Printable View
So, this time it's been even more funny here, my rig
Intel Core i7 960 @ 4GHz
3 x 2GB Kingston HyperX 1333MHz 7-7-7-20
2 x Sapphire Vapor-X 5870 in CF with 10.3
Intel X25-M 160G G2
No overheating issue at all. Why the banana can't I get just above 50fps like the others running a single card? :mad:
http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/915...2610180211.jpg
You have a super powerful system. No idea, maybe consider gtx480 sli?
^^^ useless response jared.
Sniper, the problem is WOW not Crossfire. It's an old game and can run on any single card maxed out...why not just disable Crossfire for your WOW play?
When I got a 5850 and i5 660 for my girlfriend she could only get like 27fps in Dalaran. Many people told me the CPU was too slow, the gfx card was not powerful enough. Some ppl even claimed to have 50+ fps in Dalaran. So I have just spent like $2000 to try how to get that 50+ fps. I failed again. Can someone please tell me what to do?Quote:
Originally Posted by ReverendMaynard
1440x900 windowed everything max (including shadows) i get 60 fps (vsync) in dalaran, specs in sig
put
SET processAffinityMask "240"
SET gxApi "d3d9ex"
SET gxTextureCacheSize "512"
in your config.wtf :)
actually you can probably play a bit with the cachesize, should be anywhere between 512 & 1024
Quit playn Warcraft, that would solve ALL the low fps issues.... Or, find a RPG that is actually coded decently..... Problem is, that game is made to be played on OLD hardware too, thats how the developer did it to milk $$$ outa you poor Warcraft people....
The answer is what they told you sadly, its a poorly programmed engine, it runs like crap on new hardware. Crossfire and SLI take notable peformance penalties, in addition YOUR Dalaran clearly has more people in it than perhaps another servers version. Most likely this is going to be as good as it gets because of your server pop; network traffic and poorly coded engine.
empty your config.ini or use the repair tool in WoW, your having other issues with the game hense why everyone is named UNKNOWN, this was a bug with some drivers and network connections. use the repair tool and reset all your settings. Also with CF/SLI do not run it in windowed mode, you have to run it in fullscreen for it to get the best performance on CF/SLI settings.
If you are good at WoW you can probably notice that my character got crap gear, which means i'm not really into it. The point is not about playing this game, but to beat the 19x12 max settings. Imagine the feeling of spending $2000 able to handle crysis warhead but unable to conquer a fossil game. Others are enjoying the procedure of benchmarks but I can't even handle such a stupid game lolQuote:
Originally Posted by screwtech02
Thanks but these doesn't help at all in my case :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Dahmer
That UNKNOWN is only because of newly log'ed on with some network latency so it takes some time for the names to appear. This has no effect on fps.Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokenWall
Window mode does not affect my fps at all. Resolution doesn't either. Only Shadow Quality affects seriously.
Tried to repair once but I'll just try to repair and reset the hell again.
Just confirmed neither disabling CF nor full repair could improve a single frame per second.
It's just been strange that some other players on the same server claim to get over 50 fps. I can't understand that. If there is anyone who can get 50+ fps on this forum and also plays on EU could you please pm me and make a lvl 1 char on Shattered Hand, and I'll open a portal to Dalaran for you to take a screenshot :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentential
I have a 5970+5870 and I'm tempted to try it just to see what I get in dal, the problem is the game is a black hole and when I start it I'll look up and it'll be 2012 and I'll be divorced. sorry!
3 things on wow performanceQuote:
Originally Posted by sniper_sung
1) its vary dependent on the servers when they have high load no1 will get high FPS, and its also latency dependent (but that dosnt seam to your problem as u have 0 latency)
2) WOW is coded like crap, it dose not scale linearly, it favors strange things like it used to work better clock for clock for 65nm core2 chips than the 45nm, and the gpu performance changes all the time with their being little difference from a high end and a midrange gpu until they add optimization for that specific card.
3) 29fps nominally means that u have level of detail or reduce input lag enabled, both of them are bad to have enabled and the reduce input lag setting adds lag (go figure)
dal sucks for fps try going somewhere else and see what you fps is mine always goes up when i leave dal what settings are you runing the game on
isn't there a shadow setting that also rapes ATi cards? Sorry if it's been posted but I remember reading that on these forums not too long ago.
My brother had a problem like this. The cause was one of his addons, gearscore? It dropped him from 40s to 10s. The problem is that it checks everyone around you for gear and it's all client-side before you actually target someone. The more people there are the worse it hurts.
Have you tried the new drivers: https://a248.e.akamai.net/f/674/9206...ta_March25.exe
Perkam
A really easy way to see if it's gearscore is to look at your fps in krasus landing and then walk into dal and look at the difference. If it drops like a rock, there's a 99% chance it's gearscore.
oh yes, blame gearscore...
A KILLER NIC will get you 10 fps guaranteed.:up: http://www.zam.com/video.html?video=165 (Game spout -->) With the Killer NIC, ping times on both computers were comparable: generally in the 90ms to 120ms range. Without the Killer NIC, the XP machine lagged a little bit more, with pings ranging from 100ms to 125ms. However, while ping times were relatively similar, the frame rate got a big boost with the Killer NIC, jumping from an average FPS of 45 on the XP machine without the Killer NIC to 55 with it. It seems that World of Warcraft puts out a pretty heavy network burden and the Killer NIC does a great job of handling it(/quote).Also you need 12 gb of memory,another x25 and that game will be conquered.Try to make a crossfire profile also.
I have verified that disabling ALL addons doesn't help at all.
do you have "reduce input lag" enabled?
480 is much faster than 5870 in wow
http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,7...views/?page=15
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace
GTX 480 provides better performance in a game that is 6 YEARS OLD.
And yet cant manage to get ahead of ATIs lower priced cards in a game that JUST came out:
http://images.hardwarecanucks.com/im.../GTX480-40.jpg
Come on now Jared...
Perkam
Jared your a just a nvidia fan boy and anytime you can defame ati you will lol.
Sung, go to CCC (catalyst control center) and change all settings to performance, See if that increases fps, I mean every setting should be on performance, if you dont know what that setting is for, google it and find out what setting is for performance, I bet this would fix your problem. And use AA and AF settings through game options, see if that helps.
ROFL, buying Fermi to play WoW is an overkill, though! :D
Use GPU-Z and monitor the load on the cards when playing wow. My 5870 sits at 30% load showing 40ish FPS in Dalaran. So I concluded it's not the GPU per say, it must be drivers or the game itself.
It's the game.
its the game,they've admitted it a couple of times on the tech support boards.
Reduce input lag is disabled (and i don't see any inference from this)
Buying a pair of GTX 480 seems not practical for me, because I have chosen a cr@p motherboard Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7, where the 2 PCIE x16 slots are too close to each other. You know what, one of my Sapphire Vapor-X 5870 (the non-primary card) can reach 90C under Furmark, just because its fan is blocked airflow by the other card! (This is not the case for WoW, since the temperature under WoW never exceeds 60C for either card.) I still haven't figured out how to force the fan to run at 100% for the non-primary card, which will definitely limit the peak temperature at around 80C.
If a single GTX 480 can go above 90C given that the driver can cheat on Furmark, it is really scary to put such a pair into my rig. I don't want to trigger the fire alarm someday.
Is it lame to set performance settings here? (cuz I think it reduces the visual effects in game actually)Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanousie
Anyway i'll give it a try and post another screenshot at peak time today.
At least it is still hard for many 5870 users to kill WoW. (if you google "5870 dalaran fps")Quote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
Unless I can see someone around me who can get more than 30 fps on my server, I wouldn't believe any card can overkill WoW. It looks like I have found the causality of low fps. It's probably because under max shadow settings the game attempts to render the shadow for each player. Not sure whether Dalaran has got multiple light source or not though. I have also noticed that if it's not peak time I can easily get more than 40+ fps.
ccc shows the load on primary card is around 65% or so, and the load on non-primary card is always 0% (ofc CF does not work here, and disabling CF doesn't help either).Quote:
Originally Posted by DYM
The point is I just want to figure out why I can't get 50+ fps like the others. Because I knew, before I made the rig for my girlfriend, that an i5 660@3.3GHz + 5850 would be more than sufficient for WoW. Now I have proved that an i7 960@4GHz + 2 x 5870 gets the same fps on the same server.
I just have to comment on that nvidia thing, (quick note I think defending some company that surely doesn't care about anyone but their shareholders is retarded). 5870 is 400$ retail, gtx480$ is 500$ retail. 100$ gets you not even a 1fps increase in bfbc2.
I just spent an insane amount of money on a pc and even I wouldn't pay 100$ extra for ~1 fps increase. I waited a long time for fermi and finally got tired of waiting, it finally ships and you get 5-10% in some tesselation benchmark and ~1 fps more in the latest fps. What a let down.
sniper_sung, I kindly ask you to please not make multiple posts. Use the edit button instead.
Please know that WoWs graphics engine is still very cpu dependent. The dynamic shadow system doesn't benifit greatly from faster gpus. That said I highly recommend against running dynamic shadows at higher settings than character only shadows. The performance penalty isn't worth it. I don't play anymore but my friend plays on my previous system and nothing has improved in the 6 months hes had it ( in regards to driver improvements, engine improvements, if anything its gotten worse... )
My advice is to not play the game at a high view distance (2/3 max ; do note that with the release of the lich king, the games max view distance was increased 33% over the burning crussades... )
Appart from a lower resolution, lowering the shadow and view distance settings will provide the largest performance boosts. There is also the fact that your server seems to be fairly busy as well so obviously that is a factor. The game does scale with multiple gpus but its very inconsistent ( ie you'll get a 75% boost in an area which already ran at 100+fps plus yet in a more computationally intense area you'll see no gains whatsoever... )
Setting Catalyst AI to advanced will help a bit ( it enables some further optimizations, they are rarely noticeable visually I find ) Also DO NOT use trasnparency AA in WoW. It nukes performance so bad its not even funny ( I tested my system with 2 4870x2s and there were places were I'd get under 30fps in the orginal game in places devoid of other players, ie forests ect )
As a side note, 90C on a 5870 in Furmark isn't abnormal...
alright alright, sheesh. I just realized i am in the ati subforum recommending the guy to get a gtx480, but :banana::banana::banana::banana:, that PCGH bench shows fermi with a good lead.... not saying the 5870 isn't awesome also. And to the fella who said I am an Nvidia fanboy, just look in my sig :ROTF: I also made a huge thread about 5870 OC'ing in this very forum, and about 2 or 3 big threads regarding HD5870 launch/speculation. I LOVE ATI. :cool: Now, continuing on...Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
It also appears the op doesn't have CF enabled and running properly when he states the "main gpu runs at 66% in dalaran and the second gpu stays at 0%". Maybe the crossfire mode/profile forcer will help you out. It gives you the option to force 4 different modes of multi-gpu rendering that you could test until you find the fastest one. Instead of decreasing all your rendering quality options to the "performance" mode. You might consider just lowering shadow detail for when you're raiding and 1000 characters are on screen.
Thx for editing for me :) Didn't notice the function "multi-quote" lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Ashraf
If i7 960@4GHz can't do it, do I have to get 980X instead? :D In my experiments even an i5 660@3.3GHz can overkill WoW (since there is no improvement by replacing it with this 960). I'll try to figure out CF.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chickenfeed
I think 90C is too hot for the blocked card. The non-blocked card (i.e. the airflow of the fan is not blocked by the other card) never exceeds like 80C in Furmark. Anyway, I'm satisfied with the Vapor-X cooler :) Just don't like the design of the mobo to make 2 cards so close to each other :(
In 25-player raid fights I usually get 150+ fps, and in most zones without players I usually get like 250 fps. However the only problem is Dalaran peak time.Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace
I'll try to figure out how to force CF, if it's possible.
L.E.1:
Just did some search on google and noticed that Crossfire will only be enabled in full screen mode for WoW. Does this apply to all other applications? As of now Dalaran is empty, it makes no difference between full scree mode and window mode: both sticks at around 60 fps. I will check this out at the next peak time in Dalaran.
I hate it break it to you, but that's how it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by sniper_sung
Shattrah was just as bad back in BC.
Like others have said: You can't do much.
Not only does WoW not support Crossfire or SLI but I've found depending on drivers, the number of people around, and the alignment of the stars in a certain way... you'll never get consistent results.
Due tot he badly coded engine, old hardware seems to do better.
Dunno, it's dumb.
Easiest way to fix it...buy an E6600 and a 4670 :p: Maybe someday they will patch to use better hardware...better.
I think many people here are either seriously misinformed about wow or smoking some crack. WOW is really well coded,j ust as well as any source-based games. I only have one 5870 and I get 150fps in dalaran and 270+ in classic wow places like Ironforge. I've been playing WOW for over 4 or 5 years (since the beta) and I've been in top 10 arena teams in BG9 and shadowburn battlegroup for over 6 seasons. That being said, I know a thing or two about wow because to compete against other top teams, I want to get any edge there is. Getting good fps in WOW is not just about your graphic card. It is mostly dependent on your HDD speed and your net. There were times that CPU and GPU were bottlenecking FPS in WOW but that's the the case anymore. I live right next to my server Blackrock which is located in the westcoast. So I constantly get 9~11ms ping. One thing you should know is that you can't expect to get triple digit fps right when you enter Dal, at that time, your computer doesn't even have the whole data that need to be processed. You should wait at least 1 sec before you can decide if it's the right fps you are really getting. Just jump around for a bit after you enter the Dal. Your can definitely push triple digits no problem. I have 4.5ghz E8400 so you should be definitely fine and people should back off with their accusation of wow being life sucking blackhole. The game has grown over the years tremendously and players have matured a lot more than before.
sniper_sung, did you try to disable Hyper Threading on your i7?
(You can do it in BIOS)
From what I remember, I could run WoW WoTLK all max with just E8400 @ 3,6GHz and a Radeon 4850 also OCed a bit and almost all the time I had 60FPS (vsync) including towns.
EDIT: or just park your self in the Inn in the sewers, you'll get plenty of FPS in there, and IMO it's the best Inn in game anyway :P
I have just confirmed that WoW 3.3.3 does not benefit from extra GPU if a single primary GPU is capable. In full screen mode crossfire is actually working. However the sum of the load on these 2 cards never exceeds 100%. Typically it's 40% on each card. Hence I have the same fps as in window mode, which is below 30 fps at peak time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gamekiller
This is similar to the following example:
On a dual core CPU we want to compute SuperPI. The extra core doesn't really improve the computing time even if the extra core can share some load with the primary one, because the sum of the loads on these two cores are equal to 100%. This is because SuperPI is not parallelized.
However in the case of playing a 1080p movie on a low-end dual core CPU, it is possible to notice the situations where the sum of loads on two cores exceeding 100%, which means the application benefits from the extra core.
The Vargoth's Retreat is perhaps where I can get most fps in Dalaran (250 fps):Quote:
Originally Posted by w4tch0
http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/7...2810161607.jpg
The inn in the sewers gives me around 160 fps:
http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/838...2810162056.jpg
In the ages of E8400, even my laptop shown as my sig can get 30 fps in Dalaran. The game engine is refreshing tremendously fast as the patches go on.
Yes I have tried to turn off Hyperthreading Technology and this had no effect on my fps at all.
This might be a good explanation on my low fps. I usually get latency above 100ms.Quote:
Originally Posted by deaffob
Looks like the bad framerates in WOW are caused by peak time server loads combined with distant internet connections. So maybe you should search for a server with a <20ms ping, very few hops, shorts tracert, etc.
THis is obvious since, once you load the game down with huge raids and lots of polygons, you can still get 150 fps (except at peak time server loads). Therefore, no amount of fast gpu+cpu hardware is going to save you from
game code that cannot sufficiently support your situation and that size of a player count. You already know that you are capable of 100 to 200 fps, and everyone is saying the 30fps happens at peak times...
I suggest to force v-sync & triple buffering via d3d overider. Maybe it will force 60fps at all times and improve your 30fps situations in peak times... it will also get rid of horizontal screen
tearing if you are experiencing any of that. But instead of 150-200fps in those raids, you will be capped at 60,70,72,75 or whatever your monitors refresh rate is. (which isn't a bad thing) And as a plus
the 30 fps situations might end up looking a lot smoother with a few frames pre rendered into buffer
Update:
In the name of Science :D I have done some benchmarks.
The benchmark scene is to take a flight from "Conquest Hold" to "Vengeance Landing" in Northrend. Using Fraps 3.2.1, fps values were captured for 4 modes:
a) Crossfire in full screen mode
b) Crossfire in window mode
c) Single card in full screen mode
d) Single card in window mode
Here are the results:
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/5708/wowbench.png
Can anyone here give any comments on this? :)
Unless they've changed it recently, I don't believe crossfire works in windowed mode so that explains that. Interesting that windowed mode vs full has that much of an impact on FPS.
As for ping, try doing the TCP No Delay & Ack Frequency tweak here: http://www.bigfootnetworks.com/kille...ead.php?t=2344
Edit again: Disable that GearScore addon, a friend had problems with it a week ago that was causing him to drop to ridiculous frame rates in raids.
I'm sorry but you aren't going to get 100fps + consistently in Dalaran 1920x1080+ with higher settings and AA (entering a small room with nothing to render doesn't count... im sorry ) At lower resolutions yes ( 1440x900 or less ), I'd believe that but if you are going to come in here and say you get 150+fps in Dalaran with your said system at 1920x1200, I'm sorry but that is a lie. I went from a E8400 / 4870x2 to a i7 / 5870 and although things ran faster, it still was around 25-60fps tops throughout Dalaran during peak times. There is no magical way you'll be getting 2x that. I've played the game on many different systems ( friends / lan parties ect ) and your claims are only consistent with running at a low resolution. If you are I appologize ( you never mentioned your resolution so I'll give you the benifit of the doubt ). If you aren't... :down:Quote:
Originally Posted by deaffob
@Sniper
Yes that is correct. Crossfire doesn't work in windowed mode. It has been like this for years.
you spent all that money for wow. damn. i understand the headache, a "sh.it" graphics game and you can't max out.
jus say to hell with wow and play some games that'll really make use of that $2000 system!
I do get 120~150 in dalaran unless there is server wide lag. I always play with 8X AA in wow and ultra preset(everything max). The only time I get 50~70fps is in wintergrasp when there are 500+ players in the same area. Yes my server blackrock probably has more pvper than any other server in US. One more thing is, if you have strong enough GPU, WOW doesn't give almost any negative impact on your performance with respect to AA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chickenfeed
Yes I have noticed that x8 AA gives the same performance as no AA, which means GPU is perhaps not the bottleneck. As my speculation Blizzard is enforcing some constraints to force each client to synchronize with the server and keep updating the location of each other player, at a relatively high frequency. (To prevent from cheating, e.g. walking through walls etc.) In such case network latency and number of players in sight can be a real problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by deaffob
Get a Killer NIC.:up:
Few things I've found with wow... I'm using a 4870x2, i5 750 @ 4ghz + 4GB DDR3 @ 2000 9-9-9
* Windowed mode will only use a single card/core.
* Game is heavily CPU dependant in some areas, and heavily GPU in others.
* C2D e7500 @ 3.8ghz is nowhere near enough to max out a single 4870x2 running with everything on max* 1920x1080 4xaa
* *= Except shadows. Shadows on max drops my framerate by 75%. I turn them off.
Throwing more hardware at this problem will not fix it. WoW is known scale horribly with crossfire and SLI. If you're expecting anything over 30fps in Dalaran, you're dreaming especially during peak times.
Get the new board EVGA SR-2 which supports Two 6core Xeons cpus and come back here and tell us if that will improve your fps =) Im curious to see if anyone has this setup and can post some screenshots of showing the fps in WoW, would be great.
:rofl: :ROTF: :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by jincuteguy
You've just been awarded "funniest post of the month" :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
Shadows maxed out is HORRIBLY optimized and will cripple any system at higher resolutions. I turn them off like a few others said here. And Dal is horribly optimized also Blizz has admited this on the forums. Anyone who claims they are hitting 60+ fps in dal at peak times with maxed setttings is lying.
Yea I know, but I really wanna see if anyone here has the SR-2 board with dual Xeon 6 core cpus and runs WoW. I just want to see what kind of fps you can get in Dalaran with that. It could be the same or higher u know, if you dont try you never know.
i dont think that wow is multithreaded enough for that, i havnt played it for like a year and a half or so but i remember it not using all of the cores on my 720be tri core.Quote:
Originally Posted by jincuteguy
You don't need to try. A highly overclocked x58 platform based system will score just as high or higher. WoW does not create more than 2 threads. No matter how many cores you have.Quote:
Originally Posted by jincuteguy
You dont understanding what im saying. What I said was I just want to see someone with that setup who plays WoW and show the fps. I didnt say the fps from that setup will be higher or the same as a high end X58
And obviously no one on here has the SR-2 setup so oh well
Shadow detail kills FPS, i put mine on the lowest form, looks good and massive performance gain.
set your multisampling to 8x and go into your WTF config and add the direct X 11 support comand line to it. fixed my frame rate.
