mhz...does it do the same for your P5K???

[Kunaak]

a question begs to be answered now...does it help any with the overclock on the P5K...i understood on a previous board you were able to raise your FSB by 16 Mhz...does it do the same for your P5K???

nope, I am well beyond the point where alittle ink is gonna do any miracles for me.

currently sitting at 8 x 475 for 3.8 ghz, on air cooling.
hard to imagine this mod would improve that at all, since I am well above what quad cores usually do on air already.
in my case, theres just little to no room for improvement.

[Ace-a-Rue]

thanks for the answer.

[MuTkO]

Hello everybody,
That's my first post in this nice forum
Sorry for my bad english

Take a keen interest in BSEL 266MHz mod for my E2140.



My question is what do You think about that picture? Is it true? Is it work on E2140?

[RAW-Raptor22]

Try it and see...

[MuTkO]

It's work Now on default is 266x8. Overclock stable result: 335x8 with Gigabyte 945GCMX-S2 rev. 6.6 bios F4

[alpha0ne]

It's work Now on default is 266x8. Overclock stable result: 335x8 with Gigabyte 945GCMX-S2 rev. 6.6 bios F4

Thats a nice 1GHz for FREE

[hollo]

this wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_drain and the pentium d spec sheet suggest you guys might be using the wrong voltage for the L -> H mods

One useful property is that the resistor need not be connected to the same voltage as the chip supply voltage Vcc

[Nick04263]

I apologize if this has already been answered. I searched through this thread and wasn't able to find the exact answer I was looking for.

I currently have an E6700 overclocked to 3.5GHz (350MHz X 10 Multi) on 1.4375V (Asus P5W64 Pro)
I know that Asus recently released new bios to allow for the 1333 fsb on this board so I am thinking about attempting this mod. My question, if I go from 1066 to 1333, will I see a performance increase?

I am trying to crunch the numbers and figure with the mod, I will boot up on cleared cmos to around 3.3GHz (on 10 Multi) and may be able to push it from there. I know, every chip is different but what I really want to know is if this mod is allowing people to raise the fsb ceiling or should I expect to get around 3.5GHz Stable again?

Sorry about the thought process going on here. It is late and I just got activated. Been waiting to ask this question for a little while. Also, the price drops around the Intel world are tempting for the Quad's.

Any help with my questions are greatly appreciated.
Nick

[hollo]

it doesn't seem to be all that useful to boards that already overclock quite well ;P
you may or may not see an improvement in your overclock, if you do it'll probably be slight, and you won't see any performance difference at the same clock speed (although i'm not sure if this has been well tested along a range of motherboards... and to be honest.. if there is any performance difference it'll be for a lower performance at the same clock speed after the mod, based on the loose theory that raising the default fsb setting will loosen some internal timings in the chipset. but i can't really confirm if that will happen, or what boards it might happen on.).

but umm, if you try it, would you be willing to try it out using Vtt instead of Vcc to raise BSEL2 to see if it works ;D?

the original mod, red, raises BSEL2 to Vcc. the mod i'm suggesting, in blue, raises it to Vtt. Vcc and Vtt are similar on most motherboards, and Vcc has worked for a lot of people, but the pentium d spec sheet i looked at suggests that Vtt is the 'correct' voltage to use.