regular plat with SLI version BIOS. I think these 2 are physically same. The main issue with MSI is you have to play memory setting a lot in order to get high Bclock.Quote:
Originally Posted by jcniest5
Printable View
regular plat with SLI version BIOS. I think these 2 are physically same. The main issue with MSI is you have to play memory setting a lot in order to get high Bclock.Quote:
Originally Posted by jcniest5
raptord,
Could you be more specific about this memory settings? I also have one MSI X58 Platinum (non SLI one, but I could flash it to the SLI version).
Past 3.9GHz I really can't keep the system table, specially at 20x200. I can run stable 19x200 wich generates the same uncore/qpi/memory values (3200/3600/1600), but for 20x200 I could only run 1h prime stable then crashed and I had to use like +0.230 vcore and +0.220 vQPI generating high temps.
I'm also stable at 205x19, but 210x19 for instance is completely instable too. The only things I set manually for the memories is 1T 8-8-8-24 or 1T 9-9-9-25.
Thanks for this, Interresting reading... maybe i will disable this then, Im nowhere near encoding and rendering, just plain benching gaming and usual usage...Quote:
Originally Posted by FragMagnet
Ok then :) now I have come to my 24/7 setting.. Think this is quite good though.
Vcore - 1.40(bios) 1.37.6(unloaded) 1.36(Loaded with LinX)
QPI/VTT - 1.38
vDimm - 1.70 (1.69)
Uncore @ 18x 3600
HT - OFF
Turbo - ON
Batch #3841A627
15 run of LinX ALL mem button, Realtemp shows minimum and Maximum temp, Avarage during linx was 62 highest, and 55 lowest core.
Http://hem.bredband.net/infan/i7/i74200.jpg
CPU:
vCore: 1.3v (bios) 1.35v @ load
VTT: 1.2v (bios) 1.27v (cpuz and load)
Dimm: 1.65v (bios) 1.68 @ load
Uncore: 16x
HT: off
Memory: (forgot to screenshot it)
798mhz
FSB: DRAM 2:8
8-8-8-8-24 74
Batch# 3841A574
Here is a pick @ max load
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...htGuard/42.jpg
9 hours prime95 stable.
Cooler: TRUE push
Anyone think I can get any further on my TRUE or have any sugesstions any of my other settings? New to Intel OCing.
If that's a 64bit OS, you need to check the 64 bit Mode box. That way LinX can use all your RAM. In you pic there, you're only using about 1.6GB even with the All button pressed because LinX is not in 64 bit mode.Quote:
Originally Posted by Infa
EDIT: I see that box is greyed out for you. Are you running a 32bit OS? Why?
Just picked up a 3841A595 920 from Microcenter. I'll update this once I get my other parts in.
Yep 32bit OS, dont really know why, just do it =)Quote:
Originally Posted by Renegade5399
i got 3gb and 32 can use all, i see no need for 64bit?
I've tried it once , sure there were no problems really, just some programs that didnt work for it, but that was a while ago, those things have improved though, and Linx are using all mem i CAN use, there almost only one game i play, and thats Q3 and i dont know if that works in 64bit. maybe i should change? anyhow, i dont think that using 800mb more mem in linx will make my system unstable in the test?
cheers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infa
Same here, the most I encode is the odd .avi to VOB files using nero 7, I haven't paid attention to the exact comparison between the 3.9HT and 4.1 w/o, but I know that the cores never go past 70% load either way, and it's something I only do 1-4 times a month ! So why lower my oc, or stuff another 12c into the processor 24/7 for a feature I never use ?
If software changes to use it, or I start using apps that benefit from it, I know enough to turn down the oc 200 mhz, actualy the profile for just that is saved in the bios. 3.9HT and 4.15 without. Even with improved cooling I don't think my speeds will be raised...just temps lowered.
To each his own though, I'm happy with it as is :)
Maybe its a difference between linx 5.6 and 5.8 and I'm not sure what it means exactly or if its comparable system to system but your GFlops is lower than mine and time per pass is higher as well with my 920 at 20x180 (3600).Quote:
Originally Posted by Infa
I just thought it was odd when I saw your SS.
EDIT: That may explain your low temps with linx at that clock speed, something may not be taking.
