Retail Q9650 Overclocking Thread

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

08-23-2009, 02:29 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonathankru

Well DONE. Getting close to 5Ghz
I wish i had a lower VID (Maybe 1.2) . My Chip has a 1,3V VID !!!
Then i could trade some heat for a little less Voltage.

I need 1.45V(in bios) Vcore and 1.38V VTT Just to run 4.25Ghz Stable!!!! But my Max temps are 50 when loading with prime

http://i30.tinypic.com/hsurg9.jpg

How much Vcore do you think these Q9650 can handle on Water?

.

but you can play further giving volts mate also i see you got an awesome PSU wish i had that you can have real fun with it...i have a low vid and im sharing the loop with the GTX285, higher vid quads require more volts but it's up to everyone if you decide to play with it, on the giga i pumped lots of volts and then my PSU starts shutting down i will swap for a corsair soon.

i benched it till 1,56vcore real / 1,75pll / 1,66vtt and 1,76 MCH and the 2x2 gskills till 2,4

Cheers :up:
Sergio
08-23-2009, 02:34 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by M40TURBO

I have a question. What mb should i get for a q9650? The EP45-UD3P or the EP45T-UD3P. Witch will be best for oc the cpu? Or should i go for a core I7 instead.
Is a I7 worth the extra cash compared to the performance you get from the q9650 at say 4,5ghz.? Just wondering what to go for inn a new build. Going to build inn a lian-li b70, with eighter EP45-UD3P or EP45T-UD3P and q9650.
Or I7 something on a good mb. 2 wc loops and 2 HD 4870x2 cards i think. 2 MCP655 pumps, 2x240 rads or one 2x120 and one 360 rad. Hope it's not to OT..

read napalms here

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...197802&page=99

i think if you gonna hard OC the DQ6, the extreme is better on dividers and needs a vmod and the ud3p is awesome but need more volts

cheers
Sergio
08-23-2009, 03:45 PM
M40TURBO

I don't think i'm going to clock it mutch higher than 4,5ghz if i get a new system. Not a oc guru like you guys.. :) And if i need to mod something physicli i think i'll go for the other mb. Only inn the planing stage yet..

Congrats on the 4,9ghz by the way.. It's awsome...
08-23-2009, 04:00 PM
kahuna321

tried your settings- no post. tried moving from there a little but still no post. this cpu/mb dont seem to like a lot of volts

still trying...

tyvm

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

here you go mate, you have same vid as me should be the same

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...197802&page=96

i posted the template there

Cheers :up:
Sergio
08-23-2009, 04:42 PM
OC Nub

Congrats on the 4900mhz Sergio :up:
08-23-2009, 04:54 PM
mrcape

That 3380 came out...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819117207

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=668972
08-23-2009, 05:03 PM
Hoss331

Wow they actually released it! With I7 and I5 being released I figured they wouldnt bother with another 775.
08-23-2009, 05:09 PM
xzulu

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

Well guys finally made it :up:

Q9650 vid 1.1875 @ 4905 :D

http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/5637/49051.png

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/1695/validacion.png

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=670319

Cheers :up:
Sergio

NICE! Congrats Sergio! 4.9Ghz :up::up:
08-23-2009, 06:08 PM
OC Nub

OK not 4905 but getting closer Sergio. Very hard in 64bit w7.

http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/4363/4887.png
08-23-2009, 06:19 PM
Jor3lBR

X3380

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoss331

Wow they actually released it! With I7 and I5 being released I figured they wouldnt bother with another 775.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrcape

That 3380 came out...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819117207

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=668972

Wow for the X3380 price you can buy an i7 920 + X58 Mobo + DDR3 and still have some change to watch "Inglorious Bastards"...
08-23-2009, 06:39 PM
Hoss331

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jor3lBR

Wow for the X3380 price you can buy an i7 920 + X58 Mobo + DDR3 and still have some change to watch "Inglorious Bastards"...

No kidding! That is the price they said it would be, the old 9650 price plan, but with I7 and I5 now here I doubt theyll sell many at that price. I do wonder if the retails are any better than the ES chips but im not going to find out myself.
08-23-2009, 07:45 PM
mrcape

The price might drop. Hard to say with xeons but it's interesting at least. I'm still on 775 and loving it.

What were those 9550s going for like $150 at microcenter? Geez that would make a nice setup for anyone.
08-23-2009, 07:54 PM
nugzo

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrcape

That 3380 came out...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819117207

http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=668972

I guess its just a misprint that newegg says that one doesnt support 64bit... right?

I need some input from the ud3p v1.6 users. I have another ud3p comin in tomorrow from the egg, i assume it'll be a 1.6. Anybody know what the difference is between the different revision boards? Something would have to be way different for the 1.6 to use a different bios right?
08-23-2009, 07:59 PM
bigwill68

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrcape

The price might drop. Hard to say with xeons but it's interesting at least. I'm still on 775 and loving it.

What were those 9550s going for like $150 at microcenter? Geez that would make a nice setup for anyone.

There you go MrCape they been on sale now for 6 weeks straight at Micro Center:yepp: and there $169.99

http://www.microcenter.com/single_pr...uct_id=0299412
08-23-2009, 09:14 PM
Hoss331

Quote:

Originally Posted by nugzo

I guess its just a misprint that newegg says that one doesnt support 64bit... right?

I need some input from the ud3p v1.6 users. I have another ud3p comin in tomorrow from the egg, i assume it'll be a 1.6. Anybody know what the difference is between the different revision boards? Something would have to be way different for the 1.6 to use a different bios right?

Yep, its a misprint. :up:

V1.6

Quote:

Originally Posted by stasio

Aside from featuring the new Smart 6 system management utilities package(and BIOS), this model remains unchanged.
08-24-2009, 12:28 AM
jonathankru

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

but you can play further giving volts mate also i see you got an awesome PSU wish i had that you can have real fun with it...i have a low vid and im sharing the loop with the GTX285, higher vid quads require more volts but it's up to everyone if you decide to play with it, on the giga i pumped lots of volts and then my PSU starts shutting down i will swap for a corsair soon.

i benched it till 1,56vcore real / 1,75pll / 1,66vtt and 1,76 MCH and the 2x2 gskills till 2,4

Cheers :up:
Sergio

I was using my 24/7 setup as an example. I am 3d stable @ 4.6Ghz but that is with 1.57V (In Windows) but i am unsure of how much more it can take.

