Printable View
Greetings from Germany,
and here we go:
http://www.hardwareluxx.de/community...ad-primeln.jpg.
Try to stabilized 5gig @ 1.416VC. Had a BSOD after over 1h of custom-fft. Hope to fix it :rolleyes: click .
...could boot with 5.05gig @ 1.44VC , but not win stable at all.
So long, luke
My 2500k arrived,batch L041C124.Anyone has C letter reports?I browsed the net and only found one of coolaer reports with L041C,was something like 5670 Valid :D
waiting for results :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Alex-Ro
Tomorrow my mobo will arrive,asrock p67 extreme6,fingers crossed :D
2500K / Asus P8P67 Pro 1053
Batch L040B544
Zalman CNPS10X Performa - Air
LinX 0.6.4
4700 @ 1.300
4800 @ 1.325
4900 @ 1.350
5000 @ 1.380. Internal PLL Overvoltage - enabled
Edit. Same batch as flopper: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...8&postcount=89
Not sure if this is offtopic.. It's regarding batches so I hope it's okay to discuss it here.
A batch is arround 300 cpu's right? I've heard that cpu's near the edge of a wafer are usually worse (oc/speed-wise). Are they speedbinned by where they're from on the wafer, or simply each wafer goes to make the same rated cpu? If so, then why go for the same batch as others? If 200 ppl posted good results with batch XX, there must be 100 "bad" cpus left..
((Disregard. Cant get 5ghz :-( Tried 1.350-1.375v, freezes same spot at Windows loadscreen. Any tips on voltage settings? VCCSA, VCCIO, CPU PLL, PCH? Internal PLL voltage?))
Nice chip/batch!... some of the L040BXXX are looking really good.Quote:
Originally Posted by illuminati-hwt
Already posted my batch i7-2600K L038A660. Asus P8P67 Deluxe
Running @ 5.0 Ghz might be a little too toasty got my liking
4.8 Ghz only requires 1.32v and runs IBT just under 70.deg
Using Thermalright Venomous X-RT cooler
1.39V (bios)@ 5ghz
#l039b470
Well at the stock x33 multiplier in cinebench my volts are 1.208v.Quote:
Originally Posted by renozi
Overclocking I am only able to do with the Asus AI Suite II. For some reason this new efi bios stuff has me confused. I will change the multiplier but it will not let me keep the change and instantly revert back to a lower number. I like the old fashioned bios i guess.
Yeah I had trouble with this new bois as well. You have to change the multi in Advanced/Cpu Power Management/Cpu Ratio. Make sure you leave Turbo Mode enabled. I have to save a couple of times to get it to save but it does work.:)Quote:
Originally Posted by MyPBG4Died
Mypgb4died, are you ocing the cpu multiplier or the turbo multiplier? Try setting it to "By per core (no oc in SO)"
Watch the video from 9 min mark: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vBN-cBPs98
The number of cpus in a batch depends based on die size and yield. Typical yields on a new process is around 40-50%, so assuming there are 200 dies per wafer (this is rather optimistic, considering how large the die is) you can only expect 80-100 dies to just pass the test program. Speed binning is done by how fast the processor will pass the test program plus a certain guard band (yes, they overclock your processor before it even leaves the factory), although it does typically correlate to center dies being faster and edge dies being slower. It's all dependent on any process shifts that may have occurred during production, hence why certain batches are faster than others because some may have been made leakier than others.Quote:
Originally Posted by illuminati-hwt
Quote:
Originally Posted by illuminati-hwt
I was doing it anywhere i could.
Makes no difference. Went back to micro center and exchanged the asus p8p67 for an MSI P67A-GD55 because the asus does not do sli even though they said it did. Was also having some reboot issues when it would try to post. Got a new cpu also in the deal. Still in the L040B batch but a 671 instead of an 800. Will get everything up and running and see about the differences for OC.
I am sorry that I will not be able to make a list. I know it's a weak excuse, but I really don't have time to do it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam_oslo
That's OK, no biggy. It's good to know, :) then maybe we can get somebody else to volunteer for the fun ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by raptord
Anybody with a post in first page, who is following, can volunteer to make a list of all documented results? Hey it would be fun :)
K I'll put up a list, as I did it too with the Wolfdales BUT
1) I need more proof then just saying that you got 5ghz at 1.35 stable
2) What I propose :
Grab this LinX version from Zalbards thread ( as it almost correctly stresses all the cores and threads ) : linx(0.64)_10.3.0.003.zip
3) All ram has to be selected and it has to be at least 20 runs and still running. So select eg 25 loops and once you passed 20 grab a screenie with everything running.
4) CPU-Z : CPU and Memory tab open
5) TMonitor open ( to see all the cores loaded ) 32 Bit : TMonitor_1031_32.exe 64 Bit : TMonitor_1031_64.exe
6) List : CPU , Batch, Mobo & Bios version , cooling type.
If more ideas pop up plz let me know, will start to collect from tomorrow ( now I need some sleep)
You have a better option? The only site without the waiting time to download I know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
Also, what advertisements? Not using Firefox? I didn't even know they existed there...
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=264847 :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by renozi
@Zalbard :Well my Antivirus blocks me, so I have to disable it to get access, indeed if you use IE you get directed to another site, upped the files to the FTP... good speeds and no waiting...
ow saw now that you are collecting data already mate, go ahead and continue !!!
leeg check inbox :)
What is the suggested settngs for prime95 to ensure we're on the same page as far as "prime95 stable"?
Dont use prime, Use LinX .. remember to click Check all and start ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by AH64
Can you post some pics by running prime95 26.4 by 5gig@1.38VC Custom?Quote:
Originally Posted by illuminati-hwt
I think i have a gem,more testing this day:
Batch L041C124...4800-->1.24
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/2084/4800g.th.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Not sure I did this right?
i7 2600K Batch L038A660
Mobo ASUS P8P67 Deluxe. Bios 1053.
Cooling Air. Thermalright Venomous X-RT.
This may actually run on lower Vcore as I threw 1.4100v at it in bios and ran the test.
Very nice indeed :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex-Ro
Could someone do a HT-off run with a lot of memory on IBT(or linx)? How many gflops are you maxing on, let's say, 5GHz ?
Can one of the over-5GHz folks kindly post a Cinebench 10 and 11 screen, just for kicks? My i7-930@4.2 gets 24600 & 7.16, respectively. TIA.
No gem.. your cpu-z isn't reporting correct voltage. I have the same issue. Get the trial version of AIDA64 or cpuid's HWmonitor.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex-Ro
Dropped the Vcore 3 notches from above post.
i7 2600K Batch L038A660.
Mobo ASUS P8P67 Deluxe. Bios 1053.
Cooling Air. Thermalright Venomous X-RT.
Bios set at 1.395v.
Min during test 1.398v.
Max during test 1.408v.
http://i54.tinypic.com/16aaefd.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by Ccaution
Only 1024mb ram, but in my experience the gflops didn't change between RAM levels
@crossg:
Hey could you post your UEFI Bios settings?
Got my SB already just waiting for my P8P67 and Thermalright 1156 mounting kit to arrive...
http://i56.tinypic.com/b7xgso.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by Ccaution
Bit hot but you get the idea :D
Sure. Just need to find somekind of template.:)Quote:
Originally Posted by LagunaX
I'm suprised no one has opened a Asus P8P67 thread yet.
SBB. Nice!!
Try theseQuote:
Originally Posted by crossg
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...7&postcount=11
Good to see all these 5GHz+ 24/7 stable popping up. :)
I have a impression MBs are playing smaller role in this round, because you can't push the BCLK, and won't need to push the MB with a unlocked CPU, either. Some BIOSes will need some time to mature tho.
Anybody got a good experience with 2006k on mini/micro-ATX? Or, what mini/micro-ATX would you guys recommend?
2600K batch: L042B074
MSI P67A-GD65 bios 1.6
2x2GB Team Xtreem LV
4800Mhz @ 1.256v bios - 1.24v idle - 1.288v load
Moved v v
crossg, I just made an Asus p8p67 oc thread :-) post away.
SBB, awesome oc and batch. But volt and temp seem high :-/ Will it do lower voltage?
That is looking like a very nice batch!Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackoberst
Boy, do I ? :shocked:Quote:
Originally Posted by SBB
That chip is an animal - 77GFlops! - thanks for the time mate, I think I need to get one of those asap ;)
No mate,that is the actual voltage set in bios and reported right,asrock mobo doesnt have the problem like gigabyte :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by AH64
So,5 ghz 1.33 anyone :D ?
http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/3714/5ghz.jpg
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Congrats on your new chip! I think that batch is now on my short list.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex-Ro
That's a golden chip. :up: And even better this baby has landed in Europe. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex-Ro
So C-batch-baby is the way to go? Everything is strange in this round, anyways, LOL
Good I've waited in this round. Now I've to track down this batch# and I may find it, hopefully in Norway.
EDIT: Talking to Alex on PM, so no need for the rest :).
EDIT2: Who else got a C-batch? Anybody got a list of documented results with C-batch# on this (or other) forum?
That is certainly a nice chip, yet another keeper.:up:
Got the same batch number as Alex-Ro, same 1.31V set in BIOS and 1.324-1.327V reported in AXTU, mobo ASRock Extreme4, stable fully at 5019.61MHz.
P.S. I have seen lots of guys posting here results with LinX with their 2600K running at 5ghz and having around 60-61Gflops. Doesn't this mean that their CPU is throttling?
L042A969
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...o/dsc_0371.jpg
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...o/dsc_0101.jpg
I think LinX isn't absolute stabilities test for Sandy Bridge.
I passed it at lower VCore but it not pass CPU Test of 3DMark 03 , 3DMark 05 & 10K Prime95.
CPU ..Intel Core i7 2600K
Motherboard ..ASUS P8P67 PRO
Memory ..G.Skill F3-17600 CL7D-4GBPIS 2GB*2 Dual Channel
Graphic Card ..GTX 580 @ 985/1,970/4,640MHz
Harddisk ..WD1002FAEX 1TB SATA3
CPU Cooler ..Water Cooling @ Ambient 25C
Power Supply ..Antec TPQ-1200 OC Version 1200W
Operation System ..Windows 7 Enterprise 32-bit
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...linx5217-2.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...7-pro/occt.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...23h27-cpu1.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...23h27-cpu2.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...23h27-cpu3.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...23h27-cpu4.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...3h27-vcore.png
Prime95 Blend Mode 1024K, 8K, 10K, 856K & 768K 1Hour 22Minutes
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...rime5217-1.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont.../5217hpi_1.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...p67-pro/v1.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...o/pcmark05.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...p67-pro/e1.jpg
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...p67-pro/03.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...p67-pro/05.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...7-pro/3d06.png
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...7-pro/07np.jpg
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...-pro/3d07p.jpg
http://www.vmodtech.com/main/wp-cont...p67-pro/11.png
Are you testing all ram Venom crusher ? 1.8Gb from 4 seems a bit low... It also depends a lot on the LinX version used... but you are right there's no 100% bulletproof stability test
all ram 32-bit os problem size 15500Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
aaaah that explains a lot :)
Collecting thread is up here lads : SB FPO Batch collecting thread
Will add every nite the new listed CPU's into the Excell file
That is a great idea. We can create a nice data base of info.:up:
yeah I like it like that, simple file you can print it out, go to the shop and try to find ya batch or similar performance....
Now we need more results !!
Good job :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
Hey guys fill it up, spescially those with C-batch harry up. We need a good overview to figuer out Intel's new Batch-business.
Most chips seams to B-batch in this round, in countrary with last rounds. I'm wondring if C-batch is the way to go, but we need more data to comfirm it.
2600K #L041B741, Biostar TP67XE, Noctua NH-U12P with push/pull.
WPrime 1024M load:
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/v...prime1024M.png
WPrime 1024M idle:
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/v...e1024Midle.png
Nice nice nice !!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by PolRoger
Can u pass Linx with that setup ? Care to share some settings ? I'm at 4.8 at the same voltage and slightly higher temps.
This is batch L040B208 2600K at 5G at 1.370v bios with level1 Load-Line Cal enabled. This is in my torture rack case which has twin remote rad cooling loops. Prime95 blend was ran for a little over 4 hours at 1.370 v core/1080 QPI/VTT smooth as silk. RealTemp readings are correct with EasyTune6 showing slightly higher.
Another great OC there flesh !!!Quote:
Originally Posted by flesheatinvirus
Could you fire that up and run TMonitor while Prime95 is blending ? I'm curious to see if Prime95 is being throttled. Thanks!
Thanks again. I like that little program TMonitor. What version is that? I will give it shot.
1.031 - http://www.cpuid.com/medias/files/so...nitor_1031.zipQuote:
Originally Posted by flesheatinvirus
I've not used this TMonitor program until yesterday, but I was wondering what would the graph look like during throttling? Every few seconds I am getting 1-3 bars dropping off in the graph, and sometimes I see a core drop to 1600 mhz but its only for like 1-2 seconds max. Do you think the CPU is actually throttling due to heat or due to waiting on a workload? This is when running prime95. I've set the options in my UEFI (P8P67 Deluxe) to allow for a higher than default TDP.Quote:
Originally Posted by ugotd8
EDIT: I'll add that when looking with ThrottleStop, FID sticks at the multi I have set the whole time I am running prime.
I just ran a quick test with new wPrime version 2.04 while running a multi reading log with TMonitor and saw no change at all. I do not like the new version wprime as it only loaded my cores up 50% during the 1024m test. I will also try version 1.55 My mistake, did not load all the cores up.
I see the periodic drops in TMonitor too, but I have my doubts if they're real. I don't see them when using RealTemp or ThrottleStop(monitoring).
I have seen it a couple times here but not really that much of an issue and performance seems fine.
Yes, I too see periodic drops. I'm talking about steady core speed drops. For example when I lead the TDP values to default in BIOS, then fire up Linx, core speeds drop from 4800MHz to 4200Mhz.Quote:
Originally Posted by bmg
What I'm getting at here is a rather off-the-wall theory that I could "dial-in" my TDP levels so that Linx, Cincebench (and lightwave) don't throttle, but Prime95 does hence passes. I'm working on my long held assumption that Linpack and Prime have nothing to do with real world usage, and as long as my lightwave renderer never throttles and I can get my OC to pass Linx and Prime that way, I'm golden.
Feel free to tell me how full-of-xxxx I am. :-)
ThrottleStop is awesome, thanks for that. Much less extraneous load during benching/stability testing. The FID column sticks just as you said. Not as pretty as TMonitor, but I like it better. Thanks again.Quote:
Originally Posted by korruptedone
I haven't stressed with Prime95/LinX yet... but most likely it will need a couple bumps vcore increase. I was using vcore "offset" +100, DRAM at 1600 9-9-9-24 @1.625v all other voltages set to default. BIOS PLL voltage overide set to enabled.Quote:
Originally Posted by ugotd8
L040B208 with 1.37v load for Prime @ 5GHz is looking very good! How much vcore does your other chip L042B208 need for 5GHz?Quote:
Originally Posted by flesheatinvirus
Thanks much. Actually I not even tried the L042B208 yet, waiting for the new board which should be here tomorrow, no dual channel on this board. I am hoping it will be similar to the L040B. I also snagged some nice Gskill 17066 in the 7-10-7-27 flav which should scale nice. I ran 3DM01 again for the fist time in years only to be surprised like everyone else how well Sandy scales, reminds me of my old Wolfy E8600. I will test that chip out with in a couple days and post all findings as well as some bench pics.
For some odd reason cpu-z is reading only 3400mhz lol... All my other monitors r saying 4700 and i run 1meg super pi in 7.xxx seconds ... hrmm?
Wow, quite a gem there. I need +180 or about 1.44V load for 5GHz. Temps jump to mid to 70's so fast I just stop the test.Quote:
Originally Posted by PolRoger
Just picked up a different cooler, and tried using way less thermal paste, we'll see how that goes.
Very nice oc and batch Alex-Ro! :D I asked a shop here today if they had that batch, and they had it! :D They will send it tomorrow so I should have it in 2 days. I also bought gigabyte p67 ud4 and Noctua U12P-SE2
If you look at the microarchitectural papers for Sandy Bridge(SNB) there's a decoded uOp cache which allows micro-ops to be cached off and allow the decode unit to be turned off if it isn't needed. This is rather important because for "smoke tests" like LinX and Prime95 try to keep very small loops that fit completely within the L1 instruction cache because historically execution units and caches are where most speed paths lie, so the harder you pound those units, the more likely you're able to destabilize the system.Quote:
Originally Posted by Venom-Crusher
However, it appears the caches and execution units in SNB are robust, so the weakness appears to be in the decode stage, which is rather complex for x86 parts. The uOp cache in SNB allows the decode stage to be turned off for tight loops, and any instabilities in the decode stage will only be exposed once you run a program that doesn't fit in cache and requires constant instruction decode like 3DMark.
I think there needs to be an amendment to SNB stability and that would be to run some sort of large program such as 3DMark, etc.
I think you need to install SP1 with AVX,then run latest linpack and see what happens. :clap: Kaboom;)
One problem with 3D mark is when your processor is unlocked it reports the wrong freq. I did two tests @ 5000 with my 2600KQuote:
Originally Posted by famish99
3D Mark 11.
Vantage
Both reported CPU @ 3400.
Not sure what the 2500K reports.
It's not that it reports the wrong freq, but that's what your base clock before turbo is. It's also possible that 3dmark isn't able to stress the clock all the way up.Quote:
Originally Posted by crossg
Nevertheless, the need for a non-loop intensive stress test is necessary to make sure you don't get chokes from the decode. I assure you this isn't an easy job; there are teams of people in semiconductor companies involved with just creating tests to break the system, a team which I am a member of ;)
Agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by famish99
The reason I mentioned this was my 875K, 980x and 2600K all report the wrong clocks. The i7 950 reported the correct OC clock. I don't use turbo in the other chips.:)
Well, I've only understood half of what you have said so far, but thank you very much for shedding some light on this. I've noticed the peculiarities of stress testing on this new chip and I'm frankly a little lost as to when/how to call an overclock stable.Quote:
Originally Posted by famish99
I see people on other forums hammering their chips with voltage trying to get Prime95 to pass. I on the other hand am holding off until this is sorted, it just doesn't make sense to me that on the 1366 platform the linpack test was the killer (highest load) and now on the 1155 platform that has miraculously switched around and now Prime95 is the killer.
http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/9216/5000a.th.jpg
5K!
watercooled onto a P8P67 ... not so bad ... don't you?
ps. it's a sample ... :)
Not bad at all - nice b;);)bs too :rofl:
Feel free to ask about what you don't understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by ugotd8
Different architectures have different failing mechanisms; on Nehalem the execution units (add, multiply, load/store) were the bottlenecks, but Sandy Bridge it seems the instruction decode is the bottleneck.
Linpack is designed to be more execution stress whereas Prime95 could possibly require more decode stress (especially if you choose blend instead of small fft).
I cannot verify this (still waiting for my Sandy Bridge), but if more people have problems with Prime95, that might be the goto test until more evidence comes in.
I used Prime95 on my 2600K. 4+ hours of blend at 5G was no problem. batch L040B208
You also have one of the nicest WC setups I've seen, and your chip never gets above 60C right ?Quote:
Originally Posted by flesheatinvirus
Very frustrating.
I'll be interested to see your thoughts once you get your SB. A 2600K I assume?Quote:
Originally Posted by famish99
In the meantime, there are others that have noticed this:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=264940
Thanks again.
Thank You for the rep. Yeah... That is true cooling is no longer an issue. I can hold this chip pretty low under load. My torture rack is made for builders.
Just got my 2600k , either i am retarded or there is somethings wrong i wasted 1 h in the bios without finding how to increase the multiplier it look locked at 34 no matter what i do i can't increase it, i played with major setting part the bios still show the cpu is at default speed , the motherboard is asus p67 pro
pls help
Never used that new bios on the ASUSs, but... Make sure turbo is on, speedstep is on, and then set your turbo multipliers for each core.Quote:
Originally Posted by makaka
L040B208 + P8P67 Deluxe 1053 + 2x4GB Vengeance
Prolimatech Megahalems Rev B + Scythe Gentle Typhoon 1850RPM
48 x 100 @ 1.335 V BIOS LLC Extreme
VCCSA 0.925
VCCIO 1.075
CPU PLL 1.80
PCH 1.05
http://www.zhoulander.com/projects/sandy/4800-valid.png
Same batch as flesheatinvirus but not as nice results! :shrug:
Very nice. That is a potential killer chip my friend. :up:
I have the same batch as well, and need 1.4 for 4.8 so don't feel bad. :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by zoob
My 2x4Gb Vengeance sticks should get here tomorrow.
You lowered your VCCSA ?
Batch# L040B705
MicroATX P8P67-M PRO
VenomX + 1500 RPM SFlex Fan, inside Antec P180
http://img808.imageshack.us/img808/6161/4700mhz.jpg
Sorry typo on that! It's been corrected.Quote:
Originally Posted by ugotd8
That is a nice batch and your still ~200Mhz higher than many SB 2600K at similar volts!Quote:
Originally Posted by zoob
I'm not sure that is entirely correct- I can't get past 4.5ghz (45*100) on my 2600k on the asus p8p67 evo with either the 1003 or 1053 beta bios.Quote:
Originally Posted by raptord
Batch# L041B741
I can get to 4.5ghz prime stable on air cooling (venomous-x) with 1.39xx vcore under load. I've gone as high as 1.475 vcore and still can't get into windows at 4.6ghz or above ( I can post at 4.6 ghz and above but windows freezes up during the opening splash screen). I've played with most of the settings such as phase control, LLC, internal PLL overvoltage, VRM frequency, etc, and 45x seems to be the wall for this chip- or at least a wall that 1.475 vcore with extreme LLC won't break (and I'm not willing to push more that that right now). Anyone have a similar experience?
Figures I would get a lemon...who would have thought that 4.5 ghz would be considered a less than stellar OC performance?!?
Too much vcore or maybe (most likely) memory voltage or timings.Quote:
Originally Posted by drnick
Batch# L040B307
5ghz 1,344v 8hours prime blend stable
http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/374...lend8horas.jpg
P8P67 Pro
i7 2600K (Batch: L040B698)
4 x 4GB GSkill Ripjaws @ 1333 MHz
Testing stock vcore for now. I'll increase it later.
Stock vcore:
1.165v (BIOS + AI Suite)
1.264v (CPUz + AI Suite Monitor)
- Everything is left at stock except for multiplier.
- All temps were too low be noteworthy. :rofl:
4.5 GHz:
IBT/LinX/Linpack: > 5 min. stable
prime95 (x64): instant fail
y-cruncher (SSE4.1): instant fail
4.4 GHz:
IBT/LinX/Linpack: > 5 min. stable
prime95 (x64): 2 min. fail
y-cruncher (SSE4.1): 1b stable (377 secs)
4.3 GHz:
IBT/LinX/Linpack: > 5 min. stable
prime95 (x64): > 5 min. stable
y-cruncher (SSE4.1): > 5 min. stable
*Currently, y-cruncher only supports up to SSE4.1. AVX support will come in a few weeks. I'll re-test then.
awesome voltage! And your cooling?
Noctua DH14Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
I don’t find this thread pointless, even if everyone submitted there 4.8GHz results it would still tell us which batch appears to run hot/cold low/high volt etc.
Would be nice to make the first post a list to make it easy for people to compare chips.
i5 2500K L041B517
5.0 @ 1.445
5.1 @ 1.46
5.2 @ 1.50
5.3 @ 1.57
LinX 20+ stable on air.
P.S I don’t go much on batch anyway!
I thought about that- but I'm running memory (2x2gb ddr3-2000mhz sticks that worked flawlessly in another computer) at 1333mhz with loose timings. I'm pretty sure it's not a memory issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by ugotd8
I also thought about the possibility of giving it too much vcore- but it won't load windows at 4.6ghz or above at vcores ranging from 1.2 to 1.475.
Any other suggestions? I really think that 4.8ghz is not a given with all 2600k chips based on my experience with this one.