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/863/linxt.jpg
http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/3238/linx2.jpg
Did you swap your memory to different slots, the reason I ask is I know my old msi x58 wouldn't boot unless I installed the memory in the correct slots, no beeps no nothing like the board was DOA.Quote:
Originally Posted by sparks.oc
I didn't touch my memory before I had problems. Of course I did try different banks after the problems (with 1, 2 or 3 dimms). I just swaped my thermal paste, nothing more. Very strange.Quote:
Originally Posted by highoctane
Given that the memory controller is on the i7 chips, are we comparing apples and oranges when we talk about vcore requirements without using similar memory parameters (amount of ram, speed, and timings)? Or is it only the cpu vtt value and not the vcore that should differ with different memory configurations? I have come across a post or two suggesting vcore requirements can be decreased by downclocking ram.
Just wondering, as I have two supposedly "good" batch number 920's, one requiring 1.418vcore and the other 1.4625vcore to run stable at 4.0GHz with HT on and turbo off. I run both with 6 gigs of ram at 1600mhz with 8-8-8-21 timings. Just curious what ram configuration folks who run 4GHz stable at 1.3ish vcore are using.
(I realize chips can vary considerably even within the same batch number- just curious if memory might explain some of the differences in vcore requirements. Or maybe I'm just envious of the folks with better chips:D).
Batch: 3841A522, 200*21 (HT off)
Vcore: +120mV
VTT: +100mV
Ambient was low-ish, prolly 10~15C, at 15~20C it hits 60~65C or so:cool:
Nice clock, since you're running prime95 I noticed that with ver 25.9 64bit version if you select custom you can allocate all the available memory now. I don't recall earlier versions being able to allocate all the ram so you may want to give it a shot, 25.8 might work as well but I never checked personally. If you enter too high a ram value you'll be bangin on the swap drive which will bring things to a crawl.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rammsteiner
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/5667/prime259.jpg
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fafeifa
Ive always been struggling with Prime95 to use all the RAM but it never did.Quote:
Originally Posted by highoctane
However, this was small FFT's anyway.
Ive ran 50 loops of Intelburn Test and about 8h of Prime95 Blend mode as well, guess that would be enough:p:
Hey guys,
First post for me. First system build also, and first time attempting to overclock. System setup:
i7 920 @ 3.6ghz (see below)
ASUS P6T V2
OCZ platinum 1600 @ 1440 7-7-7-18 1T timings
cm v8 cpu cooler
As you can see, I'm doing this on stock voltages. The temps seem to be my biggest limiting factor. They were idleing in the 39-43 range and load temps you can see below.
However, I just back to school this evening from my spring break and the ambient temps seem to be making a huge difference. It's quite cooler in this room, and i've been booted for about an hour and am idleing in the 35-37 range. Much more comfortable :up:
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s.../currentOC.jpg
Any problems you guys see running 24/7 at this? Passed 2+ hours of prime95 capping at 76ish. Looking for some feedback being my first time!
I think you could have a good argument as long as we are not exactly certain which voltages influence which component. However if you look at my OC (see sig) I'm able to run RAM 100Mhz faster than the rated speed and still have my CPU at 4Ghz with vcore set at 1.35v in bios and 1.28v at load. Moreover at the moment I'm testing 1720Mhz RAM and 4.1Ghz with vcore 1.4v in bios and 1.33v at load.Quote:
Originally Posted by drnick
In both cases QPI is set to 1.35v, CPU PLL at 1.88v and DRAM at 1.64v allmost all other settings at AUTO.
Is 1.42500V much for running a 920 at 4.2GHz with HT off and
I also require 1.42500V for running my 920 @ 4.0GHz with HT on?
I find it much if i compare it to the rest here...
What are youre thoughts on this?
See that you are using x64 and im not.. i have that instaleld now, and will do this test again 20 rounds all mem. strange thing though, that screen is Windows 7, and i tested this in vista to, wich gave me higher flops? same 32bit. Ah well, will get back to you, and 62c on a high end WC and 20c amb, only 1.36v? not so impossible.Quote:
Originally Posted by highoctane
cheers.
Can some one plz answear this question
when i run stock 920 133x20 CPU-Z reads 1.144 voltage
if i run 133x21 CPU-Z reads 1.225
now what exactly is considered stock voltage intel site shows 0.800-1.225
well a 21 multi is a higher clock overall so it probably has vcore set a little higher to make up for the extra speed. However if you set hte vcore manually, I have been able to do up to 3.3 GHz at 1.14vQuote:
Originally Posted by col_dilian
Thanks for the reply
The reason iam asking is at 1.184 and qpi voltage of 1.21 sometihng again cant remeber i can do 175x21. I havent had the chance to test alot. But for 2 hours its stable prime 95 blend. Now at 1.225 i can go all the way to 186x21. But the qpi volts need ot go to like 1.3 maybe less havent tried. Any Idea how safe 1.3 QPI is for long term usage.
This is ofcourse hard to tell since there is no longitudinal research or whatsoever. According to Intel's specs a QPI voltage of 1.35v is the maximum.Quote:
Originally Posted by col_dilian
Quote:
Originally Posted by sparks.oc
I'll be up and running in 1-2 weeks. A new mobo is ordered. It was tested as defective. The processor is still being tested. I expect it to be ok (as I figure that the problem is in 1 of the 2).Quote:
Originally Posted by sparks.oc
Ok, now I have installed my x64 OS , and did a LinX again, all went well as supposed ;) that extra mem didnt do anything to stabilty, and i passed 20 rounds instead of 15 as before. Setting is as followed.
System Info:
i7 920 @ 4.2Ghz (Batch #3841A627), Gigabyte UD5 (F6C BIOS), Corsair XMS3 3GB DDR3 1600 RAM, Water Cooled (Sign)
Settings:
CPU Ratio: 21x
BCLK: 200
DRAM: 160 mhz
UCLK: 3600 mhz
HT: Off
Turbo: On
C1E: Off
C3/6/7: Off
TM: off
Virt: off
Prochot:off
QPI 36X
Mem 8X
UnCore 18x
Turbo mode: Turbo
Voltages:
CPU Voltage: 1.40000v (1.36 Loaded)
CPU PLL Voltage: Auto
QPI Voltage: 1.38 (bios)
DRAM Voltage: 1.70 (1.69 bios)
QPI PLL: Auto
Timings: CL 7-8-7-20
Notes, maxtemp during test 66c. this is linx , and not prime therefore higher temps also.
Http://hem.bredband.net/infan/i7/i74200.jpg
Now that looks better, 59gflops!Quote:
Originally Posted by Infa
hehe hell yeah :) no problems so far, 64bit yeah ;)
almost 60flops, good enough. and pretty good cpu, though i need more likely 1.40 for HT ON, but who needs it? Those who say, why get a i7 if not HT ON? why? its integrated IMC, its Native Quad, performs a little better than wolfdale(dual) and its quad, i never had a quad before, and i like it, i dont need HT, come on, show me how much better (virtual) cores are in everyday usage and then hit me instead of smutter me. Im ok if if im wrong, then i can admit my defeat. but compare surfing benching and gaming, and then come back and show me the advantage with HT.
Cheerio ;)
here is mine, batch 3837B215, HT off.
im now at 4.2ghz with HT on stable 1.4v
Anyone with this batch # - 3846B109 DO? please post your oc results and general clocks. Just waiting for a few more parts before setting mine up. Thanks in advance.
What are you waiting for? Just it up and be the first one to post your result. From reading the other two D0 threads, doesn't look like someone has your batch, so why don't you just go ahead and set it up.Quote:
Originally Posted by glide 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcniest5
I did - and here is a quick run with prime. Everything on auto except vcore and multiplier.
http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r...equicktest.jpg
http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r...orei7920DO.jpg
Been searching around and this DO batch seems to be ok. Happy.
Im not 100% sure, but looks like the same batch that im waiting for.
But i see that many D0 need less volt then C0\CI need, anyway i hope i get one that is good.
And off course i will post here when the cpu and mobo come=)
See here for info on HT vs. no HT :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Infa
What I use HT for most is crunching (BOINC WCG), there the speedup by HT is almost 40% over no HT :shocked:
Of course, different people have different priorities (mostly gaming... :rolleyes: ) but mine lies with crunching, so I run HT all the way.
Also any rendering app will profit hugely from using HT, even Winrar - Games, not so much. Maybe GTA4 or Supreme Commander, but that's about it really.
@glide1: Nice CPU, my 975 needs around the same Vcore to run 4Ghz, which means you should be good for 4,4-4,5Ghz stable on water ;)
1.4vcore stock cooler,,Batch 3837A498
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/1013/i7965.jpg
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=495579
Config
Pseudo : marcolecorse
Processeur : i7 920 @ 4602
Refroidissement CPU : H2O
Mémoire : 3x1Go PC3-10700H Kingston @ 876 7-8-7-20 1T
Carte mère : Rampage 2 extreme
Score
08'02".141
Screen
http://en.zimagez.com/avatar/screen0105.jpg
Nice clocks!
Quote:
Originally Posted by chefnr1
Any reason why it says 4 cores and 4 threads in the CPUZ screen shot? Should'nt it be 4cores and 8 threads? Just curious.
You may have HT turned off...Quote:
Originally Posted by glide 1
anyone knows anything about 3847A990 ??
ill have it next week and just wanted to check if its a good one, if not ill sell it new "unopened" .
Finally got time to oc my cpu to 4 GHz.
Rampage Extreme II (1306 bios)
Core i7 920(Batch code 3841A448)
Corsair Dominators 1600 6GB
Lapped True 120
Cpu - 200x20 Ht on
QPI - 3600
Uncore - 3200
Ram - 1600 8-8-8-24 1T
Vcore - 1.34375
QPI - 1.2750
Dram - 1.65
Rest on Auto
Idle temps 38-37-38-37
Max Temps After 100 linx rounds 81-80-80-76
3.78 worked at vcore 1.20625 qpi 1.2 max 63 degress. Dunno if 4.0 is worth it for 24/7 use now.
What shows it is a DO stepping on here?? I am heading over to Microcenter here in Tustin, Cali to pick some up. Not sure where it says the DO stepping at? Anyone??Quote:
Originally Posted by glide 1
The SLBEJ is D0...Quote:
Originally Posted by Lu(ky
Don't just pick one up without knowing the S-spec. If it says: S-spec: SLBCH, then it's not a D0 stepping. If it says: S-spec: SLBEJ - then it's a D0.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lu(ky
SLBEJ but what about if its a A batch , are the B batches better ?
This opinion may vary, but it's probably too erly to tell at this moment... This similar discussion I think was had when the first 920 chips came out and there were some "is B better then A batch conversations/"Quote:
Originally Posted by freshy
I have seen some fine examples of some good B batches but now I slowing seeing some good clocks on some later A batches...
Quote:
Originally Posted by road-runner
Thanks for the help... :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by jcniest5
Well I went to MicroCenter and they just got a shipment and they had were S-spec: SLBCH :shakes: I have 2 guys there that will call me when they see them. So I plan on picking up a couple. I wanted a new i7-975, but it will not be out tell June now.. :(
I finnaly got my i7 system (for now C1 processor, still waiting for D0 to arrive at our little forgotten country:down:)
I have one question: About Turbo. If I turn turbo on CPU-z shows multiplayer 21, and EVGA utility shows 21 for core0, and all other have 20. Is that true, or did I mixed something up?
Ive couldn't resist to post at least one pic:
http://www.shrani.si/t/1P/nn/36NerjNT/img9803.jpg
Bump for a continuation...
so...whats the safest max vcore can we pump these thing to do a bench. I heard 1.45v-1.55 is fine? Is that right :)
ill have some results of a intel batch # 3842A309 i7 920
in a month or so anybody heard how far i should be able to push it on lc
Quick test from batch 8345B027
http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l1..._pc/4300i7.png
Hi, my contribution
System Info:
i7 920 D0 @ 4.2Ghz (Batch #3847A821), P6T6 WS Revolution, Corsair Dominator 3GB DDR3 1600 RAM, Water Cooled
Settings:
CPU Ratio: 21x
BCLK: 200
DRAM: 1600 mhz
UCLK: 3600 mhz
HT: On
Turbo: Off
C1E: Off
Voltages:
CPU Voltage: 1.27v(bios) (1.28v Loaded)
CPU PLL Voltage: 1.84v
QPI Voltage: 1.35
DRAM Voltage: 1.65
Timings: CL 8-8-8-21
http://i63.servimg.com/u/f63/12/23/4...h/stab_410.jpg
This is my 24/7 rig.
P6t Dlx
ozc 3gb 1600 kit
Xspc delta v3 17 block
ddc 355 pump
feser xchanger 120 rad
xspc 240 rad
Core i7 920 D0 3845b071
http://128kbs.net/mydostepping.jpg
On some OCs, I've found that doing only 5 passes of LinX didn't result with any error, but when I tried 10 passes, it errored out like 3/4 way into the test. So, you may want to test for 10 passes and see if it makes it. If it still does, then it's all good. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by leejsmith
This screen shot was just for a comparison to a system eva2000 ran. I have run overnight prime 95 with no problems and also used it for the last 3 weeks including a few games and some divx - wmv 9 hd encoding that use all 4 cores while still using firefox ect. I am happy it's stable and was thinking of dropping the vcore down a step.Quote:
Originally Posted by jcniest5
Dry Ice results on batch 3845B027,Classified 760 :
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=574756
Had time only for a quick max OC run, later I'll try some benchmarking under cold.
Hi, my contribution
System Info:
i7 920 D0 @ 4.2Ghz (Batch #3847BO19), Asus Rampage Gene,Kingston value 3GB DDR3 1600 RAM, Water Cooled
Settings:
CPU Ratio: 21x
BCLK: 200
DRAM: 1600 mhz
UCLK: 3600 mhz
HT: On
Turbo: Off
C1E: Off
Voltages:
CPU Voltage: 1.27v(bios) (1.28v Loaded)
CPU PLL Voltage: 1.81v
QPI Voltage: 1.25
DRAM Voltage: 1.65
Timings: CL 8-8-8-21
http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/3...001heur.th.jpg
Who knows the batch 3847B019 I7 920 D0?
is good?
Mario, good job dude. You got a EVGA classified now?
yes, I just got it today. I busted my UD5. While re-doing my water loop (added 3 more fans to my rad and changed tubing) My cpu block felt on the cpu socket of the motherboard and bent a bunch of pins. so far the classified looks good. the only thing is that It needs a bit more vcore than my UD5 to achieve same clocks. need to learn this bios better. oh btw I ordered a xeon W3520, it should be here next week.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Patty
damn man, sorry to heard about the UD5. The classified looks like a really solid board indeed but i'm sure you were used to the UD5 BIOS. I'm sure once you get more familiar with this BIOS, you'll probably get better clocks out of it or as good as your UD5. THe Xeon should be nice. IT'll be nice if you do a comparison between both chips :)Quote:
Originally Posted by hlonipha
Xeon W3540 batch 3845B010
4GHz - 1,26V real - in BIOS 1,30V with vDroop
4,2 GHz - 1,29V real - in BIOS 1,325V with vDroop
Max benchable on AIR in 3Dmarks 4,8 GHz ...
http://pctuning.tyden.cz/images/stories/xeon2.png
on Classified mobo
Good chip OBR :up:
Got i920 910A250 from MSI contest which wasnt good at all, 1.30v needed for prime at 4ghz on air.
I have same chip, it is not good OC'er but I'm @4GHz with 1.28v Idle/Load in CPU-Z, seems like new batches aren't very goodQuote:
Originally Posted by loc.o
hey everyone,
has any of you got his hands or seen a 3851A286 so far???
can't find it in your database, and since i have the opportunity to exchance my C0 with it .... ?
Hi guys yesterday arrived my i7, and the batch is : 3912A990, of course SLBEJ
Someone heard about this batch ?
you have to try it, from what I have seen 39xx aren't very good, average 1.26v ~ 1.28v for 4GHz HT ON but there core temp are low compared to other chips with lower vcoreQuote:
Originally Posted by Malik
That is sad info for me :(Quote:
Originally Posted by phsinc1
just got a W3520 batch number 3850A823 packing date 04/15/09. so far 4.2 ghz with 1.25v. testing some more tonight. Still trying to figure out this classified board.
what cooler are you using?Quote:
Originally Posted by hlonipha
I have the exact same chip, and its taking me 1.36v (cpu-z #) to do 4200 for a 30 minutes pass of OCCT.
HT on also**
look in my sig. I'm on a custom WC setupQuote:
Originally Posted by ex2cib
for me to get 4.4 ht on stable is becoming a pain. I mean I have 2 chips that will do 4.3 ht on fairly easy but will not do 4.4. There is got to be something I'm not doing right. This Classified board is not that easy to overclock. I need help!!!! lolQuote:
Originally Posted by ex2cib
A friend just called to ask me which of the 2 D0's he found to buy...Quote:
Originally Posted by Malik
He got the 3912A845 and the other one was a 3907A837....Hope he got the right piece...
When we test it , i'll come back with results...
Hi,
I have a D0 that I just put in that is running stock. It is running 12 GB of Corsair Dominator RAM at stock (1066mHz) speed. The CPU batch is 3910A313 that I got from the Tustin, CA Frys. I am using a Gigabyte EX58-UD5.
Anyone have experience with this batch? How well do you think it will do with 12 GB of RAM?
well I have no experience with D0's. but the more RAM you use the more your overclock is hurt. MOre stress on the memory controller. BUt if you use 12gb for daily use, then maximum overclock shouldn't be your priority.Quote:
Originally Posted by roadtonowhere08
No, I am not going for 4gHz or anything. I was hoping for anything over 1400mHz for the memory and 3gHz for the CPU. Is that doable with this stepping and 12GB of RAM?Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Patty
I do not have time to tweak like crazy, I am just looking for a set and forget setting. Not looking to max out my stuff all all.
you could probably do about 3.4-3.6 GHz without touching voltages. So yeah very doable. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by roadtonowhere08
here is mine
Room Temp. 29C
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/268...2e4405rt29.jpg
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/38/3852a328.jpg
Finally got it stable at 4.4 ht on.
from 4.3 to 4.4 huge jump in vcore
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/2...19passlinx.png
http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/9...0passlinx1.png
Batch: 3845A925
HT ON
http://www.imgx.org/files/40654_jdftn/stable-oc.jpg
How the temperature sensor on the core ? I have the same batch but some of the sensor is off scale. I saw some others with the same batch also have the same buggered sensors. It like a trade off ehh :eh: :rotf:Quote:
Originally Posted by Funky
These Xeons are about the same, Mine can do 4200 WITH 1.23V linx/prime stable. try to take it to 4.3-4.4 and see how much vcore you need.Quote:
Originally Posted by Funky
Thanks
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatRaceTin
This is one of the BEST 4.40Ghz run I have ever seen with HT enable and only needed 1.32 vcore, very very nice indeed! excellent load temperature as well. I assume this is water cooled?
He using air so it too hot to do any 100% load test at that frequency without proper ambient. Maybe his chip clock same as mine since it from the same batch and probably with the same buggered sensor too.:confused2:confused2:cheer2::cheer2:Quote:
Originally Posted by hlonipha
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/711/sparda46a.jpg
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/7...arda46b.th.jpg
http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/1329/sparda44a.jpg
http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/8...arda44b.th.jpg
I picked up a Xeon 3520 3850A823 this week from Buy.com so looks like I got the same batch and week as you hlonipha 3850A823. I'll have to get everything set up and test it out this weekend in my Classified 760. I need to try out my new beast of a power supply Enermax Galaxy EVO 1250W as well that I got earlier this week.
This is very nice indeed!!!! man congrats on an exellent chip:YIPPIE:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparda
I will be buying another one, but looking to see who is selling the better batches out there.
ey mario with all these Xeons and i7 chips you be getting your hands on ;), you should start crunching. Or are you already? You got a great team to crunch for here dude :up:
Thanks. There only 4 batch for xeon 3520 out there for now and I saw most of the good one came from batch 3845A935 eventough it still a bit of mixed bag. No idea about 920. Seems like too many batch to scout for.:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by hlonipha
Sparda "Thanks. There only 4 batch for xeon 3520 out there for now and I saw most of the good one come from batch 3845A935 eventough it still a bit of mixed bag. No idea about 920. Seems like too many batch to scout for."
Oh Sparda Your Xeon is amazing low Vcore!!! 4.4 @ 1.312V
ben805 "This is one of the BEST 4.40Ghz run I have ever seen with HT enable and only needed 1.32 vcore, very very nice indeed! excellent load temperature as well. I assume this is water cooled?"
Oh yes I am on water
EK Supreme LT Plexi
Swiftech 655
Swiftech MCRes2
BlackIce XFlow 360
where did you buy the xeon? I got mine from the egg. but since I need another one, I would like to buy it from a store that has the good batch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparda
Chicken: I'm not crunching rigt now. send me the info of the team and I will take a look at it.
check out this link. I would tell you to join my team, but XS has a great team and the guys here are great. I wouldn't do that to them. You can join team Xtreme Systems, theres a detailed how to in this below link. Lets keep this thread on topic though, if you got any other questions, PM me dude. OR you have my #, you can just give me a ring, i'll help ya out.Quote:
Originally Posted by hlonipha
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=224817
I'm outside of the states. I just mail & phone the shops in my country to confirm the batch. Looks like your neighbour knows every batch in Canada if you are interested.:p:Quote:
Originally Posted by hlonipha
It low volt but the power draw nearly the same as my first chip that like vcore. I just confirm it by wattmeter when I swap the cpu.:yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by PatRaceTin
:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Sparda
I actually have a few W3520 3845A935's arriving on Monday :up:
care to sell me one ?Quote:
Originally Posted by MACMAC
by the way now running at 4.4 ghz
http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/9416/99118959.png
seconded... pp to australia :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by hlonipha
3845a935 is the batch to get:yepp:
I'll see what I can do, just PM me if you're serious ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by dexster