Conroe 2.4Ghz on 965G mobo, brief test...

**clipse_bg** · 04-05-2006, 08:40 AM

Originally Posted by n91htmare

Again, Thank you Victor for dedicating your money and time to inform the rest of us.

Fugger and FCG, Same goes to you. Thank you for what you're both doing. Some may not appreciate it but other certainly do. I’m positive that not many of us would be able to dish out hundreds for a new motherboard or whatever just so they can do some tests for US. So good job and thanks again.

No offence, but why do you think that FUGGER, FCG, Victor, etc don't get pleasure in testing this new stuff, playing with it and tweaking it? Don't get me wrong I'm quite grateful for the info they provide, but don't be so sure they're doing it JUST for US. I think they have simply found a way to be helpful and enjoy themeselves at the same time and that's great realy!

For me solving different problems that occur with the hardware is maybe even more fun than the testing itself.

Anyways I'd like to congratulate Victor on the good buy and info. Hope you solve all the issues and will be able to do some OC-ing very soon, so that we can realy "see what this baby can do"

**~~freecableguy~~** · 04-05-2006, 08:53 AM

Victor, one thing, is your 32M run done with the LargeSystemCache=1 set the registry. Makes a HUGE difference on my system.

**horseball** · 04-05-2006, 08:56 AM

Bo-Blog Database System Tips: Can not connect to MySQL server

Time: 2006-4-5 5:54pm
Script:

Error: Too many connections
Errno.: 1040

**LowRun** · 04-05-2006, 08:58 AM

Originally Posted by VictorWang

now it's okay.

fixed the connection limit

No it's not

**maratus** · 04-05-2006, 08:59 AM

horseball
Try again, it's ok

**makatee** · 04-05-2006, 09:03 AM

Originally Posted by jebo_4jc

Shame on FCG and Fugger for getting our hopes up

My advice is, next time your "source" says you *might* be able to get an ES working on a current motherboard *if* you get lucky, don't ejaculate all over yourselves with excitement, and spread the word that "CONROE BENCHES INCOMING" until you actually get something working.

I feel like this was purely a publicity stunt to increase the XS readership, and it appears to have worked. Now I just feel like I have been cheated.

I just saw this and Im sure others have made replies back, but we don't need people like you coming around our forum if you keep acting the way you do. Anyone here at XS, knows both FUGGER and FCG aren't like that. In fact. I can't remember how many total times I've seen Intel ES because of FUGGER. Think about what your mouth is saying before you upon it up again.

**SoulGG** · 04-05-2006, 09:06 AM

Originally Posted by freecableguy

Victor, one thing, is your 32M run done with the LargeSystemCache=1 set the registry. Makes a HUGE difference on my system.

Yeah optimizing the o/s usually improves performance...there's alot of uneccesary things that you will never use

Here's one thread I found, there's probably hundreds more but here's one

http://forum.nfsunlimited.net/viewto...ighlight=tweak

**Steensen** · 04-05-2006, 09:08 AM

Nice scores youv'e got there Victor.
Can't wait to sww how fast the Super Pi is going to be, when the chip is clocked at 4-5GHz

:o

**mike** · 04-05-2006, 09:09 AM

Originally Posted by chrisf6969

Sorry I posted wrong link before. I'll go back & edit that post. Here is the correct .pdf about the changes to support Conroe : http://developer.intel.com/design/pc...D/D1060560.pdf

BUGGERS - wish they would have included all the info - lol. Thanks for the find - awesome!

**mine** · 04-05-2006, 09:11 AM

Originally Posted by iboomalot

like to see a 8m super pi.

I agree Intel looks to have stepped up to the bat finally.

still comes down to gaming and decoding and photoshop reproduction, things that the general public uses not crunching PI.

and I agree 18 mins 32m pi is very fast ***hats off***

in fact it is 18.05

and here a only slightly oced intel yonah@2,7 on air

8m 4m 14.3

see yonah thread

**NiCKE^** · 04-05-2006, 09:15 AM

You better get your 975XBX m/b back Vic! :P

**VictorWang** · 04-05-2006, 09:19 AM

OOOOOOOOOOhHhhhhhh yeah!!!!!!!!!

finally add a 6600LE on the board.

3Dmark05 cputest... huge increase !!!

from 3008 to 8279

my goodness !

don't know what will happen if with a 78gtx 512m

thx to you guys. I'll try ur sys tweak guides soon !

**demek** · 04-05-2006, 09:22 AM

we want cinebench

**black_edition** · 04-05-2006, 09:29 AM

Originally Posted by VictorWang

OOOOOOOOOOhHhhhhhh yeah!!!!!!!!!

finally add a 6600LE on the board.

3Dmark05 cputest... huge increase !!!

from 3008 to 8279

my goodness !

don't know what will happen if with a 78gtx 512m

thx to you guys. I'll try ur sys tweak guides soon !

omg

**Absolute_0** · 04-05-2006, 09:29 AM

Originally Posted by VictorWang

OOOOOOOOOOhHhhhhhh yeah!!!!!!!!!

finally add a 6600LE on the board.

3Dmark05 cputest... huge increase !!!

from 3008 to 8279

my goodness !

don't know what will happen if with a 78gtx 512m

thx to you guys. I'll try ur sys tweak guides soon !

Dayammm

and with a 6600LE lol

**chrisf6969** · 04-05-2006, 09:31 AM

Originally Posted by VictorWang

OOOOOOOOOOhHhhhhhh yeah!!!!!!!!!

finally add a 6600LE on the board.

3Dmark05 cputest... huge increase !!!

from 3008 to 8279

my goodness !

don't know what will happen if with a 78gtx 512m

Nice, but probably not much perfomance increase by going to higher videocard b/c as much as possible has already been offloaded to the GPU (supposed to be a CPU test). But 8,279 is still very impressive as its 10% faster than my 920D at 3.9Ghz (7,531). God I wish you could overclock that chip!!!

**VictorWang** · 04-05-2006, 09:38 AM

Originally Posted by demek

we want cinebench

cannot run cinebench , neither 2003 nor 9.5

seems the software cannot support

**nCrusader** · 04-05-2006, 09:39 AM

8.2k sounds better

A 6600LE should be fairly equal to a 6600GT in CPU tests, which together with a 955XE @ 4500MHz get EDIT: 9.2k.

**oozberg** · 04-05-2006, 09:41 AM

Me need Conroe

**demek** · 04-05-2006, 09:47 AM

Originally Posted by VictorWang

cannot run cinebench , neither 2003 nor 9.5

seems the software cannot support

its not good
can you test PI 16M ? with special dedication for tweak.pl

**Nazu** · 04-05-2006, 09:47 AM

That's awesome

**Kashelz** · 04-05-2006, 09:58 AM

Can you test 3DMark06 CPU test? It shuld be very high score there too. Awsome cpu!

Looks like need to go for Intel now, for Intel Conroe, AMD AM2 will not beat this monster

**The Coolest** · 04-05-2006, 10:03 AM

Also, what about a run of dual super pi? (one on each core)
I'm wondering what will be the affect on performance when both cores make heavy use the L2 cache.

**gundamit** · 04-05-2006, 10:03 AM

Originally Posted by VictorWang

OOOOOOOOOOhHhhhhhh yeah!!!!!!!!!

finally add a 6600LE on the board.

3Dmark05 cputest... huge increase !!!

from 3008 to 8279

my goodness !

don't know what will happen if with a 78gtx 512m

thx to you guys. I'll try ur sys tweak guides soon !

Hmmm ... seems like it should you on page 2 for CPU scores?

**VictorWang** · 04-05-2006, 10:06 AM

Originally Posted by The Coolest

Also, what about a run of dual super pi? (one on each core)
I'm wondering what will be the affect on performance when both cores make heavy use the L2 cache.

will be test soon.

now pcmark05_cputest

seems everything goes faster when add a 6600LE on board

pi_1m=21.390sec now
cienbench9.5=398/738
sciencemark2=1308
pi_fast=32.55sec/40.41sec

Thread: Conroe 2.4Ghz on 965G mobo, brief test...

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions