Page 6 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3456789 ... LastLast
Results 126 to 150 of 320

Thread: OPB's 3rd attempt got super pi 1m 8.906s and new pifast wr

  1. #126
    Xtreme Recruit
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    96
    Quote Originally Posted by Onepagebook
    ruggero, and ludus, that's why sometimes I love to see people doubt but well, you guys seems missed some points I mentioned earlier.
    Did you check some tweaks I mention with very obvious showing on tht calculation? That's all alright, if you have any question I am more than happy to share the tweaks with you, I never ever refused to share .

    With wrong tweaks or bad settings, I bet you even can crack it up to 5.8g, and you never closed to 9.1 second.
    I tried 8m yesterday with 5.4g but just 0.37 seconds short compare with Omega san's 8m. I also tried without any tune up for running 8m@ 5.4g what do you expect the result? It's about 2 minutes and 12 seconds. Think about that.

    ok man,but when you have try this tweak?is new?It's the same of cooaler?

    can we know this tweak?for kill 0,2 with a lower frequency and the same settings it would be a very important tweak.

  2. #127
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    1,990
    The checksum can be validated too. Do you expect OPB to give away all his secret optimizations? He worked very hard to get this 1M time. If it was Team Japan, no one would question them, nor would anyone ask about their secrets. Why is OPB treated differently? Would you divulge all your secrets if someone asked you to? Do you think calling him a cheater (with no proof) will make him divulge his secrets in order to defend himself? No one should have to do that. Remember, overclocking is a competition...you can't expect to be handed everything.

    One last thing, congrats OPB.
    Last edited by thunderstruck!; 10-17-2006 at 08:58 AM.
    Heatware: 50-0-0
    Quote Originally Posted by Charile
    I believe that GWB, who may NOT be the best overclocking CPU in the tray...
    Quote Originally Posted by -thc-(cZ) View Post
    oh c'mon, maxxx, kick that cat of that monitor and have it poop for you

  3. #128
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,631
    Awesome
    Truly impressive :thumbsup:

    @ coolaler... when are you gonna get benching again... still @ 9.000 SuperPi 1M?
    lol... This forum requires that you wait 70 seconds between posts. Please try again in 8 seconds.
    *phone rings*
    Friend: Do you have a spare PSU lying around?
    Me: No why?
    Friend: My PSU just blew up, I think the second 8800GTX might have been too much for it to handle
    Me: what PSU was that again?
    Friend: Antec 480w
    Me:........

  4. #129
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    43
    even if i agree in part with my italian friends i must do my grats to you OPB
    this is a very impressive results, and you have an impressive tweak too

    waiting for 8m and 32m now
    *EDITed by IFMU*
    Signature Removed by XS Staff for not following XS Policies

    Forum Policies

  5. #130
    Love and Peace!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    hiding somewhere!
    Posts
    3,675
    Quote Originally Posted by Ludus
    - OPB said some days ago that near impossible to reach 8s on spi1mb with the this frequency... and after some days with the same TIMINGS, the same MULTIPLER, a LOWER FREQUENCY he reach 8s
    i wasn't gonna post, but this stuck out at me.... there's a lot more to memory timings than what CPU-Z shows. a LOT. get your "facts" straight before accusing someone who is constantly redefining extreme to be lying to us. if you're so sure that it is fake, why don't you prove it, huh?

    no respect to those who don't give any
    Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them

  6. #131
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by charlie
    ...as predicted.
    Yes, Master Yoda.

    Incredible OPB.

    Whats the Highest benchable with @ 3D?

    But really.. 11/10.. fantastic stuff.

  7. #132
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    INSANE opb, you predicted your WR and you have it . Any chance you give the 3d benches a chance ?

    To ALL conspiracy-and-cheats-believers: Lay down and have some rest ... if you think benchmarking is all about cheating, you should better stop and go fishing.
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  8. #133
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    219
    HOLLY MOTHER OF GOD!!! You took the WR in a big way. Congrats on that OPB.

    Oh, ...
    Quote Originally Posted by Onepagebook
    Let me share with you guys, LN2 playing is really hard job, I am only one person, and I need to watch temp, take picture, and capture windows benchmark screeny....how many hands I have? lol...
    Need a helping hand? My salary can be watching you break records and polish RAM sticks

  9. #134
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,368
    Quote Originally Posted by Onepagebook
    ya, forgot to say, if I wanna cheat or something, I won't show you those information(about how fast I post ont the 5566 or whatever ) and then stupid enought to decreas some freq then post next day say wow, I got this and I am the man...that is the damn most stupid without wisdom way to cheat.

