FERMI Benchmarked?

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

12-14-2009, 05:41 AM
trinibwoy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tao~

well this may be fake but i would expect that kind of numbers from fermi, i mean what less for 512 shaders , thats more than 2x GT285
5970 and 5870 numbers dont seem genuine, c'mon GTX360 matching 5970 is blasphemy :p:

Games aren't shader bound so the shader increase isn't enough to predict performance. Until we know more about the architecture (and clock speeds) it's impossible to know how it will scale. Cypress didn't change much at all architecturally over RV770 and it doubled everything except bandwidth and only managed 50% more performance on average.
12-14-2009, 05:42 AM
kurt124

please 'doo':D
12-14-2009, 06:00 AM
Piotrsama

Courtesy of [H] forums.

http://i48.tinypic.com/2z9eerc.png http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...15/2z9eerc.png

http://i465.photobucket.com/albums/r...r/se_fermi.jpg
12-14-2009, 06:03 AM
Florinmocanu

Here is one more for the road...

Larrabee unleashed to the public.

http://i50.tinypic.com/sfar2c.jpg
12-14-2009, 06:08 AM
FischOderAal

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piotrsama

Yes, very skeptical :D
Let's read it again...

In this post he was refering to the FPS AMD's cards had. But in another post he says this:

Quote:

Originally Posted by 003

It could really go either way, but my personal opinion would be that there is more evidence suggesting it is real than not.

http://www.abload.de/img/lebowskiyeahryyh.jpg
12-14-2009, 06:16 AM
dinos22

Tom put on a few kgs heh
really nice guy i hope those figures are real and cards come out asap we need some competition or AMD prices will start going stupid like Intel CPU prices are right now
12-14-2009, 06:21 AM
N19h7m4r3

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

Tom put on a few kgs heh
really nice guy i hope those figures are real and cards come out asap we need some competition or AMD prices will start going stupid like Intel CPU prices are right now

Exactly!

I can understand the NV hate going around with some slides and that fake card.

But I for one can't wait for Fermi to be out, i want lower prices badly, and the same goes for Intel CPUS
12-14-2009, 06:24 AM
003

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piotrsama

Yes, very skeptical :D
Let's read it again...

This is the post I was referencing to. And when I said it "looks legit", I was referring to the fact that the FC2 performance figures on the 5970 were in fact accurate in real life, and that the graphs do appear as they are from Nvidia.

In fact, saying they look legitimate is still a perfectly acceptable statement, even now, because they do in fact look legitimate. Whether or not they actually are is a different story.

Also does anybody have a link back to the original thread where "successful_troll" posted these graphs? Because I did see some graphs posted on Tom's Hardware by a user named "successful_troll", and these graphs are completely different from the ones I saw.
12-14-2009, 06:28 AM
kurt124

Quote:

Originally Posted by Florinmocanu

Here is one more for the road...

Larrabee unleashed to the public.

http://i50.tinypic.com/sfar2c.jpg

WOW :shocked: im gettin larrabee!! :rofl:
12-14-2009, 06:31 AM
Florinmocanu

Quote:

Originally Posted by 003

This is the post I was referencing to. And when I said it "looks legit", I was referring to the fact that the FC2 performance figures on the 5970 were in fact accurate in real life, and that the graphs do appear as they are from Nvidia.

In fact, saying they look legitimate is still a perfectly acceptable statement, even now, because they do in fact look legitimate. Whether or not they actually are is a different story.

Also does anybody have a link back to the original thread where "successful_troll" posted these graphs? Because I did see some graphs posted on Tom's Hardware by a user named "successful_troll", and these graphs are completely different from the ones I saw.

This is were these slides appeared the first time, no source, nothing.

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...php?t=18089093
12-14-2009, 06:33 AM
003

Quote:

Originally Posted by Florinmocanu

This is were these slides appeared the first time, no source, nothing.

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...php?t=18089093

Why isn't the name of the poster "successful_troll" then? Or did people just get that mixed up with this?
12-14-2009, 06:38 AM
Piotrsama

Quote:

Originally Posted by Florinmocanu

Larrabee unleashed to the public.

http://i50.tinypic.com/sfar2c.jpg

Wants! :p:
12-14-2009, 06:38 AM
Florinmocanu

check the results. THey are identical to the ones from the THG forum. They just took the numbers and put them in the slides. If there were from different sources, i doubt you would get identical results for all the cards.
12-14-2009, 06:41 AM
h0bbes

Well i am thinking that successful_troll (who posted the benchmarks in the tomshardware forums) is the same person as svs22 (who posted the benchmarks in the overclockers forums). This might be stupid reasoning but:

From tomshardware thread:

successful_troll

This benchmarks is not fake, is from the tomshardware review about the GTX 300 series.