How do you now how much VTT to give your cpu? I find if i give it more then a certain percentage of the vcore it stops letting me boot. Is there some sort of stage where it starts to help? Ie: for me at 1.4VTT it is unhappy but maybe above 1.55V it will start helping?

Thanks for your response.

About the PSU. It helped my MAX OC on GPU by 65 MHZ on the core which i was glad about.
08-24-2009, 05:18 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by OC Nub

OK not 4905 but getting closer Sergio. Very hard in 64bit w7.

We will make it mate :up: hard on 64bit but im confident will arrive there :up:

Very nice mate
Cheers
Sergio
08-24-2009, 05:21 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by jonathankru

I was using my 24/7 setup as an example. I am 3d stable @ 4.6Ghz but that is with 1.57V (In Windows) but i am unsure of how much more it can take.

How do you now how much VTT to give your cpu? I find if i give it more then a certain percentage of the vcore it stops letting me boot. Is there some sort of stage where it starts to help? Ie: for me at 1.4VTT it is unhappy but maybe above 1.55V it will start helping?

Thanks for your response.

damn 1,57 is what i used for 4900 its amazing how different temps are on this chips being a lower vid to a higher

vtt it all depends mate, in my case till 4500 i dont need more than 1,36, but up to there it starts needing it, all depends. You should start to test slowly from a stable setting and then up till you get the most of it stable, then the rest will be bench or just screens.

Cheers mate and good luck :up:
Sergio
08-24-2009, 05:23 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by xzulu

NICE! Congrats Sergio! 4.9Ghz :up::up:

thank you mate :up:
08-24-2009, 05:25 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by OC Nub

Congrats on the 4900mhz Sergio :up:

Thanks Tom :up: this is a product of our team work remember that :up:
08-24-2009, 06:22 AM
jonathankru

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

damn 1,57 is what i used for 4900 its amazing how different temps are on this chips being a lower vid to a higher

vtt it all depends mate, in my case till 4500 i dont need more than 1,36, but up to there it starts needing it, all depends. You should start to test slowly from a stable setting and then up till you get the most of it stable, then the rest will be bench or just screens.

Cheers mate and good luck :up:
Sergio

Thanks for tips. Will try and post results later.

Ignore the PM :up:
08-24-2009, 07:28 AM
OC Nub

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

We will make it mate :up: hard on 64bit but im confident will arrive there :up:

Very nice mate
Cheers
Sergio

Thank you. We will keep working on it.
08-25-2009, 09:03 AM
FrostyAMD

Been reading thru this thread as I am planning a q9650 buy. Got a ep45-ud3p buying some g.skill 1100 now. I am just to about to page30 and am reading thoroughly trying to understand the oveclocking and the relationship of settings as they help or hinder sucess. My big question now is what batches have you seen that are most reponsive to overclocking. there seems also to be A B and C codes in the batch numer are they significant ? Meaning A's on average clock better Than B's ? Any help in this regard to help me try to get a good batch will be appreciated. thanks
08-25-2009, 09:18 AM
The Viper

Does anyone know what some of the good batches are for the 9650, are later weeks OCing better or earlier?

Sorry if this has already been asked in this thread.
08-25-2009, 03:09 PM
bigwill68

Quote:

Originally Posted by FrostyAMD

Been reading thru this thread as I am planning a q9650 buy. Got a ep45-ud3p buying some g.skill 1100 now. I am just to about to page30 and am reading thoroughly trying to understand the oveclocking and the relationship of settings as they help or hinder sucess. My big question now is what batches have you seen that are most reponsive to overclocking. there seems also to be A B and C codes in the batch numer are they significant ? Meaning A's on average clock better Than B's ? Any help in this regard to help me try to get a good batch will be appreciated. thanks

as far as the letters A,B,C means that what (lot)

Example: L149A463-0726

1st letter or digit = plant code (Malay)
0 = San Jose, Costa Rica
1 = Cavite, Philippines
3 = .............., Costa Rica
6 = Chandler, Arizona
7 = .........., Philippines
8 = Leixlip, Ireland
9 = Penang, Malaysia
L = ............, Malaysia
Q = ..........., Malaysia
R = Manila, Philippines
Y = Leixlip, Ireland

2nd digit = Year of production (2001)

3rd & 4th digits = week (49th week )

5th - 8th digits= lot number

10th - 13th digits = serialization code

they are made in and it's a luck of the draw if you end up with a good batch number are not it's all about how your parts work together as far as the G.SKill 1100...I wonder if this one below? and the ep45-ud3p board go to the thread on here and what people are using and what kinda luck they are getting out of the board and there parts and Compare notes alot people are willing to help I myself had alot of help with my Biostar I45 from here when..I bought it figuring the bios voltage and the different setting to use to get a Good overclock got a 4.5ghz on my E8400 and 3.9Ghz on my Q9550 both on air and I've seen the A's on the chips get pretty high ..I've only seen the A,B's in the states...I thinks the C's are over seas someone correct if..I'm wrong

G.Skill 1100
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820231194

even if you drop some 1066 in your board like this below this is some good also :yepp:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820231166

Best of Luck on your journey into the overclock World Of Computers:up:
08-25-2009, 03:27 PM
Machinus

I have L846B6B2...and I am having trouble getting past 3.8 on air, any advice?
08-25-2009, 04:13 PM
The Viper

anyone have any results with the following batch

L843B805
L842B068
L846B809
08-25-2009, 04:17 PM
Navigator1

Quote:

Originally Posted by NapalmV5

very hard to boot over 530 ??

2x q9650 545fsb windows booted + validation @ 4.9ghz on air.. no easytune

http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/5507/4905od4.jpg
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=422821

http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/4319/4905zr0.jpg
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=434280

1.2125vid: lower vcore @ higher temps
1.2500vid: higher vcore @ lower temps

both air cooled by the same ifx14

havent checked but i think its still the wr on air

Hey Napalm do you have a Template for this settings? ...pls show the template ;) ...thx
08-25-2009, 04:45 PM
Navigator1

Hmmm...

...i see all the guys with excellent validations near or over mine use ddr2 boards :yepp: ...i think with ddr3 boards its even harder to do a good oc job :(
08-25-2009, 05:12 PM
Jor3lBR

Quote:

Originally Posted by Navigator1

Hmmm...

...i see all the guys with excellent validations near or over mine use ddr2 boards :yepp: ...i think with ddr3 boards its even harder to do a good oc job :(

Yes P45 seams to work better off with DDR2, for validation it doesn't really matter as the ram is less important, they are relavant when it comes to stability, DDR2 topping out at 4800Mhz and DDR3 around 4600Mhz.
08-28-2009, 09:58 AM
Triton

C'mon guys, soon autumn is here !

LOL, 'some' of you probably thought "hey, lower ambient temps, let's break old records !" ?

Nope, I mean there will be so many new games to play soon: L4D2, CoD MW2 etc etc

I've had it with OC, I'm disgusted by the amount of time I've "spent" ocing this bastard of Q9650....I already got the freq I wanted from my Q9650, but one thing is still annoying me sooo much: can't find a stable MHz to a 1.344 or 1.360v cpuz ..thats anything above 1.3625v bios...

I've had 3 good P95 Blend runs: 10hr 4.1GHz/1.296v cpuz, 4.15GHz, 1.312v cpuz and 4176MHz, 1.328v cpuz (and this with x2.40 mem x TURBO, no nothing extra for MCH volts), so scaling is very poor, some odd 25mhz for 3 notches vcore raise...:(

Q9650 4176MHz
OCZ Blade PC2-9200 1114MHz

Load Line Calibration Enabled
VCORE 1.3625
CPU Termination 1.3000
CPU Reference 65%
MCH Termination 1.3200
MCH Reference 67%
CPU Drive 900mv

VDIMM 1.8200
TIMINGS 5-5-5-18 + AUTO
Performance Enhance Turbo

P95 Blend 8hr OK (10hr with Std Perf. enhance)

If I go 4194MHz with same MCH and FSB volts (raise vcore one notch): always BSOD withing 10mins, so here I must raise MCH (more likely than FSB vtt). 1.32v FSB and 1.34v MCH gives max 4hr Blend time

P95 Errors guys ?

rounding error - inc vcore and u be 24h OK :D
two types of "final result" errors...cant rem them both - inc MCH/mem or lower timings
BSOD - MCH volts too low, this often 1024K test
08-29-2009, 08:43 AM
Triton

This morning I flashed the BIOS, from F9 to F10e beta...wasn't successful, no way I could get memory work at 2.40 ratio. *sigh, real deep real one*

Since it was a failure BIOS for my rig, flashed back to F9 and *fingers already caught inside jar* all is working, better than before actually !

Currently P95 Blending 4230MHz, 1.344v cpuz, 1128MHz mem 5-5-5-18 with Turbo...1.5hrs already.
08-30-2009, 02:38 PM
The Viper

Well i searched high and low and finally found myself a batch# L847C153. These week 47Cs are hard to get. Anyone have any experience with this batch? Ill post some results when I get it.
08-30-2009, 03:36 PM
Sean_UK

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Viper

These week 47Cs are hard to get. Anyone have any experience with this batch?

Hi, I have two week 47C's, I dont have P45 mobo to hand for testing (Yet), just two P35's; ASUS P5K Deluxe and MSI Neo2-FR.

*VID 1.18750, 445x9 4GHz, 1.216v Prime95 & IntelBurnTest stable
*VID 1.16250, 445x9 4GHz, 1.280v Prime95 & IntelBurnTest stable

Also aquired 3rd Q9650 (L846B802) with 1.1000VID :shocked:: Have yet to test this one in any great length, sadly the early results are nothing to get excited about. :down: I guess it's safe to assume all 3 might fair a dam site better voltage wise when tested via high quality P45 motherboard?
08-30-2009, 03:53 PM
The Viper

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean_UK

Hi, I have two week 47C's, I dont have P45 mobo to hand for testing (Yet), just two P35's; ASUS P5K Deluxe and MSI Neo2-FR.

*VID 1.18750, 445x9 4GHz, 1.216v Prime95 & IntelBurnTest stable
*VID 1.16250, 445x9 4GHz, 1.280v Prime95 & IntelBurnTest stable

Also aquired 3rd Q9650 (L846B802) with 1.1000VID :shocked:: Have yet to test this one in any great length, sadly the early results are nothing to get excited about. :down: I guess it's safe to assume all 3 might fair a dam site better voltage wise when tested via high quality P45 motherboard?

great, thanks for sharing!
08-30-2009, 07:31 PM
Leeghoofd

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean_UK

Hi, I have two week 47C's, I dont have P45 mobo to hand for testing (Yet), just two P35's; ASUS P5K Deluxe and MSI Neo2-FR.

*VID 1.18750, 445x9 4GHz, 1.216v Prime95 & IntelBurnTest stable
*VID 1.16250, 445x9 4GHz, 1.280v Prime95 & IntelBurnTest stable

Thx for proving that a low VID isn't directly linked to being able to use a low Vcore for the same clockspeed. P35 still is a nice performer but is limited by the bios design. Higher FSB and better fine tweaking (voltages , GTL's, RAM settings) makes P45 better. It allowed me to drop Vcore some, but don' expect miracles from it. (came from P5K Dlx to P5Q Dlx)
08-30-2009, 08:10 PM
Hoss331

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean_UK

Also aquired 3rd Q9650 (L846B802) with 1.1000VID :shocked:

What is the min VID on that chip?
08-31-2009, 10:39 AM
Sean_UK

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoss331

What is the min VID on that chip?

CPU-Z reads 1.080v @ stock and limited by P35 Neo2-FR BIOS, since I cant set voltage any lower. P5K Deluxe has slightly more flexable BIOS, so once I get time for some decent testing in coming weeks I'll share the results and pic's etc. Might even have a quality P45 Mobo to play with by then :up:

1.1875 VID chip is stable on P5K @ stock clocks with 0.976v, no idea is that's good or not?
08-31-2009, 01:03 PM
OC Nub

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Viper

Well i searched high and low and finally found myself a batch# L847C153. These week 47Cs are hard to get. Anyone have any experience with this batch? Ill post some results when I get it.

I have batch#L847C037, VID 1.175v, it is the best chip I have had so far. 4500mhz 10hrs Prime blend stable 1.392v. Only downfall is it runs very warm, will need very good cooling with these low vid chips.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=2302
08-31-2009, 03:27 PM
Hoss331

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean_UK

CPU-Z reads 1.080v @ stock and limited by P35 Neo2-FR BIOS, since I cant set voltage any lower. P5K Deluxe has slightly more flexable BIOS, so once I get time for some decent testing in coming weeks I'll share the results and pic's etc. Might even have a quality P45 Mobo to play with by then :up:

1.1875 VID chip is stable on P5K @ stock clocks with 0.976v, no idea is that's good or not?

No, I asked for the min VID, it will be listed in realtemp like this.

http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p...apImageeee.jpg
08-31-2009, 03:53 PM
Sean_UK

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoss331

it will be listed in realtemp

Ah well you never mentioned Realtemp :shrug: Just dl it and reads 1.1000 min, 1.2750 max, which might explain why it's not producing results anywhere near expected - so why would Core Temp 0.99.5 show 1.1000 VID even under load if it's not?

The other two Q9650's are showing a Real Temp max VID to match Core Temp's VID reading...
08-31-2009, 05:05 PM
jonathankru

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean_UK

Ah well you never mentioned Realtemp :shrug: Just dl it and reads 1.1000 min, 1.2750 max, which might explain why it's not producing results anywhere near expected - so why would Core Temp 0.99.5 show 1.1000 VID even under load if it's not?

The other two Q9650's are showing a Real Temp max VID to match Core Temp's VID reading...

I Think it is a coretemp bug. I also thought my Q9650 was a 1,1 VID but it is actually a 1.3 VID with a minimum VID of 1.1. It does read it correct sometimes. I think it displays the min VID instead of the max VID.
08-31-2009, 07:10 PM
The Viper

Quote:

Originally Posted by OC Nub

I have batch#L847C037, VID 1.175v, it is the best chip I have had so far. 4500mhz 10hrs Prime blend stable 1.392v. Only downfall is it runs very warm, will need very good cooling with these low vid chips.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=2302

yep, I had your batch specifically written down, I tried to get as close to 037 as I could...L847C153 is close enough I think.
09-01-2009, 06:43 PM
andressergio

Q9650 @ 4905 Sp1m

Well mates beated my own SPI1M record it was a matter of wait a cool day :D

http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/1682/spi20.jpg

Cheers all :up:
Sergio
09-01-2009, 06:47 PM
andressergio

3dm06 Q9650 @ 4707

And also beated my 3Dm06 record

http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/4...0176414853.png

Cheers !
Sergio
09-01-2009, 07:09 PM
xzulu

Nice! Congrats Sergio!
09-01-2009, 07:35 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by xzulu

Nice! Congrats Sergio!

thanks mate im happy now :D
09-01-2009, 10:58 PM
Jor3lBR

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

thanks mate im happy now :D

#2 ON hWbOT Well Done Sergio :clap:
I better get my SuperPi scores lowered!
09-02-2009, 12:20 AM
thebluemeanie1

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

Well mates beated my own SPI1M record it was a matter of wait a cool day :D

Cheers all :up:
Sergio

Great job, I had one last Pi run left but with a little GUI adjustment (I.E. silver Luna and background) it shouldn't stand much of a chance.:up:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jor3lBR

#2 ON hWbOT Well Done Sergio :clap:
I better get my SuperPi scores lowered!

Nice to see you're back with some more wPrime1024M.
How's the heat output at 1.45V?
09-02-2009, 04:18 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jor3lBR

#2 ON hWbOT Well Done Sergio :clap:
I better get my SuperPi scores lowered!

Thanks mate :up: you created a beast lol
09-02-2009, 04:19 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebluemeanie1

Great job, I had one last Pi run left but with a little GUI adjustment (I.E. silver Luna and background) it shouldn't stand much of a chance.:up:

Thanks mate :up:
09-02-2009, 12:12 PM
OC Nub

Very nice Sergio. Great job my friend. :up:
09-02-2009, 12:14 PM
OC Nub

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Viper

yep, I had your batch specifically written down, I tried to get as close to 037 as I could...L847C153 is close enough I think.

Congrats on the new chip. Hope it clocks well for you.
09-02-2009, 12:39 PM
Linuxfan

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

Well mates beated my own SPI1M record it was a matter of wait a cool day :D
Cheers all :up:
Sergio

Great job on HWBot with Superpi Sergio! :up: Now you I am #6, time to bench it again! :yepp:
Keep up the good work! Run Wprime for HWBot! ;)
09-02-2009, 02:13 PM
The Viper

Quote:

Originally Posted by OC Nub

Congrats on the new chip. Hope it clocks well for you.

early results arent as good as I would like them. CoreTemp says I have a vid of
1.2375. Priming at 4.0Ghz got me a restart after a few minutes with 1.20V. But I havent messed with GTLs at all, this is my 1st quad core
09-02-2009, 02:42 PM
Jor3lBR

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebluemeanie1

Nice to see you're back with some more wPrime1024M.
How's the heat output at 1.45V?

The heat is almost overwhelming! From 1.48 to 1.55v if the water isn't around 10oC it's a no go, when that wPrime1024m hits 90% the processor is already about to pop.
09-02-2009, 03:07 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by OC Nub

Very nice Sergio. Great job my friend. :up:

Thank you Tom :up:
09-02-2009, 03:34 PM
andressergio

Now if you promise not to LOL :rofl: i will show you the Uruguayan method of benching without phase or chiller, etc

This first pics are on fresh air 17C entering from the window from a second floor apartment on a stormy day

http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/3019/p10208421.jpg

http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/5647/p10208461.jpg

This last is benching on AC at 10C air conditioner and 30C outside

http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/3631/p10208241.jpg

http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/8448/p10208141.jpg

http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/1548/p10208201.jpg

Cheers all :ROTF:
Sergio
09-02-2009, 03:41 PM
OC Nub

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Viper

early results arent as good as I would like them. CoreTemp says I have a vid of
1.2375. Priming at 4.0Ghz got me a restart after a few minutes with 1.20V. But I havent messed with GTLs at all, this is my 1st quad core

That's not a bad vid, you will want to adjust the ref's. The right ref's will make a huge difference in stability. If it turns out to be a good oc'er your temps should be much cooler than with a very low vid cpu.
09-02-2009, 05:00 PM
The Viper

Well my first quick test@4.0Ghz, just a quick superPI 32M...I almost have to learn to OC all over again with this Quad, its gonna take some time.

http://i28.tinypic.com/sym4x4.jpg
09-02-2009, 05:02 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Viper

Well my first quick test@4.0Ghz, just a quick superPI 32M...I almost have to learn to OC all over again with this Quad, its gonna take some time.

nice viper post your ET6 screen so we can see volts and help you if you want

cheers
Sergio
09-02-2009, 08:03 PM
ViViD

Hey Andre Wow That's Realy Cool And Cold :D
Nice Work Wery Cold Place In Uruguay :)
What's Your Case Model?
09-03-2009, 04:30 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViViD

Hey Andre Wow That's Realy Cool And Cold :D
Nice Work Wery Cold Place In Uruguay :)
What's Your Case Model?

LOL no its winter now so its cold but on summer temps reach 40C...

its an antec 900 first model modded by me

Cheers mate :up:
Sergio
09-03-2009, 12:13 PM
The Viper

Well, didnt take long to get some CPU stability. At 1.21V I was gettting BSOD after 20sec in P95, just a bump up to 1.23V got me stable (for my purposes) in P95 smallFFTs. I'm feeling better about my chip now, as I hand picked it. I'm hoping it scales well with Voltage.

[IMG]http://i28.tinypic.com/2n0j3wk.jpg[/IMG]
09-03-2009, 01:16 PM
OC Nub

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Viper

Well, didnt take long to get some CPU stability. At 1.21V I was gettting BSOD after 20sec in P95, just a bump up to 1.23V got me stable (for my purposes) in P95 smallFFTs. I'm feeling better about my chip now, as I hand picked it. I'm hoping it scales well with Voltage.

[IMG]http://i28.tinypic.com/2n0j3wk.jpg[/IMG]

Very nice. Try adjusting the ref's a bit, with a default vtt of 1.20v try cpu ref at .785 and mch ref at .80 then raise vtt/cpu termination back up to where you need it.
09-03-2009, 01:31 PM
The Viper

Quote:

Originally Posted by OC Nub

Very nice. Try adjusting the ref's a bit, with a default vtt of 1.20v try cpu ref at .785 and mch ref at .80 then raise vtt/cpu termination back up to where you need it.

have you found that to be an ideal gtl zone for your chip?
09-03-2009, 01:59 PM
Machinus

How do you get 4 ghz at 1.25 vcore??? I had to go to 1.4 :(
09-03-2009, 02:09 PM
OC Nub

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Viper

have you found that to be an ideal gtl zone for your chip?

On 3 9650's it seems to be the sweet spot.
09-03-2009, 02:31 PM
The Viper

Quote:

Originally Posted by Machinus

How do you get 4 ghz at 1.25 vcore??? I had to go to 1.4 :(

its actually 1.23, I hand picked the week batch hoping for a good clocker

Thanks OC Nub, Ill def give that a try! Are those GTLs good for any OC? Would I need to readjust them say at 4.4Ghz?
09-03-2009, 02:45 PM
Zucker2k

Quote:

Originally Posted by OC Nub

On 3 9650's it seems to be the sweet spot.

Definitely worked for my previous 9650 and my current 9550.
09-03-2009, 03:52 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Viper

its actually 1.23, I hand picked the week batch hoping for a good clocker

Thanks OC Nub, Ill def give that a try! Are those GTLs good for any OC? Would I need to readjust them say at 4.4Ghz?

also raise that MCH mate

Cheers :up:
Sergio
09-03-2009, 03:53 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Machinus

How do you get 4 ghz at 1.25 vcore??? I had to go to 1.4 :(

post your settings mate to help you

cheers :up:
Sergio
09-03-2009, 04:51 PM
OC Nub

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Viper

its actually 1.23, I hand picked the week batch hoping for a good clocker

Thanks OC Nub, Ill def give that a try! Are those GTLs good for any OC? Would I need to readjust them say at 4.4Ghz?

I am using it for 4500mhz.
09-03-2009, 04:53 PM
OC Nub

Quote:

Originally Posted by NapalmV5

template?? this whole thread is plastered with my results/voltages

4.6ghz @ extreme: 1.62vcore/1.64vpll/1.66vtt/1.80vmch/2.66vdimm fsb:mem 4:5

4.8ghz @ dq6: 1.6vcore/1.6vpll/1.8vtt/1.8vmch/2.6vdimm fsb:mem 1:1

note: much higher load on the extreme than on the dq6

you guys are water/freezing water/phase/whatnot cooling and then youre telling me if i ever tried lower vtt :shakes:

for air cooling higher vtt is what keeps it going

then again i guess im just a retard maxing voltages for no reason :up:

I just ordered this board, the dq6. Did you do mod to reduce vdroop? I should get the board in tomorrow. Am excited to try something different.
09-03-2009, 04:54 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by OC Nub

I just ordered this board, the dq6. Did you do mod to reduce vdroop? I should get the board in tomorrow. Am excited to try something different.

Congrats mate !!! :up:
09-03-2009, 05:08 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zucker2k

Definitely worked for my previous 9650 and my current 9550.

same here works on all my OC's :up:
09-03-2009, 05:37 PM
Jor3lBR

HWbot - reloaded

Updated some of my previous scores on HWbot.org:
wPrime32m = 7.612sec
wPrime1024m = 4min 8sec 910ms

http://i27.tinypic.com/2zpjn0w.jpg http://i25.tinypic.com/sb4vm8.jpg

Have a $250 4870 X2 2Gb + more SSD's incoming to conquer that last gold cup for PCMark05. :up: As soon as I get this done I'll let you guys know.
09-03-2009, 05:38 PM
OC Nub

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

Congrats mate !!! :up:

Thanks Sergio will keep you posted on results.

Nice Jor :up:. Miss seeing your posts on this thread.
09-03-2009, 06:44 PM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jor3lBR

Updated some of my previous scores on HWbot.org:
wPrime32m = 7.612sec
wPrime1024m = 4min 8sec 910ms

http://i27.tinypic.com/2zpjn0w.jpg http://i25.tinypic.com/sb4vm8.jpg

Have a $250 4870 X2 2Gb + more SSD's incoming to conquer that last gold cup for PCMark05. :up: As soon as I get this done I'll let you guys know.

Congrats mate very nice you are back again always on nice results :up:
09-03-2009, 09:58 PM
Machinus

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

post your settings mate to help you

cheers :up:
Sergio

I am seriously stuck at 4.038 :( I have tried vcore up to 1.44, dropping the divider down to 1:1 and multiplier to 7 with no stability : (

Code:

Robust Graphics Booster.........................[ Auto ] CPU Clock Ratio.................................[ 8.0 ] Fine CPU Clock Ratio............................[ +0.5 ] CPU Frequency............................[ 475x8.5 ] ******Clock Chip Control****** CPU Host Clock Control..........................[ Enabled ] CPU Host Frequency (Mhz)........................[ 475 ] PCI Express Frequency (Mhz).....................[ 100 ] C.I.A 2.........................................[ Disabled ] ******Advanced Clock Control****** CPU Clock Drive.................................[ 1000mv ] PCI Express Clock Drive.........................[ 1000mv ] CPU Clock Skew..................................[ 0ps ] MCH Clock Skew..................................[ 50ps ] ******DRAM Performance Control****** Performance Enhance.............................[ Standard ] Extreme Memory Profile (X.M.P)..................[ Auto ] (G) MCH Frequency Latch.........................[ Auto ] System Memory Multipler.........................[ 2.40B ] Memory Frequency 1066...........................[ 1140 ] DRAM Timing Selectable..........................[ Manual ] CAS Latency Time................................[ 5 ] tRCD............................................[ 5 ] tRP.............................................[ 5 ] tRAS............................................[ 15 ] ******Motherboard Voltage Control****** Load-Line Calibration...........................[ Enabled ] CPU Vcore [ 1.1875 ]...................[ 1.4250 ] CPU Termination [ 1.20 ]...................[ 1.380 ] CPU PLL [ 1.50 ]...................[ 1.590 ] CPU Reference [ 0.760 ]...................[ 0.914 ] MCH Core [ 1.100 ]...................[ 1.300 ] MCH Reference [ 0.760 ]...................[ 0.954 ] MCH/DRAM Refernce [ 0.900 ]...................[ 1.200 ] ICH I/O [ 1.500 ]...................[ 1.500 ] ICH Core [ 1.100 ]...................[ 1.100 ] DRAM Voltage [ 1.800 ]...................[ 1.960 ] DRAM Termination [ 0.900 ]...................[ 0.980 ] Channel A Ref [ 0.900 ]...................[ Auto ] Channel B Ref [ 0.900 ]...................[ Auto ]
09-04-2009, 12:51 AM
Leeghoofd

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

Congrats mate very nice you are back again always on nice results :up:

Beat them scores Andressergio, you can do it !! do it for junior :)
09-04-2009, 01:45 AM
OLDcomer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zucker2k

Definitely worked for my previous 9650 and my current 9550.

Why did you change q9650 to q9550?
09-04-2009, 03:50 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Machinus

I am seriously stuck at 4.038 :( I have tried vcore up to 1.44, dropping the divider down to 1:1 and multiplier to 7 with no stability : (

Code:

Robust Graphics Booster.........................[ Auto ] CPU Clock Ratio.................................[ 8.0 ] Fine CPU Clock Ratio............................[ +0.5 ] CPU Frequency............................[ 475x8.5 ] ******Clock Chip Control****** CPU Host Clock Control..........................[ Enabled ] CPU Host Frequency (Mhz)........................[ 475 ] PCI Express Frequency (Mhz).....................[ 100 ] C.I.A 2.........................................[ Disabled ] ******Advanced Clock Control****** CPU Clock Drive.................................[ 1000mv ] PCI Express Clock Drive.........................[ 1000mv ] CPU Clock Skew..................................[ 0ps ] MCH Clock Skew..................................[ 50ps ] ******DRAM Performance Control****** Performance Enhance.............................[ Standard ] Extreme Memory Profile (X.M.P)..................[ Auto ] (G) MCH Frequency Latch.........................[ Auto ] System Memory Multipler.........................[ 2.40B ] Memory Frequency 1066...........................[ 1140 ] DRAM Timing Selectable..........................[ Manual ] CAS Latency Time................................[ 5 ] tRCD............................................[ 5 ] tRP.............................................[ 5 ] tRAS............................................[ 15 ] ******Motherboard Voltage Control****** Load-Line Calibration...........................[ Enabled ] CPU Vcore [ 1.1875 ]...................[ 1.4250 ] CPU Termination [ 1.20 ]...................[ 1.380 ] CPU PLL [ 1.50 ]...................[ 1.590 ] CPU Reference [ 0.760 ]...................[ 0.914 ] MCH Core [ 1.100 ]...................[ 1.300 ] MCH Reference [ 0.760 ]...................[ 0.954 ] MCH/DRAM Refernce [ 0.900 ]...................[ 1.200 ] ICH I/O [ 1.500 ]...................[ 1.500 ] ICH Core [ 1.100 ]...................[ 1.100 ] DRAM Voltage [ 1.800 ]...................[ 1.960 ] DRAM Termination [ 0.900 ]...................[ 0.980 ] Channel A Ref [ 0.900 ]...................[ Auto ] Channel B Ref [ 0.900 ]...................[ Auto ]

Machinus how are you mate, from what i see you have my same vid of chip wich is great CPU Vcore [ 1.1875 ].

try to drop vtt to 1,20 and see that CPU ref is .785 and MCH .80, then up it and this values will change auto, for lots of us this worked perfect so for me tom and zucker2k...

start on a normal OC, like 445x9 ti try your CPU and MEM on 1:1 CL5 all auto, PL9 and trfc 68 (you have 2x2GB ???? wich RAM), try to find FIRST as stable point where you can start upping, dont start messing around with values and changing all at time and multis etc...go step by step or you will go crazy.

Use 800/800/0/50 or 900/900/0/50, i use 1000/1000/0/0 to 4800+ to bench the rest are for my 24/7

i will send you a template of my 445x9 and 500x8 so you have a start point, should work for ya as owr quads are close.

