I buyed it already in Austria...Originally Posted by mine
someone has the ICH7 Raid drivers for XP 64-bit for that board?
=> http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=706
Someone can help?
Thx a lot
I buyed it already in Austria...Originally Posted by mine
someone has the ICH7 Raid drivers for XP 64-bit for that board?
=> http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=706
Someone can help?
Thx a lot
Last edited by commy; 08-08-2006 at 04:31 AM.
I have the P5WDG2-WS board and I use Intel 82801GR/GH SATA RAID Controller for my RAID 0 with XP x64.Originally Posted by commy
http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scri...9&submit=Go%21
Do you have a address where you bought the PRO version?
P5WDG2-WS Pro | BIOS 0905
Core 2 Extreme X6800@3.58GHz | Arctic Freezer 7 Pro | CPU 35° MB 31°
2 x VelociRaptor RAID 0 (ICH7R) | Raptor 150GB
Corsair Dominator 4x2GB PC8500@800MHz Dual Channel
Gainward 8800GTX 768MB (196.21) | Eizo FlexScan 30" 2560x1600
CMStacker 830 | Enermax EGA1000EWL 1kW 75A@+12V
XP Pro x64 SP2 - Vista Ultimate x64 SP2 - Windows 7 x64
LAN 100/100
Hi to all
I have two question about this motherboard:
1- what happen if I put a normal PCI card in a PCI-X slot? Can I force the other PCI-X slot to go with the full bandwidth?
2- Is possible put a Pcie x1 card in the second Pcie x16 slot? If yes the first Pcie x16 slot will drop to x8?
Thanks
Ugo
Originally Posted by ugo1
1. PCI-X Support normal PCI slot.
2. If you use 2X PCIE, it would be 8X+8X.
Originally Posted by ugo1
Adding to what AndreYang said, with most boards if you put a normal 32bit 33mhz PCI card in any PCI-X slot it will put all the slots to that same speed/mode. There were some server boards that had a single PCI-X slot on a seperate controller so you could do what it sounds like you are asking for. But in a board like this I'm sure all the PCI-X slots are on the same controller.
Thanks for the replies
Ugo
Originally Posted by Simon
Hi!
Sure: www.lammer-shop.at
Cheers
Last edited by dinos22; 08-13-2006 at 11:31 PM.
Originally Posted by xgman
Mine came in the mail today!
When my E6600 comes in I will add my results to this thread![]()
natalia, flash to this bios when you get up and running, http://edu.tchsien.com/CBB/coolaler/...S-PRO-0004.rar and then in chpiset options in the bios, set "read delay" to 7 for best results.Originally Posted by Natalia
good luck!
{2012 27imac-3.4i7-680mx-32gb ram-768SSD+External TB Samsung840pro ssd + TB velociraptors-Moto828mkIII/Marantz/Amphion Sound-HPzR30w 2nd monitor}
where did you get that BIOS?Originally Posted by xgman
....
Andre Yang uploaded them for us!Originally Posted by Ender17
Antec P180 SILVER
Asus P8P67 Deluxe Bios 1602
Intel Core I7 2600K @ 4.8ghz 1.295V Manual 24/7
Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
OCZ 700W PSU
4X2GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600mhz
Seagate 1TB Samsung 1TB (X3)
MSI Radeon HD 5850
WINDOWS 7 PRO X64
notice the "coolaler" in the link. heheOriginally Posted by Ender17
niceOriginally Posted by orion23
what kind of OC do you have on that E6700?
....
Very simple. Look at the difference in FSB. Higher FSB on the same board will be faster than a lower FSB at the same cpu clock rate. His 32m is only a couple seconds slower than mine with my E6400 @ 3.6ghz with 450mhz FSB. His 1m beat mine by a little less than half a second.Originally Posted by dinos22
E6400 L624A768 @ 3600mhz 1.48V
Biostar TP35D2-A7
2x1GB Micron D9JKH, 2x1GB OCZ Gold DDR2-1100
1x250GB WD SATAII 2x120GB Maxtor IDE 1x200GB
EVGA 8800GTS 512MB stock 799/1998/2075
MCW350, Apogee, 120.1 Swiftech Rad
Antec Smartpower 500W
BenQ DVDrw
Logitech z-5300e
It's not really FSB that makes the difference in SuperPi, but rather memory speed. Andre was running at DDR2-946 versus dino's DDR2-834.
so according to you going from DDR2-834 to DDR2-946 will gain me another 2 minutes.............hehehehOriginally Posted by sierra_bound
No, that's not what I said. When all other things are equal, the system with higher memory speed will come out on top. Or maybe Andre is a better tweaker.![]()
Sometimes raw power is more important. This is what I got after half a day with the P5WDG2 WS Pro. Air cooling.![]()
![]()
One other thing I forgot to mention. A 975X will crush a 965 board in 32M. I found that out with the P5B Dlx. Great for high FSB. But terrible for Pi, unless you get extreme clocks.
nice overclock thereOriginally Posted by sierra_bound
yeah i am just trying to understand what it is that he's using cause damn those times are incredible
it would be nice to get you to compare Asus P965 and 975X chipsets in SPI performance all else equal![]()
PLEASE DO a comparison between the WS Pro and P5B DlxOriginally Posted by sierra_bound
SPI/3D :thumbsup:
Well, what I can tell you is my P5WDG2 WS Pro is better for 32M than my P5B Deluxe. But if high FSB is your thing, then stick with 965. I did run 32M with my 6600ES at 4400MHz (dry ice cooling) on the P5B and I was so shocked by the result that I didn't even bother to save it. My P5WDG2 WS Pro would have beaten the time with 400 less MHz.
I will try to run a comparison test in the near future.![]()
Last edited by sierra_bound; 08-22-2006 at 11:26 PM.
yeah no worriesOriginally Posted by sierra_bound
would be interesting to know how much of a difference there really is![]()
Originally Posted by dinos22
What is your mobo? 975x or 965?
965 is slower than 975x on the same speed, fsb and momery speed , especially gigabyte 965 is so slow.
gigabyte DS3
i will be testing Asus P5B Deluxe
it seems that this 965 motherboard is even faster than 975X boards or same as them
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=112875&page=2
Bookmarks