MMM
Page 4 of 22 FirstFirst 123456714 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 540

Thread: Onepagebook, coolaler and Superpi

  1. #76
    X.I.P
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,964
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam
    The best performance product below 4850Mhz is 50930, done by gocchin at 438.5x11 1:1, resulting in a time of 10.562.
    that is 975 i believe!
    965 and 975 is much different

    965 from 400 to 401 = bad proformance
    975 from 400 to 401 = gain proformance

  2. #77
    The Blue Dolphin
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,816
    Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe
    All we want is a possible explanation to why those results are better than average that we can think about. Nobody yet has given an answer that is reasonable or is worth chewing over.

    Regards

    Andy
    So Coolaler and OPB didn't answer the question when asked? What's the use of putting this suspicions up, when all we can do is guessing about the truth?

    I'm convinced that opening this thread was a bad idea. Also, the startpost seems to say that Coolalers and OPB's results are cheats. I know it doesn't say it, but it seems to suggest it according to me and some others in this thread. It's a personal opinion and not a fact, but opinions are just as important.

    I recommend that the startpost should be edited at the very least. It would be better to completely close the thread until you have had some more conversations with OPB and Coolaler.

    Can you please explain to me what the purpose of this thread is? I don't understand it really......
    Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides

    Blue Reviews:
    Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
    Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
    Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case


    Blue Guides:
    Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself


    98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.

  3. #78
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Quote Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
    Thanks again, this no doubt passed many people by but here it should be viewed.

    Regards
    Andy

  4. #79
    Aussie God
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    4,596
    ..
    Unappropriate section for thread like this.. - And unappropriate threat.. If OPB did cheat, which I want comment if I belive or dont, you should contact him, and ask him to explain himself, if refusing, then stating him as a possible cheater, but not puttin it in THIS section, jebus christ.
    Competition ranking;
    2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
    2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
    2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
    2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)

    Spectating;
    2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!


  5. #80
    Bulletproof
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Shun low, K?
    Posts
    2,553
    I notice both OPB and Cool's best numbers are run at Tras: 1... could that be bugging the results?
    Only the stupidest humans believe that the dogma of relative filth is a defense.

  6. #81
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    1,990
    Ok, let me get this straight. OPB & Coolaler need to post their tweaks or else they are labeled cheaters? Unfair, don't you think? It is clear from their threads, that they both spend a LOT of time and money overclocking. OPB/Coolaler even posted threads in the Spi section explaining how to get lower spi times.

    So, the only choice they have is to spill their tweaking secrets so that everyone can have them. Yeeeah, I'm sure he wants to do that.
    Heatware: 50-0-0
    Quote Originally Posted by Charile
    I believe that GWB, who may NOT be the best overclocking CPU in the tray...
    Quote Originally Posted by -thc-(cZ) View Post
    oh c'mon, maxxx, kick that cat of that monitor and have it poop for you

  7. #82
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro Rocha
    This issue have been discussed amongst moderators for days, we only decide to going public have we have strong evidence that OPB and Cooaler's results in superpi are abnormally good for the CPU speed..

    Some sort of explanation is due either it's a bug, a cheat ot or a tweak. All XS comunity will deserve a clear explanation.
    this man makes a good point
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  8. #83
    X.I.P
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,964
    i don't think they will return and answer those questions....

    1st OPB can't connect to XS for some reasons unknow.
    2nd coolaler said he will not come back to XS.

  9. #84
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,741
    Quote Originally Posted by HermS
    My suspicion is that they have a new tweak and to force them to reveal it would be unfair to them. If they've put the work in to find a tweak then fair play to them, let them have their glory for now and when the time is right they'll let everyone else in on the secret as they always have in the past.

    Well said..

  10. #85
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by NiCKE^
    What I tried to say is that OPB is a good superpi bencher, he uses most likely the best tweaks, people want to know but he don't want to share, people try to get the tweak from him by not directly calling him a cheater but making the community reacting like "If you don't tell us you're a cheater".

    I don't think everyone are idiots since I've not meet a single guy from here, juding by internet behaviour ain't fair really.

    This thread just confirms that coolaler and opb is superior when it comes to superpi. As it's stated by moderators, they don't blame them for cheating they just says it's something that makes them better then others.
    Well i don't think they are, their superpi time before "The One" are poor, just a few month before WR his spi times were as good as average clocker so don't tell me that he figured out the whole secret in 2 months while he was notoriously trying to reach highest C2D x6800 frequency.

