MMM
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 153

Thread: ATi R600 Card Re-Design In Progress

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Do
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Popo
    Old joke becoming true?

    tt LMAOOOOOOOOOO hahahaha, gosh man i guess i on my pants.

    God these videocard of today are just ridiculously BIG, i mean 12 inches? in a few months we will have to use feet and meter for the length... and Ultra Tower Cases
    Excuse me for my English

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    603
    Was going to be longer than a 8800GTX

    Darn I'm going to need an ATI Crossfire certified case as well now

  3. #28
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Few, i thought it was a core redesign, which would have meant big delays.

    This is just a PCB redesign, i feel like they just had a long pcb for the beta cards, and the shorter one was bound to happen... i mean reall, no way they would have release a 12 inch card

    Too bad about the 8 pin power plug, would be nice if its compatible with current 6 pin power plugs like the 8800. No one likes having to upgrade a psu just for new connectors.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Surat, India.
    Posts
    1,309
    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch
    Soon you'll plug your motherboard in your Graphiccard...J/K...or am I ?
    Quote of the Year
    Sound: Asus Essense ST | Wharfedale Diamond 9.1 | Norge 2060 Stereo amp | Wharfedale SW150 sub (coming soon)
    Camera Gear: Canon 6D | Canon 500D | Canon 17-40L | Canon 24-105L | Canon 50mm f1.4 | Canon 85mm f1.8 | Rokinon 14mm f2.8 | Sigma 10-20EX HSM | Benro A3580F + Vanguard SBH250 | Bag full of filters and stuff

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,713
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step
    Sadly you may be correct
    Why dont they make a GPU Co-Porcessor and just stick on a Quadfather mobo and then they can release GDDR4 sticks of ram for us to stick in the slots. Maybe even do an Intel and glue two GPU's on to one base and have constant crossfire?

    That should make some room in our cases dont you think?


    Oh and they are probably thinking that the reason why ATi is not releasing the cards now becouse they have to redsign it, who ever said the design was finnished in the first place? Its all bla bla we will still see X2k cards in time for Vista.
    TAMGc5: PhII X4 945, Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD3P, 2x Kingston PC2-6400 HyperX CL4 2GB, 2x ASUS HD 5770 CUcore Xfire, Razer Barracuda AC1, Win8 Pro x64 (Current)

    TAMGc6: AMD FX, Gigabyte GA-xxxx-UDx, 8GB/16GB DDR3, Nvidia 680 GTX, ASUS Xonar, 2x 120/160GB SSD, 1x WD Caviar Black 1TB SATA 6Gb/s, Win8 Pro x64 (Planned)

  6. #31
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    EU, Baltics
    Posts
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by Frisch
    Soon you'll plug your motherboard in your Graphiccard...J/K...or am I ?
    and you will need another quad-core cpu for yor videocard....

  7. #32
    Muslim Overclocker
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,786
    It is a card redesign and not a GPU redesign...

    My watercooling experience

    Water
    Scythe Gentle Typhoons 120mm 1850RPM
    Thermochill PA120.3 Radiator
    Enzotech Sapphire Rev.A CPU Block
    Laing DDC 3.2
    XSPC Dual Pump Reservoir
    Primochill Pro LRT Red 1/2"
    Bitspower fittings + water temp sensor

    Rig
    E8400 | 4GB HyperX PC8500 | Corsair HX620W | ATI HD4870 512MB


    I see what I see, and you see what you see. I can't make you see what I see, but I can tell you what I see is not what you see. Truth is, we see what we want to see, and what we want to see is what those around us see. And what we don't see is... well, conspiracies.



  8. #33
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    4,811
    Why are we not seeing digital PWM
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  9. #34
    Wanna look under my kilt?
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Glasgow-ish U.K.
    Posts
    4,396
    Heh thats the least of our worries!

