Conroe 2.4Ghz on 965G mobo, brief test...

[ORCBEAST]

will be test soon.

now pcmark05_cputest

seems everything goes faster when add a 6600LE on board
pi_1m=21.390sec now
cienbench9.5=398/768
sciencemark2=1378
pi_fast=32.55sec/40.2sec

Awesome news dude

Whats the CPU load still ? 25% ?
Things can only get faster...So prepare yourselfs

[Razor_Sniper]

Can you run Aquamark?

[boostedevo]

seems everything goes faster when add a 6600LE on board

No longer using mem for the IG? That's a massive jump Victor...glad to see your hard work in tracking down issues is paying off in a HUGE way!!!

[comrad]

Awesome Results man!

Thanks to everyone who is trying to get results for everyone. (Fugger, FCG, Victor)

[VictorWang]

Awesome news dude

Whats the CPU load still ? 25% ?
Things can only get faster...So prepare yourselfs

after disable NIC and uninstall its driver,
cpu load came to normal.

idle=0%~1%

[rozzyroz]

have you thought about trying an ati card victorwang?

[BrownTown]

i'll go ahead and agree with a previous post that the CPU-Z latentcy test would be a nice one to run. See if this improvment is coming from a fast cache, or a fast core .

[Dennol]

Amazing Results


will be nice to see 3dmark06 cpu score

[neoman]

Omg!! Get this baby higher

[demek]

cienbench9.5=398/768
what was time that render?

[nCrusader]

For comparison cinebench:
955XE @ 4.5GHz (300x15 3:4 4-4-4-12)
389/798(28sec, 4 threads)

FX57 @ 2.4GHz (240x10 1:1 2-2-2-5) = 358
FX57 @ 2.64GHz (240x10 1:1 2-2-2-5) = 399
FX57 @ 3.0GHz (200x15 1:1 2-2-2-5) = 451

[iboomalot]

Impressive considering I have to run my 4400+ at 2.85 ghz to equal his 2.4 ghz run in cinebench 2003

[Extera]

damn, conroe is faster then I expected.

Seems like it's realy time 4 a conroe setup

[kl0012]

Some Cinebench 9.5 scores:
http://www.3dfluff.com/mash/cb95/top.php

[VictorWang]

Now.... More test come after a 6600LE added
http://vic.expreview.com/read.php?2


for you to compare:
955EE @ 300*14, with 78gtx 512m, 3Dmark05_cputest=8197
E6600 @ 266*9, with 6600LE, 3Dmark05_cputest=8320

[2fink]

those results are better than i exspected

[404Power]

This thread, whole XS, especially this CPU ... TOTALLY INSANE!
I even cant believe those Pi Times!

@ Victor:

Can't connect to your blog!

[nCrusader]

The 3DMark06 CPU test seems a bit low, can someone with a X2 post results @ 2.4GHz?

[robg1701]

Now.... More test come after a 6600LE added
http://vic.expreview.com/read.php?2


for you to compare:
955EE @ 300*14, with 78gtx 512m, 3Dmark05_cputest=8197
E6600 @ 266*9, with 6600LE, 3Dmark05_cputest=8320

Could you add the pictures here ? They dont load for me because the server is so loaded

[Razor_Sniper]

Pifast seems a bit low?

[BrownTown]

so, those who speculated that Yonahs L2 was slowed down becasue it would be same as higher clocking Conroe were right. 14 cycle latentcy of Conroe is the same as Yonah. The 3 cycle L1 also the same or not, don't remeber that number for Yonah?

[R101]

First thing to take into account, this is not DDR2-800@ tight timings, but plain vanilla 533.. There is still some performance to be had

[BrownTown]

also, this is the 316$ part, not the 1000$ one, so the extra 900Mhz of the XE might help a little .

[gundamit]

The 3DMark06 CPU test seems a bit low, can someone with a X2 post results @ 2.4GHz?

... or take a quick look at the Orb?

[odb]

sweet results but damn 21 pages of posts in 29 or so hours is crazy i cant keep up lol