Printable View
Please quote or tell me what page that is on. I have read through the whitepaper 3 times and haven't seen ANY mention of that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chumbucket843
~2x as fast is the BEST case scenario. Shaders are being doubled but completely overhauled which should bring IPC but not necessarily.Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
Also there are many other parts of GF100 that could possibly bottleneck the architecture.
The worst scenario could be way worse then that. Roughly twice as fast as a GTX285 is probably the REALISTIC scenario.Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
IMO, it sounds like this will be a repeat of the last round. NV will have the fastest single chip and ATI will have a somewhat slower, but price/performance competitive offering. I don't know about the dual cards. Obviously ATI will have an x2. I imagine NV will want to release a dual GPU card to counter. But how do you cool 6B full speed transistors in 2 slots of space? They'll have to cut down and/or reduce the speed of the chips or wait for a shrink. The fastest single card halo could go either way, imo.
I'm not convinced. We'll all find out when it's released though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solus Corvus
Nvidia has already indicated that there will be a dual GPU version of the GT300.Quote:
I imagine NV will want to release a dual GPU card to counter.
Number of transistors is not what determines heat output, that would be the TDP, which will be similar to the GTX285, so that really won't be much of an issue.Quote:
But how do you cool 6B full speed transistors in 2 slots of space?
Nvidia won't let that happen, and based on performance of the 5870, and knowing the specs of GT300, I believe it is pretty clear the 380 will be faster, which nvidia has already confirmed.Quote:
The fastest single card halo could go either way, imo.
Eventually, yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
Full spec'ed and full speed? No.
6months after release? Maybe, most likely longer.
32/28nm shrink needed? Possibly.
I expect the performance to be MORE than two 285 in high-res 8xAA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Solus Corvus
Those are all guesses. Full spec and speed should very well be possible if TDP is similar to the GTX285 (which it should be).Quote:
Originally Posted by LordEC911
6+ months is not going to be the case IMO. There will be no need for a shrink if TDP is similar to the 285.
Well... I for one am quite happy that I held onto my money and waited for the GT300 specs to come to light. I'll more than likely buy a second gtx285 if they drop in price or just hold onto it until the initial GT300 cards prices equalize after their release.
Why? Do you honestly believe that it is in nVidia's best business interests to spend millions of dollars on driver development to make their cards architecture will work smoothly in conjunction as a physx card in conjunction with an ATi main graphics card?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ursus
yeah, that's a great idea.
... spend tons of money to help out your competitor.... :rolleyes:
Ummm... so GTX295 is two full spec'ed GTX285s? That is news to me...Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
Yes, my post was guesses and speculation but no less than your posts.
If it was just a doubling of resources without major architecture changes then I would say that the average performance would would be LESS then 2x the previous gen. You can't expect linear scaling.Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
But I'm taking into account that there are architecture changes. Most of the changes don't sound like they would make much, if any, performance difference in games. But perhaps the efficiency improvements will help make the most of the resources available. But without major changes to the shaders and arch I don't see how you'd get more then 2.13x scaling, except in corner cases.
Any timeframe? Will it launch with/near the other cards, or will we have to wait for a shrink like the 295?Quote:
Nvidia has already indicated that there will be a dual GPU version of the GT300.
You know what I mean, of course 10 billion 1 mhz transistors wouldn't be very hard to cool.Quote:
Number of transistors is not what determines heat output, that would be the TDP, which will be similar to the GTX285, so that really won't be much of an issue. Nvidia won't let that happen, and based on performance of the 5870, and knowing the specs of GT300, I believe it is pretty clear the 380 will be faster, which nvidia has already confirmed.
A TDP near the GTX285 would be very much of an issue. How many NV cards are on the market with 2 full speed, not cut down GTX285 cores, even now? 1000? To make the standard 295 they had to cut the number of shaders and the speed. To make the 395 they will probably have to make even deeper cuts to be able to fit it in the power/TDP envelope.
Nvidia didn't confirm anything, they said they "believe" it will be faster in games. And I'm not going to take their word for it, benchmarks will tell us the truth.
Why?Quote:
Originally Posted by RealTelstar
i would like to know which of the listed features will bottleneck this gpu.Quote:
Originally Posted by LordEC911
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordEC911
http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15758/34/
i know it's fud, and i'm looking for corroborating sources, but they're stating a full range release (even the 2 gpu version). when/if i find anyone else with the same info, i'll share it.
Whackypedia has you not far off the transistor count...Quote:
Originally Posted by Solus Corvus
:rofl:Quote:
The initial model in the series to be released will use the GT300 chip, a very large chip that is heavily modified of G92 GPU(Up to nine billion transistors in quad core version) manufactured by TSMC in a 55-nanometer process. Versions will be available with 1.5GB, 3GB or 6GB of memory, attached to six separate 64-bit GDDR4 memory controllers on the chip.
Also the GTX295 only had lowered clocks & 448bit Memory Bus instead of 512bit. It has the full 240 shaders on each chip.
Yeah, actually that's correct. Though they did have to wait for the shrink before they could do it. And even now only the MARS has full speed cores.Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathReborn
1. The GTX295 is not two full spec 285s, but it still is the fastest single card.Quote:
Originally Posted by LordEC911
2. Full spec dual 285 on a single card is perfectly possible. Look at the Asus Mars. Not only is it full spec, but it actually has 2GB of memory per GPU for a total of 4GB of DRAM chips. Evga was also working on a dual 285 card, but I'm not sure if they will release it with GT300 right around the corner.
ROP throughput?Quote:
Originally Posted by 570091D
Also performance is dependent on clockspeeds, which is very underwhelming at the moment.
"Look at the Asus MARS and Evga's possibly aborted project" aren't really good arguments for the likelihood of a full speed GT300, lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
what? again they did not, NOT fix something for ati, they BROKE it on purpose...Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew LB
it worked fine before, then they released a new driver that blocks it...
not supporting it, well their decision, if you want to spread physix as a standard you need to support as many customer configs as possible... but whatever...
but BLOCKING it on purpose... thats lame...
but hey, we know it from sli :D
i guess now that nvidia was forced to unblock sli, they are probably looking for other things to block instead ^^
or maybe they actually think they can do the same as with sli and ask for license fees or money from ati and intel to allow physix on their systems :D
solus corvus, yes, and gt212 seems to be dead too, otherwise there wouldnt have been mars or matrix or evga beefed up cards...
so gt212 (40nm gt200) is definately cancelled and gt300 delayed, meh :/
Saaya, are we sure it worked fine before? Multiple vendors drivers generally don't play nicely together, which usually causes all kinds of stability issues. Could you imagine the sheer number of non-computer knowledgable people calling NVidia complaining when the 2 drivers together cause graphical corruption and they blame NVidia because before they added the geforce card for physx the system worked fine? You worked in CS before, you know it would happen.
If we have a completely impartial judge to test this out, see if it worked without issue before in all physx enabled titles, then we can make that call. I'd actually be interested in seeing those numbers myself!
Yes it did clearly work before. Nvidia just blocked it with updated drivers. :down:Quote:
Originally Posted by DilTech
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showpost...&postcount=628
Quote:
I have just got a GeForce GTS 250 as dedicated PhysX card and my 4870x2 for rendering, I have run the game benchmark with those results:
- Drivers: Catalyst 9.9 & ForceWare 185.68
- Resolution: 1920x1200
- Vsync: On
- AntiAliasing: 4x with AAA forced via CCC
- Anisotropic: 16x
- PhysX: High
- Minimum: 30
- Average: 58
- Maximum 60:
It's really cool to see the ATI and nVidia cards working together. PhysX are cool in this game, I have seen banners, smoke and flying papers, it adds a bit of atmosphere to the game.
I'm with LordEC911 on that one. Very few things make think in a 3d rendering performance increase further than processing units count increase and/or clocks seeing the new arch.Quote:
Originally Posted by LordEC911
With a 113% CP increase, a 50% ROP increase, an unknown TMU increase, a 60% memory bandwidth increase, seems highly unlikely that we can say that a 100% real world performance increase is a worst case scenario. It's more like a best case scenario with a completely shader bottlenecked situation.
I think we will see something similar to last generation, maybe slightly better for NVIDIA performance wise (I would say 20-30% performance advantage to the higher end GTX380, and a very little advantage for the GTX360) but even worse price wise (competing with a product 3-4 months old and that can cut down prices after months selling, and remember that GT300 is a much more expensive chip than RV870)
That's why I asked, rather than saying it didn't. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by tdream
I'm not on windows 7 and I don't have a dual pci-e slotted mobo.
If that truly is the case, next time I talk to our NV rep I'll see if he can give me an answer for what their reasoning is with this one. They usually don't talk to us in PR speak. :yepp:
naivete i say.Wait isn't his the G300 thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by LOE
That^^ is still to be determined! Most of whats new architecturally, is indeed for the CUDA end of Nvidia's expansion into the Scientific Community. So, given Anand's comments, the GT300 could certainly debut @ only 2X the 285's performance! :down:Quote:
Originally Posted by 003
Meaning it on par with a HD5870 1GB ~ :comp10: then, think price?
2x GTX 285 performance(not sli, but DOUBLE) would be better than "par" with the 5870...Quote:
Originally Posted by Xoulz
Of course, no one knows the full performance on these cards, as been stated, but I heavily doubt it'll be less than double the GTX285(and again, NOT sli, but total double).
it all depends were its clocked, the 5870 is about 2x the 280, and we havnt seen a large review of the 5870 overclocked if it clocks and scales like the 4890 it will have a huge gain compared to the 300 if that clocks and scales like the 285. and price/watt will also be interesting it looks like 4 oced 5870 will go against 2-3 300's in wattage and price.Quote:
Originally Posted by DilTech
its going to be interesting to see performance and openCL now that khonos is finally validating drivers we should finally get some pro grade software (although im not sure what it will do for consumers)