    And I did try all of his tweaks and I can tell you they don't work not nearly as good as he said. And I wasn't the only one to try them.
    There are a couple of statements regaring some other settings about superpi performance that just didn't get true
    OC-Lab.si!!

  11. #86
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    1,990
    Quote Originally Posted by guess2098
    i don't think they will return and answer those questions....

    1st OPB can't connect to XS for some reasons unknow.
    2nd coolaler said he will not come back to XS.
    By making accusations like this in a public section, I wouldn't return to XS either. All this thread did was make XS lose 2 very respected and top tier overclockers and spi freaks. Both were huge assets to XS and likely won't return to all the flaming. I agree with everything NICKE^ has said.
    Heatware: 50-0-0
    Quote Originally Posted by Charile
    I believe that GWB, who may NOT be the best overclocking CPU in the tray...
    Quote Originally Posted by -thc-(cZ) View Post
    oh c'mon, maxxx, kick that cat of that monitor and have it poop for you

  12. #87
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by guess2098
    btw.... check his FSB...... not good!

    if he used 400*12 boot then pull up, i think his score will break 49999
    I don't know much about how i965 works, but before is clearly the highest besides OPB and coolaler clock-for-clock. He also has by far the highest ram frequency of anyone in his clock range.

  13. #88
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,835
    Quote Originally Posted by zakelwe
    DO YOU THINK THE GRAPHS RESULTS ARE WORTH TRYING TO INVESTIGATE OR NOT ?

    Yes or no ?

    Regards

    Andy
    For me it's not important to "investigate" because I'm not even trying to compete in the top for overclocking since I clearly not got skills for it.
    For you who want to reach the top spot it is probably very important to know how they do it.

    People are talking about THE TWEAK, have it accured to you it might be more then one?
    I can't say he doesn't cheat because then I would lie since I got no proof he doesn't. I can't say he does because I don't got proof.
    All I can do is believe what he says as I do with 99% of you guys.
    I don't have the "need" to question people for their results, I'm just trying to be happy for them since they achieved something good.

    Why do you want to investigate in this? To know if they cheat, to know if it's a bug or to get their tweaks?

    I'm not saying that you believe they cheat, I just made a question like you.
    I hope you're not angry with me because I don't mean to harm anyone or offend.
    Intel FTW!

    Beanna

  14. #89
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,741
    Quote Originally Posted by guess2098
    i don't think they will return and answer those questions....

    1st OPB can't connect to XS for some reasons unknow.
    2nd coolaler said he will not come back to XS.
    I think they feel disrespected this way. Especially when I know for a fact that the results are genuine, that's all I can say. Respect to OPB.

  15. #90
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    715
    Quote Originally Posted by Lithan
    I notice both OPB and Cool's best numbers are run at Tras: 1... could that be bugging the results?
    I dont think so... Its slightly better than tras 4 ussually, but slightly slightly lol
    Asus P5K Premium//Intel E6600@3,6ghz//Corsair PC6400C3@500 4-4-4-12 2,2v//8800GTS G92//Audigy 2 ZS//SeaSonic M12 700W & LianLi V2000B

  16. #91
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    Quote Originally Posted by ^don.k's^
    I dont think so... Its slightly better than tras 4 ussually, but slightly slightly lol
    in my experiences 4 is faster, both Spi1M and 32M
    OC-Lab.si!!

  17. #92
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    East Coast USA
    Posts
    768
    Quote Originally Posted by thunderstruck!
    Ok, let me get this straight. OPB & Coolaler need to post their tweaks or else they are labeled cheaters? Unfair, don't you think? It is clear from their threads, that they both spend a LOT of time and money overclocking. OPB/Coolaler even posted threads in the Spi section explaining how to get lower spi times.

    So, the only choice they have is to spill their tweaking secrets so that everyone can have them. Yeeeah, I'm sure he wants to do that.

    Well said.
    This is the dumbest thread ever.
    Shame on everyone who allowed this thread to exist. This is defiantly a low point for xtremesystems.

  18. #93
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    4,594
    Quote Originally Posted by thunderstruck!
    By making accusations like this in a public section, I wouldn't return to XS either. All this thread did was make XS lose 2 very respected and top tier overclockers and spi freaks. Both were huge assets to XS and likely won't return to all the flaming. I agree with everything NICKE^ has said.
    You don't see them posting much lately, do you? Not gonna make that much of a difference, as such has happened in the past before. Someone will step up and take thier place. Last year this time it was two very different names stealing teh show, then OPB first and then coolaler stepped up.


    Irregardless not all of us only read english.


    Besides, if they have the honor they try to portray, they'd not be insulted by this, and would take this thread as a compliment. It's quite the thing to have you peers fear you...

  19. #94
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    715
    Quote Originally Posted by zbogorgon
    in my experiences 4 is faster, both Spi1M and 32M
    Well it depends ussually of the memory used, when i compared tras 1 vs 4 i got ussually better results with tras 1, but hardly noticeable, that could depend on the sub timmings also.
    Asus P5K Premium//Intel E6600@3,6ghz//Corsair PC6400C3@500 4-4-4-12 2,2v//8800GTS G92//Audigy 2 ZS//SeaSonic M12 700W & LianLi V2000B

  20. #95
    Slovenian OC Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    1,089
    you all know that right at that very moment, eg. Kyosen can set a Superpi 1M WR with just 5GHz (or 4GHz oz 3GHz) x6800, aparently with the help of some software.

    so he is using software = tweak, checked = legal

    so there is no point of runnin Superpi anymore
    OC-Lab.si!!

  21. #96
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Quote Originally Posted by guess2098
    i don't think they will return and answer those questions....

    1st OPB can't connect to XS for some reasons unknow.
    2nd coolaler said he will not come back to XS.
    well that doesn't sound right in either case.......doesn't sound right at all hmmmm

    if coolaler is not even going to attempt to clear things up then it's hard to not think cheating may be involved

    OPB not connecting here LOL!!!!!! that's an old school excuse hahaha

    common OPB we all thing you're a great OCer...drop in and tell us what the hell's going on dude >>> it's hard to believe these guys are cheating but at least say something even if you have to hide the supertweak
    Last edited by dinos22; 12-13-2006 at 02:43 PM.
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  22. #97
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,656
    Ok another collection of data that paints a much more clear picture.

    Coolaler - 2402 - 1347 - 19.5
    Coolaler - 2706 - 1509 - 17.4
    Coolaler - 2803 - 1570 - 16.8
    Coolaler - 2903 - 1606 - 16.4
    Coolaler - 3003 - 1649 - 16.0
    Coolaler - 3003 - 1616 - 12.u
    Coolaler - 3710 - 1926 - 11.u
    Coolaler - 3710 - 1982 - 11.u
    Coolaler - 3610 - 1934 - 11.u
    Coolaler - 3703 - 1969 - unkwn
    Coolaler - 3806 - 2028 - 11.u
    Coolaler - 3703 - 1932 - 11.u
    Rol-Co - 3561 - 1987 - 13.2
    Rol-Co - 3709 - 2069 - 12.7
    Coolaler - 3801 - 2001 - 11.u
    Coolaler - 3906 - 2040 - 10.u
    Coolaler - 4454 - 2433 - 9.u

    Rule of thumb in Cinebench 32bit

    300Mhz = 1 second
    4Ghz = 12 seconds

    You don the math, I call BS

    Show me the tweak that drops the time by four seconds at the same speed yet score is lower?

    Explain that as a tweak?
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID

  23. #98
    X.I.P
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,964
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22
    well that doesn't sound right in either case.......doesn't sound right at all hmmmm

    if coolaler is not even going to attempt to clear things up then it's hard to not think cheating may be involved

    OPB not connecting here LOL!!!!!! that's an old school excuse hahaha

    common OPB we all thing you're a great OCer...drop in and tell us what the hell's going on dude
    he already talked to someone about this. even someone told me all his account havn't log-in for about 2+ weeks

  24. #99
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    2,741
    yup,

    the guys deserve some respect. Should not have been doubt amongst the readers in any case. Let's hope they come back to XS. I have contact and I can tell you there's no need to regard them cheats if they don't reveal their methods, that's all I can say, I don't have permission to go further, my friendhip has some principles for a start. If this is not factual enough for you then it's too bad.

    sayonara
    raja

  25. #100
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1,835
    Quote Originally Posted by zbogorgon
    you all know that right at that very moment, eg. Kyosen can set a Superpi 1M WR with just 5GHz (or 4GHz oz 3GHz) x6800, aparently with the help of some software.

    so he is using software = tweak, checked = legal

    so there is no point of runnin Superpi anymore
    Then XS has some work to do since they're the author of SuperPi Mod.
    I bet they already know the program and that should make them have a clue how it works and try to block it.
    I don't know a jack about programming but I hope they will be able to block the cheating programs somehow.
    Intel FTW!

    Beanna

Page 4 of 22 FirstFirst 123456714 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •