The E0 Q9550 SLB9V thread (finally!)

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

09-27-2009, 10:57 AM
rurik

Quote:

Originally Posted by truehighroller

That's not to high of temps for air cooling and when you run games etcedera your temps will not be nearly that high, no program tortures CPUs like Linx code. I think if you hone everything in a little more you will be suprised about how your temps go up, I'm guessing you will hit 80C~. I think you might have some settings off a little but, you are pretty close to honed in though. I am basing this off just looking at that screen shot though. You need to watch your temps like I had mentioned earlier, they speak volumes.

btw,I waiting a Giga EP45T-UD3P and I hope,4Ghz I will receive wihtout any problems. and that Im posting my results.
09-27-2009, 11:01 AM
truehighroller

Quote:

Originally Posted by rurik

btw,I waiting a Giga EP45T-UD3P and I hope,4Ghz I will receive wihtout any problems. and that Im posting my results.

It is a sweet board.
09-29-2009, 09:54 AM
Unrealer

Quote:

Originally Posted by truehighroller

What I did was get it semi stable or boot-able then tweak one setting up and down until I could see / feel what spot was more, stable again just by watching my temps while running burntest for the most part then leave that setting at the best spot and go to the next one and do the same thing. The FSB Term has different names, it depends on the board. I'm sorry I don't know all the names.

It was the fastest I have ever been able to set all my settings, honestly. So, if your CPU GTLs were the most stable say at 63 because .67 was 2 minutes and lets just say you went to .59 as well and it was one minute then stay at .63 and move to the next one. I think if you were to watch your temps while benching you would see what I am talking about.

Q9550 E0 @ 4Ghz (471x8.5)
DFI Lan Party P35 Dark
Vcore: 1.36v (@ full, stable 9h of prime 95 large FFT)
VTT(FSB): 1.47v
Northbridge: 1.5v
Northbridge GTL: 0.67 (posible values: 0.61 & 0.67, with 0.67 is unstable)

Posible values:
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...l/Dsc09855.jpg

testing....

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 57
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...real/5761b.jpg

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 61
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...eal/061061.jpg

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 63
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...nreal/6361.jpg

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 67
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...nreal/6761.jpg

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 63
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 67

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...nreal/6357.jpg

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 67
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 57

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...nreal/6757.jpg

Thats all for now....
09-29-2009, 11:00 AM
MrDucky

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unrealer

Q9550 E0 @ 4Ghz (471x8.5)
DFI Lan Party P35 Dark
Vcore: 1.36v (@ full, stable 9h of prime 95 large FFT)
VTT(FSB): 1.47v
Northbridge: 1.5v
Northbridge GTL: 0.67 (posible values: 0.61 & 0.67, with 0.67 is unstable)

Posible values:
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...l/Dsc09855.jpg

testing....

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 57
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...real/5761b.jpg

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 61
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...eal/061061.jpg

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 63
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...nreal/6361.jpg

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 67
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...nreal/6761.jpg

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 63
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 67

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...nreal/6357.jpg

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 67
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 57

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...nreal/6757.jpg

Thats all for now....

wow high northbridge and vtt ... but nice results :)
09-29-2009, 11:35 AM
Unrealer

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

wow high northbridge and vtt ... but nice results :)

dont quote the images please.... :rolleyes:
09-29-2009, 12:19 PM
ju-rek

Q9550 E0 batch L848C436
Asus P5Q-E
GTL0/2 - 0,67
GTL1/3 - 0,65
VPLL - 1,52
VTT - 1,22
VDDR - 2,00
VNB - 1,24
VSB - 1,1
VPCI - 1,5
http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/803/test1c.th.jpg
09-30-2009, 05:36 AM
truehighroller

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unrealer

Q9550 E0 @ 4Ghz (471x8.5)
DFI Lan Party P35 Dark
Vcore: 1.36v (@ full, stable 9h of prime 95 large FFT)
VTT(FSB): 1.47v
Northbridge: 1.5v

Posible values:

testing....

CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt - 61
CPU GTL 1/3 REF Volt - 61

Thats all for now....

That setting there looked to be your most stable spot for you from what I am looking at. I think your motherboard just can't handle much more at this point. You should get the UD3P motherboard board for higher FSB on that chip. In other words that might be the highest GFlops your motherboard will let your CPU push it looks like... that is if, everything is stable.
09-30-2009, 06:55 AM
MrDucky

i finaly got the cpu of my brother does anny one had 500FSB x 8.5 on a normal voltage :|?
09-30-2009, 04:05 PM
Unrealer

Quote:

Originally Posted by truehighroller

In other words that might be the highest GFlops your motherboard will let your CPU push it looks like... that is if, everything is stable.

But why i have that score? 4Ghz are 4Ghz....
09-30-2009, 04:37 PM
Leeghoofd

not alone to do with ya total cpu speed, include ram speed, FSB, total ram tested etc...
09-30-2009, 09:01 PM
truehighroller

True he was testing the same amount of ram as I was 1024 but and speed at one point as well, I don't know what his other settings are though.
09-30-2009, 09:23 PM
Zucker2k

It could be performance level too, plus cpu could be throttling from heat if the chip exceeds 71c and thermal control isn't disabled in bios.
10-02-2009, 06:19 PM
Unrealer

Another E0 (the right one):

http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...l/Dsc09872.jpg

The VID is 1.22v, instead of 1.26v of the other.
And is cooler, around 4-5º less:
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x.../Dibujo-15.png

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zucker2k

plus cpu could be throttling from heat if the chip exceeds 71c and thermal control isn't disabled in bios.

Nope, around 60-65º al max with Linx.
10-03-2009, 09:02 AM
DAAS

Got an Q9550 sinds 2 little weeks.

My Goal was a min of 3800mhz becos i hade a Q6600 @ 3400mhz already.

