32m Low Clock Challenge

[dinos22]

interesting i haven't tried that particular timing yet

[Gautam]

It's one of the more important ones...tRRD sorta helps, tRFC we all know about. The rest are basically for show IMHO.

[andre X_X]

13.xx Category....
Gautam, my clock speed lower 0.6mhz than yours , this was with 2/3 divider

[dinos22]

It's one of the more important ones...tRRD sorta helps, tRFC we all know about. The rest are basically for show IMHO.

yeah TRRD is good for a few seconds for sure

[Gautam]

13.xx Category....
Gautam, my clock speed lower 0.6mhz than yours , this was with 2/3 divider

Wow! I didn't see that one coming. I didn't really even try the 2/3. Looks great.

[andre X_X]

16.xx Category
im closer to you gautam...
i got 17m 0.172s on 2.659mhz, but still trying to catch 16x...

[over@locker886]

Thanks bro. You sure didn't make things easy on me! Seems like overclocker886 has given me some more work too.

btw, nice 10min time
12.XXX category
http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/8...n58312szb7.jpg

[andre X_X]

14xx Category

I got you now Gautam, my clock were 0.1mhz lower than yours Countless effort on trying to get sub 15m on this clocks....

[andre X_X]

update on 16.XX Category....

Three in a row Gautam

[Ad Rock]

Andre your results seem to be the product of CPU-Z fluctuation's rather than actual efficiency.

For example in the 16.XX category Gautam would not normally beat your time by .45 of a second by simply increasing his 'clocks' by .3 mhz.

The point of this thread is to measure efficiency not to take advantage of the CPU-Z clock variances.

[coop]

^^ We're having fun here. The point of the thread is to get under the minute with the lowest clock speed. .1mhz less is lower.

[Gautam]

Heh, indeed we are. I happened to get 3 in a row tonight as well.

[Gautam]

13.xx..good thinking on the 2:3 andre, wasn't expecting it to be this fast.

[Gautam]

14.xx

[Gautam]

16.xx

[Oldscarface]

He Gautam,

Those are some serious nice times you have there, but offcourse I want to challenge you. Here is mine best score for the 13,xx catagory.
I want to challenge you on more catagories, but there's one problem, my system has crashed recently and up till now I'am not able to find the setting I had.
Forgotten to wright them down

System :
Asus Commando
Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3320 Mhz (8 x 415 Mhz, 1,53 Volt bios)
2x1GB Crucial Ballistix PC8000 @ 622,5Mhz 4-4-4-4-5 (2,575 Volt bios)
Everything is air cooled (cold air)

[Gautam]

Whoa, your ram is just amazing...dunno if I can keep with that.

[Gautam]

Okay, here's to both of us staying on our toes.

[andre X_X]

Gautam, how you do that dude... its awsome....do you have new tweaks? i mean, you were at higher clocks on 13xx with 3:5, share us the tweaks plesee .... Great job... you too oldscareface... your memory is sick , your tweaks also... great job dude... dont forget to write down your tweaks also, and share with us so that we can remember it for you

[Gautam]

Heh you're doing quite well andre...your times on 2:3 etc differ practically within the margin of error with mine. Last time on 3:5 note my timings were a lot slacker. I was thinking of going for 2:3 on the 8x like Oldscarface did here but I was pleasantly surprised by the way 3:5 was doing on 9x.

[koda]

Hey Gautam,
Too slow to challenge you but 12'5x"@3.6 is not so bad.



Maybe i need to try with W2K3.

[Gautam]

Looks good. That's a very strong time for XP.

[andre X_X]

12xx Category

This is my best effort.... too bad my ram cant run 4-4-4, need loosened to 4-5-4... this is with 2.6v and the result wasnt bad at all, it just 0.01s to 13s
might need 2.7v for 4-4-4 maybe.

[Gautam]

Is that the Team Xtreem 5300? I could get that 32M stable at 4-4-4-8, ~2.65v actual, more seemed to hurt. Tried looser tRAS?

Anyways thats very fast for 4-5-4. Far ahead of most at 4-4-4-x.

[coop]

Very nice times lately.
Welcome koda.