Heheh yesterday's night single card testing:Originally Posted by Kinc
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1649930
Hope the other card will play nice as well.
Heheh yesterday's night single card testing:Originally Posted by Kinc
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1649930
Hope the other card will play nice as well.
You just made me plug in my soldering ironOriginally Posted by LardArse
![]()
Okey Kinc a 3-way? Sounds pretty nasty in my ears![]()
![]()
![]()
Nice anyway![]()
Intel FTW!
Beanna
810/2245!!! Amazing Shamino! This battle will be a good one!Originally Posted by LardArse
![]()
Oh yes!!!
Good work guys
Shamino was that done with the gpu on your cascade or a differnt form of cooling?
That is nasty shamOriginally Posted by LardArse
![]()
K|ngp|n do you plan on trying any dual core chips as they seem to be the real beasts in 03 05 so far?
I thought last year was a golden age at one point but people are still really pushing it as we enter 2006 and it sounds like Charles will be possibly joining in as well. It's a bit like rock climbing where new incredible formerly "impossible" routes are being put up by the new generation year on year. It's great to watch by we armchair benchers![]()
Vince is spot on about LOD, it's not just flicking a switch, it takes a lot of boring runs to work out what is best and it varies by card. If you have a card which is memory bandwidth limited then you know that certain tests show this up more and need a bigger LOD, however if you are gpu limited you cannot go too much LOD or it gets worse or at least plateau's out. Even that rule does not follow between 2001, 03 and 05 though.
The one good thing about LOD runs is that although they are boring they properly burn your card in before it gets cooled and volt modded.
Good luck to all competitors, 2006 is around the corner soon, so maybe we might find 2001 leaving us ..no pressure though! heh heh.
When are they going to remove that cheating ass'ole at the top of 2005, it's spoiling the front page ?Does nobody at futuremark look at the ORB nowadays ?
Rergards
Andy
OMG that is just sick!![]()
Thx, it'll take every once of MHz to ctach up with u guys :POriginally Posted by k|ngp|n
Your outa control with those memory clocksOriginally Posted by LardArse
![]()
ANYONE...
I have a chance to grab a 4800+ toledo pretty cheap locally. Should I grab it and hope for the best with the cold bug? What is the locked multi? can run 5/4 easily? any mem performance issues? I guess I have some reading to do.
that was on cascade ~ -80c or soOriginally Posted by Cpt Twitchy
I've got a retail box 4800+ coming my way. Apparently it will work under DI so we'll see how it goes when it comes to higher HTT and mem controller issues. I've been trying to figure out what to do about the locked multi as well, I'm so used to benching 1:1 with BH-5 and the FX that I never really think about dividers. I was thinking of trying some TCCD or 2gb ballistix that can run 300 @ 3-3-3-8... just to stay 1:1Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
otherwise use the 166 divider with BH-5 if the controller is good. It'll go under DI this weekend.
![]()
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 3645 MHzOriginally Posted by LardArse
dual core?
if not i smell 15K single card![]()
If it is as 0536 i would certanly give it a chance. My friend has one that overclocks almost the same as the dc chip I got here. Singelphase or even DI should work fine with that. Or you just pour what temp you ever desire, heheOriginally Posted by k|ngp|n
3250MHz on air in spi 1M aint to bad. Beacuse of the heat generated it wont take 3d05 higher then 3150MHz, crashes in Game test 1. I managed to run through gt1 and 2 @ 3170MHz with lower vcore but then it would crash in to windows in gt3. With watercooling I think 3250 or even higher would work for 3D also. Since 3100MHz DC equals 3600MHz SC in game test 2 that would be some seriuos cpu power on only water.
I say go for it![]()
Last edited by Kinc; 01-04-2006 at 10:31 AM.
hehe I already know that, anyone wanna gimme a bribe for itOriginally Posted by k|ngp|n
(jking)
1. coz ya told me
2. coz I was already using it![]()
how wide are the gpu pots gonna be?
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3GHz . DFI DK P45-T2RS Plus . XFX 9800GT 512MB . 8GB OCZ Blade PC2-9200 . WD6400AAKS AHCI .
Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic . Hanns.G 28" LCD . Thermalright U120-E . Seasonic S12 600w . Windows 7 Professional E Retail x64 .
2245MHz GDDR3.. That's insane![]()
| Pentium-M 730 SL86G 1.60@2.81GHz | ASUS P4P800SE w/ CT-479 | 2x512MB BH-5 | 1M @ 26s | Windows XP SP2 |
| Athlon64 3000+ E6 LBBWE 0544EPHW | ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 | WinXP and various Linux distros | Currently enjoying:
@ gocchin and kink...That is the kind of info I needed. Thank you![]()
Check this out...This x2 is as/more powerful as the fx @3894mhz in single card 05' with only 3250mhz and 270fsb tight as nails! Look at the compare.
All tests run with default gtx clocks and same tweaks/ ram settings:
4800+ at 270x12 bh-5 tight as nails 1:1:
4800+ at 3305mhz 275x12 bh5 w/div
fx57 @ 3894mhz with 15x bh5:
details from the 3894 fx run:
These results are pretty crazy.
Chip maxes so far around 3350mhz or so.
Last edited by k|ngp|n; 01-04-2006 at 10:29 PM.
Hahah how lucky can one get!
KP, I've just passed you by 1 point.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1655234
System power sucks, seems been tweaking the wrong stuff!
Hope you didn't manage to make backups the last time :P
OMG ! World Records are just falling like snow :O
Keep up da good work guys. This is so close combat![]()
Originally Posted by LardArse
Dam thats a cloase battleGrats on the new WR !!!!!
![]()
Regards
Overklokk
First in world over 90k in 3D Mark 03 with 90400p
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5160409
Bookmarks