sorry, what post are you referring to?Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDias
Printable View
sorry, what post are you referring to?Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDias
Perfect. I'm going to hunt for a batch like yours. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by namegt
thats the one I was trying to get but I got the 0831 CPCW instead, I even returned my first one at Tiger and they only had the "0831" stepping :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliverda
"chicken patty"
your settings of the ACC what can we do?
what do you mean my settings of the ACC?Quote:
Originally Posted by namegt
I have mine at +4 for 3.4 GHz.
what do u mean with "what post"? i mean all the posts with screenshots of ur ramsettings. i just wanted to know if u changed anything manually other than the primary 5-5-5-15 timings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Patty
Just wasn't sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDias
My RAM at SPD is 5-5-5-18. THat is how I ran all tests, unless I stated I changed them. BUt all tests were ran at SPD which is 5-5-5-18 at DDR2 800 or 5-7-7-24 for DDR2 1066.
this is the best time i could do !
i didn`t try yet 3400 (200*17) with the 1066 strap and the ram at 4-4-4-15, but i doubt i`ll get a better result
^^^^ nice bro, how much voltage you feeding the RAM to have it a 640MHz
i gave it 2.26 if i`m not mistaken
i`d go higher with the cpu but it won`t start wind even with 1.5 at 3500
nice Pi :clap:
best ive gotten is 23.515s at 3.45ghz running at 1.57vcore.
ram timings are slowing me down...cant seem to boot over 1100mhz at cas 5 at 2.2v. this is on 2x1gb OCZ sticks....changed over to the 2x2gb HyperX sticks as Vista seems to like more memory. they have horrible timings though. at ddr8500 they run at cas 7. having better stability running at the 400mhz strap with cas 5 timings.
Attachment 87122
Prime stable at 3.3ghz at 1.475v though. software readings of 1.488v-1.504v
220fsb 15x multi 2300mhz nb 2200mhz ht 880mhz ram cas 5-6-6-18 at 2.2v
Attachment 87123
initial 3dmark06 17025
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8554262
3dmark vantage P13119
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=456847
3dmark vantage X9614
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=457303
9950be
ma-790gp-ds4h
ati 4870x2
2x2gb ddr8500 kingston hyperx
700w silverstone
ok, when i have time, tomorrow i`ll try 1.55 maybe it`ll start windows :D at over 3500 :DQuote:
best ive gotten is 23.515s at 3.45ghz running at 1.57vcore.
hopefully i`ll have a cpu-z and super pi
working on these settings now.
Attachment 87127
boots into windows but havent had much luck completing benches.
back at it... :shrug:
Amazing work people!Keep pushing it .And remember to watch the cpu temps and temps of pwm section :)
you gave me some ideas :DQuote:
Originally Posted by zif33rs
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=433594
and my beautiful super pi:D
great job guys, I havent got much time to try and do anything lately, but my CPU doesnt wanna boot at over 3.45GHz, even with the voltage between 1.5v all the way to 1.63v.
I might be getting a Q6600 soon to do some comparisons, it'll be a great to have both and compare them in benchmarks.
However i am saving some money to see if I can order a Deneb as soon as they hit the stores, that'll be sweet
so far here is my most 100% stable 24/7 setting, i'm not focusing on max clocks right now, just need to get the rig stable
still working on it
http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/4...2ghzct0.th.jpghttp://img374.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
My memory clock
ram : ocz 7200 sli (d9gmh) 5-5-5-15 2.4v
http://cfs7.tistory.com/original/11/.../48e8844eac9f9
^^^sweet, I can't wait till my new ram comes in. Its some Crucial Ballistics Tracers DDR2 1066, should yield a big improvement over my current memory.
Nice 24/7 setting Chicken Patty... :up:
Here's mine.... I got lower V's, Neener Neener... :D
CLICKABLE:
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...2_Everyday.jpg
That's almost an hour 4core Prime, heres a 10 pass Linpack run at the same settings:
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...02_Linpack.png
The CPU's/Chipsets have gotten much better since the early days, I'm actually pretty happy with this setting. Until Deneb comes around that is... :yepp:
It'll be nice if you can do 3.2 GHz stable at the same vcore :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveburt714
Of course, when the Deneb comes out, a new thread shall be made buahahahaha :rofl::up:
My biggest problem seems to be getting my IMC speeds up. I don't know if my chip is just a little weak in that department or maybe I need to keep my HT multi and IMC multi matched....
I've noticed alot of people hitting 2.4nb are also running 2.4ht....
I've seen too many people kill their CPUs running high IMC v's, so I try not to go over 1.3 (stock). Guess that will give me something to play with tonight.. ;)
I'm waiting for that Deneb Thread though!! :up:
Yeah i plan on getting the Deneb as soon as it hits the stores,Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveburt714
when you refer to IMC, what are you talking about, the Hyper Transport?
IMC = integrated memory controllerQuote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Patty
Yep, that's what I meant... ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by pershoot
The only reason I reference it that way is because Phenom is a little different than Intel based systems so I try to discern between the two... NB on an Intel system relates directly to the Mem Controller, while on Phenom the NB is more of an IO chip and the Mem Controller is on the CPU (IMC)...
It can get a little confusing and at least to me it provides some amount of clarity, since most Phenom bios have NBvid (IMC) and NBvolts (chipset/IO).
Chicken Patty: Hope that clears things up a little :D...
Do you run your NB(IMC)Multi at the same speed as your HTMulti?
IE: if you go into AOD does NBspeed and HTLinkSpeed show the same frequency?
I've noticed alot of people with high IMC speeds have matching HTlink speeds...
Daveburt714 Hi yupper on my 24/7 OC i run my NB and HT link speed the same 231 my chip will not OC as hight and be 24/7 stable as you guy are getting 3.0ghz for me here a AOD screen shot my 24/7 OC on my Foxconn board
AMD says Max voltage on a 65nm Phenom is 1.55v's Merkk1.
Personally, I don't feel comfortable running the voltage that high, even though I'm running on pretty good aftermarket air....
As long as you have good cooling (load temps under 60c) you could probably get better clocks if you bumped your CPUvid up to 1.4v.
Of course you'd do so at your own risk... :D
I'm actually a wimp when it comes to high V's... ;) When I bought my 1st Phenom back in December I wouldn't go over 1.3v for extended periods either. But now, I really don't think 1.4v is too extreme unless your going to stress your system (4core Prime/Linpack 30pass/OCCT for hours)....
I've had mine at 1.4vid for a few weeks under normal use without any problems and that includes Video Compression, massive multi tasking and gaming...
BTW: Thanks for your input on the matching IMC/HT clocks!! :)
Hi AOD dosen't show my cpu volts right for 3.0ghz i run1.35v on the cpu just finsh a prine run a 3.105 stable 1.4 volts ACC setting -4% on core 1,2,3 core 4 set to 0 going to run 3dmark-06 than the big test to see if it reboot with thoughts ACC setting.
Same old story. As soon as i run a ACC setting that has a split made into it ,it will boot the frist time around run 3.1 ghz stable but when i try reboot it, it will not reboot .Now i got to run the PC declock for a few hours before i can try again .I'am going ot test to see if a -4% and a -2% ACC will reboot tomarow .
Hey guys..
I just started doing my homework last night.
With a few tests I managed to run 3dMARK06 and Aquamark.
At 3248mhz with 14 multi, I currently passed SPI with 23,593sec.
Stock cooling, 1,33vcore and temp around 67 degrees.
My ACC is at 0.
Now my question is hot to get pass a small multi problem.
At 14 multi, I reach 230 at fsb (460 memory) and pass SPI.
At 14,5 multi, I reach 222 and pass SPI.
At 15 multi,I can't pass SPI at 209 fsb..
Tried a little more vcore, nb vid and vdimm but nothing changed.
Any ideas??Should I reaise any other voltage?Or change ACC, which works great at 0?
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/4...8mhzjr7.th.jpg
yeah, the supposed maxtemp is 64, so i`d say never go more than 56-57(in full)Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAVIPER
and stock cooling kind of suks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveburt714
yeah I gotcha, I just refered to it as Hyper transport. Anyhow, the Nehalems (intel) now have IMC's but those chips are not proving to be as tough as people thought.
The IMC frequency will only run as fast as your FSB runs, since its a multiple of it. So since I am using only the multiple to clock my IMC will not run past 2.0 GHz (200 FSB). However the NB (I/O chip) has its own multiplier which is the FSB x what multi you set for it at 200x12 making the NB run at 2.4GHz right now for me. So no, my frequencies are not equal.
Oh, and thanks, It did clear up any confusions. :up:
I ran this current chip at 1.63v on water :), still here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveburt714
Of course for a very short time, trying to get it to boot at 3.5 GHz, went into windows then crashed shortly after.
Merkk, wassup buddy.Quote:
Originally Posted by merkk1
Hey why you running ACC on the "-" settings?? IF you want stability at higher clocks you need a "+" setting. The minus settings are for power savings and low voltage clocks, you don't want that. :p:
Hi there. I see you have a 125w 9950, congrats on that. I can already see the difference from the 140w version I have.Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAVIPER
Anyhow, I would just raise up one notch on the CPU voltage. Try these settings:
CPU voltage one notch higher
CPU NB voltage - 1.35v
then put your NB and SB voltages on Auto. I run them auto all the time and I have no problems. Try that and let me know how it goes. Remember you don't need to give your RAM voltage as you are using a lower FSB meaning your RAM will be clocked at lower speeds.
Ah dang ,, Bro thats all that cooler can handle..Seriously get a nice Aircooler and 86 the stocker.. Your Overclocking and that is the only thing holding you back..ONCE YOU PUT MORE THAN 1.35VOLTS the stock cooler fumbles bad above 3.2ghz...Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAVIPER
Despite the STOCk thing your doing good...that chip has more left trust me..
Hers a link that shows some decent coolers..
I really like the Xigmatek for the price it performs like the Thermalrights..Which are tabout the best for air..Even the (Sythe Mine) Rocks better than stock cooler.
http://www.petrastechshop.com/cpuheatsinks.html
Also i got board and decided to see how fast my 9950 goes..i lowered it from 3.5ghz to 3.4ghz but tweaked the Ram timing and NB ..Now ,i know sounds like i slowed it down .The NB and Ram still has it srceaming..My TA770/sb600 dosnt like Volts so i decided to run it at only 3.4-3.45ghz for now..Should have my new Mobo Sunday To see what this chip can do on SB750:D
@ 3.4ghz Phenoms are a very fun ,nice ,nice ,nice ,chip when tuned on any mobo.
http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u.../3400_2640.jpg
Note;
Have you found a setting that lets you set the CPU to CHIPSET NBvolts to say 1.31-1.35v this will help the IMC // Ram be more stable.
Im refering to the MOTHERBOARD NB CHIPSET volts not CPUNBvolts.
Its wierd ,, the CPU Multiplyer can affect ram stability alot..
Some CPU multis work better..Its tuff to narrow it down ,,so keep track what works and what dosnt .This way you know what you did.
Try Different ram dividers 400 may be better than 667 and so on..
The Higher CPU Multi = lower Ram divider ,, unless you have uber clocking ram or unlocked CPU like us.
(In my Screenshot see my HTT = 220 that using 1066 divider)...your ram may not like the divider your using @ 15x..The 15x divider may be Pushing your CPU's imc by not having More Volts .
9850/9950 = 1.35- 1.45v CPU needed for 3.3-3.35ghz... That heatsink verywell can be holding you back(Too much heat @1.35volts already).
Last if it dosnt work on 209 try 208 or 210..could be just buggy...The Higher the CPUMulti = lower HTT regardless.
If all else fails im pretty shure its the heatsinks fault not yours:D
Hope that helps ya..
gOtVoltage whats the 24/7 safe voltage for a 9950 ?
Chicken Patty
Hi i use a +4% on my 24/7 3.0 ghz prime stable set-up but to get 3.1 prime stable i have to put a split into the ACC setting to get prime stable .If i do it on the +ACC setting side it take a big split but doing on the -side of ACC it make the split smaller to get my CPU prime stable just trying to see if i can find a ACC setting that will let me run prime stable 3.1 ghz and still let me reboot the PC all the time like my like 24/7 3.0 ghz set-up dose .
Ok I get you now, I forgot you're having the reboot issues. Have you found any suggestions at all for that issue? I still can't think of what it is :(Quote:
Originally Posted by merkk1
right now working on my highest stable everyday clock
here is what I have so far, hasnt crashed yet, I'll put it through some torture later
http://img361.imageshack.us/img361/7...6620if4.th.jpghttp://img361.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Woot baby 3.1 ghz stable just finsh up hour long prime run some 3Dmark-06 runs vantage run and now it reboot all the time . What it took for me to get there was a ACC setting of -4% on core 1, 2, 3 and core 4 was set to -2% and with thoughts setting 3.1 ghz run stable and i can reboot it after i trun it off . On the Foxconn a79a-s board if i run a split of more than 1 (-4% to 0) and i get the rig stable it will not be able reboot after i turn the power off. So i have to keep the split with in one than that fix the rebooting trouble . Run 3.1 ghz @ 1.4v NB and NT link 230 @ 1.35v
I find that no matter what the ACC or cpu vid my Core #3 bugs out on me. So as a last resort, I cheated. I clocked this core at 3.105ghz and left the others at 3.208, and it worked! I am using cpu vid of 1.350 which peaks at 1.38 (using different monitors) under very heavy load.
I am very stable with 2 hrs of OCCT and 3 hrs of Prime95. My max temp is 47.5C under water.
http://i37.tinypic.com/5uhjxd.jpg
way to go Merrk, very happy for you man. finally stable at 3.1GHz.
and Jazzman, I have never thought of that, but that is brilliant hehehe. Great work :)
Thank you . I'am going to start thinking what i need to do to get 3.2 ghz stable now . I'am using vista-64 so 3.2ghz stable on that OS air cool would be a good over clock i think .
yeah it would. Keep us posted please.:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by merkk1
is the aod build in stress test as good as the good old prime95 or orthos?
these settings are 1hr aod stress test stable.
will do a long 8hr run tomorrow to see if it craps out. so far it runs everything i throw at it (vantage, cod4, dod, cs:s, dirt, aitd) under vista x64.
Hi, would you please explain how you go about telling the difference between the 125watt cpus and the 140's?Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Patty
Do the 125w cpus have different product code?
Cheers
Yes they do havea different product code, I would imagine. In this case I was reffering to a post where the poster said it was a 125w version of the 9950Quote:
Originally Posted by mongoled
while aod stability test runs for hrs @3.2ghz, prime95 v25.6 bsods after a few minutes and reboots my system. what could be the reason?
my ram settings are on auto except the primary 5-5-5-15. tried the ram on auto(2.1v) and 2.2v, they are rated for 2.2-2.4v. maybe i have to fine tune the secondary timings, but i canīt find any information about these sticks and the GeiL forum seems to be down forever.
i also canīt raise the htt, even 5mhz more and i get a bsod. so i think it has to be ram related.
Ok understood, do you happen to know the product code? CheersQuote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Patty
THe number for the 140W version I got it of the box mine came in, and the 125W version I got the # of NeweggQuote:
Originally Posted by mongoled
9950BE 140W version - HD995Z:banana::banana::banana:HBOX
9950BE 125W version - HD995ZXAGHBOX
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDias
You can test the ram by booting into memtest. But since you are using AOD I think you may have to set your bios to your AOD configuration for 3.2, thus booting to your overclocked settings. I admit I don't really know how AOD works at bootup, I have always thought it only calibrates at the windows bootup session not the bios boot session. I say this because my bios startup screen shows 2.6 not 3.2.
Personally, I'd monitor heat during the Prime95 run. In my case, I see a rise from 37C to 47.5C with Prime95. Since my prime version shows each core's run, I can visually see which core bombs first and then each in succession. With my 3.2 run, Core#3 always bombed in Task#1 while the rest ran just fine. In your case, you may see a quick cascade of cores failing then lockup then reboot.
Also, ACC adjustment helped my 3.2 run. While very, very time consuming, it helped me attain 3.2. BTW, I can confirm ACC does goose the voltage. In my case - the AOD voltage setting is 1.35 and it gooses to 1.39 under very heavy load (OCCT load).
[/QUOTE]Quote:
Also, ACC adjustment helped my 3.2 run. While very, very time consuming, it helped me attain 3.2. BTW, I can confirm ACC does goose the voltage. In my case - the AOD voltage setting is 1.35 and it gooses to 1.39 under very heavy load (OCCT load).
I noticed the same thing on my rig, same setup as yours.
i tested my ram with the windows version of memtest (4 instances with 1gb of ram dedicated to each instance) and got no errors.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzman
to test the settings with memtest in dos mode i have to set everything up in bios, thatīs right. aod doesnīt change bios settings. iīm booting into windows at default settings. all i changed in bios was 1066 mem speed and the primary 5-5-5-15 timings in unganged mode.
when setting up unganged mode i can adjust timings for both dimm banks seperately, just noticed that today.
i noticed a higher temperature with prime95 too. with aod stability test highest temp is around 40°C and with prime95 its 43°C.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzman
funny thing is, that i canīt see which core craps out...
i just get a bluescreen with irq_not_less_or_equal and it reboots.
to be honest, i wasnīt really paying attention to the monitor till it turned blue. so i might see a core crapping out before the bsod if i stare at the screen all the time.
acc adds about 0.04v under 100%load on my system too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzman
my msi gave me that IRQ...Serive, and whater else screen 8 times yesterday -_-Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDias
Thank you both for your answers
Currently at 3.3 witn 1,35 volts
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/4...3300mhzqo5.jpg
Ram is not pushed at all, so I keep them at 1,9 for the time being.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Patty
CPU NB voltage at 1,35 is ok with stock cooling?
Ek supreme is at it's way, so don't worry about that!:)Quote:
Originally Posted by gOtVoltage
+2 at ACC helped a lot with 15 multi.Still haven't done much research as I was for 4 days at an overclocing event, but I will try more settings when I have more spare time.Quote:
Originally Posted by gOtVoltage
But for sure the first thing is to put everything inside the HAF and start running the water.Then I will start real business!:p::p:
I just installed my 79-T ,, I will have results of the 140watt phenom that clocked 3.5ghz on my TA770// SB600...Well see if theres more left to sqeeze and funny you say HAF.
I just ordered the HAF:D .My long awaited TJ09 which actually came in, i decided to return. After looking it over ,, i realized two tripples would fit nicer in the HAF...Plus i wont mind painting the Steel vs aluminun.
The HAF iii post in Liquid cooling when i get everything together at the end of the week(two tripples will be nice and snuggled INSIDE) ...I like to mod things.
P.s If this mobo dosnt make my 9950 happy,, i have dibs on the new 790fx/sb750 DFI:D
Well I believe that HAF will serve my whole system well.Quote:
Originally Posted by gOtVoltage
I like the RED-BLACK combination and the SUPREME is black too.
My HAF arrived 2 days ago at GREECE and I was one of the first to get it.
Excellent choice for waterccoling systems and I believe that there is absolutely no need for adding any extra fans.Especially the 23cm fan on the side will keep chipset and ram quite cool.Maybe a fan regulator will be good as an extra for bench time and I plan to use my old good akasa front panel.Also with black plate in front!:)
Forgot to ask.Quote:
Originally Posted by gOtVoltage
What should put to 1,35?
NB VID or NB Voltage??
hey guys...im running custom water with 3 rads so temps are no issue, im running 100% load on prime atm with 1.4v in bios on the cpu and at 3.2ghz. my max loads dont pass 49-50 deg .
my question is whats regarded as "safe" max volts for 125w phenoms.
cheers
Ninjagordy. :yepp:
damn prime95...
seems to be my vista ultimate 64 that doesnīt work well with prime.
iīm on winxp now and itīs priming at 3.2ghz/2.4ghz nb 1.3875v+2%acc.
crazy thing... and i almost thought i had bad ram.
is there a 64bit version of prime95? the mersenne.org site seems to be down.
http://vozforums.com/attachment.php?...8&d=1223453852Quote:
Originally Posted by MadDias
ftp://mersenne.org/gimps/p64v257.zip
Nbvoltage on 79-T is 1.325v this is the Chip set volts...Im testing 1.61v CPUvid and 1.55NBvid as i type @ 3.4ghz:DQuote:
Originally Posted by RASTAVIPER
@same voltage i used on the TA770 this 79-T has my chip 2c higher temp wise for CPU.. The Vcore is 100% stable with almost no vdroop for VIDs..The TA770 i had to give 1.64v to get 1.61v.. The 79-T overvolts a little 1.587v = 1.61v
So far ASUS 79-T with 140watt 9950 @ 3.4ghz//2000mhzNB @ 1.61vCPUvid 1.55vNBvid and NO ACC yet.. Im testing the limits before i try ACC...My ram is @ 1067mhz ganged .. Using origanal BIOS..After some more tweaks ill update BIos and see what she really has:D
Havnt tried HTT yet ...I like to see limit with out using first.
http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...hz161volts.jpg
^^^nice clocks bro, I tried to do 1.3v for 3.5 but it wouldnt go. However I can do 3.4Ghz with 1.5v. But with ACC on, can't wait to see your results with it on.
ive settled for 3.1cpu/2.16nb/860mem...i think on vista x64 and stock cooling, its great haha!
^^not bad, right now my best daily setting that is `00% stable is 3.2Ghz @ 1.4v
Hmmm for some reason the MOBO kepps the CPUVID @ 4.87v...I want 1.55v but i see no setting to Change CPUVID on this thing...I have Vcore set @ 1.61v and CPUVID still reads 1.48v in CORETEMP.
Even the old TA770 let me set 1.55vid for both CPU and NB? When i set ACC it dosnt Raise or lower the CPUVID either...Only CPUvolts which is totally different..VID is very important for me to achieve 3500//2600 in which both CPU/NB needs to be set @1.55vid..Then I add the Vcore..
looks like i have some ASUS reading to do ,, ill see if Polygon has a MOD BIOS yet hahaaa.
http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...ra/asusvid.jpg
Update: Update: Update:,,
3.5ghz @ 1.6v but the VID dropped down to 1.462v with ACC auto? im so confused right now haaaaha.. But its making progress..Just working on the CPU with out NB for now ...Then ill change the Ram then ill work on NB...My Bios is a little Buggy with 1066 so its taking me time to get used to it. For the Most part to do 3.5 on the TA it took 1.65+ So ACC is working for the Most part on Auto.
http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u...sus3511mhz.jpg
hey you guys should try this little generic CPU benchmark that was found over at TPU. Its pretty interesting, and this way we can compare scores :)
The forced 32 bit version yields better scores, but feel free to try both
http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=73579
I'll start it off :)
http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/6...1020sv1.th.pnghttp://img374.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
you dont find that a little warm for water cooling?? Im running 1.48v (sb600 and vista) for 3.2ghz and only hit 50c using prime95 on air. room temp is 22cQuote:
Originally Posted by ninjagordy
On a side note I lost 100mhz going from XP to vista (3.3ghz to 3.2ghz) and had to increase voltage .03 from 1.45 at 3.2 in xp to 1.48v in vista at the same speed.
That bench was written by a dude from this forum,Particle i believe :).
So, NB Voltage at 1,325 and NB VID at 1.55.Quote:
Originally Posted by gOtVoltage
What is exactly each item and the first needs only 1,3 and the other 1,5??
You're right http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=204361 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by informal
how did you get 1.6V in the BIOS??? I thought the motherboard as CPU over volt protection above 1.55V:confused:
thanks alot.Quote:
Originally Posted by pershoot
finally a version that doesnīt bsod on me.
priming 3.2ghz/2.4ghz nb @1.4v+2%acc now
and iīm pulling 360w... the max i was pulling so far was during vantage with 560w.
KTE has posted some overclocking advice regarding memory on another forum HERE that I thought you all might want to see. Since the relationship between the IMC and CPU is so important, he gives some insight on memory latency settings that could be helpful for those of us hitting a wall at a very high clock. His example below is for someone struggling with a 9850 on an EVGA mobo. I'm testing the memory tweaks today to see if I can breakthru the wall. (BTW: MAL=MaxAsyncLatency)
Quote:
Hold on, take it slowly or you'll crash again.
Set your HT Ref. to 200MHz, your HT-Link to 10x, keep your MEM stock. Now set 1.375v (or closest to it), 13.5x CPU Multiplier and try booting. If it boots fine increase tRFC to 127ns and MaxAsyncLatency (in MEMSET) to 3 values above what you get at boot. Then check voltage in some tools like Everest, HWMonitor and what CPU-Z shows (they don't always show correct and your board especially will not read K10 voltage correctly). If things seem fine, run some light stability test and that will give you an indication if its extremely unstable or slightly unstable. Don't try 2k6, it's too heavy and will crash the system if its unstable. Try something like SuperPi 1M first on 1-core. If that passes, then try wPrime 32M (set to 4-threads). If that passes fine then run 2k6 CPU tests. If that does fine then you can move up to Linpack 3 trials. Now this is very heavy load, probably the max you'll ever see, so any instability and it may suddenly crash. If 3 trials run fine, then go for more. If you can get 30mins worth of runs of that stable, then you should be fully stable in CPU/IMC and MEM, definitely load stable anyway.
That's a start.
Check your tRFC is above 105ns for all DIMMs, vDIMM can be kept to stock and check the MAL setting I mentioned in Memset above. If things are still unstable, first move is to move the MAL up 2 notches at a time. Once you've moved up 6 values/thrice and you still don't gain any stability, start to move up "NB VID" in AOD. Stay below 1.375VID and in most cases you should certainly find stability.
Its just like running on Intel setups. Once 2GB DIMMs are in you have to bump MCH voltage up and loosen MCH Performance settings. Many times vDIMM also has to be increased to gain any stability. They're much heavier load on the MEM controller by nature and even worse if in a x64 environement.
got my ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe
put today put it all up today tried with auto out on AOD I got up to 2.9ghz which is nice, gona have to change it my self though, anyways how do I change my ram settings on this board the books a little vag on where the hell it is ? so I can change it to 1066mhz and adjust the timings.
I noticed this board runs a lot cooler too my MSI board as getting up to about 44C load. Now I'm barely getting to about 40C load @ 2.9ghz O_O
go to jumperfree configurationQuote:
Originally Posted by demonkevy666
set it to manual
then memory timing settings
u can only change everything if u set it to manual.
where ou select the OC to manual, you have 2 submenues for ram settings, in the second one the first option :P, and you`ll be able to set the speed that you wantQuote:
Originally Posted by demonkevy666
yes, I remember reading that somewhere, its pretty cool, it completes very quickly, and seems to be pretty good.Quote:
Originally Posted by informal
GO to Jumper free configQuote:
Originally Posted by EXxx
THen go to the 2nd ram configuration menu. Once there set it to manual, then set 2t mode to "enabled" and set it to 1066.
i swapped out my geil estoria's for some g-skill 1066 2x2 gig to see how they work.not to bad so far. i so want to get below 22 sec spi. so close but so far away. i cant seem to get 2600 nb at 3.5 ghz. i am sure that is what it is going to take to ge there.
superpi 22.375
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=783328
^^ great run equinox, my best so far is this
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=784810
i have a crucial stick that doesn`t boot under 2.3V, so i think i`m gonna torture IT this week-end :D, let`s see 2.5, maybe i`ll get some better super pi score than may last
Woot
Small Victory
I was able boot and run at 3.6 Ghz lasted long enough run SuperPi and get CPU validition
SuperPi 1M @ 21.762 secs
This time I took a screenshot
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=435762
After that I backed it down just a little bit to 3.570Ghz and was able to run 3DMark06 with Triple 4870's
3Dmark06 score=19709
We really need HTT 3.1
With three 4870's(PCIE2.0 x8), a CPU @3.57GHz and my NB and HTT 210x12(2520) all I could get was 19700
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=8625915
hopefully this gets better with Deneb
http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/e...r/SPI36002.jpg
damn!!!! Mine booted right up at 4-4-4-12-20 2.2v.Quote:
Originally Posted by EXxx
deathstar, thats awesome bro. Why is your CPU score so low in 3dmark though? I was like five points under the 5k mark at 3.4 GHz. With my 9850, my 9950 at 3.4 GHz was only a few points off.
http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/8...izedwi9.th.jpghttp://img377.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
don`t get me wrong, the other 3 sticks i have are perfect :)), only this one is troublesome
amddeathsar, could you post you`re voltages?:D
just got that bad stick, freaking stick had to be the party pooper :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by EXxx
3.3 GHz using a bit higher FSB instead of upping the multi, higher ram clocks. Ram pretty good for 3.3 GHz
http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/4...6x16qa0.th.jpghttp://img388.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
The few reasons I can think of isQuote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Patty
One I had to switch from XP to Vista to run Trifire
second I ran a lower ref. clock this time 215 in XP, 210 in the Vista run
plus I had to drop my PCI-E speed from 119 from CF to 105 to run Trifire
(210*17, NBx12, HTTx12, PCIE@105, vcore1.55v NBvid1.3v, HTT1.28v, NB1.28v, SB1.28v, disabled ACC, Autoexpress, Microcode update and ganged mode,enabled CPUTweak(that's all I remember for now))Quote:
Originally Posted by EXxx
I had modded my water/ice cooling to get thru these runs
My temps were at 25c at those speeds
23.59 with 232 FSB and 50mhz less.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicken Patty
http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=783247
23.43 at 3.3
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/4...3300mhzqo5.jpg
Hey guys,
is this possible?
3.5G with 1,34 vcore and 260 fsb??:confused::confused::confused:
need more vcore
well I'm in vist64bit and have 9850 but I finally got 3.0ghz (3,010mhz 215x14)Quote:
Originally Posted by crazydiamond
takes me 1.5625 volts though idle here is high 47C but that's because AOD has the red circle on in the corner and when I turn it off it freezes up on me >_> after like 2 minutes.
little gaming I haven't seen no near 60C yet.
That chip would be SO golden you'd go blind instantly if you looked directly at it!:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAVIPER
Dont take this the wrong way, i'm only comparing as I could only imagine how good you would score if the score was right, but I used to score that in Vista at 3.15 GHz, i'll look for the screeny and see if I have and post it.Quote:
Originally Posted by AMDDeathstar
Here is a comparison with CPU and the same clock, everything identical, but one score is with all 4 cores enabled, and one is with only 2 cores enabled. Notice the difference in vCore also.
Runs in Super Pi
All Four Cores Enabled:
http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/6...5151oo6.th.jpghttp://img503.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Only Two Cores Enabled:
http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/3...2781ei0.th.jpghttp://img518.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Here is the same comparison as above in the Generic CPU bench. I didnt take a screen of the two core 3.4 GHz run so to show the difference in crunch time I put a 3.2 GHz run of the two core run. Still crunches quicker, but obviously scores a lot less.
All Four Cores:
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/3...1021pi1.th.pnghttp://img101.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Two Cores:
http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/2...1023vw0.th.pnghttp://img116.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
3.3 ghz with good temps? :)
Just raised the multi a little bit... more overclocking coming soon :D
http://i36.tinypic.com/ofyjp1.jpg