    Oh ya, I also remember that Cpulloverclock did the same thing when Coolaler had 9.00 1m WR...and apologized
    he is way more better than those just shout here and do nothing.

    oh forgot to say as well, mattstrike3, you don't have to waste time to explain that to them,
    and for this moment, I change my mind, I won't even share in public how I put the effort to sort out all the tune up and
    re-organize all the information Coolaler-san discuss with me the day before I did the bench. Cuz basically they are not
    worth to let me do so. oh, I only share how I did that @ coolaler.com Hope they can easily understand that traditional
    chinese so they can understand, but I doubt they are capable of learning that language that fast.


    here you go, learn some Chinese before go there and check it. Good luck

    http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...9&postcount=45
    http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...2&postcount=49

    Thank you


    Translate English


    http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...9&postcount=45

    Congratulations article civalize look great ~ ~ mad for a long time ... finally succeeded crashed into the realm of p ... Little did she expect that she would P5WDH break ... is a terrible ... this will not be the mastermind of a lazy oh ... every day ... haha he was Fansi Yesterday, I even told him I maxmem discuss the problem anymore.I was never really in Unadvisable apply maxmem is to be set up like 104 or 512 ... 600 ... 256 is not expected.104 is the right time, but the memory is there in the 2x512.to double the original to be the best way to deal with the proper and stable than 104mb.



    http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...2&postcount=49

    Congratulations less frenzy, the first eight seconds when the male vein lower than roro 19mhz, pi has a fast 0.2 seconds.fsb os and it is very important not know Vcore number, and C is his u is the same?Unfortunately, some feel that C is his shoulders.If the measurements above the 5.8 GHz band should be 1.73v 5526 pi 8.5 seconds on the strength of this proportion could not be considered;Before I go 5566mhz also try using 14x400 5600mhz.na run 1,200 2:3.4-4-3 ... the pi 1m 1m 9.125s 5566mhz worse there than in 1 :1 position, the higher the frequency, the greater the burden mch and ram, the relatively higher Vcore increases,cpu load greater, although the frequency of super elevated,But, it will reduce the efficiency of C. .. This is the great debate yesterday and today .. So I put vcore dropped 1.75v.vmch use 1.9v, 2.55v vdimm use all reasonable limits,coupled with the transfer of the regulation has, naturally fast. omega 8m run on the very fact of God.I like it there is no way to break the 16m, I have to go to 8m.The result is 0.372 lose the next bar .. like ..
    OCM Member / IXTREMTEK Admin !!



    DDR1 2*256 BH5 Adata @324.7Mhz 1.5/2/2/5 1T at 4v @318.6Mhz Benchs
    DDR2 1*512 Kingston Pc8500 @702Mhz 5/5/5/18 at 2.42v réel
    DDR2 2*1024 Cell Shock Pc8000c4 @534Mhz 3/3/3/8 at 3.5v réel

    Cooling : XP90C , Big Typhoon , waterchiller R507 , LN2 ....

  10. #135
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    155
    Hey dudes, do you really think that XIP like OPB or coolaler need to cheat for getting WR? Two days ago i saw an excellent overclock of s.O.t, and saw OPB benching hard. Now I see that OPB got a WR and the first 8.XXX 1m result, and all italian people begin to doubt of a master of overclocking.

    Dudes do you really think that OPB need cheating to get it? I dont wanna generalice but IMHO all italians were hoping a italian spi1 wr, and now they see that a taiwanese oc master got it before... just complaining? I dont know... only know that just suck.

    Id never doubt of a dude like opb, coolaler, or all PRTeamJapan, beacause they have too high reputation to loose it only for cheating...
    Gaming/benchmarking rig - Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 ES || Asus p5b deluxe vcore, vdroop, vmch and vdimm mods || ATi x1900xtx + ATi x1900 CF edition || 2x1024 Team Xtreem 667 3-3-3-8 || SilverStone 650w || 2x EK blocks for VGA's + D5 + BIX2 || LittleDevil Single Stage
    PIC 1 - PIC 2 - PIC 3


  11. #136
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Quote Originally Posted by Garrett
    Awesome
    Truly impressive :thumbsup:

    @ coolaler... when are you gonna get benching again... still @ 9.000 SuperPi 1M?
    Coolaler? He is more like OC teacher in Taiwan Now, He gave me his best OC concept when I was noob.

