Xeon E3110 oc - Quick test

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-24-2008, 07:25 AM
Dumo

Xeon E3110 oc - Quick test

E8400 is hard to find?

Then here is an alternative....

Xeon E3110 on the left and E8500

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/8...shot256ee7.jpg

Can you tell the difference?

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/5...shot265bh4.jpg

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/9...shot255lt0.jpg

http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/1...shot262hk2.jpg
02-24-2008, 07:27 AM
Dumo

Test with air, comparo to E8500....

E8500 Vcore 1.584V

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6...shot026ig2.jpg

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/3...shot027la4.jpg

E3110 Vcore 1.60V

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/9...shot252me8.jpg

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/964...shot253pi0.jpg
02-24-2008, 07:34 AM
ReverendMaynard

very nice. What kind of load temps are you getting with those insane volts?
02-24-2008, 07:45 AM
Dumo

Cpu cooler with TT Big Typhonn, Maximus Formula and Team Xtreme 6400.

Bios is idle @ 28C, not sure of load temp.

http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/6...shot263wi3.jpg
02-24-2008, 08:07 AM
TEDY

excellent quick test....i knew i should buy xeon instead of e8400 :P
02-24-2008, 08:23 AM
shine121

nice piece, are this cheaper than E8400 on price
02-24-2008, 09:51 AM
s0lid

"C2D" Xeons kick ass :D
How much extra that costs compared to E8400?
02-24-2008, 10:45 AM
aoch88

Yeah, I'm curious to know which one is cheaper. I thought Xeon has a different architecture, etc?
02-24-2008, 11:07 AM
TEDY

same price here....
02-24-2008, 11:50 AM
Mykou

Hi Dumo nice try ! :clap:

Could you please post some results in 3d benches just to know how xeon can manage with games

I bet there is not difference between E8xxx and them but could you confirm that please

Regards

Mykou
02-24-2008, 01:50 PM
Kunaak

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mykou

Hi Dumo nice try ! :clap:

Could you please post some results in 3d benches just to know how xeon can manage with games

I bet there is not difference between E8xxx and them but could you confirm that please

Regards

Mykou

theres no difference between the two.
they have the same cores, same IPC, same cache, same cache stage.
all the same.

the bit with the "Xeon" line on 775, is they are suppose to be higher quality CPU's.

sometimes its true, sometimes not.
02-24-2008, 02:12 PM
Mykou

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kunaak

theres no difference between the two.
they have the same cores, same IPC, same cache, same cache stage.
all the same.

the bit with the "Xeon" line on 775, is they are suppose to be higher quality CPU's.

sometimes its true, sometimes not.

Thanks Kunaak for answer :)

too late as i took one to try , find a few ones still available , not yet in France

and a link to some review " wolfdale Xeon E3110 vs conroe E6850"

http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn...01/Xeon_E3110/

very interresting indeed :p:

couldn't wait no more as in Europe wolfdales prices still run hot !

Regards
02-24-2008, 02:34 PM
LyP0

Yeah mykou, since the introduction of the 45nm's the price has gone up by 35% because they are so hard to find.
02-24-2008, 05:15 PM
Mykou

Quote:

Originally Posted by LyP0

Yeah mykou, since the introduction of the 45nm's the price has gone up by 35% because they are so hard to find.

right!

saw a guy on ebay selling E8400 for about 371$ while E8500 at 445$..

Has 10 of each.. damn and already sold 6 of 8500

maybe does he plan to buy some skulltrail with such money :ROTF:
02-24-2008, 05:29 PM
dinos22

dumo which one is which in the photo :cool:

http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/7...t255lt0hy4.jpg
02-24-2008, 06:15 PM
wickedld9

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

dumo which one is which in the photo :cool:

Noticed that too....
02-24-2008, 06:41 PM
mrcape

Wait, what's different in those boxes? I don't see anything but different lighting angle.
02-24-2008, 06:45 PM
jaredpace

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrcape

Wait, what's different in those boxes? I don't see anything but different lighting angle.

same here, chip on the right is tilted
02-24-2008, 08:36 PM
Dumo

Left one is E3110
02-24-2008, 08:40 PM
keiths

So, I guess if he ripped off those caps he'd turn the 8500 into a xeon.

Dare he try?:)
02-24-2008, 08:45 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumo

Left one is E3110

yeah that's what i thought considering the placement of boxes in first post

wonder what those resistors/caps or whatever they are called do exactly
02-24-2008, 08:50 PM
Reefa_Madness

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

dumo which one is which in the photo :cool:

http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/7...t255lt0hy4.jpg

If he was consistent, then note that the E3110 box was pictured first on the left, followed by the E8500 on the right. The E3110 box label was pictured first, followed by the E8500, therefore, it would appear that the cpu underside pictured first and on the left would be the E3110...followed by the E8500 on the right.

I'd say that the odds are 50/50 that I'm right. :D
02-24-2008, 09:00 PM
Dumo

What's wrong with those 2 cpus?:(

I will take a pic before I freez it
02-24-2008, 09:00 PM
dinos22

you could have just read his post to see which one was which you know :p:
02-24-2008, 09:01 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumo

What's wrong with those 2 cpus?:(

I will take a pic before I freez it

i haven't looked at my chips
will see what they are like

maybe would be good for Xeon owners to chime in as well
02-24-2008, 09:19 PM
keiths

No.
02-24-2008, 09:24 PM
mrcape

Looks to be identical to a good Q746 e8400. Somehow I think I'd rather take a chance on one of these if I couldn't know the batch# beforehand.

Thanks for posting the info and pics!
02-24-2008, 09:40 PM
Dumo

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrcape

Looks to be identical to a good Q746 e8400. Somehow I think I'd rather take a chance on one of these if I couldn't know the batch# beforehand.

Thanks for posting the info and pics!

You're the one that started it all:)
02-24-2008, 09:50 PM
keiths

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumo

What are you talking about?

The caps Reefa_Madness highlighted in red. The xeon, supposedly the one on the left, doesn't have the caps that the 8500 has on the right. That leaves one wondering whether that's the difference between the chip operating as an 8500 or xeon. If that's the case, people can pull off those caps and get the ioat feature xeons have. But it's speculation until someone risks their 8500 to find out.
02-24-2008, 10:09 PM
dinos22

^^^ there has to be a benefit from doing that first of all

i'm sure there would be many modding them if there was including me hahahah :D

well maybe not me doing the mods but on my hardware as i'm useless with a soldering iron :D
02-25-2008, 03:24 AM
Dumo

Quote:

Originally Posted by keiths

If that's the case, people can pull off those caps and get the ioat feature xeons have. But it's speculation until someone risks their 8500 to find out.

Are you serious or you just trying to be funny:D

Actually it just the angle and lighting...when I took that pic.

Heres...all those caps and do not pull those out because it will kill any 8500:)

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/5...shot265bh4.jpg
02-25-2008, 03:39 AM
dinos22

Dumo

seems like the first shot was an optical illusion then for me too

as far as i know there should be no difference besides the fact they bin Xeon chips harder (what someone told me)
02-25-2008, 03:48 AM
Dumo

It just misunderstanding Dinos:)

All cool

Anyway, as usual max. fsb with ddr2 and X38 is 550ish and it seems to hate voltages

With SS..Its like pulling teeth to go 5GHZ....It just a hot chip:(

In the other hand, this might be a gem under -70C and colder pot:)

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/5...shot267gj8.jpg
02-25-2008, 03:56 AM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumo

With SS..Its like pulling teeth to go 5GHZ:(

i was just talking to a fellow aussie about our week 45 chips
the one i benched on sunday at 5.7GHz 1.73v

this chip is friggin hot man............i am talking about idling at stock settings at like 45C in bios LOL (TTBT+100CFM fan at full blast 24C ambient) hahahah :D

it really struggles like your on single stage because it's too hot

but LN2 is a different story as long as the pot has good mass and volts are not too high :D
02-25-2008, 04:00 AM
VoRtAn_MaDgE

Those cpu's rocks with p35/965 chipset mobo's

I grabbed an E8400 put in on a p35 mobo (dfi) ss on him and :shocked:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=177773
03-03-2008, 09:24 PM
jacky89

The max temperature for the E8500 is 1.225 while the E3110 is 1.25. I thought the E3110 should have lower max voltage rating than the E8xxx series.
03-03-2008, 09:39 PM
systemviper

So with all this info out there, :shrug:

if you could have one of these chips E8400 or Xeon E3110 price no object ;)

and your a gamer/OCer that also uses it for your 24/7 workstation/playstation. :yepp:

Is there one that is the better choice, or is it to close to call and some kind of personal choice bullchit? :shakes: :shrug:
03-04-2008, 06:51 PM
Ratatosk

This was the answer I was looking for... I'm planning an upgrade to E8400/E3110 and I wasn't sure about Xeon compatibility with my Maximus...

Many thanks :>
03-04-2008, 08:00 PM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacky89

The max temperature for the E8500 is 1.225 while the E3110 is 1.25. I thought the E3110 should have lower max voltage rating than the E8xxx series.

Same as my E3110 i just received today 1.25v

E3110 SLAPM 2V7***** / ***414
FPO/Batch: Q750A158
Version: E27970-001
Pack Date: 02/06/08

http://i4memory.com/reviewimages/cpu...Q750A158_1.jpg
03-04-2008, 08:14 PM
mrcape

750A Xeon huh? I love seeing all of these new chips lately. Looking forward to the result. : ) good luck http://www.movement-radio.com/kontra.gif
03-04-2008, 08:54 PM
Dumo

Any result Eva?
03-04-2008, 09:41 PM
eva2000

Nice low AUTO vcore at 1.152v in bios with Coretemp VID = 1.0875v. So I set bios vcore to lowest available option = 1.1v for 1.056v idle/1.048v load with Loadline Calibration disabled.

Realtemps shows Coretemp is over reporting temps by 7-10C :)

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...ime95_load.png

Very promising cpu as the low vcore end

3207Mhz at 1.048v load

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...ime95_load.png

3300Mhz at 1.048v load

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...ime95_load.png
03-05-2008, 12:26 AM
TEDY

damn nice chip.
03-05-2008, 07:27 AM
eva2000

Sure is

4005Mhz at 1.256v load

With loadline calibration disabled (vdroop enabled). Notice what CPU VTT is set ;)

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...ime95_idle.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...ime95_load.png

:cool:
03-05-2008, 07:45 AM
Ratatosk

Do you need special bioses to make it work on mobos that do not officially support it?
03-05-2008, 08:30 AM
Eldonko

Max fsb please mr eva200. :)
03-05-2008, 08:32 AM
brinox

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eldonko

Max fsb please mr eva200. :)

DOOOOOO IT! gah i feel like such a moron limiting myself to a Dell PERC 5i raid card, which turns away SO MANY intel based boards... BOOOO
03-06-2008, 01:27 AM
TEDY

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ratatosk

Do you need special bioses to make it work on mobos that do not officially support it?

same thing as for e8400..
03-06-2008, 04:22 AM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eldonko

Max fsb please mr eva200. :)

will do.. later :)

4203Mhz at 1.360v load - loadline calibration enabled (1.368v idle/1.360v load)

Prime95 v25.6 ~4+ hrs min mark

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...ime95_load.png
03-06-2008, 12:10 PM
Mykou

Here is my little contribution

E3110 Q746A534 /2V7XXXX/XXX287

3.6ghz @1.23v bios / 1.14v load :) ( Cpu voltage damper disabled )

http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/4893/60623919ik2.jpg

4.32 ghz 1.41v bios air cooling ( valid in sig )

Xigmatek HDT 1284:)
03-06-2008, 12:15 PM
Big Lar

Nice chips of late. Here's what I am working on now.

Larry

http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/1...tt11uh5.th.jpg
03-06-2008, 12:20 PM
stephen23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mykou

Here is my little contribution

E3110 Q746A534 /2V7XXXX/XXX287

3.6ghz @1.23v bios / 1.14v load :) ( Cpu voltage damper disabled )

http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/4893/60623919ik2.jpg

4.32 ghz 1.41v bios air cooling ( valid in sig )

Xigmatek HDT 1284:)

how much voltage needed for 4Ghz stable?
03-06-2008, 12:39 PM
Mykou

Quote:

Originally Posted by stephen23

how much voltage needed for 4Ghz stable?

lol didn't test for 4ghz stability :)

just bench for spi benchable @4.32 ghz air .

my goal was a decent 3.6 ghz at low vcore

maybe later make some benches with a better board and 8500 ram .

actually stuck at 480 fsb which I think is nice with this cheap mobo ;)

sold my former E8400 and E6600 allowed me to buy this xeon and just spend around $ 30 lol

my cheapiest rig ! :p:
03-06-2008, 05:57 PM
Kryckter

Where can you locate a E3110 to buy?
03-07-2008, 04:09 AM
Mykou

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kryckter

Where can you locate a E3110 to buy?

seems xeons out of stock in most places :(

not happy with your penryn ??
03-07-2008, 04:49 AM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eldonko

Max fsb please mr eva200. :)

For you mate :)

Max FSB tests continued....
Looks like this E3110 has a slightly higher max FSB for Super Pi 32M at least, topping out at 545FSB straight boot from bios to complete Super Pi 32M run. With max cpu validation matching my E8500 Q740A493T on same Asus Blitz Formula at 555FSB

Click images below for full screenshots

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/325918.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...z_valid_tn.png

Super Pi 32M @540FSB & @545FSB straight boot from bios

@540FSB
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...2s782ms_tn.png

@545FSB
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...6s219ms_tn.png
03-08-2008, 01:28 PM
Cptn Vortex

Here some http://www.frontierpc.com/ProductDet...E3110&version=
03-14-2008, 06:49 PM
Mykou

update my superpi 1M with less than 4.5ghz :p:

10.437 s @4.48ghz 1.44v bios / 1.39 load

http://images3.hiboox.com/vignettes/1108/2erhsg3d.jpg

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=329517

regards
03-15-2008, 02:06 PM
Mykou

Xeon E3110 air cooling

4.7 ghz @1.56v core bios

Sub 10 :bounce: :bounce:

superpi 1M >>>>> 9,968 sec under vista 32 :p:

http://images3.hiboox.com/vignettes/1108/w2sz5msu.jpg
03-15-2008, 02:25 PM
GUFY

1 Attachment(s)

Here is may Xeon.
03-15-2008, 05:34 PM
Mykou

Quote:

Originally Posted by GUFY

Here is may Xeon.

:up:
03-16-2008, 12:00 PM
vcp-cur

Quote:

Originally Posted by systemviper

So with all this info out there, :shrug:

if you could have one of these chips E8400 or Xeon E3110 price no object ;)

and your a gamer/OCer that also uses it for your 24/7 workstation/playstation. :yepp:

Is there one that is the better choice, or is it to close to call and some kind of personal choice bullchit? :shakes: :shrug:

Is anyone willing to answer what he is looking for ?

I'm in the same train as he is..

thanks
03-16-2008, 12:04 PM
mrcape

Quote:

Originally Posted by vcp-cur

Is anyone willing to answer what he is looking for ?

I'm in the same train as he is..

thanks

If you can pick a good batch number of either one, that's your best bet. If you buy blindly with no idea of the batch, you probably have a better chance getting a fairly good one if you go Xeon. From what I can tell, there is no big difference between the good xeons and the good 8400s.
03-16-2008, 12:31 PM
Gen

nice results, looks like 4ghz with less that 1.3v is the 24/7 sweet spot
03-16-2008, 01:56 PM
Mykou

Quote:

Originally Posted by vcp-cur

Is anyone willing to answer what he is looking for ?

I'm in the same train as he is..

thanks

I like xeons for their low vcore for most of them I saw around .

but in games , I don't think you should se a difference with penryns E8xxx.

I saw very good E8200's too :)

very promising for further steppings although I think I probably keep mine :p:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gen

nice results, looks like 4ghz with less that 1.3v is the 24/7 sweet spot

yes true .

even with my 3.6ghz 1.14v 24/7 so happy and don't regret my E6600 ^_^
03-16-2008, 02:27 PM
vcp-cur

These are some answers from other forums

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mithent

Core 2 LGA775 server chips have not been better or worse than desktop chips, I believe, except that they have different microcode and this risks incompatibility with some motherboards.

Quote:

Originally Posted by silent-circuit

After pretty much going through hell as a result of decided to get (on more or less a whim) an X3220 instead of a Q6600 (both 2.4Ghz 1066Mhz FSB rated quads with 9x multis, same cache sizes, etc...) just trying to find a board that'll play nice with the thing I now /fully/ support what most of the [H] staff already repeat on a regular basis:

Desktop CPUs for Desktop boards.
Server CPUs for Server boards.
Do not mix them.

It may work perfectly... it may be torture. They are not the same, as the Xeon identifies itself to the machine differently (uses different microcode). Given Xeons are pretty much never officially supported on desktop boards, I cannot recommend you play the game I have been for a few weeks now.

after stuff like that, i wonder ... is the Xeon 3110 worth going with? that is my concern .. some say its really good ... others say you shouldn't get it ... I want some answers from people that know for sure what they're doing.
03-16-2008, 02:37 PM
mrcape

Quote:

Originally Posted by vcp-cur

I want some answers from people that know for sure what they're doing.

Then state what board you're using and maybe someone has the same combo. I've never heard of microcode/incompatibility issues like that.
03-16-2008, 06:30 PM
cabbspapp

I just ordered one, I really can't wait for it!
03-16-2008, 07:44 PM
vcp-cur

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrcape

Then state what board you're using and maybe someone has the same combo. I've never heard of microcode/incompatibility issues like that.

DFI LP DK P35
03-16-2008, 09:49 PM
Dumo

Then either 8400 or 3110 sdhould be good to go
03-17-2008, 07:58 AM
vcp-cur

so if you want a Q9450 , you could also go with a X3350? and it will do just fine?

http://www.lagoom.com/INTEL_CPU_XEON...id-580363.html
03-17-2008, 10:06 AM
PhilDoc

Quote:

Originally Posted by vcp-cur

so if you want a Q9450 , you could also go with a X3350? and it will do just fine?

http://www.lagoom.com/INTEL_CPU_XEON...id-580363.html

If they really have that in stock. It should work just fine and is very temping.

Edit: not in stock, figures
03-17-2008, 10:53 AM
vcp-cur

this is kind of the 1st time intel has this right? that both Xeons and normal Desktop CPU's can fit on the same mobo ?

Edit: it was in stock when I posted. wow
03-17-2008, 11:03 AM
mrcape

This was the case with the 65nm chips as well. They made Xeons for socket 775 and many people bought those. There was talk that they were higher binned chips but I can't say for sure.
03-17-2008, 11:49 AM
PhilDoc

Quote:

Originally Posted by vcp-cur

this is kind of the 1st time intel has this right? that both Xeons and normal Desktop CPU's can fit on the same mobo ?

Edit: it was in stock when I posted. wow

On the site it says in stock, but I called them and they said next week.
03-17-2008, 04:42 PM
Mykou

happy to be able to reach 540 fsb with that mobo on air

4.6 ghz ( 8.5 x 540 / PC 6400@1080 4-4-4-4) 1.56v real bios ( set at 1.68v )

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/331019.png

http://images3.hiboox.com/vignettes/1208/ajvvi46k.jpg

something strange I couldn't raise VMCH more than 1.4v ( 1.5 and 1.7 available bios 903 asus P5K-C )

Regards
03-24-2008, 03:47 PM
sfdmalex

Whats the verdict?

Anything over 4.0 needs the big volts?
03-24-2008, 05:13 PM
Xvys

I got the E3110 and it requires less voltage than the two E8400 I had, which were stable at 445 MHz x 9 @ 1.365v in bios. The E3110 is stable at 460 MHz with the exact same settings, although with the higher FSB I backed off the Performance Level to 8, from Level 6

Not sure about maximums, but I o/c my E8400 to 4630 MHz @ 1.60v and this E3110 should do 4.6 with under 1.50v
03-24-2008, 06:06 PM
sfdmalex

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xvys

I got the E3110 and it requires less voltage than the two E8400 I had, which were stable at 445 MHz x 9 @ 1.365v in bios. The E3110 is stable at 460 MHz with the exact same settings, although with the higher FSB I backed off the Performance Level to 8, from Level 6

Not sure about maximums, but I o/c my E8400 to 4630 MHz @ 1.60v and this E3110 should do 4.6 with under 1.50v

Great, 1.36 in bios, what would that be in real terms on the P5k?

On my P5B 1.36 bios = 1.296 real
03-24-2008, 08:57 PM
Xvys

1 Attachment(s)

The P5K has Load Line Calibration, which reduces the vdrop and locks in the voltage closer to bios settings. So 1.365v in bios drops to 1.344v at idle and about 1.337v under load. If the load line is disabled, then more voltage is required for stability...such is the case with the P5B.

I had the P5B vanilla with a E6300 and it ran 24/7 at 490 MHz X 7 with 1.375v in bios. After vdrop the voltage would show 1.32v at idle. With that setup it o/c to 533FSB x 7 = 3730 MHz. With my P5K Deluxe I could only match the 3730 MHz with the E6300, but no better, despite all the voltage and bios adjustments with the P5K-D.

Tonight, I ran some basic tests at 4600 MHz, not bad for air cooling, at a little lower voltage than my E8400.

This E3110 runs way hotter than my E8400. Not sure this is due to the thermal diodes actually working, and not being stuck like on both of my E8400's? But it shows about 20C higher under load.
03-25-2008, 02:39 AM
Mykou

Xvys

it seems that xeon's run hotter than 8400 and requires less vcore to reach same frequencies .

You should mention too taht " load calibration line " seems only efficient with deluxe P5K and not working on others .

I still have lot of vdroop on P5K-C with voltage damper enabled and this issue was already described on another topic .
03-25-2008, 08:26 AM
sfdmalex

I should be getting my E3110 today.

I'll do some quick testing on the P5B Vanilla and if it doesnt like it Ill run out to get the P5K- Premium.

My real concern is the fact that any bios I tried on my P5B after the 0701 just wont overlock at all. ANd I need a new bios for the Xeon...So I dont know if its just the combo of the E6300 and the new BIOS that is bad, or its just new bios plus my P5B = not going anywere. I know its not ram cause its doing the same thing with different sticks.
03-25-2008, 09:35 AM
vcp-cur

i wonder if one gets the dfi dk p35 right now together with an e3110 , how one will manage it to work? don't it need a bios update? or do they work right away and recognize it (same goes for other 45nm like e8500 or q9450 etc.)
03-25-2008, 11:47 AM
sfdmalex

Quote:

Originally Posted by vcp-cur

i wonder if one gets the dfi dk p35 right now together with an e3110 , how one will manage it to work? don't it need a bios update? or do they work right away and recognize it (same goes for other 45nm like e8500 or q9450 etc.)

If your picking one up at a store then look for the 45nm sticker....All boards Ive come across that are retail and do support it have a sticker on them "45NM supported"

If your getting it online them maybe email em first.

P.S No E3110 today, picking it up at the post office tomorrow. Ill come back with a report.
03-25-2008, 03:49 PM
sofarfrome

1 Attachment(s)

Here is my best 1M SPi time so far with the P5K-Premium. Gotta little more tweaking to do.
03-25-2008, 04:23 PM
Mykou

nice sofarfrome :up:

does anybody actually run E3110 with batch ending with "T" ?
03-26-2008, 06:16 AM
eva2000

Max CPUZ Validation @1.48v idle vcore hitting my max 32M PI stable FSB of 545FSB so no idea if FSB limited me or vcore or both heh. I was running 4x1GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500 as well :)

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...4638mhz_tn.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/Bli...uz_4638mhz.png

Now to move from Windows 2008 and install Vista Ultimate SP1 64bit :)
03-26-2008, 08:06 AM
Mykou

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

Max CPUZ Validation @1.48v idle vcore hitting my max 32M PI stable FSB of 545FSB so no idea if FSB limited me or vcore or both heh. I was running 4x1GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500 as well :)

Now to move from Windows 2008 and install Vista Ultimate SP1 64bit :)

nice xeon and mem !

Do you have some feedback from other Q750xxxxx owners ?
03-26-2008, 08:16 PM
sfdmalex

Some quick results

http://www.is-mad.com/upload/userfil...110_TEST_1.jpg

Myn is batch Q745A784

Pack Date 02/06/08

450fsb @ 1.352 but drops to 1.312 under load...seems that Vdroop is way higher on with this chip then with the E6300....where underload my voltage would only drop 0.016

At first I was paranoid cause it just wouldnt boot at anything between 390-410FSB....regarldes of voltage. So I just said "f*c* it" and gave it 450 and it worked fine :)

THe above is stable in the 8mb two core Pi and 3dmark06...

More will follow.
03-26-2008, 11:21 PM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mykou

nice xeon and mem !

Do you have some feedback from other Q750xxxxx owners ?

only other Q750A158s i've seen are PC's results http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=181476 and spyboy48's one http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=242957
03-27-2008, 02:06 AM
Mykou

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

only other Q750A158s i've seen are PC's results http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=181476 and spyboy48's one http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=242957

thnks for links eva
03-27-2008, 07:24 AM
sfdmalex

Wasnt that stable at 1.352...Had to bump up to 1.392, 1.33* under load to pass OCCT.

Before it would pass superPi 32 but not OCCT...

It really likes the volts. I'll wait for my 120Ultra before I go higher.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/335993.png
03-27-2008, 07:34 AM
Eldonko

Q746A535

http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/76/img04791oh9.jpg

Max FSB H20 = 580. Hoping for more sub zero.

http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/4395/mar94lc1.jpg

1.31v for 4G Orthos.

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/4947/mar95jk3.jpg

Board = DFI P35 T2RS
03-27-2008, 07:37 AM
Plastok

Some results with my Q746A534 E3110 1.55v idle cpu-z on AIR!!

http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/7682/superpibzy5.jpg

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/screenshot/331544.png

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=331544

Testing stable OC now 1.35v FULL:

http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/1...1043ghzcb9.jpg

Great chip :up:
03-27-2008, 08:14 AM
sfdmalex

http://www.is-mad.com/upload/userfil.../E3110_Mk1.jpg
03-27-2008, 10:53 AM
micheskillz

What's up with this?

http://geting.se/image.php/93971-mar95jk3333.jpg

Your other CPU-Z screen doesn't say e8400 anywhere :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eldonko

Q746A535

[-IMG]http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/76/img04791oh9.jpg[/IMG]

Max FSB H20 = 580. Hoping for more sub zero.

http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/4395/mar94lc1.jpg

1.31v for 4G Orthos.

[-IMG]http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/4947/mar95jk3.jpg[/IMG]

Board = DFI P35 T2RS
03-27-2008, 10:59 AM
Plastok

not the same version of cpu-z

1.44.1 vs 1.43
03-27-2008, 12:40 PM
Eldonko

Yeah, I tested stability before FSB and got new cpuz in between. Good attention to detail tho. :D
03-28-2008, 05:44 PM
Mykou

yes

had to download it to validate my new max fsb at x 9

532 x 9 lol on this crappy board and its max 1.4v stuck on NB :p:

and still dude for pencil mod > 1.59v real vs 1.56 max before (1.70 set in bios ) :ROTF:

4787 mhz lol still air still vista 32 ^_^

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/336661.png

http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/1003/478ag4.jpg
03-28-2008, 06:37 PM
askimo

Xeon 3110

Got a Xeon 3110 today, but the temps reported under everest and coretemp are just out of this world. With 4.5Ghz@1.45volt the temps are around 80c, Idle around 49C. Is this normal or the diodes of this CPU are broken?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 AM.

XtremeSystems