http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/4710/dsc00051k.jpg
heres my first image
im liking this cam the more i play around with it!
Printable View
http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/4710/dsc00051k.jpg
heres my first image
im liking this cam the more i play around with it!
Looks like you're having fun, Barfastic.
One of my first pics with the Canon 5DMarkII
http://shazza53.smugmug.com/photos/5...17_n9rYo-L.jpg
I found you :p:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=693792
But lets see if you can find me...
Found you yesterday :yepp:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...d.php?t=695256
I wanted to take a shot of the blueberry flowers.
I didn't let the camera decide for me, I did choose f2.8 because i wanted the background to be blur but i let the camera decide the exposure-time, there was plenty of light that is why i chose 100 Iso otherwise i would have went with 200 "I Can't go higher because the noise will get crazy with my bad camera"
Do you think f2.8 was too high ? I'm still trying to learn ;)
Here is another picture hopefully you like it more :) "you can see how much noise in the picture even at iso 100 :( "
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/56956/new/Leaves4.jpg
Model : HP R818
Exposure Time : 1/500
F Number : F 5.6
ISO Speed Ratings : 100
Exposure Bias Value : 0 EV
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3379/...a9f00b8aee.jpg
Canon 40D + Canon 50mm 1.8
F=4.5
1\125 sec
ISO=200
Hmmm. Imho (you can always argue about motives) there was too much on the picture. Try to show details, for instance just one blossom.
OK, I see. Seems like you've learned the details and effects.
F2.8 normally is fine to get a small depth of field. Problem is, as you showed a too big picture I find it difficult to make out what is within the sharp area and therefore is the motive. Plus for my taste the depth of field was too big, even at F2.8 (or did I just missed it?).
This is what F2.8 should look like imho (one of my first shots with the DSLR and the Sigma Makro). Not really good, but you should get the idea :)
http://www.abload.de/img/img_02749kwn.jpg
# Camera Model = Canon EOS 450D
# Lens: Sigma EX DG 105 mm Makro
# Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) = 1/1000 second = 0.001 second
# Lens F-Number/F-Stop = 28/10 = F2.8
# ISO Speed Ratings = 200
# Focal Length = 105/1 mm = 105 mm
http://www.abload.de/img/img_0298ig85.jpg
The noise is really high, but the chromatic aberrations are bad as well :/
Up to now I think this is your best picture.
Very nice shot you have there, I'm trying to save money to buy a DSLR till then i'm very limited with my crap camera. I appreciate the help i still have so much to learn :)
I blame my camera :down:Quote:
F2.8 normally is fine to get a small depth of field. Problem is, as you showed a too big picture I find it difficult to make out what is within the sharp area and therefore is the motive. Plus for my taste the depth of field was too big, even at F2.8 (or did I just missed it?).
Here is another picture.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3569/...7989ddf6_o.jpg
Model : HP R818
Exposure Time : 1/700
F Number : F 2.8
ISO Speed Ratings : 100
Exposure Bias Value : 0 EV
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3359/...ae02db5b_b.jpg
Camera: Leica M6
ISO: 400
Shutter: ---
Aperture: ---
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Lens: Leica 50mm f/2.0 Summicron-R
GTX285 - Olympus Camedia C-4040
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/9088/uuyq.jpg
On sunday we were on a marathon. The fastest were the runners from Kenya! They reached the goal 30 minutes ahead of the best German :up: The weather sucked hard, typical for germany :rofl: Not very happy with the picture, was the first shoot of sports :wth:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2013/...f1796529_o.jpg
# Camera Model = Canon EOS 450D
# Lens = Sigma EX DG 105 mm Makro
# Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) = 1/1000 second = 0.001 second
# Lens F-Number/F-Stop = 28/10 = F2.8
# ISO Speed Ratings = 400 (*doh*)
# Focal Length = 105/1 mm = 105 mm
# Exposure Bias (EV) = -1/3 = -0.33
# Flash = Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode
Thanks. I'm still learning as well. It's crazy to compare recent shots to my "old" pictures. Although I began with photography not two months ago there's a noticable difference. You learn very much very fast.