    He will continue to bench and get the awesome results as usual.

  12. #137
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    556
    Hey Kevin.... be careful, Godfather is coming back...

    Please go on with your superb ocs and benches and don't pay attention to ridiculous people... the steak was to big for their stomach

  13. #138
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Some of the translation is totally wrong, some is correct...

    you got about 70%

    you can ask if shamino wanna read that




    Quote Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
    Thank you


    Translate English


    http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...9&postcount=45

    Congratulations article civalize look great ~ ~ mad for a long time ... finally succeeded crashed into the realm of p ... Little did she expect that she would P5WDH break ... is a terrible ... this will not be the mastermind of a lazy oh ... every day ... haha he was Fansi Yesterday, I even told him I maxmem discuss the problem anymore.I was never really in Unadvisable apply maxmem is to be set up like 104 or 512 ... 600 ... 256 is not expected.104 is the right time, but the memory is there in the 2x512.to double the original to be the best way to deal with the proper and stable than 104mb.



    http://forum.coolaler.com/showpost.p...2&postcount=49

    Congratulations less frenzy, the first eight seconds when the male vein lower than roro 19mhz, pi has a fast 0.2 seconds.fsb os and it is very important not know Vcore number, and C is his u is the same?Unfortunately, some feel that C is his shoulders.If the measurements above the 5.8 GHz band should be 1.73v 5526 pi 8.5 seconds on the strength of this proportion could not be considered;Before I go 5566mhz also try using 14x400 5600mhz.na run 1,200 2:3.4-4-3 ... the pi 1m 1m 9.125s 5566mhz worse there than in 1 :1 position, the higher the frequency, the greater the burden mch and ram, the relatively higher Vcore increases,cpu load greater, although the frequency of super elevated,But, it will reduce the efficiency of C. .. This is the great debate yesterday and today .. So I put vcore dropped 1.75v.vmch use 1.9v, 2.55v vdimm use all reasonable limits,coupled with the transfer of the regulation has, naturally fast. omega 8m run on the very fact of God.I like it there is no way to break the 16m, I have to go to 8m.The result is 0.372 lose the next bar .. like ..

  14. #139
    X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hellas-->Athens
    Posts
    1,298
    well done OPB
    When Mercedes brought their C111 to Talledega years ago and blew away the closed course record did it count? Yes..
    That was a "factory" car and a "one of" that no one could buy and was never sold.
    Records are records and that is a fact so get over it.

  15. #140
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,858
    Great result OPB.

    How much work this took shows that 8 seconds would be extremely hard. I think we might be stuck in 9's until 45 nm.
    i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
    Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
    Quote Originally Posted by CompGeek
    The US is the only country that doesn't use [nuclear weapons] to terrorize other countries. The US is based on Christian values, unlike any other country in the world. Granted we are straying from our Christian heritage, but we still have a freedom aimed diplomatic stance.

  16. #141
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    41
    OPB he is the king of de spi and OC

    The one who doubts OPB's word is for envy....
    That I am a fan of OPB

    regards
    I LOVE OCX

    http://www.dacosa-xtreme.es
    REVIEWS-OVERCLOCKING-HARDWARE

  17. #142
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    San Jose, CA.
    Posts
    146
    I was too busy to read this thread last night. Anyways, I am here now. Gratz Kevin! and can you please go get some sleep now? I beg you bro.... get some sleep. Don't make me call your gf and ask her force you to. .

    Just take it easy for today.

    Jason is right! You deserve some booze and massage , my TREAT!
    Please visit Team Group's forum at http://www.teamgroup.com.tw/forums/
    For RMA problem please email rma@teamgroup.com.tw
    For Trouble shooting problem pls email xtreemtech@teamgroup.com.tw

  18. #143
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,368
    Quote Originally Posted by Onepagebook
    Some of the translation is totally wrong, some is correct...

    you got about 70%

    you can ask if shamino wanna read that

    it is a simple translation by google

    it isn't has me to contact other people to check what you say on the forum of coolaler, each one must have its idea

    I doesn't question the results of the benchs but of the frequencies which made to obtain them

    That make since more 1 Years that you have make screens with scores/Fréquency incredible and that nobody can make…

    You have surely a OS and tweaks out of the commun run for carried out performances also enormous but accumulated all this, some start has to have some doubt on the level of these tweaks magic ....

    But for me to make a benchs and then to lower the frequency (Setfsb, clock gen….) to make believe very good tweaks has is very easy A to make and it is what seems most logical with the questions that I am posed since more than 1 year…
    OCM Member / IXTREMTEK Admin !!



    DDR1 2*256 BH5 Adata @324.7Mhz 1.5/2/2/5 1T at 4v @318.6Mhz Benchs
    DDR2 1*512 Kingston Pc8500 @702Mhz 5/5/5/18 at 2.42v réel
    DDR2 2*1024 Cell Shock Pc8000c4 @534Mhz 3/3/3/8 at 3.5v réel

    Cooling : XP90C , Big Typhoon , waterchiller R507 , LN2 ....

  19. #144
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    835
    Quote Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
    That make since more 1 Years that you have make screens with scores/Fréquency incredible and that nobody can make…
    And this makes him a xtreme oc tweaker, he is OPB

    if OC was only frequency probably anyone with ln2 = xtreme legend or something like this...

  20. #145
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    597
    Nice to conclude that OPB is untouchable

    Too many fans... They don't understand something : the score is real but the bench frequency is around 150MHz higher.

  21. #146
    ¿
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    4,772
    Quote Originally Posted by boblemagnifique
    I doesn't question the results of the benchs but of the frequencies which made to obtain them
    Coolaler reached 9 sec on 5526mhz, this result was reached on 5549mhz.

    The record has fallen, get used to it.

  22. #147
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Near Rome
    Posts
    80
    Quote Originally Posted by ozzimark
    i wasn't gonna post, but this stuck out at me.... there's a lot more to memory timings than what CPU-Z shows. a LOT. get your "facts" straight before accusing someone who is constantly redefining extreme to be lying to us. if you're so sure that it is fake, why don't you prove it, huh?

    no respect to those who don't give any
    you think that i don't know the impartance of alpha timings? in the screen there are also Memtest with all alpha timings
    i write what i think and i think with my head... that's all.
    how do you think that i can prove the contrary?
    i know only that the time for the frequency is strange, ok the optimizations, but i know also that gained 0.3seconds at this frequency is very hard, morever not VS a neewbie, but under serious team overclockers with very good so. maybe OPB and coolaler have a new super tweacking metods.

    sorry OPB, i don't have nothing against you and sorry for the flame in this topic.

  23. #148
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Quote Originally Posted by jmax_oc
    Nice to conclude that OPB is untouchable

    Too many fans... They don't understand something : the score is real but the bench frequency is around 150MHz higher.
    lol
    if you can totally manipulate the question I list below, I can say, you even can do better than I did here. Just like Omega-san's 8m is untouchable even I use 5450 and still 0.3s short and he only used 5369mhz I think maybe you need to doubt that as well.

    ************************************************** **

    Since Alex from the Italy Shark Team PM me, I think I can post here
    about the hint I gave him:
    but I use question ask you instead of Answer


    Have you try to compare the windows 2000 achitecture with xp and 2003 original by checking the each file

    allocation size you set? or you just use default?

    What and how you set or deal with your paging file for virtual memory usage ? is there any difference before

    and after you doing the well-know copy-waza tweak? How far you understand the copy-waza tweak?

    How good that you understand exactly what type of service you need to keep and abandon when you bench super pi?

    Have you really observe the reaction after you change the frequency from either setfsb or clock-gen and

    immediately running super pi and got what type of error message? and what kinda error message you get?
    Not exactly run or not convergent in sqr? and what is that ?

    have you tried stop the calculation in the middle of running and NOT cleaning the cache(run a 16k then re-do

    it) and run it over..? and what result will be? faster or slower?

    have you think about just using keyboard instead of mouse to operate that calculation ?

  24. #149
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    ITALY
    Posts
    292
    under 9
    go s.o.t. next step under 8 sec and 6 ghz
    Last edited by qballe; 10-18-2006 at 12:53 AM.

  25. #150
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,038
    Opb, u'll can try my requests there are some pages?
    I love XS

    Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications

    I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92

Page 6 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3456789 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •