:ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by Frisch
Printable View
:ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by Frisch
Now thats scary!:eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] riptide
Naaaah. I think its in line... Heres the screeny. the scary bit is the first bench. Had I not rebenched i would have been left with a crap bench.Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Kent Bench. Look at all the diff bench results.. same speed, same enviroment.
Phelan... is that the Kent rig in sig at 3.2? Man you need to look at the one above for me and look for ~5500 for drys.
Wow, those benches are waaaay off.. Ok do this, stop all work and network access- reboot- open boinc and run 3x... If this persists then send the cpu to me:D No, really if its still low keep running the benches but give it at least 1 min between your rebenches.
For a couple days I noticed every time I ran my benchmarks it was low like
3200
3400
I was giving it a day in between benchmarks cuz they got lower each time I rebenched. So I just ran today at 390x9 3510mhz
3298 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6898 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
So these went up since the last time I benched.
5/11/2007 12:22:01 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/11/2007 12:23:02 PM||Benchmark results:
5/11/2007 12:23:02 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/11/2007 12:23:02 PM|| 2490 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/11/2007 12:23:02 PM|| 4581 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/11/2007 12:23:03 PM||Resuming computation
oh, and, hello everyone.
My C2D Celly 1Mb SC gets 3100/6666 at 3530Mhz.
@Milly, :welcome: If you need anything or have any questions please dont hesitate to ask.
Hello and welcome!Quote:
Originally Posted by Milly
Oh I didnt see Millys' post.
Welcome to the fun :toast: :toast:
e6600 @ 390x9
5/12/2007 11:28:43 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/12/2007 11:28:44 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/12/2007 11:29:44 AM||Benchmark results:
5/12/2007 11:29:44 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/12/2007 11:29:44 AM|| 3286 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/12/2007 11:29:44 AM|| 6846 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/12/2007 11:29:45 AM||Resuming computation
5/12/2007 11:30:21 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/12/2007 11:30:22 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/12/2007 11:31:23 AM||Benchmark results:
5/12/2007 11:31:23 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/12/2007 11:31:23 AM|| 3290 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/12/2007 11:31:23 AM|| 4480 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/12/2007 11:31:24 AM||Resuming computation
5/12/2007 11:31:44 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/12/2007 11:31:45 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/12/2007 11:32:46 AM||Benchmark results:
5/12/2007 11:32:46 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/12/2007 11:32:46 AM|| 3286 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/12/2007 11:32:46 AM|| 4802 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/12/2007 11:32:47 AM||Resuming computation
Chuck, give it a day and rebench and stick with your first bench if its over 6k.. I saw this same thing with my Q6600 the other day so I waited a day and rebenched it and just stuck with the first one.
Will do.:)
Here's mine
E6400 @ 3600mhz
Something doesn't seem right with those benchmarks and if a WCG WU were passed in using that it might be disqualified. They are way too high!Quote:
Originally Posted by ANP !!!
A more realistic benchmark for that 6400 would be something like 3700/7100
Ohh srry this is just a random screenshot that i got, so i just posted it.Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] serlv
Here is a full shot, if u think somethings wrong, tell me
http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/4...0756ht2.th.png
Just point me towards the legal procedure that i need to follow for a qualified benchmark :rolleyes:
Ahhh those are the Crunch3r files that allows boinc to use SSE3.. We dont want to use those because they are considered cheating.
ohh,, i m extremely SORRY .. lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
I seriously didnt knew it was cheating to use those files. :(.
U can delete my posts.
It's ok but if your running any project using boinc those files are frowned upon:D
The Grey area is still in QMC I believe to use them. And also its SSE2 is it not that they utllise? (as opposed to SSE3) :)Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
Ran it this morning. Got this.Quote:
Originally Posted by njkid32
5/13/2007 7:55:12 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/13/2007 7:55:12 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/13/2007 7:56:13 AM||Benchmark results:
5/13/2007 7:56:13 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/13/2007 7:56:13 AM|| 3295 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/13/2007 7:56:13 AM|| 6887 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/13/2007 7:56:14 AM||Resuming computation
My second e6600 at 385x9.
5/13/2007 8:03:00 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/13/2007 8:04:01 AM||Benchmark results:
5/13/2007 8:04:01 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/13/2007 8:04:01 AM|| 2232 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/13/2007 8:04:01 AM|| 3740 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/13/2007 8:04:02 AM||Resuming computation
5/13/2007 8:04:28 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/13/2007 8:04:28 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/13/2007 8:05:29 AM||Benchmark results:
5/13/2007 8:05:29 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/13/2007 8:05:29 AM|| 2233 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/13/2007 8:05:29 AM|| 3803 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/13/2007 8:05:30 AM||Resuming computation
5/13/2007 8:05:47 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/13/2007 8:05:48 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/13/2007 8:06:49 AM||Benchmark results:
5/13/2007 8:06:49 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/13/2007 8:06:49 AM|| 2235 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/13/2007 8:06:49 AM|| 4239 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/13/2007 8:06:50 AM||Resuming computation
5/13/2007 8:07:48 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/13/2007 8:07:48 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/13/2007 8:08:49 AM||Benchmark results:
5/13/2007 8:08:49 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/13/2007 8:08:49 AM|| 2233 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/13/2007 8:08:49 AM|| 4678 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/13/2007 8:08:50 AM||Resuming computation
5/14/2007 1:05:49 AM||Benchmark results:
5/14/2007 1:05:49 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/14/2007 1:05:49 AM|| 3391 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/14/2007 1:05:49 AM|| 6776 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/14/2007 1:05:50 AM||Resuming computation
E6400 @ 3.6Ghz
Updated:
E6400 @3.7ghz
5/15/2007 10:53:19 PM||Benchmark results:
5/15/2007 10:53:19 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/15/2007 10:53:19 PM|| 3464 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/15/2007 10:53:19 PM|| 7224 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
eidt:
E6400 @ 3.8GHz
5/31/2007 10:02:53 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/31/2007 10:02:53 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/31/2007 10:03:54 AM||Benchmark results:
5/31/2007 10:03:54 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2
5/31/2007 10:03:54 AM|| 3543 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/31/2007 10:03:54 AM|| 7375 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
You simply don't get all credit, that's it. Even my own compiled versions on linux that score higher don't get full credit. Just overclock and use as many cores as you can :)Quote:
Originally Posted by ANP !!!
Today...e6600 @3.55Ghz
http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/3...c051907mk3.jpg
This is what it shows:
5/24/2007 9:22:14 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/24/2007 9:22:15 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/24/2007 9:23:16 AM||Benchmark results:
5/24/2007 9:23:16 AM|| Number of CPUs: 8
5/24/2007 9:23:16 AM|| 1277 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/24/2007 9:23:16 AM|| 851 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/24/2007 9:23:17 AM||Resuming computation
That is w/ hyperthreading enabled. Should I disable it?
8*1277= 10,216 Whetstone
8*851= 6,808 Dhrystone
This is no HT:
5/24/2007 9:34:43 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
5/24/2007 9:34:43 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
5/24/2007 9:35:44 AM||Benchmark results:
5/24/2007 9:35:44 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
5/24/2007 9:35:44 AM|| 1500 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/24/2007 9:35:44 AM|| 2429 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
5/24/2007 9:35:45 AM||Resuming computation
4*1500= 6000 Whetstone
4*2429= 9716 Dhrystone
??? Which is better?
Bench with HT off, then run with HT on :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Nightcreeper
Massive update!!
Celeron 420 (Conroe-L) @ 2.8GHz, Asrock 1333 R1.0
2750/6300
Who would think it :)
New version BOINC bench results...
Benches on EVGA 680i, QX6700@3.2g, 2gig ram. Three runs each
V5.8.16 (old)
3000/6208, 2998/6266, 3000/6259
V5.10.7 (new)
3143/7220, 3143/7198, 3145/7221
The new stuff benches higher....
6/20/2007 1:40:28 PM|| 3632 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/20/2007 1:40:28 PM|| 7501 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
E6400 @ 3.7 at this moment.
I seem to be getting the same numbers on OS X with the new one...though I'm also encoding a movie at the exact same time, so that may be interfering a little :p:
Still higher than XP too :D
EDIT:
QX6700 @ 318x11 (3.5GHz), XBX2, 2x2GB 318 6-4-4-18, OS X
2835/8484, 2834/8484, 2836/8485
Definite increase once I turned off the encoding.
I didn't know there was a new BOINC release out . Is this a beta version ? (ending on an odd number , or what's the rule again , Sierra ?)Quote:
Originally Posted by 123bob
nice bench scores :up:
EDIT : there's a new thread about BOINC 5.10.7 already, i see now :rolleyes: :shakes:
Interesting. 5% flops, 15% iops. Will result in about 11% claim increase (not necessary granted though).Quote:
Originally Posted by 123bob
Edit: I think I have a hunch about why this happened.
How's this for a change?
Using Boinc ver 5.8.16
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM|| 1597 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 5:40:25 AM|| 1694 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Using Bionc ver 5.10.7
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM|| 1639 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 6:45:38 AM|| 3004 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
-------------------------------------------------------------------
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM|| Number of CPUs: 4
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM|| 1635 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 6:47:53 AM|| 3037 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
---------------------------------------------------------------------
First one was the best of 3 benches with 5.8.16..BIG improvement!:D
You are not serious! have you been running it like that for long?Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
That was a bad bench MM, not a 100% improvement. :D
Is this the older Xeons?
This is the old netburst xeons and yes, thats all you could get from them.Quote:
Originally Posted by meshmesh
Not any more!:ROTF: Changing the DX2400 in a minute and I am wondering about the clovers..
Talk to me my friend.
I'll do mine first and then let you know what I see.
Ok. One thing though:Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
The new Grid "features" eats some considerable cpu cycles. So definitly install as service and don't leave the boinc manager open after checking.
Understood and this is what I saw after installing on the "slow" clover:Quote:
Originally Posted by meshmesh
With Boinc 5.8.16 at 2667mhz:
6/21/2007 7:10:27 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 7:10:27 AM|| Number of CPUs: 8
6/21/2007 7:10:27 AM|| 2502 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 7:10:27 AM|| 5179 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
With Boinc 5.10.7 at 2667mhz:
6/21/2007 7:13:56 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 7:13:56 AM|| Number of CPUs: 8
6/21/2007 7:13:56 AM|| 2621 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 7:13:56 AM|| 5738 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
new benches on the "fast" clover..quite a difference:
at 3157mhz:
On Boinc 5.8.16
5/14/2007 8:47:32 PM||Benchmark results:
5/14/2007 8:47:32 PM|| Number of CPUs: 8
5/14/2007 8:47:32 PM|| 2968 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5/14/2007 8:47:32 PM|| 6184 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
----------------------------------------------------------------------
at 3157mhz with Boinc version 5.10.7:
6/21/2007 9:28:00 AM||Benchmark results:
6/21/2007 9:28:00 AM|| Number of CPUs: 8
6/21/2007 9:28:00 AM|| 3108 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
6/21/2007 9:28:00 AM|| 6921 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU-----------------------------------------------------------------------
looks like a rather good improvement
What's your's on your..ahh, the machine your running?:DQuote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
what do you think? :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
I sort of know but couldn't resist harassing you!:DQuote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
harassment seems to be the theme of the week. Which reminds me, I'll probably need to buy more aspirinQuote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
yea, but when I harass you, your sure it's done with a smile.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Remember, I only tease people I like, the ones I don't like I ignore.;)
True :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
Latest.. new BOINC.
Intel 945 (thanks riptide) @ 3.4 on the new BOINC
1728 Wet
2630 Dry
Stock? You had it at 4.4 ?:confused: Did you read the fine print? It says that part of the deal is you always run the schitt out of it. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by [cTx] mysticmerlin
Impressive..:eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] riptide
Been 90+ deg here and it was random rebooting so stock till I get the water case or phase hooked up to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] riptide
Just got my cruncher up and running. Right now I've got:
Main rig:
3625 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
8372 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Cruncher:
3287 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
7370 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Both are running 5.10.7. I've also got my 700m working, but I bore you with those benchmark numbers. :P
Q6600 G0 @ 4005MHz on watercooling:
3936 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
9088 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
TOTAL (4 cores): 52096
-FCG
Great! What ram speeds are we looking at?Quote:
Originally Posted by freecableguy
24-07-2007 14:02:42||Benchmark results:
24-07-2007 14:02:42|| Number of CPUs: 8
24-07-2007 14:02:42|| 2215 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
24-07-2007 14:02:42|| 6931 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Got 10 of these :)
Dual Quad 2.33Ghz, 4GB in Dell 1950.
10x8 is just insane!
winxp 32bit sp2, boinc 5.10.13
whet 3470
dhry 6360
is this about right for a dc opty at 3.4 ghz?
Still Odd for me
A little late to the party with this one but here's some numbers from a "slow server":D
Boinc 5.10.13 at 3157mhz:
8/16/2007 6:02:16 PM||Benchmark results:
8/16/2007 6:02:16 PM|| Number of CPUs: 8
8/16/2007 6:02:16 PM|| 3011 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
8/16/2007 6:02:16 PM|| 9356 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Window Vista 64 bits?
No, win2k3 server enterprise 64 bitQuote:
Originally Posted by Bail_w
Vista x64 Home Prem., rig in sig
@3100 5.10.13
7/24/2007 2:58:52 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
7/24/2007 2:58:53 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
7/24/2007 2:59:24 PM||Benchmark results:
7/24/2007 2:59:24 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
7/24/2007 2:59:24 PM|| 2910 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
7/24/2007 2:59:24 PM|| 6009 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
7/24/2007 2:59:25 PM||Resuming computation
7/24/2007 2:59:34 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
7/24/2007 2:59:35 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
7/24/2007 3:00:06 PM||Benchmark results:
7/24/2007 3:00:06 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
7/24/2007 3:00:06 PM|| 2906 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
7/24/2007 3:00:06 PM|| 5999 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
7/24/2007 3:00:07 PM||Resuming computation
@3100 5.10.18
8/16/2007 7:39:20 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
8/16/2007 7:39:21 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
8/16/2007 7:39:52 PM||Benchmark results:
8/16/2007 7:39:52 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
8/16/2007 7:39:52 PM|| 2911 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
8/16/2007 7:39:52 PM|| 7288 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
8/16/2007 7:39:53 PM||Resuming computation
8/16/2007 7:40:00 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
8/16/2007 7:40:00 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
8/16/2007 7:40:31 PM||Benchmark results:
8/16/2007 7:40:31 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
8/16/2007 7:40:31 PM|| 2905 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
8/16/2007 7:40:31 PM|| 7287 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
8/16/2007 7:40:32 PM||Resuming computation
HMM, goes to try 5.10.18:DQuote:
Originally Posted by hawkeyefan
5.10.13:
Number of CPUs: 4
3147 floating point MIPS(Whetstone)per CPU
9708 integer MIPS(Dhrystone)per CPU
5.10.18:
Number of CPUs: 4
3137 floating point MIPS(Whetstone)per CPU
9742 integer MIPS(Dhrystone)per CPU
no diff for me (winxp64)
8/19/2007 8:46:56 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
8/19/2007 8:47:27 PM||Benchmark results:
8/19/2007 8:47:27 PM|| Number of CPUs: 4
8/19/2007 8:47:27 PM|| 2624 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
8/19/2007 8:47:27 PM|| 4628 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
8/19/2007 8:47:28 PM||Resuming computation
5.10.13 Vista 32
Quad Opterons 4GB
20.08.2007 19:45:30||Starting BOINC client version 5.10.18 for windows_x86_64
20.08.2007 19:45:30||log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops
20.08.2007 19:45:30||Libraries: libcurl/7.16.4 OpenSSL/0.9.8e zlib/1.2.3
20.08.2007 19:45:30||Data directory: C:\Program Files\BOINC
20.08.2007 19:45:30||Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Genuine Intel(R) CPU 2160 @ 1.80GHz [EM64T Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 2]
20.08.2007 19:45:30||Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 pni
20.08.2007 19:45:30||OS: Microsoft Windows Vista: , (06.00.6000.00)
20.08.2007 19:45:30||Memory: 2.00 GB physical, 4.21 GB virtual
20.08.2007 19:45:30||Disk: 74.53 GB total, 39.83 GB free
20.08.2007 19:45:30||Local time is UTC +2 hours
20.08.2007 20:03:52||Suspending network activity - user request
20.08.2007 20:03:55||Running CPU benchmarks
20.08.2007 20:03:56||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
20.08.2007 20:04:27||Benchmark results:
20.08.2007 20:04:27|| Number of CPUs: 2
20.08.2007 20:04:27|| 2759 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
20.08.2007 20:04:27|| 7460 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
20.08.2007 20:04:28||Resuming computation
20.08.2007 20:04:46||Running CPU benchmarks
20.08.2007 20:04:47||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
20.08.2007 20:05:17||Benchmark results:
20.08.2007 20:05:17|| Number of CPUs: 2
20.08.2007 20:05:17|| 2724 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
20.08.2007 20:05:17|| 8347 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
20.08.2007 20:05:18||Resuming computation
Vista ULT x64 BOINC 5.10.18 x64
Intel E2160@ 3.3Ghz 366FSB 4,4,4,4,10 <- nice cheap rig to carry me until penryn or whatever AMD is cooking is ready :)
Saw about 1000 MIPS improvement when going from XP x64 to Vista ULT x64
Pentium 4@3.3Ghz Win XP Pro x86
.13
1723/3230
.18
1799/3406
Those are some good numbers. :cool:
I'm going to download 5.10.18 in a few minutes.... right after I place my order for Vista x64.... :D This distributed computing stuff sure will max out a credit card in a hurry. :shocked:
.18 from BOINC have lot more options than .13 from WCG.
Also i downloaded work for 8 days, so i'm sure that if someone dropped my router, the WCG is still crunching.
hey guys I have ran the benchmarks alot and even back in the rosetta days I get occasional really low benches? it has happened on stock hardware, and overclocked hardware alike, and the oc'ed hardware was atleast 3-4hrs orthos stable... so what gives? just curious since I have never understood why boinc's benchmarks are so finiky
win vista
e6400 @ 2.13
2121/4237
need to get the oc back. also i figured i would join and help the cause
Thanks for helping out.:) No contribution is too small.
:welcome:
Another Belgian on the team :clap:
Better watch out for them!Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] Jaco
All the ones I've met are good people..
There must be a bad one somewhere!:shrug:
03/10/2007 09:35:22|| 3184 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
03/10/2007 09:35:22|| 7023 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
E6300@3.25.
Just beats my clover at 3157..course I have 6 more cores!:DQuote:
Originally Posted by vaio
:p:
Be one hell of a fsb on my Ally to best the Clover :rofl:
Hmmmm, lets try 4000 x 7.....may need more than 1.3v though :rofl:
Welcome to the team, jettasin00!Quote:
Originally Posted by jettasin00
Good to have another teammate for the cause.
I'm at 9X351..:D If I tried anything over 360 it goes POOF!:DQuote:
Originally Posted by vaio
2 x 466 :p:
Nothing much but sure makes my x2's look slow at WCG :confused:
Dual Clovertowns @ 3148MHz
5.10.13 (64-bit)
Server 2003 x64
Whetstone: 3330
Dhrystone: 9338
wow , almost 31K
and your temps :up:
JEEZ, I got to change Mesh's machine..Quote:
Originally Posted by sierra_bound
3011/9376 at 3157mhz
win2k3 64 bit BUT Boinc 5.10.13 32 bit..
31K is not typical by any means. Yesterday just happened to be a better than average day.:) Every now and then I will see 28-29K.
with 5.10.20 64 bit at 3157mhz
3023/9333
I knew those were good chips you got you bastage you!:rofl:
Q6600 @ 3.38GHz
Vista Ultimate 64
4 X 1GB Ballistic PC-8500
BOINC 5.10.20
3235 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
9933 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Go ahead..Rub it in!:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by David_L6
jaco what part of belgium. im in limburg. i dont speak dutch or french.
10/4/2007 3:11:17 PM||Running CPU benchmarks
10/4/2007 3:11:17 PM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
10/4/2007 3:11:48 PM||Benchmark results:
10/4/2007 3:11:48 PM|| Number of CPUs: 2
10/4/2007 3:11:48 PM|| 2793 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
10/4/2007 3:11:48 PM|| 5544 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
better than 2121/4237. bumped it from 2.1.3 to 2.88
I'm from Leuven . (I speak Dutch )
im in peer
E6850 @ 3.6Ghz
4GB DDR
XP64
BOINC 5.10.20 (x64)
3379 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
10448 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
and I am in cognito :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by jettasin00
Been having issues with .20 release.....reverted back to .13 and got:Quote:
Originally Posted by vaio
04/10/2007 22:32:01|| 3205 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
04/10/2007 22:32:01|| 6837 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
I see that the WCG site have the latest recommended version as 5.10.22 on its download page http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/re...ewMember=false - but its still at 5.10.21 (Beta) on the Berkeley site.
Although I haven't seen an announcement over at WCG, from a post by one of the WCG CA's it seems its a purpose built WCG version which also automatically uninstals any UD Agent present to assist in the forthcoming migration to Boinc only, and also has its own WCG skin - whether it is any improvement from versions 5.10.20/21 I have no idea :shrug:
Quote:
The 5.10.22 is the version packaged by WCG and WCG-Skinned to also make use of the extra functionality to identify the old WCG (UD) agent and optionally remove that. Each WCG project, including FA@H come with their own set of slides you can see rotating in the BOINC Simple View window.
Between 5.10.20 and 5.10.21 there are lots of bug fixes and a few more with the one WCG released, some not yet documented. As always WCG recommends their checked and endorsed version, link provided on the WCG download page.... anything else and it gives support headaches
OK, I've just loaded 5.10.22 over 5.10.20, and I see that it has its own 'WCG' skin whilst installing, and some pretty slides in simple view - but nothing else.
Benchmark seems to have gone up a tad though, on a Q6600@3GHz it was 2821/5890, now its:
05/10/2007 17:38:45||Benchmark results:
05/10/2007 17:38:45|| Number of CPUs: 4
05/10/2007 17:38:45|| 2945 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
05/10/2007 17:38:45|| 6373 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
Could just be explained by variations at the bench time though :shrug:
11.11.2007 11:58:00||Running CPU benchmarks
11.11.2007 11:58:00||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
11.11.2007 11:58:31||Benchmark results:
11.11.2007 11:58:31|| Number of CPUs: 2
11.11.2007 11:58:31|| 3393 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
11.11.2007 11:58:31|| 7487 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
here is my result