Wow... some cable management there maybe.. lol jk jk Not bad at all. and I see why your 280 stays cool. It has those 2 fans blowing 150CFM of air into it.. or more lol.
cool. I want the TRUE
Printable View
Wow... some cable management there maybe.. lol jk jk Not bad at all. and I see why your 280 stays cool. It has those 2 fans blowing 150CFM of air into it.. or more lol.
cool. I want the TRUE
Yes. The project managers assign points to different kinds of work that they distribute. And these points are subject to change over time. They know that most folders will configure their rigs to maximize PPD so they assign more points to the types of work (work units, or "WU's") that are the most important to the project at that time. Sometimes this is just for beta test results - as they are testing a new client or WU they may temporarily assign higher points to get high participation until they work the kinks out. Bear in mind, this may change. The risk of going out and buying/building a farm that's geared towards a certain WU or client or project is that the PPDs may change, or the and leave you hanging... the other thing that many of us look for is PPD/$ or PPD/watt or whatever. Check out the F@Hinfo database. Interesting effort to track F@H scores on particular setups.Quote:
Originally Posted by xguntherc
You've come to the right place :yepp:Quote:
I've spent all this time and money getting this thing up, and just like you guys have said. OK. I've finally got over 19k in Mark06.. now what...
Many of us have lost loved ones to the diseases that F@H and other DC projects aim to cure. It's the best way I know to contribute directly to the greater good. It's that sense of doing something bigger than ourselves that make this such a great community and a rewarding project.Quote:
And yes, my grandpa was very close to me. He was the nicest man I've ever known.
You pretty much control this. There are several different versions of the F@H client, with varying demands on system components. And just as with overclocking, how hard you push it, and how cool you can keep everything has the most to do with component lifespan and failure rates. There is no doubt that folding is intensive work, and as U&G says, "stable rigs are happy rigs". Power consumption does go up, but with some of the newer clients (like the nvidia GPU client), you can get a whole lot of points with relatively low power consumption.Quote:
Also, I'm not trying to sound mean, Selfish...I've spent ALL this money on this...Learned so many things. use it daily. Something like a 100% 12/7 or 24/7, or even 24/5 loading up the computer.. that would severely shorten the life of the system right. What type of wear and tear does folding add to your system overall.. Oh and here is even a better question. How much did your power bills rise with running this.
HTH!
If you want to do a cheap farm, forget CPU folding...
Get an althlon x2, something that can handle vista without giving you a head ache, 2 gigs of ram.
Now for the important stuff.
Mobo: 4 pci-e slot, like the msi k9a2
PSU: something that'll handle 4 cards, like corsair 750watt psu. :up:
Cards: 9600gso's or 8800gs (if you can find it) x4
That system will put out about 20K points for relatively low cost.
Ya I bet it would.. 4 cards even if GS models would push a lot. the eVGA 9600 GSO is at newegg.com for 35 bucks after MIR.. great deal. I almost got one for a backup. that would be a good deal to get for a farm.
and to coo coo, Thanks for the info there. yea I can see how this can really push your system. but Mines stable as can be at 4.0 Ghz so I'm ok for that. Although I have not installed the CPU folder yet.
the GPU2 seemed to run fine. my card only got to about 59c after about 2 hours of folding so thats not bad at all.
I do have a question. I let it go and went to sleep. I get up this morning and it's finished. but it never sent, and my net was down. I had to restart to get it back. That never, ever happens. was that cuz the folding? and how can I send it now and get the points and start my next. In Fahmon it's yellow and says finished.. (6380 PPD on just the GFX card. is that good for it at stock speed.) I can run this GTX from 576 Mhz to 740 in games fine. So I could probably do that while folding..
So what do I do. I restarted and it's still in Fahmon. but how do I send it now?
Edit* Now it restarted. the same one is going again. Now back to the beginning. it's at 9% already. Is it going to redo the entire one I already did? I'm confused a little here. Can't seem to figure out how to send it.
it probably sent, it should be in your log. but you need to gto control panel power options and set it to high performance, so your system and nic wont goto sleep and shutdown the client. you can set your screensaver to turn the monitor off, that's fine. just not the rest of the system.
this is what it looks like when it send, it does it on it's own. all you have to do is start the client and keep your system and internet connection running.
[18:46:01] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[18:46:04] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[18:46:04] Sending work to server
[18:46:04] Project: 5013 (Run 7, Clone 363, Gen 93)
[18:46:04] + Attempting to send results [October 12 18:46:04 UTC]
[18:46:26] + Results successfully sent
[18:46:26] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[18:46:26] + Number of Units Completed: 800
and then after a while when you turn in some units and eoc can track your points..
you can check the team page here http://folding.extremeoverclocking.c...php?s=&t=36362
click on users list and find your name, then you can use that sig image link I gave you in the other thread and put it in your sig.
but I'd give it a day before eoc sees you as a new user. just make sure you're running the client and it's not going to sleep and stopping everytime you leave the pc alone.
Ya I just saw that about 10 mins ago.. I restarted my system. and opened fahmon and then GPU2 started on it's own something else. I looked in the log and it shows it not sending and all the retry's. then it trying to get a new WU and failing. but then after I restarted system I think it sent it as I saw that farther down now I restarted it.
After restart this is what my log says:
[18:44:35] + Attempting to send results [October 12 18:44:35 UTC]
[18:44:36] - Presenting message box asking to network.
[18:44:50] + Results successfully sent
[18:44:50] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home. <--- (thats what I'm lookin for right)
[18:44:50] + Starting local stats count at 1
[18:45:05] + Attempting to get work packet
[18:45:05] - Connecting to assignment server
[18:45:05] - Successful: assigned to (171.xx.xx.xxx).
[18:45:05] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[18:45:05] Loaded queue successfully.
[18:45:06] + Could not connect to Work Server
[18:45:06] - Attempt #1 to get work failed, and no other work to do.
Waiting before retry. (did like 7 retries then finally started. Not sure what thats about. It did that after it finished last night also. and then when no WU started it stopped working and PC went to sleep. Oh and It's already set to Performance in the Power options, but thanks for the idea. So ya, looks like the first one went then. and this second one is doing much better now I added the OC'd profile to my GTX260 so far it's saying 7425 PPD.. but it's been rising this entire time. What can I expect from this 260?
shader is where you'll se the most gain in folding.
but you need to watch that log and make sure it completes from 1%-100% without spitting out an unstable machine before it gets to 100%. if it is, your oc is too high.
dont' worry about all the retries , that's stanfords servers getting busy and not allowing your client too connect. it puts you in line to wait and spits out that retry message until it's your turn to get a wu or send one.
the most imprtant thing is making sure it can go from 1-100% without errors.
also in fahmon, goto preferences and set to calculate ppd on last frame only and it wull give a quicker ppd averages.
this is what successful wu's looks like, notice I have some busy reties near the end also. those are fine. but if you cant get a 1-100% completion, then you need to back off the oc.
Code:
--- Opening Log file [October 9 09:35:45 UTC]
# Windows GPU Console Edition #################################################
###############################################################################
Folding@Home Client Version 6.20r1
http://folding.stanford.edu
###############################################################################
###############################################################################
Launch directory: C:\Users\Mike Hudson\AppData\Roaming\Folding@home-gpu
[09:35:45] - Ask before connecting: No
[09:35:45] - User name: mikeb12 (Team 36362)
[09:35:45] - User ID: 504D8E7326393487
[09:35:45] - Machine ID: 3
[09:35:45]
[09:35:45] Loaded queue successfully.
[09:35:45] Initialization complete
[09:35:45]
[09:35:45] + Processing work unit
[09:35:45] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[09:35:45] Core found.
[09:35:45] Working on queue slot 07 [October 9 09:35:45 UTC]
[09:35:45] + Working ...
[09:35:46]
[09:35:46] *------------------------------*
[09:35:46] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[09:35:46] Version 1.09 (Fri Aug 1 11:46:54 PDT 2008)
[09:35:46]
[09:35:46] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[09:35:46] Build host: amoeba
[09:35:46] Board Type: Nvidia
[09:35:46] Core :
[09:35:46] Preparing to commence simulation
[09:35:46] - Looking at optimizations...
[09:35:46] - Files status OK
[09:35:46] - Expanded 45554 -> 246249 (decompressed 540.5 percent)
[09:35:46] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=45554 data_size=246249, decompressed_data_size=246249 diff=0
[09:35:46] - Digital signature verified
[09:35:46]
[09:35:46] Project: 5506 (Run 6, Clone 113, Gen 161)
[09:35:46]
[09:35:46] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[09:35:46] Entering M.D.
[09:35:52] Will resume from checkpoint file
[09:35:52] Working on p5506_supervillin_e1
[09:35:53] Client config found, loading data.
[09:35:53] Resuming from checkpoint
[09:35:53] Verified work/wudata_07.log
[09:35:53] Verified work/wudata_07.edr
[09:35:53] Verified work/wudata_07.trr
[09:35:53] Starting GUI Server
[09:35:53] Verified work/wudata_07.xtc
[09:35:53] Completed 42%
[09:37:18] Completed 43%
[09:38:41] Completed 44%
[09:40:04] Completed 45%
[09:41:26] Completed 46%
[09:42:49] Completed 47%
[09:44:11] Completed 48%
[09:45:35] Completed 49%
[09:46:58] Completed 50%
[09:48:20] Completed 51%
[09:49:43] Completed 52%
[09:51:05] Completed 53%
[09:52:28] Completed 54%
[09:53:50] Completed 55%
[09:55:13] Completed 56%
[09:56:38] Completed 57%
[09:58:02] Completed 58%
[09:59:31] Completed 59%
[10:00:55] Completed 60%
[10:02:19] Completed 61%
[10:03:44] Completed 62%
[10:05:07] Completed 63%
[10:06:32] Completed 64%
[10:07:55] Completed 65%
[10:09:19] Completed 66%
[10:10:43] Completed 67%
[10:12:08] Completed 68%
[10:13:32] Completed 69%
[10:14:56] Completed 70%
[10:16:20] Completed 71%
[10:17:43] Completed 72%
[10:19:08] Completed 73%
[10:20:41] Completed 74%
[10:22:16] Completed 75%
[10:23:52] Completed 76%
[10:25:22] Completed 77%
[10:26:46] Completed 78%
[10:28:08] Completed 79%
[10:29:31] Completed 80%
[10:30:53] Completed 81%
[10:32:16] Completed 82%
[10:33:40] Completed 83%
[10:35:04] Completed 84%
[10:36:30] Completed 85%
[10:37:55] Completed 86%
[10:39:18] Completed 87%
[10:40:43] Completed 88%
[10:42:08] Completed 89%
[10:43:31] Completed 90%
[10:44:54] Completed 91%
[10:46:17] Completed 92%
[10:47:39] Completed 93%
[10:49:03] Completed 94%
[10:50:27] Completed 95%
[10:51:52] Completed 96%
[10:53:27] Completed 97%
[10:55:01] Completed 98%
[10:56:37] Completed 99%
[10:58:11] Completed 100%
[10:59:11]
[10:59:11] Finished Work Unit:
[10:59:11] - Reading up to 34800 from "work/wudata_07.trr": Read 34800
[10:59:11] trr file hash check passed.
[10:59:11] - Reading up to 1128228 from "work/wudata_07.xtc": Read 1128228
[10:59:11] xtc file hash check passed.
[10:59:11] edr file hash check passed.
[10:59:11] logfile size: 125267
[10:59:11] Leaving Run
[10:59:16] - Writing 1289367 bytes of core data to disk...
[10:59:16] ... Done.
[10:59:16] - Shutting down core
[10:59:16]
[10:59:16] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[10:59:20] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[10:59:20] Sending work to server
[10:59:20] Project: 5506 (Run 6, Clone 113, Gen 161)
[10:59:20] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[10:59:20] + Attempting to send results [October 9 10:59:20 UTC]
[10:59:41] + Results successfully sent
[10:59:41] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[10:59:41] + Number of Units Completed: 7
[10:59:45] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[10:59:45] + Attempting to get work packet
[10:59:45] - Connecting to assignment server
[10:59:46] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.20).
[10:59:46] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[10:59:46] Loaded queue successfully.
[10:59:47] + Closed connections
[10:59:47]
[10:59:47] + Processing work unit
[10:59:47] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[10:59:47] Core found.
[10:59:47] Working on queue slot 08 [October 9 10:59:47 UTC]
[10:59:47] + Working ...
[10:59:47]
[10:59:47] *------------------------------*
[10:59:47] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[10:59:47] Version 1.09 (Fri Aug 1 11:46:54 PDT 2008)
[10:59:47]
[10:59:47] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[10:59:47] Build host: amoeba
[10:59:47] Board Type: Nvidia
[10:59:47] Core :
[10:59:47] Preparing to commence simulation
[10:59:47] - Looking at optimizations...
[10:59:47] - Created dyn
[10:59:47] - Files status OK
[10:59:47] - Expanded 44054 -> 244433 (decompressed 554.8 percent)
[10:59:47] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=44054 data_size=244433, decompressed_data_size=244433 diff=0
[10:59:47] - Digital signature verified
[10:59:47]
[10:59:47] Project: 5016 (Run 4, Clone 58, Gen 101)
[10:59:47]
[10:59:47] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[10:59:47] Entering M.D.
[10:59:53] Working on 576 p5005_supervillin_e1
[10:59:54] Client config found, loading data.
[10:59:54] Starting GUI Server
[11:01:19] Completed 1%
[11:02:45] Completed 2%
[11:04:12] Completed 3%
[11:05:35] Completed 4%
[11:06:59] Completed 5%
[11:08:22] Completed 6%
[11:09:48] Completed 7%
[11:11:22] Completed 8%
[11:12:57] Completed 9%
[11:14:28] Completed 10%
[11:15:58] Completed 11%
[11:17:24] Completed 12%
[11:18:48] Completed 13%
[11:20:17] Completed 14%
[11:21:44] Completed 15%
[11:23:11] Completed 16%
[11:24:38] Completed 17%
[11:26:06] Completed 18%
[11:27:39] Completed 19%
[11:29:14] Completed 20%
[11:30:49] Completed 21%
[11:32:25] Completed 22%
[11:34:00] Completed 23%
[11:35:36] Completed 24%
[11:37:09] Completed 25%
[11:38:36] Completed 26%
[11:40:03] Completed 27%
[11:41:30] Completed 28%
[11:42:57] Completed 29%
[11:44:23] Completed 30%
[11:45:49] Completed 31%
[11:47:19] Completed 32%
[11:48:55] Completed 33%
[11:50:30] Completed 34%
[11:52:05] Completed 35%
[11:53:40] Completed 36%
[11:55:13] Completed 37%
[11:56:47] Completed 38%
[11:58:23] Completed 39%
[11:59:54] Completed 40%
[12:01:22] Completed 41%
[12:02:57] Completed 42%
[12:04:26] Completed 43%
[12:05:53] Completed 44%
[12:07:21] Completed 45%
[12:08:48] Completed 46%
[12:10:17] Completed 47%
[12:11:49] Completed 48%
[12:13:24] Completed 49%
[12:14:59] Completed 50%
[12:16:35] Completed 51%
[12:18:10] Completed 52%
[12:19:45] Completed 53%
[12:21:09] Completed 54%
[12:22:36] Completed 55%
[12:24:12] Completed 56%
[12:25:48] Completed 57%
[12:27:24] Completed 58%
[12:29:00] Completed 59%
[12:30:27] Completed 60%
[12:31:55] Completed 61%
[12:33:22] Completed 62%
[12:34:49] Completed 63%
[12:36:16] Completed 64%
[12:37:41] Completed 65%
[12:39:07] Completed 66%
[12:40:33] Completed 67%
[12:42:00] Completed 68%
[12:43:27] Completed 69%
[12:45:02] Completed 70%
[12:46:38] Completed 71%
[12:48:07] Completed 72%
[12:49:37] Completed 73%
[12:51:07] Completed 74%
[12:52:34] Completed 75%
[12:54:02] Completed 76%
[12:55:29] Completed 77%
[12:56:59] Completed 78%
[12:58:35] Completed 79%
[13:00:06] Completed 80%
[13:01:36] Completed 81%
[13:03:09] Completed 82%
[13:04:45] Completed 83%
[13:06:14] Completed 84%
[13:07:40] Completed 85%
[13:09:06] Completed 86%
[13:10:31] Completed 87%
[13:11:56] Completed 88%
[13:13:21] Completed 89%
[13:14:46] Completed 90%
[13:16:12] Completed 91%
[13:17:37] Completed 92%
[13:19:02] Completed 93%
[13:20:32] Completed 94%
[13:22:02] Completed 95%
[13:23:32] Completed 96%
[13:24:58] Completed 97%
[13:26:26] Completed 98%
[13:27:53] Completed 99%
[13:29:20] Completed 100%
[13:30:20]
[13:30:20] Finished Work Unit:
[13:30:20] - Reading up to 34800 from "work/wudata_08.trr": Read 34800
[13:30:20] trr file hash check passed.
[13:30:20] - Reading up to 1130420 from "work/wudata_08.xtc": Read 1130420
[13:30:20] xtc file hash check passed.
[13:30:20] edr file hash check passed.
[13:30:20] logfile size: 124127
[13:30:20] Leaving Run
[13:30:23] - Writing 1290419 bytes of core data to disk...
[13:30:23] Done: 1289907 -> 1157587 (compressed to 89.7 percent)
[13:30:23] ... Done.
[13:30:23] - Shutting down core
[13:30:23]
[13:30:23] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[13:30:27] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[13:30:27] Sending work to server
[13:30:27] Project: 5016 (Run 4, Clone 58, Gen 101)
[13:30:27] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[13:30:27] + Attempting to send results [October 9 13:30:27 UTC]
[13:30:46] + Results successfully sent
[13:30:46] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[13:30:46] + Number of Units Completed: 8
[13:30:50] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[13:30:50] + Attempting to get work packet
[13:30:50] - Connecting to assignment server
[13:30:51] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.20).
[13:30:51] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[13:30:51] Loaded queue successfully.
[13:30:52] + Closed connections
[13:30:52]
[13:30:52] + Processing work unit
[13:30:52] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[13:30:52] Core found.
[13:30:52] Working on queue slot 09 [October 9 13:30:52 UTC]
[13:30:52] + Working ...
[13:30:52]
[13:30:52] *------------------------------*
[13:30:52] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[13:30:52] Version 1.09 (Fri Aug 1 11:46:54 PDT 2008)
[13:30:52]
[13:30:52] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[13:30:52] Build host: amoeba
[13:30:52] Board Type: Nvidia
[13:30:52] Core :
[13:30:52] Preparing to commence simulation
[13:30:52] - Looking at optimizations...
[13:30:52] - Created dyn
[13:30:52] - Files status OK
[13:30:52] - Expanded 44059 -> 244433 (decompressed 554.7 percent)
[13:30:52] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=44059 data_size=244433, decompressed_data_size=244433 diff=0
[13:30:52] - Digital signature verified
[13:30:52]
[13:30:52] Project: 5016 (Run 0, Clone 265, Gen 97)
[13:30:52]
[13:30:52] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[13:30:52] Entering M.D.
[13:30:59] Working on 576 p5005_supervillin_e1
[13:30:59] Client config found, loading data.
[13:30:59] Starting GUI Server
[13:32:24] Completed 1%
[13:33:58] Completed 2%
[13:35:34] Completed 3%
[13:37:10] Completed 4%
[13:38:45] Completed 5%
[13:40:20] Completed 6%
[13:41:55] Completed 7%
[13:43:30] Completed 8%
[13:45:05] Completed 9%
[13:46:41] Completed 10%
[13:48:16] Completed 11%
[13:49:51] Completed 12%
[13:51:26] Completed 13%
[13:52:54] Completed 14%
[13:54:18] Completed 15%
[13:55:42] Completed 16%
[13:57:06] Completed 17%
[13:58:29] Completed 18%
[13:59:53] Completed 19%
[14:01:16] Completed 20%
[14:02:37] Completed 21%
[14:04:01] Completed 22%
[14:05:24] Completed 23%
[14:06:48] Completed 24%
[14:08:13] Completed 25%
[14:09:35] Completed 26%
[14:10:57] Completed 27%
[14:12:20] Completed 28%
[14:13:42] Completed 29%
[14:15:04] Completed 30%
[14:16:26] Completed 31%
[14:17:49] Completed 32%
[14:19:11] Completed 33%
[14:20:33] Completed 34%
[14:21:56] Completed 35%
[14:23:20] Completed 36%
[14:24:43] Completed 37%
[14:26:08] Completed 38%
[14:27:36] Completed 39%
[14:29:04] Completed 40%
[14:30:31] Completed 41%
[14:31:58] Completed 42%
[14:33:24] Completed 43%
[14:34:51] Completed 44%
[14:36:19] Completed 45%
[14:37:46] Completed 46%
[14:39:13] Completed 47%
[14:40:38] Completed 48%
[14:42:03] Completed 49%
[14:43:31] Completed 50%
[14:44:58] Completed 51%
[14:46:23] Completed 52%
[14:47:48] Completed 53%
[14:49:13] Completed 54%
[14:50:38] Completed 55%
[14:52:06] Completed 56%
[14:53:31] Completed 57%
[14:55:03] Completed 58%
[14:56:36] Completed 59%
[14:58:09] Completed 60%
[14:59:41] Completed 61%
[15:01:14] Completed 62%
[15:02:46] Completed 63%
[15:04:18] Completed 64%
[15:05:50] Completed 65%
[15:07:23] Completed 66%
[15:08:52] Completed 67%
[15:10:17] Completed 68%
[15:11:43] Completed 69%
[15:13:10] Completed 70%
[15:14:37] Completed 71%
[15:16:05] Completed 72%
[15:17:32] Completed 73%
[15:19:02] Completed 74%
[15:20:35] Completed 75%
[15:22:07] Completed 76%
[15:23:39] Completed 77%
[15:25:11] Completed 78%
[15:26:44] Completed 79%
[15:28:14] Completed 80%
[15:29:39] Completed 81%
[15:31:04] Completed 82%
[15:32:30] Completed 83%
[15:33:56] Completed 84%
[15:35:22] Completed 85%
[15:35:44] + Working...
[15:36:49] Completed 86%
[15:38:15] Completed 87%
[15:39:43] Completed 88%
[15:41:15] Completed 89%
[15:42:47] Completed 90%
[15:44:19] Completed 91%
[15:45:51] Completed 92%
[15:47:23] Completed 93%
[15:48:56] Completed 94%
[15:50:27] Completed 95%
[15:51:54] Completed 96%
[15:53:20] Completed 97%
[15:54:47] Completed 98%
[15:56:14] Completed 99%
[15:57:44] Completed 100%
[15:58:44]
[15:58:44] Finished Work Unit:
[15:58:44] - Reading up to 34800 from "work/wudata_09.trr": Read 34800
[15:58:44] trr file hash check passed.
[15:58:44] - Reading up to 1126976 from "work/wudata_09.xtc": Read 1126976
[15:58:44] xtc file hash check passed.
[15:58:44] edr file hash check passed.
[15:58:44] logfile size: 126631
[15:58:44] Leaving Run
[15:58:49] - Writing 1289479 bytes of core data to disk...
[15:58:49] Done: 1288967 -> 1154138 (compressed to 89.5 percent)
[15:58:49] ... Done.
[15:58:49] - Shutting down core
[15:58:49]
[15:58:49] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[15:58:52] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[15:58:52] Sending work to server
[15:58:52] Project: 5016 (Run 0, Clone 265, Gen 97)
[15:58:52] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[15:58:52] + Attempting to send results [October 9 15:58:52 UTC]
[15:59:11] + Results successfully sent
[15:59:11] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[15:59:11] + Number of Units Completed: 9
[15:59:15] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[15:59:15] + Attempting to get work packet
[15:59:15] - Connecting to assignment server
[15:59:15] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.106).
[15:59:15] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[15:59:15] Loaded queue successfully.
[15:59:16] + Could not connect to Work Server
[15:59:16] - Attempt #1 to get work failed, and no other work to do.
Waiting before retry.
[15:59:30] + Attempting to get work packet
[15:59:30] - Connecting to assignment server
[15:59:30] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.106).
[15:59:30] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[15:59:30] Loaded queue successfully.
[15:59:31] + Could not connect to Work Server
[15:59:31] - Attempt #2 to get work failed, and no other work to do.
Waiting before retry.
[15:59:47] + Attempting to get work packet
[15:59:47] - Connecting to assignment server
[15:59:48] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.106).
[15:59:48] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[15:59:48] Loaded queue successfully.
[15:59:48] + Could not connect to Work Server
[15:59:48] - Attempt #3 to get work failed, and no other work to do.
Waiting before retry.
[16:00:23] + Attempting to get work packet
[16:00:23] - Connecting to assignment server
[16:00:23] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.106).
[16:00:23] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[16:00:23] Loaded queue successfully.
[16:00:25] + Closed connections
[16:00:25]
[16:00:25] + Processing work unit
[16:00:25] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[16:00:25] Core found.
[16:00:25] Working on queue slot 00 [October 9 16:00:25 UTC]
[16:00:25] + Working ...
[16:00:25]
[16:00:25] *------------------------------*
[16:00:25] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[16:00:25] Version 1.09 (Fri Aug 1 11:46:54 PDT 2008)
[16:00:25]
[16:00:25] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[16:00:25] Build host: amoeba
[16:00:25] Board Type: Nvidia
[16:00:25] Core :
[16:00:25] Preparing to commence simulation
[16:00:25] - Looking at optimizations...
[16:00:25] - Created dyn
[16:00:25] - Files status OK
[16:00:25] - Expanded 45349 -> 246249 (decompressed 543.0 percent)
[16:00:25] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=45349 data_size=246249, decompressed_data_size=246249 diff=0
[16:00:25] - Digital signature verified
[16:00:25]
[16:00:25] Project: 5506 (Run 5, Clone 732, Gen 32)
[16:00:25]
[16:00:25] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[16:00:25] Entering M.D.
[16:00:31] Working on p5506_supervillin_e1
[16:00:32] Client config found, loading data.
[16:00:32] Starting GUI Server
[16:01:58] Completed 1%
[16:03:29] Completed 2%
[16:05:02] Completed 3%
[16:06:36] Completed 4%
[16:08:09] Completed 5%
[16:09:42] Completed 6%
[16:11:14] Completed 7%
[16:12:43] Completed 8%
[16:14:10] Completed 9%
[16:15:35] Completed 10%
[16:17:04] Completed 11%
[16:18:31] Completed 12%
[16:19:59] Completed 13%
[16:21:26] Completed 14%
[16:22:52] Completed 15%
[16:24:20] Completed 16%
[16:25:48] Completed 17%
[16:27:20] Completed 18%
[16:28:53] Completed 19%
[16:30:26] Completed 20%
[16:31:59] Completed 21%
[16:33:32] Completed 22%
[16:35:05] Completed 23%
[16:36:38] Completed 24%
[16:38:11] Completed 25%
[16:39:40] Completed 26%
[16:41:07] Completed 27%
[16:42:35] Completed 28%
[16:44:02] Completed 29%
[16:45:30] Completed 30%
[16:46:59] Completed 31%
[16:48:31] Completed 32%
[16:50:04] Completed 33%
[16:51:37] Completed 34%
[16:53:10] Completed 35%
[16:54:43] Completed 36%
[16:56:16] Completed 37%
[16:57:49] Completed 38%
[16:59:22] Completed 39%
[17:00:55] Completed 40%
[17:02:27] Completed 41%
[17:04:00] Completed 42%
[17:05:33] Completed 43%
[17:07:07] Completed 44%
[17:08:40] Completed 45%
[17:10:11] Completed 46%
[17:11:38] Completed 47%
[17:13:06] Completed 48%
[17:14:33] Completed 49%
[17:16:01] Completed 50%
[17:17:28] Completed 51%
[17:18:56] Completed 52%
[17:20:23] Completed 53%
[17:21:51] Completed 54%
[17:23:18] Completed 55%
[17:24:45] Completed 56%
[17:26:13] Completed 57%
[17:27:41] Completed 58%
[17:29:08] Completed 59%
[17:30:36] Completed 60%
[17:32:03] Completed 61%
[17:33:30] Completed 62%
[17:34:58] Completed 63%
[17:36:26] Completed 64%
[17:37:54] Completed 65%
[17:39:21] Completed 66%
[17:40:48] Completed 67%
[17:42:16] Completed 68%
[17:43:43] Completed 69%
[17:45:11] Completed 70%
[17:46:39] Completed 71%
[17:48:06] Completed 72%
[17:49:34] Completed 73%
[17:51:01] Completed 74%
[17:52:28] Completed 75%
[17:53:55] Completed 76%
[17:55:23] Completed 77%
[17:56:51] Completed 78%
[17:58:19] Completed 79%
[17:59:46] Completed 80%
[18:01:13] Completed 81%
[18:02:41] Completed 82%
[18:04:08] Completed 83%
[18:05:36] Completed 84%
[18:07:03] Completed 85%
[18:08:31] Completed 86%
[18:09:58] Completed 87%
[18:11:26] Completed 88%
[18:12:53] Completed 89%
[18:14:20] Completed 90%
[18:15:48] Completed 91%
[18:17:16] Completed 92%
[18:18:43] Completed 93%
[18:20:11] Completed 94%
[18:21:38] Completed 95%
[18:23:05] Completed 96%
[18:24:33] Completed 97%
[18:26:00] Completed 98%
[18:27:28] Completed 99%
[18:28:55] Completed 100%
[18:29:55]
[18:29:55] Finished Work Unit:
[18:29:55] - Reading up to 34800 from "work/wudata_00.trr": Read 34800
[18:29:55] trr file hash check passed.
[18:29:55] - Reading up to 1129264 from "work/wudata_00.xtc": Read 1129264
[18:29:55] xtc file hash check passed.
[18:29:55] edr file hash check passed.
[18:29:55] logfile size: 76739
[18:29:55] Leaving Run
[18:30:00] - Writing 1241875 bytes of core data to disk...
[18:30:00] ... Done.
[18:30:00] - Shutting down core
[18:30:00]
[18:30:00] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[18:30:03] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[18:30:03] Sending work to server
[18:30:03] Project: 5506 (Run 5, Clone 732, Gen 32)
[18:30:03] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[18:30:03] + Attempting to send results [October 9 18:30:03 UTC]
[18:30:23] + Results successfully sent
[18:30:23] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[18:30:23] + Number of Units Completed: 10
[18:30:27] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[18:30:27] + Attempting to get work packet
Cool, Ya i can up the shaders even farther. I'm not sure how high of a load my card can handle. so right now I'm runnin it at 650 Mhz core, usually game around 740 Mhz os sometimes less.. but thats not 12 hours or more straight like I am with this. so I'll turn it up later if I see this runs great. I can always load the shaders though. I know the limit there for this card.. it's aanything over 1550 it starts strugglin.
So how long Do GPU's generally last if properly cooled. I mean this is a great card. I'd hate to kill it by running 24/7 folding.. If I'm runnin that on this card at like 62c max like it's at now.. Would that be ok. Maybe I'll just do 12/7 instead..
What I really wanna do is use my old Q6700 and build a Folding rig. so I don't have to worry about all my good new stuff in this rig.. would my spare 250w PSU be enough to handle a Q6700 and a 8800GS. not a GT.. or no. that might not be enough power.. I can get a dsl3 gigabyte board and a Antec Noepower 430w PSU all for $109 as a bundle. maybe I should do that. throw my Q6700 in it. my spare 1GB of ram. although might need 2 for vista. then somehow get a 8800/9600.. Maybe I can find somewhere to donate one.. since it will be a 24/7 folding rig. It's a good cause and not me begging for something. there'd be results of my PPD. lol. Just a thought. I'll look into maybe getting it built. we'll see.
either way, thanks for helping me get this all going.
for folding you can leave core and ram at stock, shader is the only thing that matters.. and it doesn't produce heat like core does..
to find your max folding shader.
1. start the client and fahmon.
2. up your shaders 50mhz at a time and watch the client in fahmon for 5 minutes for errors (keep refreshing fahmon).
3. when you you try a 50mhz shader hop and the client errors within 5 minutes, back it down 100mhz. this is your folding shader oc. core and ram stay stock.
your gaming oc can be different. whatver. but that's what your folding oc needs to be. it'll put the least stress on your card and maximize ppd.
Cool, Ya i can up the shaders even farther. I'm not sure how high of a load my card can handle. so right now I'm runnin it at 650 Mhz core, usually game around 740 Mhz os sometimes less.. but thats not 12 hours or more straight like I am with this. so I'll turn it up later if I see this runs great. I can always load the shaders though. I know the limit there for this card.. it's aanything over 1550 it starts strugglin.
So how long Do GPU's generally last if properly cooled. I mean this is a great card. I'd hate to kill it by running 24/7 folding.. If I'm runnin that on this card at like 62c max like it's at now.. Would that be ok. Maybe I'll just do 12/7 instead..
What I really wanna do is use my old Q6700 and build a Folding rig. so I don't have to worry about all my good new stuff in this rig.. would my spare 250w PSU be enough to handle a Q6700 and a 8800GS. not a GT.. or no. that might not be enough power.. I can get a dsl3 gigabyte board and a Antec Noepower 430w PSU all for $109 as a bundle. maybe I should do that. throw my Q6700 in it. my spare 1GB of ram. although might need 2 for vista. then somehow get a 8800/9600.. Maybe I can find somewhere to donate one.. since it will be a 24/7 folding rig. It's a good cause and not me begging for something. there'd be results of my PPD. lol. Just a thought. I'll look into maybe getting it built. we'll see.
either way, thanks for helping me get this all going.
I don't know of any GPUs having a shortened life due to folding, as long as the temps are in check. I've never had a CPU/GPU fail from folding. I've popped a couple caps in some PSUs and burned out some fans but that's about the extent of the damage on my end :p:
250W PSU won't handle the Q6700 and 8800GS. The 430W could though more than likely.
A really strong 250w psu might handle a non overclocked Q6700 and 8800gs but I doubt it could handle folding on both maybe 1 but not both and you would risk EUE's due to starving the computer of power under heavy load. As SparkyJJO said I would go to at least a 430w psu if not bigger. I used to fold on my Shuttle with its 250w psu on a overclocked Q6600 but no video card and the Shuttle psu's are noted for being very robust they are server psu. I am having problems trying to fold on both a E8400 and a 8800gt in a shuttle with a 300w psu without any overclocking I can fold on one or the other but not both I am waiting on a 110w supplemental psu to help power the card which should be here sometime this week.
I would say anything that utilizes hw to 100% all the time will have a negative impact on it's lifespan. Everything has an MTBF. and this is always related to the conditions it's working under.
But as far as killing hw that wasn't about to die doing something else then folding ( let's say gaming for instance :) ). naw I don't think so. Or I should say, yeah sure it will but the chanche of you being able to tell the difrence between it failing due to prolongated 100% use through folding in comparison with it dying of natural causes are slim to none. Every gpu will die eventually. It's like a car, every car has a service period, after which you need to bring it in for checks on whatever, if you drive the car on it's limits all the time, you could shorten that timespan, but at no time it should make the car stop running completely ( as you're still only using the product for it's intended purposes, driving ).
The car analogy doesn't really hold up, as in a car you have components you can exchange which will extend the MTBF. Maybe adding some caps to smoothen out the voltages ( and knowing that folding seems to brings along very fast current switching, faster then for instance normal gaming that could very well help. )
Short answer, don't have any... sorry :)
To put it in short terms - yes it will reduce lifespan, but odds are not by enough to worry about. Like overclocking a CPU can reduce lifespan by a couple years but when the CPU lasts for 10+ years already anyway I hope you aren't still using the same CPU that long down the road. Similar with a graphics card I'm sure. Of course, those with lifetime warranties on their cards should have no issues at all :D
That's a good short one :)Quote:
Originally Posted by SparkyJJO
Sparky here is also a master in replacing caps, maybe it would be a nice test ( you do have two identical 9600gso's right? ) to maybe cap mod one and leave the other stock, and watch if anything will happen to either one..
I'm more leaning towards believing that with f@h, the gpu itself isn't going to die quickest but the other components on the card ( eg the power circuitry ).
Well My point of view is different, If I didn't use the component it could die in 3 years , which is in EU out of warranty but F@H makes sure it will die sooner = dead card or anything = RMA still in the 2 years of warranty = New Card for me ! :hehe:
Lol that one is very true to!
No, I don't have 2 of the same card. I have a Palit 9600GSO and an evga 8800GT. But I do agree with you, odds are supporting stuff like the power caps would go before the GPU itself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin_The_Martian
Would be nice if you had, it's always fun to be able to compare data with eachother and look at what the discrependancies are caused by, but I think this one might even be to clear from the start to be really fun.
I noticed one fascinating thing guys ... When I wake up I power my PC on with my feet [ must be feet ! ] log in start the SMP and GPU client and go to work , I usually leave my doors open and when I return it's freaking hot in that particular room, so I heat it until I go to bed and in the morning it's still warm ... I don't need an A/C or the central heating ! The GTX is simply amazing, I need another one for a couple more degrees.
I do something for the ill and still spare a lot because I'm not using the heating , and the electricity is freaking cheap here, 1$ = 3kW
Kondik, sell that gtx! Get two 9800gx2s. You'll be bumping out 22k AND you can heat your entire house for nothing! :up: ;)
Nyeh , never, I love the GTX 200 series, I'm amazed by them ... raw power, it chews and spits out single GPU card like a V8 Chevy sucks and eats european trolleys [ you call it cars ?! ] ... I'm amazed by big things , faliure or no, the ATI simply doesn't lick with me ... and what doesn't lick with me licks agains me :hehe:
As for the GX2 , nuuh ... two old sandwitch cards, Because I don;t care abotu the price I'm fine with it even through the R4870 is better bang for bucks but it sucks at folding, and folding its what the PC does when the lord is not at home :hehe:
And for gaming ... I have 60 FPS at 1680x1050 in everything [ cept Crysis and MS X ] and I use Vsync so if I have 60 with GTX280 or 60 with 4870X2 or 4870 does it count ? Nyeh ...
I thought you meant you had an 8800gtx still! :p:
Nah Gave it away , GAVE it I repeat GAVE it for free .. I'm such a douchebag ...
Pff should have given it to me then atleast it would have folded ( card been having some issues, that I been doing allot of uhm... testing Just a disclaimer if people say I shouldn't talk about keeping it folding :rofl: )
Something about how you said that, I can almost hear you. That's some funny **** brother. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kondik
GAVE it away.. boy did I come a little late.. that would be perfect for my spare Q6700..
and you all make a great point.. who cares if my GTX260 fails. It's an eVGA and they have a lifetime warranty. thats partly why I got it over the 4870, the warranty. and cuz Nvidia's proven themselves to me, as i've never actually had to try ATI.. Not saying I'm a fanboi. just saying I've never needed to go to ATI. not yet at least. I might as weel keep folding, cuz I have the warranty, IF.. If anything should happen.
what do you guys mean when you say the CAP thing. like get two identical cards and one CAP mod, one not? I'm lost with that.. I know a pretty good amount, but not all the in's and outs. I've built many computers though.. Is this a MOD for gfx cards or something? also I'm running everything I have now on my corsair 520HX... thats enough right? It also has a 5 yr warranty. thats good enough. but if I ever wanna get SLI on my 260 I'd need a bigger PSU huh.
Well just as a side note, visiontek and powercolor have lifetime warranties on their cards. My 4870 is guaranteed forever by visiontek :D
Ya I know.. well visiontek does.. but powercolor is only 3 yr I thought. when I was looking into 260/4870 I found that only visiontek offered it.. but Meh, oh well. I'm happy with what I got.
When I got my X1950XT it was 3 year or if you register lifetime. Guess I just assumed that they kept that going, maybe not :shrug: Went with visiontek when I got my 4870.
But the gtx260 folds better :)
hm.. I wonder why.. is it the CUDA..?
So, how often are you guys on your computers. I'm on mine maybe 4 hours at the end of each day. but the last few weeks my Eyes hurt, and get headaches and have to get off.. why. just eye strain.. anyone have any suggestions to help me here.. lol..............
Sounds stupid maybe, but when I turned into a addict I had to resort to reading glasses sometimes to prevent my eyes getting to irritated from the crappy crt I was using... It did help. my eyes were allot less tired. But that was a crt and not a good one, lcd's are already much easier for your eyes.
Ya thats what I thought. I've used a LCD for a good 7 months or so.. but the last about a month or so I've been having problems. Nothing before this though. thats why I'm not sure. Maybe I need to get my eye's checked. last time was a solid 2 or more years ago. but I had 20/15 back then. Great vision. so IDK.. just gettin sick of the fatigue I get while on the PC. and I need to get rid of it before FarCry 2 comes out. cuz I'll be playin a LOT of that. lol
Don't listen to those people that tell you to go outside:p:
huh?
I'm sitting in the office since 6 AM ! it's 10 AM ... will be here until 8 PM if not longer, you call that To Go outside ? :explode2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingcarcas
ROFL.. he means dont listen to people that tell you;
"you spend too much time in front of that computer, you need to go outside more often"
at which point you can usually say: "but I'm shopping for a gift for you"
and then fast tab to this page, which is already open in another window.
and say, "this shopping sure does make one thirsty and hungry"
lol :rofl:
I'll have to try this with my wife.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeB12
My wife would never fall for that one. :shakes:
If you try that excuse, she will be a waiting at the door every time the mailman comes around... you better make sure she gets something then :up:
Quarter Machine at Walmart.. put in a nice box..
:):):)
that ought to really make her happy.... haha
well... i'll start waving rite now, cuz Bobsamas coming up quick behind me! :wtf: Keep up the good work everyone!
I requested today a speciality for you guys .
SMP client test + FAHMON on .... YES i7 940 Nehalem ! Mwahahaahah !
Stay tuned
Tuned...
With a question though, what nehalem do you have? I don't even know which one's are coming out first but my intrest atm is mainly a question regarding HT and additional clients :)
I'm curious to see how this will work, but only curious. Nehalem will not be under my tree this year, that's for certain.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kondik
I'd be curious to see 1 client vs 2 clients, and just run a 3rd to see how much the cpu can take. I know the overall ppd will drop, but how much will HT help? We'll have to see I guess.
Want to know what I'm telling him on msn, trying to convince him to please do this :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by [XC] Synthetickiller
Maybe even a forth client, because this is what dual SMP on a Quad is doing right now - 2x a1 on one core. I'm eager to see what i7 can do for us.
Yeah 8 logic cores :up:
I forwarded your requests to ORB which has now four X58 Boards available for testing and I politely asked him to put the SMP client in his review.
I'll inform you asap as I recieve the results [ As I know orb a couple of days ]
It's good to have a friend who works for the best national OC' Web isn't it ? :hehe:
Teasing mode on !
Thanks Kondik :hump:
I'm coo coo for coa coa puffs :rofl:
Got me on your radar huh? :ROTF: :up:
uh-oh... Looks like Skycrane is coming in hot. (or at least hotter than me) the race is on man! I think i finally got my 8600's to fold without EUE-ing!! we will see tomoro...
Woot! I hit the top 10 folders yesterday. :D WFO peruses those in front looking for people to mow down. :up:
Congratz WFO :up: :wtf: :cheer:
Be carefull, some of those people might not like being run over :hehe:
OMG project 4418 is brutal! 15 points and takes my t7100 2.5 hours! :down: That's ~150 PPD from a 1.8ghz dual core. :ROTF: My single core opty did more than that...
That's the cache you're missing on that chip, nothing you can do about it. And to quote someone pretty famous around here, 'Whatever you bring, it's enough' :up:
It EUE'd 60% into it. :rolleyes: Now I've got another 2665. I'm only folding on this (my laptop) for the race and to help hold off Whoopass (which apparently we are...easily!) :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin_The_Martian
XS is already at 600K for the day today :wtf: :up:
EDIT: btw, i love my new cards!! Skyrocket PPD compared to previous cards...
My 24hr broke 100K today 100,199 to be precise. :yepp:
Umm... what's this:
?Code:[20:34:14] Client config found, loading data.
[20:34:14] mdrun_gpu returned
[20:34:14] NANs detected on GPU
[20:34:14]
[20:34:14] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
[20:34:18] CoreStatus = 7A (122)
Never happened to me before, it didn't even start to fold and ran into EUE limit. Closed the client and now it's doing fine again... client hiccup? :shrug:
Could be an unstable overclock. Which project was it working on?
http://fahwiki.net/index.php/EUE_TypesQuote:
Quit 101 - Fatal error: NaN detected: (ener[xx])
Quit 101 - Fatal error: NaN detected: (ener[xx])
...snip...
Folding@home Core Shutdown: EARLY_UNIT_END
xx can be 0, 11, 12, 13, 18, 20, or perhaps other values.
From Gromacs.org: The error comes from coordinates being NaN (not a number). The physical reason for this is that particles come too close to each other.
The most frequent cause of this error is an unstable CPU, which causes incorrect results to be inserted into the simulation. This is turn can result in molecules being reported in different (wrong) positions sometimes manifesting itself in this error.
MaK is right could be unstable oc but also a bad wu, some wu's just break sooner then others :) Need more info :up:
Oh it's by no means unstable, it ran for days at these clocks without any problem (standard EUE is one per day maybe, so one in 23). And it's folding now again. What got me thinking is that it didn't even start to fold, it stopped before...
That's the log:
I just realised that I could have answered the question myself by really looking at the log, it choked on this WU: Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164). Lol. :rolleyes:Code:[20:32:24] Completed 100%
[20:32:24] Successful run
[20:32:24] DynamicWrapper: Finished Work Unit: sleep=10000
[20:32:34] Reserved 1127756 bytes for xtc file; Cosm status=0
[20:32:34] Allocated 1127756 bytes for xtc file
[20:32:34] - Reading up to 1127756 from "work/wudata_03.xtc": Read 1127756
[20:32:34] Read 1127756 bytes from xtc file; available packet space=785302708
[20:32:34] xtc file hash check passed.
[20:32:34] Reserved 34800 34800 785302708 bytes for arc file=<work/wudata_03.trr> Cosm status=0
[20:32:34] Allocated 34800 bytes for arc file
[20:32:34] - Reading up to 34800 from "work/wudata_03.trr": Read 34800
[20:32:34] Read 34800 bytes from arc file; available packet space=785267908
[20:32:34] trr file hash check passed.
[20:32:34] Allocated 560 bytes for edr file
[20:32:34] Read bedfile
[20:32:34] edr file hash check passed.
[20:32:34] Allocated 17997 bytes for logfile
[20:32:34] Read logfile
[20:32:34] GuardedRun: success in DynamicWrapper
[20:32:34] GuardedRun: done
[20:32:34] Run: GuardedRun completed.
[20:32:37] - Writing 1181625 bytes of core data to disk...
[20:32:37] Done: 1181113 -> 1144483 (compressed to 96.8 percent)
[20:32:37] ... Done.
[20:32:37] - Shutting down core
[20:32:37]
[20:32:37] Folding@home Core Shutdown: FINISHED_UNIT
[20:32:40] CoreStatus = 64 (100)
[20:32:40] Sending work to server
[20:32:40] Project: 5014 (Run 2, Clone 402, Gen 182)
[20:32:40] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[20:32:40] + Attempting to send results [November 3 20:32:40 UTC]
[20:33:05] + Results successfully sent
[20:33:05] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.
[20:33:05] + Number of Units Completed: 579
[20:33:09] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[20:33:09] + Attempting to get work packet
[20:33:09] - Connecting to assignment server
[20:33:10] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.106).
[20:33:10] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[20:33:10] Loaded queue successfully.
[20:33:12] + Closed connections
[20:33:12]
[20:33:12] + Processing work unit
[20:33:12] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[20:33:12] Core found.
[20:33:12] Working on queue slot 04 [November 3 20:33:12 UTC]
[20:33:12] + Working ...
[20:33:12]
[20:33:12] *------------------------------*
[20:33:12] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[20:33:12] Version 1.18 (Thu Oct 23 10:15:05 PDT 2008)
[20:33:12]
[20:33:12] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[20:33:12] Build host: amoeba
[20:33:12] Board Type: Nvidia
[20:33:12] Core :
[20:33:12] Preparing to commence simulation
[20:33:12] - Looking at optimizations...
[20:33:12] - Created dyn
[20:33:12] - Files status OK
[20:33:12] - Expanded 45566 -> 246249 (decompressed 540.4 percent)
[20:33:12] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=45566 data_size=246249, decompressed_data_size=246249 diff=0
[20:33:12] - Digital signature verified
[20:33:12]
[20:33:12] Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164)
[20:33:12]
[20:33:12] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[20:33:12] Entering M.D.
[20:33:18] Working on p5506_supervillin_e1
[20:33:19] Client config found, loading data.
[20:33:19] Starting GUI Server
[20:33:19] mdrun_gpu returned
[20:33:19] NANs detected on GPU
[20:33:19]
[20:33:19] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
[20:33:23] CoreStatus = 7A (122)
[20:33:23] Sending work to server
[20:33:23] Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164)
[20:33:23] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[20:33:23] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_04.dat
[20:33:23] - Error: Could not read unit 04 file. Removing from queue.
[20:33:23] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[20:33:23] + Attempting to get work packet
[20:33:23] - Connecting to assignment server
[20:33:23] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.106).
[20:33:23] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[20:33:24] Loaded queue successfully.
[20:33:25] + Closed connections
[20:33:30]
[20:33:30] + Processing work unit
[20:33:30] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[20:33:30] Core found.
[20:33:30] Working on queue slot 05 [November 3 20:33:30 UTC]
[20:33:30] + Working ...
[20:33:30]
[20:33:30] *------------------------------*
[20:33:30] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[20:33:30] Version 1.18 (Thu Oct 23 10:15:05 PDT 2008)
[20:33:30]
[20:33:30] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[20:33:30] Build host: amoeba
[20:33:30] Board Type: Nvidia
[20:33:30] Core :
[20:33:30] Preparing to commence simulation
[20:33:30] - Looking at optimizations...
[20:33:30] - Created dyn
[20:33:30] - Files status OK
[20:33:30] - Expanded 45566 -> 246249 (decompressed 540.4 percent)
[20:33:30] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=45566 data_size=246249, decompressed_data_size=246249 diff=0
[20:33:30] - Digital signature verified
[20:33:30]
[20:33:30] Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164)
[20:33:30]
[20:33:30] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[20:33:30] Entering M.D.
[20:33:37] Working on p5506_supervillin_e1
[20:33:37] Client config found, loading data.
[20:33:37] Starting GUI Server
[20:33:37] mdrun_gpu returned
[20:33:37] NANs detected on GPU
[20:33:37]
[20:33:37] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
[20:33:41] CoreStatus = 7A (122)
[20:33:41] Sending work to server
[20:33:41] Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164)
[20:33:41] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[20:33:41] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_05.dat
[20:33:41] - Error: Could not read unit 05 file. Removing from queue.
[20:33:41] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[20:33:41] + Attempting to get work packet
[20:33:41] - Connecting to assignment server
[20:33:42] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.106).
[20:33:42] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[20:33:42] Loaded queue successfully.
[20:33:44] + Closed connections
[20:33:49]
[20:33:49] + Processing work unit
[20:33:49] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[20:33:49] Core found.
[20:33:49] Working on queue slot 06 [November 3 20:33:49 UTC]
[20:33:49] + Working ...
[20:33:49]
[20:33:49] *------------------------------*
[20:33:49] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[20:33:49] Version 1.18 (Thu Oct 23 10:15:05 PDT 2008)
[20:33:49]
[20:33:49] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[20:33:49] Build host: amoeba
[20:33:49] Board Type: Nvidia
[20:33:49] Core :
[20:33:49] Preparing to commence simulation
[20:33:49] - Looking at optimizations...
[20:33:49] - Created dyn
[20:33:49] - Files status OK
[20:33:49] - Expanded 45566 -> 246249 (decompressed 540.4 percent)
[20:33:49] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=45566 data_size=246249, decompressed_data_size=246249 diff=0
[20:33:49] - Digital signature verified
[20:33:49]
[20:33:49] Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164)
[20:33:49]
[20:33:49] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[20:33:49] Entering M.D.
[20:33:55] Working on p5506_supervillin_e1
[20:33:56] Client config found, loading data.
[20:33:56] mdrun_gpu returned
[20:33:56] NANs detected on GPU
[20:33:56]
[20:33:56] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
[20:33:59] CoreStatus = 7A (122)
[20:33:59] Sending work to server
[20:33:59] Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164)
[20:33:59] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[20:33:59] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_06.dat
[20:33:59] - Error: Could not read unit 06 file. Removing from queue.
[20:33:59] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[20:33:59] + Attempting to get work packet
[20:33:59] - Connecting to assignment server
[20:34:00] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.106).
[20:34:00] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[20:34:00] Loaded queue successfully.
[20:34:02] + Closed connections
[20:34:07]
[20:34:07] + Processing work unit
[20:34:07] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[20:34:07] Core found.
[20:34:07] Working on queue slot 07 [November 3 20:34:07 UTC]
[20:34:07] + Working ...
[20:34:07]
[20:34:07] *------------------------------*
[20:34:07] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[20:34:07] Version 1.18 (Thu Oct 23 10:15:05 PDT 2008)
[20:34:07]
[20:34:07] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[20:34:07] Build host: amoeba
[20:34:07] Board Type: Nvidia
[20:34:07] Core :
[20:34:07] Preparing to commence simulation
[20:34:07] - Looking at optimizations...
[20:34:07] - Created dyn
[20:34:07] - Files status OK
[20:34:07] - Expanded 45566 -> 246249 (decompressed 540.4 percent)
[20:34:07] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=45566 data_size=246249, decompressed_data_size=246249 diff=0
[20:34:07] - Digital signature verified
[20:34:07]
[20:34:07] Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164)
[20:34:07]
[20:34:07] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[20:34:07] Entering M.D.
[20:34:13] Working on p5506_supervillin_e1
[20:34:14] Client config found, loading data.
[20:34:14] mdrun_gpu returned
[20:34:14] NANs detected on GPU
[20:34:14]
[20:34:14] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
[20:34:18] CoreStatus = 7A (122)
[20:34:18] Sending work to server
[20:34:18] Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164)
[20:34:18] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[20:34:18] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_07.dat
[20:34:18] - Error: Could not read unit 07 file. Removing from queue.
[20:34:18] - Preparing to get new work unit...
[20:34:18] + Attempting to get work packet
[20:34:18] - Connecting to assignment server
[20:34:19] - Successful: assigned to (171.64.65.106).
[20:34:19] + News From Folding@Home: GPU folding beta
[20:34:19] Loaded queue successfully.
[20:34:21] + Closed connections
[20:34:26]
[20:34:26] + Processing work unit
[20:34:26] Core required: FahCore_11.exe
[20:34:26] Core found.
[20:34:26] Working on queue slot 08 [November 3 20:34:26 UTC]
[20:34:26] + Working ...
[20:34:26]
[20:34:26] *------------------------------*
[20:34:26] Folding@Home GPU Core - Beta
[20:34:26] Version 1.18 (Thu Oct 23 10:15:05 PDT 2008)
[20:34:26]
[20:34:26] Compiler : Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 14.00.50727.762 for 80x86
[20:34:26] Build host: amoeba
[20:34:26] Board Type: Nvidia
[20:34:26] Core :
[20:34:26] Preparing to commence simulation
[20:34:26] - Looking at optimizations...
[20:34:26] - Created dyn
[20:34:26] - Files status OK
[20:34:26] - Expanded 45566 -> 246249 (decompressed 540.4 percent)
[20:34:26] Called DecompressByteArray: compressed_data_size=45566 data_size=246249, decompressed_data_size=246249 diff=0
[20:34:26] - Digital signature verified
[20:34:26]
[20:34:26] Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164)
[20:34:26]
[20:34:26] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[20:34:26] Entering M.D.
[20:34:32] Working on p5506_supervillin_e1
[20:34:32] Client config found, loading data.
[20:34:32] mdrun_gpu returned
[20:34:32] NANs detected on GPU
[20:34:32]
[20:34:32] Folding@home Core Shutdown: UNSTABLE_MACHINE
[20:34:36] CoreStatus = 7A (122)
[20:34:36] Sending work to server
[20:34:36] Project: 5506 (Run 2, Clone 278, Gen 164)
[20:34:36] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.
[20:34:36] - Error: Could not get length of results file work/wuresults_08.dat
[20:34:36] - Error: Could not read unit 08 file. Removing from queue.
[20:34:36] EUE limit exceeded. Pausing 24 hours.
Folding@Home Client Shutdown.
I was just a bit startled because I never saw a WU behave this way.. :rolleyes:
tht's a bad wu in that log.. you can report it if you want http://foldingforum.org/viewforum.php?f=19
I report them sometimes when I feel like it. other times I just say screw it, too much work.. lol
Well, last time I reported a bad SMP WU this particular WU was out for months and reportedly no one was ever able to complete it, so I guess no one at PG cares about such reports anway. :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeB12
http://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.ph...575&hilit=5506
Those are bad wu's. Sorry took me awhile, had some pm's there which were important to I didn't paste the link as quick as I could. But judging from your smillies I think you were already aware of the project issues so I'm carrying water to the ocean :rofl:
*Edit.
I missed the two above posts as this reply was open while I was handling my pm's there.
They actually rely on the reports badly. It's true their collection servers will know it eue'd but it does not send with it the log content, only the wu results, and an identifier who's account it was folded on. So most of the time it's the reports from the john doe's like us which enable them to pin point a particular issue going wrong. I am willing to report issues like this for you if you're not having the time for it or don't feel like it, just pm the logfile and I relay it, don't forget whe're doing this for a good cause :up:
If you think it really does something then the log excerpt is in my post above, I'm just not as optimistic about this as you. I'm just wondering what would happen if I had a really big GPU farm... I think it would need baby sitting around the clock. :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin_The_Martian
yeah it's disappointing to see a wu get reported over and over and never get pulled... that used to tick me off.. just one of those PG disappointments I've learned to accept as normal. it's sad sometimes.
that's why I'm not to disciplined about reporting them anymore. though I still do occasionally.
COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC WARNING:
Its officially Nov 4th here, so DONT FORGET TO VOTE TODAY ALL YOU UNITED STATES CITIZENS THAT ARE REGISTERED TO VOTE!!!!
we will be stuck with everyone's decision for four years at the least, so what's the pain in getting your voice in there...
END OF COMPLETELY OFF TOPIC POST...
Owww... no political posts to be made on XS.... :nono:Quote:
Originally Posted by sniperbob
<snip> removed due to a grown consience :rofl:
This ends our subliminal advertising :up:
Done. And I can't answer the last question with anything other then... it takes abit of devotion, but as Mike says they do know most people do not watch their clients as closely, What I said was only to try and make that percentage who does report spotten problems abit bigger. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by p2501
White House is not called White House because of its marble surface ... :hehe:
I'm going to refrain from posting more then one political post, don't give .. ammo to shoot at me :rofl:
Well well Marvin... you have build up some patience since... :up: :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Marvin_The_Martian
I even cleaned up my post where I went against he whishes of the admins, it was a joke anyway but in a way it also represented my hopes atm so I shouldn't have done it.Quote:
Originally Posted by sc00p
There there my beloved sensor shortfused bomb :cord: umm i ment :buddies:Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin_The_Martian
:rofl: my arms hurt from hanging on the ceiling but I kinda enjoy the whip Kondik, next time when you're in amsterdam we should really go to that same club again yes....
3some anyone :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvin_The_Martian
One of my folders / servers are down b/c I have a failing HD and I don't want data loss. I will need to recover it before i bring them back up.
Want a free 80gb(I think, gotta look when I get home, won't be less than 40gb though) drive? Sata or pata, I have both just laying around. Let me know and we'll see what I can get sent out to you.Quote:
Originally Posted by texnofobix
catawalks, i just barely squeezed by you today, but i am sure you won't stay in my rear-view for long. I have a feeling I am going to get passed again by you in the future...
:para::hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by sniperbob
If it hadn't been for my gpu2 client getting stuck on load this morning when I restarted, I would have been folding all day....but nooo. Stupid me, I should have checked to make sure everything was all good before I left. :doh:
I know this is supposed to be a harassment thread. I wasn't sure where to put this. :)
I scouted this team for a while before contributing in the last race. ;) A number of contributors here convinced me you guys were going places. :up:
I have to single out RR in particular. :yepp: He was putting up points I thought I was capable of but had never achieved. In the first race I just hoped to match his output and came up short. In the current race, I jumped him out of the gate and he has responded improving his output considerably. :worship: RR is a true competitor. And provided the needed inspiration for me to up my game. :bows: :wtf: RR :toast:
:ROTF: I think some of you got mowed down in the process of me trying to catch him. ;)
Thanks WFO, now where are my jato rockets? Oh thats right they will be here tomorrow...:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by WFO
mowed down??? no i wouldnt say that... maybe being behind the jato rockets when they took off, some of us are feeling a little burnt by the both of you...
but with what ive got running :D i still might get burnt, but it might just be a small first degree burn :)
Mine will too! I guess it comes down to who builds faster and has the least technical problems. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by road-runner
I don't think mowed down is quite the term... how about totally obliterated :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by WFO
Point taken. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by SparkyJJO
This can only be considered self indulgence. Fold long enough and there are fewer goals to shoot for. Tomorrows hardware upgrades should improve this...
http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/8...dulgentge2.png
16th in points for the week is pretty cool. :p: It's all RR's fault. He was like 20-22 in the last competition. He set the bar and I'm still trying to raise it. :up:
But if you take lesson from one of our leaders, examplary Angra, he has dragged the whole teams performance up just being with us. Of course this does not mean I'm giving all the credit of current pace of XS_Folding to him... yet sure that you, WFO... can be also one of the initiative forces for an individual person thinking about joining to bunch of jolly folders :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by WFO
This is a goal which never fades IMO :yepp:
At that, a member with tinier PenisPerDay, can make a huge difference :)
Approximately 3 days till I hit the top five. I'm running with the big dawgs now. :rofl:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He82NBjJqf8
SNIPERBOB! Even though with my projected path or destruction being calculated using my daily average, I seem to have snuck up on you and will probably pass you today if you do not get off your but and 24h fold for a while! BWAHAHAHA! Come on man, kick it up a notch, I know you can make it a couple weeks sleeping with your machine on.
Haha i just recruited some guy with a 9800GX2 at gamespot:D
Awesome! :up: :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingcarcas
WFO & RR...Again I solute you !!!:up:
Sorry sniperbob, I got my 8800GS up and running. Looks like next update or 2 and I'll be overtaking you.
Thanks Dak! We're just doing our part. :) I was all set to declare penalties againts RR for getting Space-X rocket engines instead of standard jato rockets because 2 days in a row his production increased 10K after the new WUs and cores. :yepp: Then he had network problems and today it seems he is getting his share of 5748s so it's all good for now. :rofl::rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by DAK1640
I just got one thing to say:
"Put em uhhhp, put em uuuuhhhhppp!"
I dropped 1.15 back in there and it lasted a couple days until it downloaded 1.19 again...:shakes:Quote:
Originally Posted by WFO