dx58so
w3520@4100
4x1gb corsair ddr3-1333
gtx 295
TR ultra-x, 2 scythe ultrakaze push/pull
xclio stablepower 1000
vista ultimate
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
-------------------------------
would you crunch if you thought it would save her life?
maybe it will!
Great test! Ty !
Intel Q9650 @500x9MHz/1,3V
Asus Maximus II Formula @Performance Level=7
OCZ OCZ2B1200LV4GK 4x2GB @1200MHz/5-5-5-15/1,8V
OCZ SSD Vertex 3 120Gb
Seagate RAID0 2x ST1000DM003
XFX HD7970 3GB @1111MHz
Thermaltake Xaser VI BWS
Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP
M-Audio Audiophile 192
LG W2486L
Liquid Cooling System :
ThermoChill PA120.3 + Coolgate 4x120
Swiftech Apogee XT, Swiftech MCW-NBMAX Northbridge
Watercool HeatKiller GPU-X3 79X0 Ni-Bl + HeatKiller GPU Backplate 79X0
Laing 12V DDC-1Plus with XSPC Laing DDC Reservoir Top
3x Scythe S-FLEX "F", 4x Scythe Gentle Typhoon "15", Scythe Kaze Master Ace 5,25''
Apple MacBook Pro 17` Early 2011:
CPU: Sandy Bridge Intel Core i7 2720QM
RAM: Crucial 2x4GB DDR3 1333
SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB SSD
HDD: ADATA Nobility NH13 1GB White
OS: Mac OS X Mavericks
Wow! This runs about 10C hotter than anything else I have ever used! Kick-ass!
How do I interpret the results?
Q6700 @3.52 GHz
Windows XP Pro
Last edited by Super Nade; 08-11-2008 at 05:10 AM.
Code:ASUS Maximus II Q6700 ZIPPY GSM-6600P (G1) Ballistix PC6400 Sapphire HD4870
Ok this program gets Cores HOTTER then Orthos Prime.
I need to figure out why 2 of my cores always read 10C higher then the other 2.
Linpack 0-1 Cores 84C and 2-3 Cores 74C Max.
Orthos = 0-1 Cores 74C and 2-3 Cores 64C Max. (Were talking like 2-3 instances of 3 secs of a Max of 74C)
Here is my test results just done 6 min ago and all is OK Residual result numbers 5 passes all same.
Also ppl read the read me text ... only use what free memory is available to use.
Last edited by BeastNotro; 08-11-2008 at 05:24 AM.
**PC Specs**
- Intel E8600 E0 @ 4.2ghz @ 1.33v full load (Vid 1.25) Batch # Q822A441
- Asus P5Q Deluxe P45 (Bios 1402)
- T-Right Ultra 120 Extreme (lapped), 1 x Noctua P12
- 1 x ATI HIS 4850 @ 700/1100
- 4gb G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-2GBPK @ 1008mhz
- TT ToughPower 650w
- 1 x 640GB Seagate Sata II
- Antec 900 Case
- Vista 64bit SP1 and All Useful Updates
**My Template for 4.2ghz speed**
[URL=WILL MAKE ONE UP SOON[/URL]
Orthos Prime (Blend) Stable 16hrs
Super Nade, bad result. Your system is not stable.
Intel Q9650 @500x9MHz/1,3V
Asus Maximus II Formula @Performance Level=7
OCZ OCZ2B1200LV4GK 4x2GB @1200MHz/5-5-5-15/1,8V
OCZ SSD Vertex 3 120Gb
Seagate RAID0 2x ST1000DM003
XFX HD7970 3GB @1111MHz
Thermaltake Xaser VI BWS
Seasonic Platinum SS-1000XP
M-Audio Audiophile 192
LG W2486L
Liquid Cooling System :
ThermoChill PA120.3 + Coolgate 4x120
Swiftech Apogee XT, Swiftech MCW-NBMAX Northbridge
Watercool HeatKiller GPU-X3 79X0 Ni-Bl + HeatKiller GPU Backplate 79X0
Laing 12V DDC-1Plus with XSPC Laing DDC Reservoir Top
3x Scythe S-FLEX "F", 4x Scythe Gentle Typhoon "15", Scythe Kaze Master Ace 5,25''
Apple MacBook Pro 17` Early 2011:
CPU: Sandy Bridge Intel Core i7 2720QM
RAM: Crucial 2x4GB DDR3 1333
SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB SSD
HDD: ADATA Nobility NH13 1GB White
OS: Mac OS X Mavericks
Essentially you just made a simple front-end for this [ Lets put your CPU into REAL test! Intel Linpack 64bit ] in order to fish for donations? Clever...
You should at least give Cronos proper credit in the first post. I doubt your efforts are worth a donation... I'm sorry, but to me it just comes across as astute and arrogant.
Either way, Linpack seems useful (as does your program), so thanks for that. It should at the very least automatically scan for errors (inconsistencies) though.
Program Creator, If you created a program that would automatically run 2 tests, 1 with low ram, and one with ~remainder free ram, and also check for errors, that would be donation worthy. As the program stands right now, I agree with krille.
Technically it could be done noob proof, autodetecting remaining memory, automaticaly doing both high and low memory utilization and automatically compare normals to see if they are the same and display it with nice "You're system is fully stable" text instead several lines of numbers and letters. Or simply a summary display of tested stuff and "Ok" next to it if passed and "Failed" if not...
Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))
Okay I'm probably a noob and will probably be flamed but... explain to me the need for this program.
Because.. this thing will test your CPU higher then anything ever will and will heat it up higher then anything ever will (other then this program obviously).. so whatever you're going to be using, it will not heat up your CPU as much as this program will and your CPU will not be stressed as much as this program will make it. So whats the point?
If I'm stable for my games, my 3dmarks, my SuperPIs, and my folds, then.. in essence, am I not stable for my needs?
If your computer is stable enough, then you don't need to worry about it. This is more for servers where you need 100% data integrity, or you want a 100% stable system. Some people don't need 100% stability, some people want just another test. It's basically another tool similar to OCCT and prime, it just runs your system harder so you can find out if it's not stable faster.
Well i guess my question is.. if you're stable under Prime but not stable under this... why heat up your CPU more by increasing voltage to get stable under this program when your system will NEVER be tested under this programs circumstances?
Small fft prime (what most people run) tests mainly the CPU and L2 cache. If you run prime in blend, that will test your memory controller as well. This will stress your memory controller and cpu, while also working it harder so you get a result faster.
Well yeah you get the result faster, but like I said, under the kind of stress that it'll NEVER be put under.
If you have the test fail, then it could happen at any time. Again, this test is more designed for areas where absolute 100% stability and data integrity are necessary. For the rest of us, it's a new stability toy to play with. I don't care if my computer will never be pushed to it's limits for normal day use, but if I can prevent stability issues by quickly checking, I see no reason not to.
thanks for the program AgentGOD
well , can i read this stable system ? . still a lil confused about the result readouts .. maybe some smarter people help me to ''decode'' this TIA
( was using 1024Mb for Ram .. ? half of total coze have 2Gb )
sys spec..
CPU: E8400 (@4005Mhz) /445X9 / Vcore set= 1.2500 // Aircooled noctua NH-C12P
RAM: G.Skill F3-10600CL8D-2GBH (DDR3-1333 PC3-10600 1024Mb x2 CL-8-8-8-21 1.65v / voltage set 1.70
MBO: Asus P5K3-Deluxe wifi/ap bios v.1014
GFX: XFX 9600GT (512MB)
PSU: Chieftec 650W (CFT-650-14CS)
( naked /caseless ( table ) setup ALL AIR COOLED
bios setup: vCore=1.2500 ; CPU PLL-1.50 ; FSB Term v=1.40 ; DRAM v=1.70 ; NB v=1.40 ;SB v=1.20 ; LLC=Auto ; CPU GTL=0.63 ; NB GTL=0.61
btw .. on same settings,
OCCP 2.0.0a 1 hour Passed
Prime95 (25.6) Blend test fail ( second core dropped ) ~0.5 Hour run (no crash)
Prime95 (25.6) Small FFT test 1.5 Hours - fail ( second core dropped ) no crash
for common usage - seemsto be stable tough ..
other readouts visible on screenshot
Maximus Extreme / Air // E8400 // Noctua NH-C12P
Asus 8800 ULTRA /Stock Air/
G.SKILL F3-10600CL8D-2GBHK
Tagan TG700-BZ // Antec P182 B
Rampage Extreme / Air // QX9650 // True120 Black
A-Data DDR3-1600G 3x2gb kit (using 2 modules 2x2b)
((CellShock (MSC CS3222580) ) dead
Sapphire HD 4870x2 (single) stock Air
Be Quiet! Dark Power Pro 1KW // HAF'932
i have same issue on my q9450, cores 0&1 are allways around 8-10 degrees higher then 2&3, remouted heatsink 2-3 times, even lapped it once, it doesnt makes a difference, then someday during prime95 test i noticed, that each time when core 0 or 1 will fail, failed core will starts to read temperature from other core, so i think its bugged/stucked sensors and i stoped caring about temperatures on core 0&1 and i just take 2&3 as only ones valid under stress... problem is linpac sometimes on hot day can get core 0&1 on 95 degrees and that turns on thermal throttling but like i said that exceptional on very hot day, when i get temperatures inside case over 40 degrees, so i dont mind much...
Last edited by SoLoR; 08-11-2008 at 08:52 AM.
Yeah, you failed. Judging by the fact that you failed blend and small FTT, I would say you need a but more voltage to the cpu. Playing around with the NB GTL may also help a bit.
For Prime:
Small FTT = CPU test. The CPU holds all of the data it needs in L2 Cache
Blend Mode = CPU and RAM/NB. The CPU data cache cannot hold all of the data that it needs, so it makes frequent calls to the memory for new data.
If you can pass Small FTT for hours, but blend fails quickly, then you need to play around with your memory system. Adjust NB GTL's, up NB core or loosen RAM. If you fail Small FTT quickly, you need to play around with your CPU GTL's, CPU voltages or lower your FSB/Multi.
works awesome under linux using wine... my lappie stayed as hot as hell
C2Q QX6800@ 3.75GHz (375x10 - 1.450v) - L725A - G0
4GB PC2-5300 Kingston Micron D9@ 3-4-4-10 750MHz 1:1
Asus P5E-Deluxe - no mods
eVGA 9600gso G92 + XFX 8500 GT (physics)
H4ck3d-Slackware 11.0
kernel-2.6.22.1@MCORE2 Arch Optimized
http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/hpl/ You can run linpack in linux without the use of a "not emulator".
This could be my PC being unstable....but if I run 7 tests using 3300MB of RAM (as I am on Vista x64 SP1) all values are identical (which is good as that indicates stability), however if I run, then a few seconds later open CPU-Z and RealTemp while the test is in progress my 1st 2 results are completely different. Is this a sign of instability? Or is it because the applications I am launching whilst the test is in progress are causing some sort of conflict.
Please note that if I run Real Temp and CPU-Z and leave them open I can complete 7 tests with no errors, however launching them during the test causes 2 results to differ.
John
Stop looking at the walls, look out the window
No i think the problem is the IHS is concave in that area and it is causing a Air bubble or a GAP there in which the heatsink is not making 100% contact.
The sensors are not stuck as if you use RealTemp you can Test the Sensors for movement in which my move np's.
I lapped my Ultra 120 Extreme 2 days ago now and it dropped temps 5-6C from previously when not lapped at Idle.
But under full load it dropped maybe 2-3C, but it is still MID 60's-65C-^8C on average on those 2 cores where as the other two are 8-10C less.
I think i may have to lap the CPU, but i hate to do so cause of warranty, but i not care in one way as i can afford another one if need to be, but it would suck if it did die.
Now cause the Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme is LOOSE when installed this can cause a 4C-5C increase in those cores expecially if the IHS is concave in that area .. now add heat to the issue and that is another 4C-5C increase making the total overall 8-10C increase on those 2 cores alone.
I may try to use a dime or penny or a 1/8 washer ynder the retention bracket to try and get it to be a tighter fit and see how that works out .. with new Paste of course.
I using AS5 right now, but i am going to try the thermalright Chill Factor stuff as in many reviews it is about 2-3C less then AS5 and NO BREAK IN period.
**PC Specs**
- Intel E8600 E0 @ 4.2ghz @ 1.33v full load (Vid 1.25) Batch # Q822A441
- Asus P5Q Deluxe P45 (Bios 1402)
- T-Right Ultra 120 Extreme (lapped), 1 x Noctua P12
- 1 x ATI HIS 4850 @ 700/1100
- 4gb G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-2GBPK @ 1008mhz
- TT ToughPower 650w
- 1 x 640GB Seagate Sata II
- Antec 900 Case
- Vista 64bit SP1 and All Useful Updates
**My Template for 4.2ghz speed**
[URL=WILL MAKE ONE UP SOON[/URL]
Orthos Prime (Blend) Stable 16hrs
Bookmarks