This was my first atempt

Bios :
Fsb : 459
pci : 101
Mem : 1/1
Vcore @ 1.2.56
Mch @ 1.3.40
Ram @2.1

http://i38.tinypic.com/23m3fxg.jpg

So went furter with this :

Fsb : 471
Pci : 101
Mem : 1/1 5/5/5/15
Vcore @ 1.2.625
Mch @ 1.3.60
Ram @ 2.1

http://i36.tinypic.com/169f3fk.jpg

This is all on my shiny new Gigabyte p45 board.

I m looking forward for the 4100mhz.

Tips are welcome ;)

DER.DAAS
10-03-2009, 09:09 AM
phsinc1

@DAAS

You can try to lower your MCH Core to 1.32v @ 471 FSB

What CPU Termination and PLL you use?

Can you post screenshot from ET6 settings
10-03-2009, 09:33 AM
DAAS

All the rest of the settings are set @ normal in bios i didnt touch anything just putted them on normal what the Gigabyte Ud3 uses.

Is this enough info ore shall i look later this weekend for the exact numbers ?

And shall try out the Mch lowering. :):)

DER.DAAS
10-03-2009, 01:04 PM
kagula323

HI. I've just installed my Q9550 vid 1.2625 . Can u post some 4GHZ templates I could use for a start? Until now I've only used dual core procesor on my EP45-UD3P. The rest of the build is EP45-UD3P, GSKILL F2-9600 2x2GB DDR2 1200, GEF 9500GT 1GB, Cooler Master Real Power 700W.
Thank's in advance :)
10-03-2009, 06:33 PM
Kain665

Guys, help me out here! I just lapped my Q9550 (SLB8V, L847C208), and it dropped my temps down 5-6c. But at 1.288v at 460x8.5, My temps are 78-73-68-68 degrees under prime small FFT. Core 2 seems to be always 4-5c cooler than core 1 and cores 3 and 4 seem to always be ~10c cooler than core 1. Is this normal? I mean, I'm using a Big Typhoon and only 1.288v...

At 1.312v and 475x8.5, core 1 hit 85c!
10-03-2009, 08:39 PM
MrDucky

it seems you didn't lapp it good. maybe you pushed to hard on the cpu u need to let the cpu do the work not your own strength :)
10-04-2009, 01:07 AM
Kain665

I'm using a Big Typhoon, might that be the problem?
10-04-2009, 06:00 AM
MrDucky

You could check if its flat if its not then you can lap it to :)
10-04-2009, 05:31 PM
Kain665

It is flat, it's been lapped. I mean, is the BT enough for it? I don't think that an U120 would be 20 degrees cooler!
10-05-2009, 09:33 PM
MrDucky

then i think your temp sensors are broken are they still the same temps as before?
10-06-2009, 03:36 AM
truehighroller

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

then i think your temp sensors are broken are they still the same temps as before?

Or it could be his GTLs are not set right `100%. I think he should try to mess with those before throwing in the towel. I mentioned this a couple pages back. GTLs directly affect your CPU temps. Watch your temps after changing a GTL setting and while in mid intelburntest or linx testing and you will see what I am talking about. You want to try to settle your GTL settings where the temps are the highest and most even for all cores and your CPU passes the test of course.
10-06-2009, 11:35 AM
Kain665

That is interesting, Never knew GTLs could have such a big effect. I will mess around with those in a little bit, I should be getting my Megahalem in the mail today. Right now it is happy at .66 for both cores.
10-06-2009, 04:20 PM
Marvin

1 Attachment(s)

Finally after installing ket bios i managed to get 485 fsb stable....:D
vtt 1.3
nb 1.32
10-06-2009, 04:44 PM
Marvin

1 Attachment(s)

vtt 1.32
nb 1.36 (0.65)
500 mhz barrier priming now
10-06-2009, 06:26 PM
Kain665

Guys what is the general agreement for the TJmax of E0 Q9550s? I know intel said 100c, but I'm pretty sure it is 95c, at least for my SLB8V. My reasoning for this is simple: A) My old Unlapped Q6600 B3 at 1.34v got up to 69c on it's hottest core under an unlapped Big Typhoon, my Lapped 45nm Q95 at 1.32v under a Prolima Tech Megahalem in a push/pull config is at 67c on it's hottest core. and B) the socket temp is about 12-14c cooler at full load, I would think that socket temps would be very little under the core temps (5c at most) from my experience with AMD64s and Conroes. What do you think?
10-10-2009, 06:50 AM
kagula323

Q9550 bad vid (1.2625) cooled by Megahalem @ 2x Scythe Gentle Typhoon 1450rpm, Gigabyte EP45-UD3P, 2x2GB GSKILL F2 @ 1200 PL8 Turbo

http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/4...m120011ore.jpg

What is the max safe cpu termination recommended for daily use?
10-13-2009, 11:05 AM
Kamil Grzbiecik

Hi I'm a new user.
I have a Q9550
My new result is:
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/6...4poobciciu.jpg http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/9...jpg/1/w996.png

Cooler is Ultra 120 Extreme
10-14-2009, 09:08 AM
MrDucky

What mobo did you use?
i have mine nog 500x8 stable at 1.216V @ Load
this on my DFI LP DK P45-T2RS+
10-14-2009, 09:54 AM
Kamil Grzbiecik

Mobo - Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3P BIOS F9
10-16-2009, 02:41 AM
SpuTnicK

guys, need your advice
Couple days ago changed my old C1 e8400 to new E0 q9550
Batch L922xxxx
Vid 1.2125
Although i am glad that my temps decreased by 7-10 degrees compared to e8400
by my problems is temp sensors of quad.
@idle 30 37 32 32
@prime 45 41 42 42

What is wrong with them& Can they be fixed? Is it normal?

BTW: using WC rig to cool it:
dtek fusion v2
360feser rad
tygon 7/16 tube
mcp355 pump
xspc res/top
4xSun Ace h1011 @5v
10-16-2009, 05:55 AM
unclewebb

45nm Core 2 Duo and Quad temperature sensors have a tendency to get stuck at low temperatures and are not accurate. Your E8400 wasn't accurate and neither is your Q9550 so it's kind of pointless to make any temperature comparisons between these two CPUs.

The core reporting 37C at idle is likely stuck. Run a RealTemp CPU Cool Down Test and you will be better able to see the sticking points of your sensors. Intel designed these sensors to control thermal throttling and thermal shutdown and doesn't recommend that they be used to report accurate core temperatures. They all get stuck at some point. Yours look better than most as some can get stuck whenever the core temperature goes below 50C.

http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip

It's also likely that TJMax is not consistent across your 4 cores. You would need to take your CPU up to about 70C before this becomes obvious.
10-16-2009, 06:54 AM
scharnhorst

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marvin

Finally after installing ket bios i managed to get 485 fsb stable....:D
vtt 1.3
nb 1.32

What bios are you talking about?
Might it be possible to have all your bios settings?
Thank you in advance
10-16-2009, 11:32 PM
KingLex

Q9550 L847c...
VID=1.23750

ep45-ud3 (bios f9a)
LLC=enabled

do my temps look OK for a TRUE push/pull ? +washer (not lapped)

http://i977.photobucket.com/albums/a...5503800mhz.jpg
case= antec sonataII
http://i977.photobucket.com/albums/a...ngLex/case.jpg
10-16-2009, 11:41 PM
dan7777

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingLex

Q9550 L847c...
VID=1.23750

ep45-ud3 (bios f9a)
LLC=enabled

do my temps look OK for a TRUE push/pull ? +washer (not lapped)

http://i977.photobucket.com/albums/a...5503800mhz.jpg
case= antec sonataII
http://i977.photobucket.com/albums/a...ngLex/case.jpg

nice temps mate:up:
10-17-2009, 12:14 AM
KingLex

When I use IBTv2 my temps go up to 76°C

Looking at kagula's results, with higher vcore and clock speed, he gets 64°C max after +-12h Prime

True papst/nfp12 <> Megahalem scythe/scythe should give the same performance I think ?

Could it be the case ? I don't really have an intake fan.
10-17-2009, 04:38 PM
overclocking101

my buddy just got one yesterday and the VID is 1.3V I could not belive it! i was very unimpressed
10-18-2009, 01:49 AM
kagula323

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingLex

When I use IBTv2 my temps go up to 76°C

Looking at kagula's results, with higher vcore and clock speed, he gets 64°C max after +-12h Prime

True papst/nfp12 <> Megahalem scythe/scythe should give the same performance I think ?

Could it be the case ? I don't really have an intake fan.

HI KingLex ... I have a verry well ventilated case (Antec Twelve Hundred) and the ambient temperature is low (about 20 degrees) ... Also my Q9550 is a high VID so it's working cooler. The low VID quads tend to overclock higher (and using much lover CPU voltage) but they tend to be hot and they usually require extreme cooling ... like water or high cfm fans.
Anyway u seem to have a nice Q9550 there ... have fun with it! :)

EDIT: also True scales well with high cfm fans (not too great with low cfm ones) ... while Megahalems (or Noctua and even Scythe Mugen 2) is good with both low and high rpm fans ... while for only silent fans (if someone intends to make a powerful silent computer) one off the best to do this job would be Cooler Master Z600. In your case water cooling would do miracles :).

Hope my answer helps.

Cheers, Ovidiu Florin.
10-18-2009, 04:27 AM
KingLex

Quote:

Originally Posted by kagula323

HI KingLex ... I have a verry well ventilated case (Antec Twelve Hundred) and the ambient temperature is low (about 20 degrees) ...

I was also thinking that my case isn't the best ventilated. Just 1x120mm intake and 1x120mm exhaust. Ambient temperature 22~23°C.

So...
http://i977.photobucket.com/albums/a...opexhaust2.jpg
http://i977.photobucket.com/albums/a...topexhaust.jpg

Change in temps ...

none whatsoever :rolleyes:

At least I had something fun to do this sundaymorning :D

I'm hoping to take my q9550 to 4000mhz, my e8400 did it so it would be a nice upgrade if I would get it also stable at that speed.
10-23-2009, 11:03 PM
KingLex

OCCT large ran 12+hours and I started prime blend directly after that :up:
I'm guessing it's goiing to be stable :shrug:

http://i977.photobucket.com/albums/a.../q95504000.jpg

I'm now running the corsair h50 with the noctua nf-p12 fans at +-1100rpm (little less noise than at 1300rpm). This is also with the new antec 300 case (much better ventilated).

I would just like to run with a little less vcore and mch core
10-25-2009, 03:16 AM
rurik

Now 4Ghz at 24/7 rock stable!

http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/091025/87vc3DfUSS.png

and some benchis

http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/091025/TTKj3V1pky.png
http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/091025/zUP3wZlpwI.png
http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/091025/N3pTp2A1jP.png
http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/091025/FEYSZ8i3YW.png

temps at Linx not more,than 80C,at Prime95 not more,than 65C.
Rampage Extreme is great mobo!
10-27-2009, 05:14 PM
m0h1t

Q9550 E0 Batch L847 C032
3.8Ghz (450x8.5) Stable at 1.15v Actual (1.20v in BIOS) // 3 Hours OCCT (Large Data Set)

Ambient Temp | Core0 Temp | Core1 Temp | Core2 Temp | Core3 Temp | vCore
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/1...sambien.th.png http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/341...h20cpu1.th.png http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/225...h20cpu2.th.png http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/689...h20cpu3.th.png http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/7...h20cpu4.th.png http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/5...20vcore.th.png
10-30-2009, 09:21 AM
fdisker

Hello ... long time lurker, infrequent poster. Just picked up a Q9550 at my local Microcenter in Columbus, Ohio. Batch # L847C221, pack date of 8/20/09. Coretemp reports a VID of 1.1v. Running a modest overclock of 3.2ghz (375x8.5) in an Asus P5K. Sorry, no screenshots. Folks here seem interested in vids related to batch numbers so I thought I'd share.
11-01-2009, 03:25 AM
MrDucky

Quote:

Originally Posted by fdisker

Hello ... long time lurker, infrequent poster. Just picked up a Q9550 at my local Microcenter in Columbus, Ohio. Batch # L847C221, pack date of 8/20/09. Coretemp reports a VID of 1.1v. Running a modest overclock of 3.2ghz (375x8.5) in an Asus P5K. Sorry, no screenshots. Folks here seem interested in vids related to batch numbers so I thought I'd share.

Can't jou show a screenshot of your VID? 1.1 is verry low my vid is 1.1375
11-01-2009, 05:03 AM
Xplodonu

Just like fdisker, I just picked up a Q9550 at Microcenter in Kansas City with a Batch # L847C224, Pack Date: 08/03/09, and a vid 1.175.... I'm only slightly overclocked at 3.2ghz (400x8.0) on an old Asus Commando...but only 1.040 Vcore priming as I'm typing this. Just sharing like everyone else.
11-01-2009, 07:17 AM
fdisker

Ok, here's a screenshot.

http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/g...coretemp-1.jpg
11-01-2009, 11:00 AM
MrDucky

Quote:

Originally Posted by fdisker

Ok, here's a screenshot.

http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/g...coretemp-1.jpg

Dude thats your Low VID the voltage of your CPU when its IDLE at lowest... otherwise my VID is 1.00V lol use Realtemp and then look in options you will see max VID and Min VID
11-01-2009, 02:25 PM
papatsonis

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

Dude thats your Low VID the voltage of your CPU when its IDLE at lowest... otherwise my VID is 1.00V lol use Realtemp and then look in options you will see max VID and Min VID

his VID is the max VID man , get over it, (coretemp 0.99.5 reports fine my VID , in "idle" mode, wonder why would not reporting his...

@fdisker : nice VID :D , hope clocks really well :up:
11-01-2009, 03:33 PM
unclewebb

These CPUs have a Minimum and Maximum VID. Take a screen shot of Core Temp while Prime95 or similar is running so your CPU is loaded.

That might be your maximum VID but it looks more like your minimum. Your multiplier is at 6.0 so it's likely your Minimum VID in that screen shot.
11-01-2009, 05:10 PM
fdisker

Ok, this screenshot was taken while Cyberlink's MediaShow Espresso was transcoding some blu-ray video from my sony hd cam to 720p wmv. This seemed to load up the cores pretty good. Looks like vid is 1.2v.

http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/g.../coretemp2.jpg
11-01-2009, 11:59 PM
Unrealer

Quote:

Originally Posted by unclewebb

These CPUs have a Minimum and Maximum VID. Take a screen shot of Core Temp while Prime95 or similar is running so your CPU is loaded.

That might be your maximum VID but it looks more like your minimum. Your multiplier is at 6.0 so it's likely your Minimum VID in that screen shot.

x6
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...unreal/1-7.png
x8.5
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...unreal/2-8.png

the same VID.
11-02-2009, 07:15 AM
MrDucky

Quote:

Originally Posted by papatsonis

his VID is the max VID man , get over it, (coretemp 0.99.5 reports fine my VID , in "idle" mode, wonder why would not reporting his...

@fdisker : nice VID :D , hope clocks really well :up:

So you say my vid is 1.00V?

http://i34.tinypic.com/2l930id.jpg
11-02-2009, 08:18 AM
papatsonis

no im saying that..
http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/9852/idleh.gif
and that..
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/9089/loadf.gif

the above is the proof for the 2nd part of my quote.(Unrealer also showed that)

as for the 1st part, im full of guys who are uber skeptical, when see something too good to be true to... their standards.. (like were ppl on my VID initially) , that's why for a L847C seemed "common" a 1.1v "area" vid and it had really good chances to be the "high" VID (as fdisker showed unfortunatelly it was the LOW VID of course :/) , that's why my reaction..
11-02-2009, 12:25 PM
unclewebb

A lot of this depends on how your motherboard is set up and also how Windows has been set up and what energy saving features you're using. Sometimes when the multi drops down to 6.0 at idle, the VID will also drop down. On other motherboards, the multiplier will drop down but the VID will remain high. That's why when reporting VID, it's best to have a load on your CPU to try to get around this.

Here's a few examples of what the latest version of RealTemp shows.
My E8400 will drop the VID down if I'm using the default multiplier but if I go into the bios and lock the multi to 8X, then in the same situation VID never drops down.

http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/1632/vididle.png

At full load, both Core Temp and RealTemp report the same maximum VID.
In the RealTemp settings window, the Maximum VID is always shown.

http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/4180/vidload.png

Now here's the fun part. If you know what you're doing you can go in and manipulate a register within these CPUs and force the CPU to report the wrong VID.
All software will fall for this trick because the CPU itself is reporting the wrong information. Watch out for uber VID chips on EBay. :)

http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/6303/vidbs.png

At full load, this E8400 is being forced to report the Minimum VID of 1.150 even though the Maximum VID is actually 1.2250.
At least the RealTemp Settings window is smart enough to spot this kind of fraud. :up:
11-02-2009, 12:37 PM
Unrealer

Whats the max vcore for WC?
11-02-2009, 12:43 PM
overclocking101

hi i have this chip and a black opps. its vid is 1.3V max but runs stock on 1.19V im haveing MAJOR problems getting above 3.7GHZ could someone help? maybe its a black opps issue and thers no real telling as foxconn has completely abandoned quantum force wish i knew that was gonna happen when I bought the black opps. woulda went ASUS if I had known
11-02-2009, 04:44 PM
fdisker

Thanks for the clarification on the min and max VIDs. I'm not an extreme overclocker by any measure and I didn't want anyone to think I was trying to fool someone into thinking I had some super fabulous processor. I was just trying to add to the dataset of the thread. My chip won't see anything north of 3.2ghz.
11-03-2009, 06:18 AM
Hardc0r3

anyone selling a good q9550 or q9650 ? Is there a forum section, buy , sell stuff? , i need a Q9X50 E0 which will do 4ghz @ most 1.28v
11-08-2009, 05:19 AM
_AntLionBR_

In the testing phase yet ...

Q9550 E0 FPO/Batch: L847C130 (Noctua NH-U12P w/P12 1300)

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/647...inx10loops.jpg

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/1830/...216v20loop.jpg

http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/887...256v20loop.jpg

http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/305...4v20loopsl.jpg

http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/863...296v25loop.jpg

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/963/q...352v20loop.jpg
11-08-2009, 10:57 AM
KingLex

Quote:

Originally Posted by _AntLionBR_

In the testing phase yet ...

Q9550 E0 FPO/Batch: L847C130 (Noctua NH-U12P w/P12 1300)

I also have a q9550 L847c...(forgot the last 3 numbers) running at 4gh (8.5x471). I got the vcore down to 1.296v (report in cpu-z, 1.3250 in BIOS) with 1.34 on the NB. Maybe you should try the same ? You go from 1.296v@3910 to 1.352v@4003.
Just a tought , congrats btw :up:
11-08-2009, 11:18 AM
_AntLionBR_

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingLex

I also have a q9550 L847c...(forgot the last 3 numbers) running at 4gh (8.5x471). I got the vcore down to 1.296v (report in cpu-z, 1.3250 in BIOS) with 1.34 on the NB. Maybe you should try the same ? You go from 1.296v@3910 to 1.352v@4003.
Just a tought , congrats btw :up:

You could spend your BIOS settings you are using to 4.0GHz? Here I have done several combinations of values, but I will try to 1.34V (VNB) here. Thank you.
11-08-2009, 12:55 PM
phsinc1

can someone post everest cpu cach benchmark @ 4250Mhz (500x8.5)?
11-09-2009, 03:35 AM
KingLex

Quote:

Originally Posted by _AntLionBR_;

You could spend your BIOS settings you are using to 4.0GHz? Here I have done several combinations of values, but I will try to 1.34V (VNB) here. Thank you.

Code:

*** GigaByte GA-EP45-UD3 BETA F9a Robust Graphics Booster: Auto Cpu Clock Ratio: 8.5 *** Clock Chip Control *** CPU Host Clock Control: Enabled CPU Host Frequency(MHz): 471 PCI Express Frequency(MHz): 100 C.I.A.2: Disabled *** DRAM Performance Mode *** Performance Enhance: TURBO (G)MCH Frequency Latch: 333 System Memory Multiplier (spd): 2.40B DRAM Timing Selectable (spd): Manual *** Standard Timing Control *** CAS Latency Time: 5 tRCD: 5 tRP: 5 tRAS: 18 *** Advanced Timing Control *** All AUTO *** Motherboard Voltage Control *** >>>CPU Load-Line Calibration: Enabled CPU Vcore: 1.3250 V ( 1.296 v in cpu-z) CPU Termination: 1.30v CPU PLL: 1.50V CPU Reference: 0.878v >>>MCH/ICH MCH Core: 1.34V MCH Reference: 0.903V
11-09-2009, 10:05 AM
insane11

Quote:

Originally Posted by phsinc1

can someone post everest cpu cach benchmark @ 4250Mhz (500x8.5)?

http://i880.photobucket.com/albums/a...11/Capture.png
11-09-2009, 11:35 AM
doodle

hi.insane 11 what are your volts for that 500x8.5 as ive got mine so far with v-core at 1.33 (1.3625 in bios) and need to have fsb at 1.46 with northbridge at 1.32.and for 490x8.5
11-09-2009, 06:48 PM
insane11

Quote:

Originally Posted by doodle

hi.insane 11 what are your volts for that 500x8.5 as ive got mine so far with v-core at 1.33 (1.3625 in bios) and need to have fsb at 1.46 with northbridge at 1.32.and for 490x8.5

http://i880.photobucket.com/albums/a...1/Capture1.png
11-09-2009, 07:39 PM
caRpetbomBer

Not bad at all:D

http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6215/intelh.jpg
11-10-2009, 02:33 AM
doodle

oh didnt realise your using DFI board as ime using ASUS P5Q-E .still nice overclock though.
11-10-2009, 03:57 PM
Hardc0r3

1 Attachment(s)

here is my 24/7
11-13-2009, 03:45 AM
MrDucky

insane how do you keep your northbridge so cool mines always above 40C even with just 1.15v ...
11-13-2009, 07:46 AM
insane11

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

insane how do you keep your northbridge so cool mines always above 40C even with just 1.15v ...

i use thermalright HR-05 IFX on my dfi dk p45 board..
11-19-2009, 04:18 PM
Gaul

ON progress........HIGH VID :( , LOW TEMP !!!!

4 GH @ v1.25 :shrug:

http://i46.tinypic.com/2zhflaq.jpg

TRY VANTAGE

http://i48.tinypic.com/n5g8ps.jpg
11-20-2009, 04:11 PM
Unrealer

Im thinking of change the mobo cause i tried 6 Q9550 E0 and I got almost the same results with all, so, will be the DFI LP P45 Dark much better than the LP P35 Dark? for example, i need around 1.5v @ NB to get 4Ghz stable :rolleyes:

This is the last Q9550 i tested:
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...nreal/1-10.png
11-20-2009, 04:43 PM
pezcore

Man, some of you guys get to use low voltages.

<--jealous

I downloaded Core Temp to see what mine was, and I get 1.2625, which explains why I'm at 1.4v for my 4.0GHz. Oh well, I still idle at 40*C
11-20-2009, 05:51 PM
Kashelz

Take the Gigabyte P45 UD3R or P45 UD3P, really great board for 45nm Quad CPU, got mine and went from max 450 FSB to 510+ fsb that is Linx Ok. Got from 3.8 to 4.3 Ghz for 24/7. Old one was Asus P35 P5K-E, that was good with 65nm Quads.
11-20-2009, 08:24 PM
spinejam

2 Attachment(s)

Code:

11/20/2009 settings: UD3P (F9 Bios): LinX (Max Mem) 20X Stable - Yes Q9550 E0 (L835B166) pack date: 11/11/2008 Robust Graphics Booster.....................[ Auto ] CPU Clock Ratio.............................[ 8 ] Fine CPU Clock Ratio........................[ 0.0 ] CPU Frequency 4.0GHz........................[ 500*8.0 ] ******Clock Chip Control****** CPU Host Clock Control......................[Enabled ] CPU Host Frequency (Mhz)....................[500 ] PCI Express Frequency (Mhz).................[100 ] C.I.A 2.....................................[Disabled] ******Advanced Clock Control****** CPU Clock Drive.............................[ 1000mv ] PCI Express Clock Drive.....................[ 1000mv ] CPU Clock Skew..............................[ 0ps ] MCH Clock Skew..............................[ 50ps ] ******DRAM Performance Control****** Performance Enhance.........................[ Turbo ] Extreme Memory Profile (XMP)................[ Disabled] (G) MCH Frequency Latch.....................[ 400MHz ] System Memory Multipler.....................[ 2.00d ] Memory Frequency (Mhz) .....................[1000 DDR2] DRAM Timing Selectable......................[ Manual ] CAS Latency Time............................[ 5 ] tRCD........................................[ 5 ] tRP.........................................[ 5 ] tRAS........................................[ 15 ] ******Advanced Timing Control****** tRRD........................................[Auto ] PL=9 tWTR........................................[Auto ] tWR.........................................[Auto ] tRFC........................................[Auto(52)] tRTP........................................[Auto ] Command Rate (cmd)..........................[Auto ] ******Motherboard Voltage Control****** Load-Line Calibration [Enabled] CPU Vcore [ 1.25 ]...............[ 1.35625] (1.328 CPU-Z) CPU Termination [ 1.20 ]...............[ 1.32 ] CPU PLL [ 1.50 ]...............[ 1.570 ] CPU Reference [ 0.760 ]...............[ 0.861 ] MCH Core [1.1 ]...............[ 1.36 ] MCH Reference [0.760 ]...............[ 0.876 ] MCH/DRAM Refernce [0.900 ]...............[ 1.020 ] ICH I/O [1.500 ]...............[ 1.500 ] ICH Core [1.100 ]...............[ 1.100 ] DRAM Voltage [1.800 ]...............[ 2.04 ] DRAM Termination [0.900 ]...............[ 1.02 ] Channel A Ref [0.900 ]...............[ 1.02 ] Channel B Ref [0.900 ]...............[ 1.02 ] ******Advanced BIOS Features****** Limit CPUID Max to 3........................[ Disabled ] No-Execute Memory Protect...................[ Enabled ] CPU Enhance Halt (CIE)......................[ Disabled ] C2/C2E State Support........................[ Disabled ] C4/C4E State Support........................[ Disabled ] CPU Thermal Monitor.........................[ Enabled ] CPU EIST Function...........................[ Disabled ] Virtualization Technology...................[ Disabled ]
11-21-2009, 02:40 AM
MrDucky

Well i clocked my Q9550 E0 vid of 1.1375 to 4GHz @ 1.23 Volts with 500FSB but as soon as i change 1 thing on my GTL settings exept my NB it will not boot so i think if i had a Gigabyte UD3P i would have a higher clock. but maybe i need to try another bios so il be trying the newest soon :)
11-21-2009, 03:30 AM
Unrealer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kashelz

Take the Gigabyte P45 UD3R or P45 UD3P, really great board for 45nm Quad CPU, got mine and went from max 450 FSB to 510+ fsb that is Linx Ok. Got from 3.8 to 4.3 Ghz for 24/7. Old one was Asus P35 P5K-E, that was good with 65nm Quads.

Wow, thats a nice change... so, did u use the same vcore and nb voltage for that oc?
11-21-2009, 05:52 AM
MrDucky

my max fsb is 520 on my DFI Mobo thats stable but i need much higher vcore cause i didnt test the GTL voltages but look at the Q9650 tread you will see that every one that has a UD3P has realy good OC's with the Quads its famous for Quads :) still i like my DK P45-T2RS+ i just need to take some more time and since its weekend now :D updating bios ;)
11-21-2009, 09:57 AM
Gaul

@ unrealer = low vid, high vcore ? compare with mine ....something wrong with that ?
11-21-2009, 10:51 AM
Unrealer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gaul

@ unrealer = low vid, high vcore ? compare with mine ....something wrong with that ?

What do u mean?
11-21-2009, 10:55 AM
pezcore

Is there a difference/benefit to using 500x8 instead of 471x8.5?
11-21-2009, 11:01 AM
Gaul

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unrealer

What do u mean?

many said, lower vid, meant lower volt for 4 GH.......or better OC :shrug:

well, see

u had vid 1.125, need 1.3v for 4 GH

mine vid 1.265, only need 1.25v for 4 GH :)

@ all = 4.25 GH for 1.32 v

http://i50.tinypic.com/24q01oj.jpg
11-21-2009, 11:31 AM
MrDucky

@ pezcore with Higher FSB More data can be send over the northbridge so your Memory is a little faster and for example if u use Crossfire like i do you need the Brandwith to support the Graphic cards ;) so 500x8 is better for me..

@Gaul well Low VID means most of the times better OC or lower Voltage at same clock but she has P35 chipset thats not the best platform for a Quadcore for example if u use a Gigabyte UD3P or Her mobo DFI P35 the Gigabyte would clock much higher on lower clock simply cause the P45 can have higher FSB and has more Settings. so my question What mobo do you use?
11-21-2009, 11:47 AM
Gaul

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

@Gaul well Low VID means most of the times better OC or lower Voltage at same clock but she has P35 chipset thats not the best platform for a Quadcore for example if u use a Gigabyte UD3P or Her mobo DFI P35 the Gigabyte would clock much higher on lower clock simply cause the P45 can have higher FSB and has more Settings. so my question What mobo do you use?

ic...ic, my mistake..mine UD3R :p: sorry
11-21-2009, 11:50 AM
pezcore

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

@ pezcore with Higher FSB More data can be send over the northbridge so your Memory is a little faster and for example if u use Crossfire like i do you need the Brandwith to support the Graphic cards ;) so 500x8 is better for me..

@Gaul well Low VID means most of the times better OC or lower Voltage at same clock but she has P35 chipset thats not the best platform for a Quadcore for example if u use a Gigabyte UD3P or Her mobo DFI P35 the Gigabyte would clock much higher on lower clock simply cause the P45 can have higher FSB and has more Settings. so my question What mobo do you use?

I see. Well I am using a GTX295, so would 500x8 be better for me?

Can I just change it to that without messing with other things? (voltage, etc.)
11-21-2009, 02:59 PM
Unrealer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gaul

many said, lower vid, meant lower volt for 4 GH.......or better OC :shrug:

well, see

u had vid 1.125, need 1.3v for 4 GH

mine vid 1.265, only need 1.25v for 4 GH :)

I tested SIX Q9550 E0 with this mobo, the lowest VID was 1.1x and i couldnt get 4Ghz stable with 1.35v, the other five are stable with that vcore.
11-21-2009, 03:35 PM
MrDucky

@Gaul well then your lucky i guess that you have such a good mobo :P

@pezcore

well try it and test with 3dmark but i guess 16x 2.0 is enough for your GTX295.
Look i have 2 HD4850's and in Crossfire my link is set to 16x 2.0 and 8x 2.0 so for my second card i want to get more brandwith :) and its an massive change in 3dmark it costs me more then 1k if i do 471 or 500...
11-21-2009, 03:59 PM
pezcore

I tried 500x8 and it wouldn't even boot so I put it back :D
11-21-2009, 09:26 PM
Gaul

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unrealer

I tested SIX Q9550 E0 with this mobo, the lowest VID was 1.1x and i couldnt get 4Ghz stable with 1.35v, the other five are stable with that vcore.

yup, all because u'r mobo.sorry

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrDucky

@Gaul well then your lucky i guess that you have such a good mobo :P

THANX man....!!

let's me introduce u

Q9550 @ 4.25 GH v 1.35, prime for 3 hours

http://i48.tinypic.com/14shxlh.jpg
11-21-2009, 10:17 PM
phsinc1

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gaul

yup, all because u'r mobo.sorry

THANX man....!!

let's me introduce u

Q9550 @ 4.25 GH v 1.35, prime for 3 hours

http://i48.tinypic.com/14shxlh.jpg

:up:

can you put full template for your settings? and what bios do you use?
11-23-2009, 05:09 AM
Kashelz

You can and can not get 4 Ghz stable? It all depends on FSB and GLT voltage, that’s all :up:

My old P35 board was great with Q6600, it did 480 x 8 with no problems for 24/7, so board was good for 480 fsb, but with 45nm Quad id did only 450, no more. Asus P5K-E have really bad settings for GLT voltage (only 4 settings), so there is no chance to get something good, with Giga P45 UD3R/UDRP it is different story :cool:

At first posts I could not get 4 Ghz ok, but after some time of testing and tweaking BIOS I went to 4.2+ Ghz that max Linx ok. After all I can say that GLT voltage is the key for high fsb and also FSB voltage. Even high vcore is not needed as it was with 65nm quads.
11-27-2009, 07:44 AM
Gaul

Quote:

Originally Posted by phsinc1

:up:

can you put full template for your settings? and what bios do you use?

templates ? later.....BIOS, default from factory F11.....:up:
11-29-2009, 07:20 PM
bigwill68

aight fellows. i hav'en posted here in awhile picked up a UD3P slaped the Quad 9550 EO to see what it can do here's a shot a 4.2ghz passed IBT vcore set at 1.387v droop to 1.360v...I forgot was the rest of my setting did'nt record them at the tiime and ET6 was'nt install yet.I've been resting at 3.935Ghz for awhile with the vcore at 1.268v set in the (Mit) no problems passing IBT now here also the setting to reach 4.2ghz

http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/2...4250ghz.th.jpg

50% oc'd

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/8629/everestg.th.jpg

Code:

MB Intelligent Tweaker(M.I.T.) Robust Graphics Booster ..................: Auto CPU Clock Ratio ..........................: 8 Fine CPU Clock Ratio......................: +0.5 CPU Frequency ............................: 4.25Ghz (500x8.5) Clock Chip Control Standard Clock Control CPU Host Clock Control....................: [Enabled] CPU Host Frequency (Mhz) .................: 500 PCI Express Frequency (Mhz) ..............: 101 C.I.A. 2..................................: [Disabled] Advanced Clock Control CPU Clock Drive...........................: 1000mV PCI Express Clock Drive...................: 1000mV CPU Clock Skew (ps).......................: 0ps MCH Clock Skew (ps).......................: 0ps DRAM Performance Control Performance Enhance......................: Turbo MCH Frequency Latch......................: 333 System Memory Multiplier ................: 2.00B Memory Frequency (Mhz) ..................: 1066 DRAM Timing Selectable ..................: Manual Standard Timing Control CAS Latency Time.........................: 5 tRCD ....................................: 5 tRP......................................: 5 tRAS.....................................: 18 Advanced Timing Control [Press Enter] tRRD.....................................: Auto tWTR.....................................: Auto tWR......................................: Auto tRFC.....................................: Auto tRTP.....................................: Auto Command Rate (CMD) ......................: 2T Channel A Channel A Timings Settings Static tRead Value......................: 8 Channel B Channel B Timings Settings Static tRead Value......................: 8 Motherboard Voltage Control Load-Line Calibration.....................: Enabled CPU Vcore...............1.22500V..........: 1.3875~ under load 1.360 CPU Termination.........1.200V............: 1.44 CPU PLL.................1.500V............: 1.570v CPU Reference...........0.760V............: 0.937 MCH/ICH MCH Core................1.100V............: 1.50v MCH Reference...........0.760V............: 0.912v MCH/DRAM Reference......0.900V............: 0.96v ICH I/O.................1.500V............: 1.500v ICH Core................1.100V............: 1.200v DRAM DRAM Voltage............1.800V............: 2.1v DRAM Termination........0.900V............: 0.86v Channel A Address Vref..0.900V............: 0.86v Channel B Address Vref..0.900V............: 0.86v Advanced Settings Limit CPUID Max. to 3.....................: Disabled No-Execute Memory Protect.................: Disabled CPU Enhanced Halt (C1E)...................: Disabled C2/C2E State Support......................: Disabled x C4/C4E State Support....................: Disabled CPU Thermal Monitor 2(TM2) ...............: Disabled CPU EIST Function.........................: Disabled Virtualization Technology.................: Disabled __________________

some say...I need to change memory multiplier to 2.00D and test, and also may need to raise my tRead to a 9 is that true? Right...I'm resting at 4.020Ghz at 1.318v droop of 1.296v on the CPU_Z reading here's a shot below

http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/3...dalongw.th.jpg

Gaul has incredible results in his out come of Oc'ing at low volts.I wonder is there something.I'm doin wrong to get that? I can't remember what board he got it's not posted in his sign
11-29-2009, 07:56 PM
Hoss331

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigwill68

some say...I need to change memory multiplier to 2.00D and test, and also may need to raise my tRead to a 9 is that true? Right...I'm resting at 4.020Ghz at 1.318v droop of 1.296v on the CPU_Z reading here's a shot below

Are you sure your even on PL8 now? The lowest you should be able to go on 2.00B is PL10 with CAS 5 and PL9 with CAS 4, 2.00D will let you drop to PL9 with CAS 5 and PL 8 with CAS 4.
11-29-2009, 08:16 PM
spinejam

[QUOTE=bigwill68;4132586]aight fellows. i hav'en posted here in awhile picked up a UD3P slaped the Quad 9550 EO to see what it can do here's a shot a 4.2ghz passed IBT vcore set at 1.387v droop to 1.360v...I forgot was the rest of my setting did'nt record them at the tiime and ET6 was'nt install yet.I've been resting at 3.935Ghz for awhile with the vcore at 1.268v set in the (Mit) no problems passing IBT now here also the setting to reach 4.2ghz

http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/2...4250ghz.th.jpg

50% oc'd

http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/8629/everestg.th.jpg

Code:

MB Intelligent Tweaker(M.I.T.) Robust Graphics Booster ..................: Auto CPU Clock Ratio ..........................: 8 Fine CPU Clock Ratio......................: +0.5 CPU Frequency ............................: 4.25Ghz (500x8.5) Clock Chip Control Standard Clock Control CPU Host Clock Control....................: [Enabled] CPU Host Frequency (Mhz) .................: 500 PCI Express Frequency (Mhz) ..............: 101 C.I.A. 2..................................: [Disabled] Advanced Clock Control CPU Clock Drive...........................: 1000mV PCI Express Clock Drive...................: 1000mV CPU Clock Skew (ps).......................: 0ps MCH Clock Skew (ps).......................: 0ps DRAM Performance Control Performance Enhance......................: Turbo MCH Frequency Latch......................: 333 System Memory Multiplier ................: 2.00B Memory Frequency (Mhz) ..................: 1066 DRAM Timing Selectable ..................: Manual Standard Timing Control CAS Latency Time.........................: 5 tRCD ....................................: 5 tRP......................................: 5 tRAS.....................................: 18 Advanced Timing Control [Press Enter] tRRD.....................................: Auto tWTR.....................................: Auto tWR......................................: Auto tRFC.....................................: Auto tRTP.....................................: Auto Command Rate (CMD) ......................: 2T Channel A Channel A Timings Settings Static tRead Value......................: 8 Channel B Channel B Timings Settings Static tRead Value......................: 8 Motherboard Voltage Control Load-Line Calibration.....................: Enabled CPU Vcore...............1.22500V..........: 1.3875~ under load 1.360 CPU Termination.........1.200V............: 1.44 CPU PLL.................1.500V............: 1.570v CPU Reference...........0.760V............: 0.937 MCH/ICH MCH Core................1.100V............: 1.50v MCH Reference...........0.760V............: 0.912v MCH/DRAM Reference......0.900V............: 0.96v ICH I/O.................1.500V............: 1.500v ICH Core................1.100V............: 1.200v DRAM DRAM Voltage............1.800V............: 2.1v DRAM Termination........0.900V............: 0.86v Channel A Address Vref..0.900V............: 0.86v Channel B Address Vref..0.900V............: 0.86v Advanced Settings Limit CPUID Max. to 3.....................: Disabled No-Execute Memory Protect.................: Disabled CPU Enhanced Halt (C1E)...................: Disabled C2/C2E State Support......................: Disabled x C4/C4E State Support....................: Disabled CPU Thermal Monitor 2(TM2) ...............: Disabled CPU EIST Function.........................: Disabled Virtualization Technology.................: Disabled __________________

Do you need such a high CPU Term Volt. and MCH Voltage for this overclock?
11-29-2009, 08:53 PM
bigwill68

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoss331

Are you sure your even on PL8 now? The lowest you should be able to go on 2.00B is PL10 with CAS 5 and PL9 with CAS 4, 2.00D will let you drop to PL9 with CAS 5 and PL 8 with CAS 4.

the lowest my System Memory Multiplier will go is 2.00B and your saying Only cas4 memory will you let drop to PL9? if you would post a code I'll try to run of it and test and post the results and see how...I come out

Quote:

spinejam Wrote:

Do you need such a high CPU Term Volt. and MCH Voltage for this overclock?

Never tryed lowing it what would you recommend and good trying setting to test?
12-02-2009, 08:13 AM
Gaul

@ bigwill = we have similiar templates 4 q9550 @ 4.25 GH here........

anyway ? there is different : PCI Express Frequency (Mhz) ..............: 101
than 100 MHZ ?? cause im still 100

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigwill68

Gaul has incredible results in his out come of Oc'ing at low volts.I wonder is there something.I'm doin wrong to get that? I can't remember what board he got it's not posted in his sign

UD3R......

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM.

XtremeSystems