Looking at those benchmarks the GTX 3xx seems to be more powerful than we expected, I am surprised.

From overclockers thread:

svs22

Looking at those benchmarks the GTX 3xx seems to be more powerful than we expected, I am surprised.
12-14-2009, 06:42 AM
kurt124

Quote:

Originally Posted by 003

This is the post I was referencing to. And when I said it "looks legit", I was referring to the fact that the FC2 performance figures on the 5970 were in fact accurate in real life, and that the graphs do appear as they are from Nvidia.

In fact, saying they look legitimate is still a perfectly acceptable statement, even now, because they do in fact look legitimate. Whether or not they actually are is a different story.

Also does anybody have a link back to the original thread where "successful_troll" posted these graphs? Because I did see some graphs posted on Tom's Hardware by a user named "successful_troll", and these graphs are completely different from the ones I saw.

this is it i think:shrug:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/...6100_15_0.html
12-14-2009, 06:44 AM
Florinmocanu

Quote:

Originally Posted by h0bbes

Well i am thinking that successful_troll (who posted the benchmarks in the tomshardware forums) is the same person as svs22 (who posted the benchmarks in the overclockers forums). This might be stupid reasoning but:

From tomshardware:

successful_troll

This benchmarks is not fake, is from the tomshardware review about the GTX 300 series.

Looking at those benchmarks the GTX 3xx seems to be more powerful than we expected, I am surprised.

From overclockers:

svs22

Looking at those benchmarks the GTX 3xx seems to be more powerful than we expected, I am surprised.

He is right, he posted the same thing on both forums =))

He has FERMi hands so he cannot type that much...

Maybe he is Jen Hsuan in disguise.
12-14-2009, 06:48 AM
skugpezz

Quote:

Originally Posted by 003

Why isn't the name of the poster "successful_troll" then? Or did people just get that mixed up with this?

Quote:

successful_troll

This benchmarks is not fake, is from the tomshardware review about the GTX 300 series.

Looking at those benchmarks the GTX 3xx seems to be more powerful than we expected, I am surprised.

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/...6100_15_0.html

it is the 8th post on the page. Now 003 please stop trolling
12-14-2009, 06:59 AM
kurt124

:

Quote:

successful_troll wrote :

This benchmarks is not fake, is from the tomshardware review about the GTX 300 series.

Looking at those benchmarks the GTX 3xx seems to be more powerful than we expected, I am surprised.

Quote:

MARSOC_Operator wrote :

Care to post a link then? I think you fail.

Quote:

successful_troll wrote :

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/nvidia...iew-31769.html

:shocked: omg he's telling the truth!...
12-14-2009, 07:03 AM
kurt124

...404 error figures:down::shakes:

so its still a mystery to the gt300's performance as there was clearly no review, and there wouldn't be one anyway since nvidia havent even made a benchmark yet. i cant believe one guy made so much hype.
12-14-2009, 07:05 AM
Florinmocanu

haha, i thought you already knew the link was fake...

But forget about Fermi, we must wait for the GPU to rule them all, Larrabee... :rofl:
12-14-2009, 07:11 AM
dengyong

Quote:

Originally Posted by skugpezz

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/...6100_15_0.html

it is the 8th post on the page. Now 003 please stop trolling

http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/8756/locked1.gif

It's probably not a good idea to argue constantly and call people trolls when you just got your foot in the door.

I don't want you to think I'm taking sides, so click on your user name and find more post by "your name" and look back through them.
Do the same for the person you accuse, then ask yourself who needs the...http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/9302/trollspray1.gif
.
.
12-14-2009, 07:16 AM
kurt124

Quote:

Originally Posted by Florinmocanu

haha, i thought you already knew the link was fake...

But forget about Fermi, we must wait for the GPU to rule them all, Larrabee... :rofl:

i did jus didnt fink no1 saw it yet.
Goooo larrabee!:kissbutt::bananal::YIPPIE:
12-14-2009, 07:23 AM
SKYMTL

Quote:

Originally Posted by Florinmocanu

Here is one more for the road...

Larrabee unleashed to the public.

http://i50.tinypic.com/sfar2c.jpg

I see the makings of another News article on certain sites!!! ;)
12-14-2009, 07:25 AM
Eastcoasthandle

According to this post, the slides are fake per nvida.
12-14-2009, 07:37 AM
Florinmocanu

Quote:

Originally Posted by SKYMTL

I see the makings of another News article on certain sites!!! ;)

Shhhh, don't give them ideas...

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:55 PM.

XtremeSystems