Cheers :up:
Sergio
09-04-2009, 03:52 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leeghoofd

Beat them scores Andressergio, you can do it !! do it for junior :)

I can do second for SPI for sure but impossible to catch my mate Jor lol his chip is awesome. So far i achieved what i was lookin for and im very happy now i will start using tha beast for normal operations.

Cheers mate :up:
Sergio
09-04-2009, 05:15 AM
Zucker2k

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLDcomer

Why did you change q9650 to q9550?

I caught the x58 fever and wanted to familiarize myself with the architecture, so I sold my UD3P+Q9650+8GB G.Skill Pis and upgraded without spending a penny more.

This was my result:

http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...19dbac2416.jpg

But then I started getting withdrawals from moving away from s775 :rofl: so I decided to build a cheapo rig and satisfy my appetite for overclocking on this platform.

I had the choice of picking another Q9650, but there were many horror stories in this thread about lack-lustre 9650s with 1.300 vids, while the 9550s seem to show relatively better results. I decided to go as cheap as possible while pushing the clocks as much as my air-cooler would allow for 24/7. I still haven't finished putting parts together; I need better ram and psu, but this is what I've done so far. Oh, this chip also happens to be my best s775 chip do date. :cool:

Q9550 L844B872
EP45C-UD3R
2x 1GB Mushkin DDR2 1066
Xigmatek HDT S1283 (Stock fan)
Windows 7 x64

8x500 64bit P95 (Single-stock fan)

http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...053b17b19f.jpg

8x500 Linx 64bit (Stock fan + 93cfm thermaltake fan)

http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...7cd5e05327.jpg

8.5x500 Linx 64bit (Stock fan + 93cfm thermaltake fan)

http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...0fd35ab14e.jpg
09-04-2009, 02:43 PM
OC Nub

Very nice Zucker. :up:
09-04-2009, 03:12 PM
Zucker2k

Quote:

Originally Posted by OC Nub

Very nice Zucker. :up:

Thanks Nub, your own results with your 9550 probably nudged me over the fence to get mine. Best $170 I ever spent. :up:
09-04-2009, 03:50 PM
Machinus

Quote:

Originally Posted by andressergio

Machinus how are you mate, from what i see you have my same vid of chip wich is great CPU Vcore [ 1.1875 ].

try to drop vtt to 1,20 and see that CPU ref is .785 and MCH .80, then up it and this values will change auto, for lots of us this worked perfect so for me tom and zucker2k...

start on a normal OC, like 445x9 ti try your CPU and MEM on 1:1 CL5 all auto, PL9 and trfc 68 (you have 2x2GB ???? wich RAM), try to find FIRST as stable point where you can start upping, dont start messing around with values and changing all at time and multis etc...go step by step or you will go crazy.

Use 800/800/0/50 or 900/900/0/50, i use 1000/1000/0/0 to 4800+ to bench the rest are for my 24/7

i will send you a template of my 445x9 and 500x8 so you have a start point, should work for ya as owr quads are close.

Cheers :up:
Sergio

Ah! I made a mistake :( I copied the template with the wrong VID! Mine is a terrible 1.3v :(

I will lower the clock to 900/900/0/50.

Even at 1:1 and higher mch/ref the board doesn't seem to go over 500 despite having temps always 65 and below.

So I should start atvcore 1.3125 and put everything on auto and just try to increase clock with 9x multi? It is very unstable at 9x with 400 and over unfortunately.

I guess I got a bad chip.

Code:

Robust Graphics Booster.........................[ Auto ] CPU Clock Ratio.................................[ 8.0 ] Fine CPU Clock Ratio............................[ +0.5 ] CPU Frequency............................[ 475x8.5 ] ******Clock Chip Control****** CPU Host Clock Control..........................[ Enabled ] CPU Host Frequency (Mhz)........................[ 475 ] PCI Express Frequency (Mhz).....................[ 100 ] C.I.A 2.........................................[ Disabled ] ******Advanced Clock Control****** CPU Clock Drive.................................[ 1000mv ] PCI Express Clock Drive.........................[ 1000mv ] CPU Clock Skew..................................[ 0ps ] MCH Clock Skew..................................[ 50ps ] ******DRAM Performance Control****** Performance Enhance.............................[ Standard ] Extreme Memory Profile (X.M.P)..................[ Auto ] (G) MCH Frequency Latch.........................[ Auto ] System Memory Multipler.........................[ 2.40B ] Memory Frequency 1066...........................[ 1140 ] DRAM Timing Selectable..........................[ Manual ] CAS Latency Time................................[ 5 ] tRCD............................................[ 5 ] tRP.............................................[ 5 ] tRAS............................................[ 15 ] ******Motherboard Voltage Control****** Load-Line Calibration...........................[ Enabled ] CPU Vcore [ 1.30 ]...................[ 1.41250 CPU Termination [ 1.20 ]...................[ 1.380 ] CPU PLL [ 1.50 ]...................[ 1.590 ] CPU Reference [ 0.760 ]...................[ 0.914 ] MCH Core [ 1.100 ]...................[ 1.300 ] MCH Reference [ 0.760 ]...................[ 0.954 ] MCH/DRAM Refernce [ 0.900 ]...................[ 1.200 ] ICH I/O [ 1.500 ]...................[ 1.500 ] ICH Core [ 1.100 ]...................[ 1.100 ] DRAM Voltage [ 1.800 ]...................[ 1.960 ] DRAM Termination [ 0.900 ]...................[ 0.980 ] Channel A Ref [ 0.900 ]...................[ Auto ] Channel B Ref [ 0.900 ]...................[ Auto ]
09-04-2009, 06:47 PM
Jor3lBR

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zucker2k

But then I started getting withdrawals from moving away from s775 :rofl: so I decided to build a cheapo rig and satisfy my appetite for overclocking on this platform.

Q9550 L844B872
EP45C-UD3R
2x 1GB Mushkin DDR2 1066
Xigmatek HDT S1283 (Stock fan)
Windows 7 x64

8x500 64bit P95 (Single-stock fan)

Hey Zuc nice to see you're back in town! Those are amazing results on the Q9550 and what really cough my eyes is the fact that those Q9550 don't give up after 70oC when most of the Q9650 bugs out after 63oC :clap:

Might get one of those to play with on the other rig, thanks for sharing.
09-04-2009, 08:50 PM
thebluemeanie1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jor3lBR

Hey Zuc nice to see you're back in town! Those are amazing results on the Q9550 and what really cough my eyes is the fact that those Q9550 don't give up after 70oC when most of the Q9650 bugs out after 63oC :clap:

Might get one of those to play with on the other rig, thanks for sharing.

That wPrime 32M really amazes me, I couldn't even get near your 4.7GHz time when I was using 4.8GHz.:clap:

Will your Q9650 bug out on wPrime and other benchmarks or is it just stress tests?
09-04-2009, 08:55 PM
Jor3lBR

hwbot

Quote:

Originally Posted by thebluemeanie1

That wPrime 32M really amazes me, I couldn't even get near your 4.7GHz time when I was using 4.8GHz.:clap:

Will your Q9650 bug out on wPrime and other benchmarks or is it just stress tests?

No bugs, never seen anything like that in cpu's only on vid. card benchmarks... Processor speed for 32m is close to 4.9. Processor speed for 1024m is close to 4.87. Did you check ram speed? I almost had it running at 1400Mhz_ddr2 for 1024m.
09-05-2009, 05:23 AM
Zucker2k

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jor3lBR

Hey Zuc nice to see you're back in town! Those are amazing results on the Q9550 and what really cough my eyes is the fact that those Q9550 don't give up after 70oC when most of the Q9650 bugs out after 63oC :clap:

Might get one of those to play with on the other rig, thanks for sharing.

Thanks, mate. Yeah, it seems to me that Intel's process is so mature they no longer need to bin for the 9650s; they're merely using dividers to designate different clocks. Awesome indeed. :up:
09-05-2009, 09:10 AM
OC Nub

Got the EP45 DQ6 installed, after some head scratching I am running some small fft's at 4500mhz. The dates are screwed up in prime because it fudged up after my last try and 4500 when it bsod'd. The temps seem to be much lower than with before on my other board. Don't know why they would be any lower, same chip.

EDIT: Had to go up a notch on vcore. The board has 2 CPU Ref's and 1 MCH Ref, the values are different and has thrown a curve in my ocing. I left CPU Ref's at default .760 ref1 and .80 ref2 and went up 2 notches on MCH ref, seems to be working so far. I tried to leave at default but failed instantly. The skew doesn't work the same for 4500mhz either as on the UD3P. I went with Napalms 1000/1000/0/0, running blend now, for 4400 it was blending fine at 800/800/0/50.

http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/962/dq64500mhz.png
09-08-2009, 12:26 AM
grishenko45

I've finally found a q9650 thread!!! Great!

I've got a water cooled q9650 on a P5Q Deluxe with 1066Mhz DDR2 - im hoping for 4.25Ghz - thats 9*470 - about!

U all recon this is possible? I hope so!!! - Stock speeds - my 9650 idles at 28c and loads after a couple of hours P95 at 38c - so ive plenty of room for a higher Vcore!!!

Any advice??
09-08-2009, 02:18 AM
Leeghoofd

Sould be possible mate, start off with 400FSB , get to know ya CPU (what it likes regarding FSB term , PLL volts) , 450 is a no brainer on P45 (normally) and even 500FSB is doable on the P5Q Dlx but be prepared to pump over 1.35FSB term voltages... and you will need to get off the 1:1 Divider ( so good high speed rams are a must )
09-08-2009, 09:00 AM
rurik

now I have a new baby! :) my 9550 E0 FPO L922B951 VID 1.1125V:clap:
today finishing testing and results is :
http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/090908/mzq73diz81.png

I belive,4Ghz too izzi for this chip, but my mobo is not good for quad 45nm.
465 FSB is good result, and it not a limit,but I dont want raising too much volt fot NB.
BTW, what temp is critical for NB? now I have 64'C at peak load, is this good or not?
Temps for chip is not more,than 79'C at LinX,Prime95 at 65-67

and my rig is:
Intel Core 2 Quad E8550 E0@ 3952 at 1.264V real
Thermalright IFX-14 +NOCTUA NF-P12-1300@
Asus Maximus Formula @ Rampage Formula x38
DDR2 2x2Gb G.Skill F2-8800CL5D-1100@1117
2xClub3D ATI RADEON HD4870 512MB OC Edition 800/950 CROSSFIRE
Raid0 2x320Gb Seagate SATA2 16Mb
320Gb Seagate SATA2 16Mb
DVDRW Samsung 182M LightScribe
PSU 780W Tagan Superrock
Full Tower Thermaltake Xaser VI + 4x120 vent. + Scythe Kama Meter
Windows7 x64 RTM

sorry,wrong thread
09-08-2009, 09:03 AM
systemviper

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jor3lBR

Updated some of my previous scores on HWbot.org:
wPrime32m = 7.612sec
wPrime1024m = 4min 8sec 910ms

http://i27.tinypic.com/2zpjn0w.jpg http://i25.tinypic.com/sb4vm8.jpg

Have a $250 4870 X2 2Gb + more SSD's incoming to conquer that last gold cup for PCMark05. :up: As soon as I get this done I'll let you guys know.

WOW, Jor3lBR - every time i see your posts i wish i still had that q9650, maybe i can find a cheap one to beat on, you have been kicking it, rock on :up:
09-09-2009, 03:34 AM
ViViD

Hi Guys

I Thinck Problem With That Benchmark 3D Mark 01

Look:

http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.php/t18546_82516.JPG

82516 Is Not Low? For 4600Mhz CPU Frq And 1300Mhz Ram???
Any Sugesstion?
09-09-2009, 04:56 AM
andressergio

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViViD

Hi Guys

I Thinck Problem With That Benchmark 3D Mark 01

Look:

http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.php/t18546_82516.JPG

82516 Is Not Low? For 4600Mhz CPU Frq And 1300Mhz Ram???
Any Sugesstion?

How are you ViViD i got 87k with the quad at 4500 and the GTX285 at stock clocks mines are 729/1674/2800, didnt tried to OC more cause i have a problem with XP that wont lent me use High CPU OC + High Clocks on VGA, just could do some benches on 3DM06 but on W7 i can do whatever i want.

Cheers
Sergio
09-09-2009, 05:56 AM
Leeghoofd

Score is low mate for them clocks, should be more in the 89K region. Tried another driver ? thermal throttling ?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:43 AM.

XtremeSystems