But you don't necessarily need a DSLR to take great pictures, I think a good photographer could take better pictures with a compact than I do with my DSLR. A DSLR has quite high following costs compared to a compact or, if you want something better, a bridge-camera.
And you might be right. The compact cameras have evolved much in the past years. We have a Fuji Finepix F601 as well as a two years old Panasonic Lumix (my sister's) and the difference ist just increadible. The Lumix takes remarcable pictures if you have enough light and don't use the flash. To prevent to blur the picture because of a too long exposure you should use the self trigger. The press on the button sometimes is enough to blur the picture. That even helps with DSLRs.
Try not to shoot too centered or cut your picture afterwards, because for most pictures it looks "boring".
More details: http://www.digital-photography-tips....or-thirds.html
Another image of the day from me :D im loving this cam!!!! cant wait till i get my macro lense aswell!
http://img35.imageshack.us/img35/4514/dsc00065o.jpg
Does anyone know how i can EXIF data? do i need a specific peice of software? im using Photomatix and Firegraphics aswell as the usual Photoshop. And can i only obtain exif data using the RAW capturing format?
oh and can anyone recommend a program that is a bit faster at processing RAW files, because firgraphics takes 2-3 minutes to open each image :S
JPEG-picutures can contain EXIF-data as well! My bet is that one of the programs you are using deletes the data.
What is the make of your camera? Photoshop should be able to open RAW as well.
My camera can only center focus :(Quote:
Try not to shoot too centered or cut your picture afterwards, because for most pictures it looks "boring".
More details: http://www.digital-photography-tips....or-thirds.html
It was my mistake afterall, when i take pictures in JPEG + RAW format the data is in there if i right click and view the properties tab. Its because i opened the RAW file and saved it as a JPEG it got deleted.
Its a Sony A350 with a 18-70 Lens
Wish I was using a FF...
Anyways, I'm probably going to give the 70-200mm f/4 IS a try and see if that does any better in lower light, probably will only have an edge though when handheld (slower but it has IS).
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2430/...ce456ce4_b.jpg
Camera: Canon Rebel XSi
ISO: 800
Shutter: 0.017 sec (1/60)
Aperture: f/2.8
Exposure Bias: 0 EV
Lens: Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM
Does it have the option where you depress the shutter button part way to focus, then allow you to move the subject in the frame before clicking? Won't work for all shots, but will allow you to follow the rule-of-thirds for many.
@ Marin ... did you shoot that last pic with your right or left eye? ;)
This is a picture of my dad at the track today, he coaches my brother in athletics and was the Finnish champion in 1986 for 400-meter hurdles himself.
http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x...ip/trnaren.jpg
Model = Nikon D60
Exposure Time = 1/320"
F Number = F9
ISO Speed Ratings = 100
Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
Focal Length = 18mm
http://s10b.directupload.net/images/...1/7j7o35rc.jpg
This was the reason my GPU went too hot..
Exposure time: 0,005
F number: 9
ISO speed rating: 200
Nice shot, inCore. Yikes, Agor, that definitely is a bit much on the TIM.
another image of the day from me... i know im busting peoples @@ but i cant get my hands off this new camera!
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/6145/dsc00272q.jpg
EXIF Data
Camera Make: Sony
Camera Model: DSLR - A350
F-Stop: f/8
Exposure Time: 1/20 sec.
ISO: 100
Focal Length: 55mm
Max Aperture: 4.97
Thank you. :)
Here's a picture that I took earlier today, it's a picture of Rapperswil, Switzerland, 30 kilometers from Zürich at the other end of the lake of Zürich. Not one of my best pictures but the view makes up for it.
http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x...mountains1.jpg
Model = Nikon D60
Exposure Time = 1/200"
F Number = F7.1
ISO Speed Ratings = 100
Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
Focal Length = 22mm
in core thats a heck of a shot bro, you have a hi res of that?