    I reallllly hope the "2x4" pin connectors are 2 molex, and not a new type of plug. An ATX revision just for a GPU? Well....i`ve heard worse
    Quote Originally Posted by T_M View Post
    Not sure i totally follow anything you said, but regardless of that you helped me come up with a very good idea....
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    you sigged that?

    why?
    ______

    Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Hammerfest, Norway
    Posts
    245
    dude.. the 8800GTX is frikkin long and the R600 was supposed to be LONGER?!

    omg, I miss the X800XT, loved that card.
    Opteron170/X1900XT/OCZVX: 42128 3d01se - 22447 3d03 - 14037 3d05

    Main:
    Gigabyte P35 DS4 Rev 2.1
    Core 2 Q6600 @ 3.81 Ghz, 1,45v
    4x2GB Kingston HyperX PC-6400 LL
    Powercolor HD5870 LCS Edition, EK Fullcover block shizle
    2x Intel X25-M 80GB Gen2, RAID0
    Asus Xonar D2X

  11. #36
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    316
    Makeing them all a bit to long, Widening would be more sensible and as the guy mentioned above Digital PWM's would cut down alot of the clutter the amount of Power and Space they are takeing for one upmanship games is getting beyond the point of worth while for the Consumer even if it is a new generation.
    Last edited by rapty; 11-13-2006 at 05:37 AM.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Holy Land Profile: Sexy Overclocker
    Posts
    779
    Isn't it possible to design a single GPU dual PCB video card? I mean, instead of making them longer, just cut them in half.

  13. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Popo
    Isn't it possible to design a single GPU dual PCB video card? I mean, instead of making them longer, just cut them in half.
    Yes, it is possible. But with such not a complex PCB. Also, 2 stack PCBs would cost more on assembly line and more problem on QC, QA and testing too. The assembly process would be far more complex to a single PCB design as you need to handle both the card and stack them up each other.

  14. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,533
    Quote Originally Posted by LenniZ
    dude.. the 8800GTX is frikkin long and the R600 was supposed to be LONGER?!

    omg, I miss the X800XT, loved that card.
    Were did this come from. Who says R600 was suppose to be longer than G80gtx? This whole story smells of AEG. The cards sent out to game developers aren't indicative what a retail card would be like. This is more AEG prapaganda. Much like the other distorted information put out by AEG concerning companies that employ AEG.

    There has been a little negative talk about the length of the G80gtx. So Aeg or NV fanboys make up stories about ATI's cards being 12" long and ATI is redoing them to be = to or shorter than G80gtx.

    ANYONE got a link to a R600 finished card. The game developers can't talk about the cards they recieved as they are under nda. Those cards were put out simply for the purpose of debugging games.

    The VR-Zone gets things wrong way more than the inquirer. Were did Vr-Zone gets its info? It seems to me the editor of VR-zone is employed by AEG. If you know Some of the Companies that Employ Aeg . It fits with what the Vr-Zone puts out.
    Last edited by Turtle 1; 11-13-2006 at 08:10 AM.

  15. #40
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Turtle 1
    Were did this come from. Who says R600 was suppose to be longer than G80gtx? This whole story smells of AEG. The cards sent out to game developers aren't indicative what a retail card would be like. This is more AEG prapaganda. Much like the other distorted information put out by AEG concerning companies that employ AEG.

    There has been a little negative talk about the length of the G80gtx. So Aeg or NV fanboys make up stories about ATI's cards being 12" long and ATI is redoing them to be = to or shorter than G80gtx.

    ANYONE got a link to a R600 finished card. The game developers can't talk about the cards they recieved as they are under nda. Those cards were put out simply for the purpose of debugging games.

    The VR-Zone gets things wrong way more than the inquirer. were did Vr-Zone gets its info. It seems to me the editor of VR-zone is employed by AEG. If you know Some of the Companies that Employ Aeg . It fits with what the Vr-Zone puts out.
    Thank you, i agree completly. Just what i said.

  16. #41
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,533
    Quote Originally Posted by Revv23
    Thank you, i agree completly. Just what i said.
    I try to read everyones post. You can never tell when you can pick up a gem.

    You snook one in on me now this post makes no sense.LOL
    Last edited by Turtle 1; 11-13-2006 at 08:19 AM.

  17. #42
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Swamp
    Posts
    67
    Cards are getting more and more rediculous they need to use lower nm chips or somthing to increas effiency :-p

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    "shorter" is quite an ambiguous term here don't you think?

  19. #44
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    316
    lol depends on how you use it

  20. #45
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Turtle 1
    I try to read everyones post. You can never tell when you can pick up a gem.

    You snook one in on me now this post makes no sense.LOL

    Hey no i wasn't calling you out, you explained alot better then me and it's good to see not everyone is buying into this PR game.



    AS for didgital PWM, its more expensive, hotter, and harder to design. Not to meniton it may not free up as much space as you think as the card will still need just as many traces.

  21. #46
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by Turtle 1
    Were did this come from. Who says R600 was suppose to be longer than G80gtx? This whole story smells of AEG. The cards sent out to game developers aren't indicative what a retail card would be like. This is more AEG prapaganda. Much like the other distorted information put out by AEG concerning companies that employ AEG.
    Ah yes, you again...

    Just thought I'd be the one to tell you, AEG is no more. Go ahead and run a search. Here's the beyond 3d thread where they talked about AEG and their website and whatnot... Try any of the urls for AEG.

    http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showth...t=26199&page=1

    Their website was AEGInfo.com, notice the old site is gone, since then it's been registered to someone else. That's because AEG isn't there anymore.

    This use to be their other website.
    http://www.aegmarketing.com/
    It's now a entertainment marketing company.

    Both are no longer with AEG Internet marketing.

    There has been a little negative talk about the length of the G80gtx. So Aeg or NV fanboys make up stories about ATI's cards being 12" long and ATI is redoing them to be = to or shorter than G80gtx.
    I'm going to just flat out say it... At it's smallest it'd be equal in size to the 8800GTX.... That's at it's smallest.

    ANYONE got a link to a R600 finished card. The game developers can't talk about the cards they recieved as they are under nda. Those cards were put out simply for the purpose of debugging games.
    You won't see a picture of a card from any developers. Developer cards generally never leave the office of the developer, and no developer is going to risk their job, or being sued, on being the first one on the net with a "picture" of the R600.

    Also, they're not just for the purpose of optimizing games on them, they're for debugging the cards. Finding anything wrong with them and reporting back to ATi.

    The VR-Zone gets things wrong way more than the inquirer. Were did Vr-Zone gets its info? It seems to me the editor of VR-zone is employed by AEG. If you know Some of the Companies that Employ Aeg . It fits with what the Vr-Zone puts out.
    No one gets things wrong more than the inquirer...You're talking about a site who said china was going to buy out microsoft for gods sake. The same site was swearing the G80 would be a 48 pixel shader non-unified part til what, 3 weeks before launch?

    VR-Zone was the ONLY site who handed up the correct specs on the 8800GTX, where they only had ONE aspect wrong, the ram.

    Yes, they've gotten things wrong, but they've gotten a lot right too.

    To say this is just an AEG and NVidia coverup has got to be....well.....I'd say the dumbest thing you've said yet, but your next post is going to be even worse anyway.
    Last edited by DilTech; 11-13-2006 at 09:39 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  22. #47
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,533
    Quote Originally Posted by Revv23
    Hey no i wasn't calling you out, you explained alot better then me and it's good to see not everyone is buying into this PR game.



    AS for didgital PWM, its more expensive, hotter, and harder to design. Not to meniton it may not free up as much space as you think as the card will still need just as many traces.
    I was referring to your edit. You did it befor I seen your final reply. You know what I mean. I know you weren't calling me out. Its just that when I edit 99% of the time its spelling. What you edited wasn't a bad thing in anyway. You just reconsidered it. But I replied to what you edited out. LOL

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    316
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech
    Ah yes, you again...

    Just thought I'd be the one to tell you, AEG is no more. Go ahead and run a search. Here's the beyond 3d thread where they talked about AEG and their website and whatnot... Try any of the urls for AEG.

    http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showth...t=26199&page=1

    Their website was AEGInfo.com, notice the old site is gone, since then it's been registered to someone else. That's because AEG isn't there anymore.

    This use to be their other website.
    http://www.aegmarketing.com/
    It's now a entertainment marketing company.

    Both are no longer with AEG Internet marketing.



    I'm going to just flat out say it... At it's smallest it'd be equal in size to the 8800GTX.... That's at it's smallest.



    You won't see a picture of a card from any developers. Developer cards generally never leave the office of the developer, and no developer is going to risk their job, or being sued, on being the first one on the net with a "picture" of the R600.

    Also, they're not just for the purpose of optimizing games on them, they're for debugging the cards. Finding anything wrong with them and reporting back to ATi.



    No one gets things wrong more than the inquirer...You're talking about a site who said china was going to buy out microsoft for gods sake. The same site was swearing the G80 would be a 48 pixel shader non-unified part til what, 3 weeks before launch?

    VR-Zone was the ONLY site who handed up the correct specs on the 8800GTX, where they only had ONE aspect wrong, the ram.

    Yes, they've gotten things wrong, but they've gotten a lot right too.

    To say this is just an AEG and NVidia coverup has got to be....well.....I'd say the dumbest thing you've said yet, but your next post is going to be even worse anyway.
    lol

  24. #49
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,533
    Quote Originally Posted by DilTech
    Ah yes, you again...

    Just thought I'd be the one to tell you, AEG is no more. Go ahead and run a search. Here's the beyond 3d thread where they talked about AEG and their website and whatnot... Try any of the urls for AEG.

    http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showth...t=26199&page=1

    Their website was AEGInfo.com, notice the old site is gone, since then it's been registered to someone else. That's because AEG isn't there anymore.

    This use to be their other website.
    http://www.aegmarketing.com/
    It's now a entertainment marketing company.

    Both are no longer with AEG Internet marketing.



    I'm going to just flat out say it... At it's smallest it'd be equal in size to the 8800GTX.... That's at it's smallest.



    You won't see a picture of a card from any developers. Developer cards generally never leave the office of the developer, and no developer is going to risk their job, or being sued, on being the first one on the net with a "picture" of the R600.

    Also, they're not just for the purpose of optimizing games on them, they're for debugging the cards. Finding anything wrong with them and reporting back to ATi.



    No one gets things wrong more than the inquirer...You're talking about a site who said china was going to buy out microsoft for gods sake. The same site was swearing the G80 would be a 48 pixel shader non-unified part til what, 3 weeks before launch?

    VR-Zone was the ONLY site who handed up the correct specs on the 8800GTX, where they only had ONE aspect wrong, the ram.

    Yes, they've gotten things wrong, but they've gotten a lot right too.

    To say this is just an AEG and NVidia coverup has got to be....well.....I'd say the dumbest thing you've said yet, but your next post is going to be even worse anyway.
    1) So AEG has gone anonymous and have changed their anomlous big deal their still around.
    2) Your statement: I'm going to just flat out say it...[ At it's smallest it'd be equal in size to the 8800GTX.... That's at it's smallest]. I would say you just broke NDA.
    3) Again I ask whom do you work for.
    4) No one here cares about the cards sent to Game developers for debugging. I am surprized you haven't reported the clock speeds of those cards. Even tho we know that it wouldn't be indicative of retail cards.
    Last edited by Turtle 1; 11-13-2006 at 09:56 AM.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    316
    why do you care about ATI NDA's, ATI Fanboy?

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •