http://www.tweaktown.com/news/58635/...ler/index.html
Battlefield 1: 95.4FPS (GTX 1070: 72.2FPS)
Civilization 6: 85.1FPS (GTX 1070: 72.2FPS)
DOOM: 101.2FPS (GTX 1070: 84.6FPS)
COD:IW: 99.9FPS (GTX 1070: 92.1FPS)
http://www.tweaktown.com/news/58635/...ler/index.html
Battlefield 1: 95.4FPS (GTX 1070: 72.2FPS)
Civilization 6: 85.1FPS (GTX 1070: 72.2FPS)
DOOM: 101.2FPS (GTX 1070: 84.6FPS)
COD:IW: 99.9FPS (GTX 1070: 92.1FPS)
Somehow i suspect these are amd leaked numbers representing best case scenario.
Anyhow, im still interested in vega 56, 210W means theres should be some decent OC headroom.But only in AIB versions, so probably mid september, because reference model almost certainly will suck balls.
i WAS interested in vega 64 water when initial leaks put it into 599$ ,but asking 700$ for a 1080 competitor at 375W is a bit unwise.
Last edited by vario; 08-03-2017 at 07:54 AM.
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
Seems like Vega 56 is the 1 to get, AMDs cut chip always offers the best combination of perf/cost. Compared to their full chip. Hopefully prices aren't stratospheric and I can pick 1 up.
I feel like if these drop to around 299 somehow it will be a real winner. AMD seems poised to dominate the value market for chips and graphics... At the very least should drive the currently insane pricing downwards.
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
If AMD could launch these as 10nm or 7nm then nobody would be complaining.
Bookmarks