I don't play wow but i've played aion for a while and we had similar issues.
low fps in crowded aera with high end system.
the problem is that in crowded aera,the game is cpu dependent so not matter how powerfull are your card,you will see no changes.
I'm pretty sure that if you disable your crossfire,your fps will be same.
Also people reporting high fps like 150 are in a empty room or simply lying.
You can make few tests like check the fps with your cpu @ stock
Disable crossfire and put all your graphics settings to minimum and compare if the change is big.
with thoses tests you should know what is the bottleneck and if its the cpu/game,there is nothing you can do.
disabling shadow may help though.
Wow is super cpu-memory bandwitdh intensive game.
From GPU point of view, even 9800GT is totally enough to play very high details and 4x AA etc.
And please dont compare dalaran FPS here. Thats pointless because dalaran always lags. :D
Anyway. Have a high frequency DDR3 and clocked CPU and youll do fine.
Google for more info. There should be tests about it somewhere. Read it few days ago.
An e8400 @ 3.6GHz system with 2GB ddr1000 at 1920x1080 gets me 50fps using an 8800GT card and 27fps using a Sapphire 4890. I'd be interested to see how an nVidia 460/470/480 and ati 5870/6870 compare.
Its funny this post arose while I was looking for any information on the HD6xxx Dual processor cards.
A neighbor said a guy at work wants me to build him a kick ass computer strickly for WOW. I've been throwing stuff together in the good old Newegg cart and can't get below 600 for core components for inside a case with todays tech. If I remember correctly though 2 years ago when I was playing wow on private servers I had a e8400 with 8 gigs of ram and dual 9800 GTX KO cards and ran the game just fine on all high settings and 1920x1050.
So what would be the best setup for wow?
I was pricing a gigabyte board with an i3 530 and 4 gigs coupled with a hd 5770. Should that be plenty or is any of that too much?
Not to jack the thread or anything, but it still goes along the lines of what you need to get the sweet spot in FPS with WOW. lol
Other than dalaran and a very few 25man raid bosses i dont have any fps issues, everything maxed except shadows one tick lower at 1920x1600, but i always run WCG while playnig wow :cool: I can fix raid fps by stop cruching, dalaran fps issue is not my pc issue though :up:
As it stands, a 470 would be the best bet for WoW at 1680x1050 with high settings. The ultra shadow setting kills any machine I've played the game on and in the beta ultra shadows in twilight highlands (end game 85 zone ) brings even a GTX480 to its knees regardless of a 4Ghz + cpu, fast memory and storage system.
That coupled with full scene based water reflection, there are areas where top of the line hardware can fall under 30fps and these are actual game play areas, not just cities. Stormwind runs better than Dalaran did, same with Org ( in 4.0.3 ) so don't put too much weight into Dalaran performance anymore, Blizzard have addmited it wasn't an ideal execution. Still, shadows followed by view distance, liquid detail, resolution then particle density seem to effect performance most. I tend to run with shadows, liquid detail and viewdistance on high opposed to ultra as I demand at least 60fps in non city areas ( higher if possible )
Personally a decent processor with a good overclock, a small SSD and a 470 would be most cost effective (I've played the beta on various hardware ranging from a 8800gt to a gtx480 ). SLI/CF still is a waste of money for WoW. An SSD isnt needed but it increased my enjoyment of the game substantially.
In WoW settings disable vertical sync and lower shadows one below max, that should boost your frame rate.Quote:
Originally Posted by sniper_sung
I wouldn't suggest changing the resolution, playing on an LCD screen in any resolution other than native results in awful picture quality.Quote:
Originally Posted by HTI
No-one complains a 6yr old game doesn't run well on their new $2000 machine :p:
Stop beating that dead horse and go play something which actually USES your new gear :up: