What are the differences between these UD3P and UD3Rs and say a DQ6 version P45 motherboard? Just curious if the DQ6 is any better or the r or the p?
Printable View
What are the differences between these UD3P and UD3Rs and say a DQ6 version P45 motherboard? Just curious if the DQ6 is any better or the r or the p?
UD3P is DDR2, UD3R is DDR3, the DQ6 is more expensive (usually) and the consensus is that it is not up to par with the UD3P/R in terms of 24/7 clocking ability for quads :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
Well sorry, I meant the other one that just has a different letter that is a little cheaper that has ddr2, I would have to look but its ok. The main thing I was wanting to know was what you just said. I was getting the impression that this was the case with the DQ6 from reading around as well. I might grab one of these, my motherboard is crippling my CPU right now and it kills me a little inside more and more every day. :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by tool_462
New PiFast Test With Higher Ram Frquenc
And Once Again Break My Record :D
http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.php/i18385_1.JPG
well done Vivid ... u certainly know how to overclock a quad! :clap:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tool_462
The regular UD3R is DDR2.
Which one is best? I need Raid by the way. Thank you for your opinion. :up:\Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoss331
Edit: To late I ordered the P version and said hell with it. Higher overclocking heaven~ here I come.
Indeed it's the T that makes it DDR3 or notQuote:
Originally Posted by Hoss331
EP45 UD3P : DDR2
EP45T UD3P : DDR3
Quote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
The only difference between the regular P and the R is the P has 2 PCIE 2.0 slots and the R only has one. The ep45C-ud3r on the other hand has both ddr2 and ddr3 slots.
Well thank god I ordered the P version LMAO. I would have been salty. I think I would have noticed it though before buying it though, probably. I can't wait to get it, I am so geeked.
Great work Vivid.:up: Glad you are getting such great results.Quote:
Originally Posted by ViViD
If he got that high on air, I am in there when I get this board..Quote:
Originally Posted by OC Nub
How high is your VTT? I can reach 3.825G at 1.35V core and 1.40V VTT.
Tanx M8Quote:
Originally Posted by OC Nub
Just HardWork :cool:
I'm Use Water Chiller But I Don't Think It's Necessary:D Air Can Be Enough To 1.5 Vcore:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
VTT: 1.6 For High Test And 1.4~1.45 For 4530Mhz FSB 533Mhz :yepp:Quote:
Originally Posted by chenxuwen
Hi everyone, this is my first post and i apologize for my english but i'm italian :) not my fault anyway lol
I have a question to the "Batch Experts". I just ordered a Q9550 SLB8W with this batch "L847C200"
Could someone tell me what can i expect in oc with this batch? is it a good or bad one? i'm still a bit confused about this batch story...
thx all
PS: congrats to Vivid for his amazing results
I'm not a "Batch expert" lol :D, but you can check your VID using CoreTemp:Quote:
Originally Posted by Andren83
-If your VID is lower than 1.2000v (lowest in this thread is 1.1375) then you're having a golden batch CPU :D :yepp:.
-If your VID is around 1.2500v, you're having a :banana: CPU.
Keep in mind that a high VID CPU doesn't always OC badly, some with high VID can OC very well (my old E6600 with 1.325 VID can make 3.6Ghz with stockfan), but this case is rare :p:.
/My Q9550 L848C310 1.2125VID is now running at 450*8.5=3825Mhz 24/7 completely stable with 1.2250v in BIOS (1.2000v in CPU-Z).
I know how to check the VID with CoreTemp but i ain't got the cpu with me yet :D that's the reason why i asked.. im thrilling to know if my batch is a good or bad one :hehe:Quote:
Originally Posted by David-Duc
I already have a Q9650 L845B562 that make 4ghz with 1,3v but im not so satisfied about it so i'm looking for luck with this new Q9550 L847C200 and in case the "baby" will do it better i think im gonna sell my Q9650 ;)
Your cpu rocks for me :up: i guess u can reach 4ghz staying under 1,3v (thats my aim)
now I have a new baby! :) my 9550 E0 FPO L922B951 VID 1.1125V:clap:
today finishing testing and results is :
http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/090908/mzq73diz81.png
I belive,4Ghz too izzi for this chip, but my mobo is not good for quad 45nm.
465 FSB is good result, and it not a limit,but I dont want raising too much volt fot NB.
BTW, what temp is critical for NB? now I have 64'C at peak load, is this good or not?
Temps for chip is not more,than 79'C at LinX,Prime95 at 65-67
and my rig is:
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 E0@ 3952 at 1.264V real
Thermalright IFX-14 +NOCTUA NF-P12-1300@
Asus Maximus Formula @ Rampage Formula x38
DDR2 2x2Gb G.Skill F2-8800CL5D-1100@1117
2xClub3D ATI RADEON HD4870 512MB OC Edition 800/950 CROSSFIRE
Raid0 2x320Gb Seagate SATA2 16Mb
320Gb Seagate SATA2 16Mb
DVDRW Samsung 182M LightScribe
PSU 780W Tagan Superrock
Full Tower Thermaltake Xaser VI + 4x120 vent. + Scythe Kama Meter
Windows7 x64 RTM
Have a new board to play with, trying the EP45 DQ6. Ran some blend on 2 cpu's. Was able to get stable on the same vcore load with both cpu's on this board as on my UD3P. Only thing i dont like is this board does not have LLC so need higher idle voltage because of vdroop. My main goal was to try for higher max oc but in w7 64bit it is a real pain above 543fsb.
http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/368...q95501312v.png
After this screen i think u should change ur nickname from "OC Nub" to "OC God" :)Quote:
Originally Posted by OC Nub
Amazing result mate :up:
LOL Thanks, got lucky with this chip.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andren83
4350mhz prime blending on the dq6 board. Sorry for the tiny ss but I am on xp and have no snipping tool. 4350mhz 1.360vcore pl8 turbo 5:6 divider. I hate xp but want to use it to try for higher max validation.
http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/4...50dq6board.png
I thought the DQ6 Dual Quad 6 is the High-end version of GBT and it doesn't have LLC ? Strange :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by OC Nub
I was told it is junk compared to the UD3 boards when it comes to overclocking so, I am hoping this holds true for me as I am getting the UD3 I ordered today. Other wise I wll be sending this one back and getting one of those.....Quote:
Originally Posted by David-Duc
It isn't junk, the thing I dont like is it has no LLC so you will need more vcore set in bios to allow for vdroop/vdrop. I have been able to reach the same stable oc's with this q9550 and my q9650 with the same load vcore and other voltages on this DQ6 as on my UD3P. It is actually a higher end board but I think the UD3P/R are a better value. My main reason for getting this board was to shoot for higher max oc, I believe this is a better benching board but for 24/7 use I would probably go with the UD3P/R. I am back in Windows 7-64 running blend at the same settings with a more clear ss. Will let this run for a few more hours to be sure it is stable.
http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/8...50dq6q9550.png
Nice :up:
I wish my RAM wasn't holding me back :( Think I might stick some different sticks in there and see how high I can get the chip, then if its worthy...pick up some of the LV's and see if 8GB will run 550+ :D
ThanksQuote:
Originally Posted by tool_462
I tried some LV's and much prefer the gskill9600 pi's. LV's liked the 4:5 divider and not the 5:6. Corrupted my install using 4:5 more than once but I guess that all depends on which board you are using. Havent tried
lv's on this board.
Passed 6hrs+ Blend. Idle vcore between 1.392-1.408v because of no option for LLC, load 1.360v.
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/1...hzblend65h.png
Very nice my friend as you told me yesterday i tried your settings in my Q9650 (512x8,5) with LLC enabled and same volts passed 7+ hours of blend at 1,36vcoreQuote:
Originally Posted by OC Nub
http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/1430/captura6h.png
Cheers :up:
Sergio
Very nice Sergio.
Trying 4400mhz blend on the DQ6 board.
http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/189...0mhzq95501.png
Still running 4400, will run this a while longer I hope.
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/718...400mhz3hrs.png
Nice :D 1240+ RAM, what kind of Everest BW does it have at that speed? My UD3P needs PL9 at that speed but thats with 8GB of inferior RAM.
anyone tried this batch?
FPO/Batch #L848C311
Thanks,Quote:
Originally Posted by tool_462
I will try everest bench after this run and see.
6hrs and going strong.
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/6...blendstabl.png
What settings did you set? IM me the settings please. I have 475 x 8.5 stable right now but can't get her to boot past that. I switched my chip to a different one as well I will add. I have a 070 now with a VID of 1.175v.Quote:
Originally Posted by andressergio
14 hours blend 4400mhz w7-64bit.
http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/148...ndq9550pas.png
how impressive !
Thank you.
Starting a new test, Prime blend 4450mhz.
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/5...end1hr4450.png
WTB Everest results! :p:
Making me want to start using a pagefile again and go back to 4GB of some 9600's :lol:
Everest score,
http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/5350/cachemem2.png
Nice Work Guys :D Of Course OC Nub You Are Soo Activly :)
Some Worked In This Week:
Q9550 @ 4675 Mhz
Dram @ 1100 Mhz 5-5-5-15
ATI 4870X2 @ 750/900 Stock Clock
http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.php/t18832_83536.jpg
SuperPi1M @ 9.875 S
http://shahrsakhtafzar.com/img/out.php/t18831_9.875.jpg
And 1440Mhz Single Ram :)
Valid Link
Very nice work Vivid.
wow JUST WOW ViVid. Although too much V. for my poor x38ASUSMF AIR. FBS478 stable seems to be max. congrats
Alright I had to return the 070 chip I had because it was bad internally IHS wise. The damn thing was pushing 94c at 3.5GHz. I now have a 170 batch and it's VID is 1.2375 but, it is a hell of a lot cooler, it is running Prime95 at 4GHz 480 x 8.5 at a temperature of 65c on the hottest core and at a voltage right now of, 1.296. I will push it more later.
Q9550 batch L848C311 @ 475x8.5 1.23v
http://i26.tinypic.com/35bib20.jpg
Congrats, looks like you have a nice chip. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by phsinc1
very nice OC's guys. been away for a bit. got that work thing going on..lol
ok finally got me some 1066 mem(corsair dominators) ploped them in this morning and took it to 475mhz fired right up
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=714880
every thing is running smoothly right now. i havent tested anything yet thats next.
now i dont know what all i need to tweak so i will just post what i have tweaked. could you all tell me if im missing anything. im sure i am
vcore in bios= 1.350v
freq=475x8.5
mem strap 2.00D
mch 1.28v
mem volts 2.1v (mem rated at 2.1v)
going to run IBT then Linx and of course some prime95
please guys am i missing anything that is something major that i dont know about yet. i know this chip will do higher i just dont know of what else i need to be doing to get it higher
EDIT:
ok all i cant get it to do 4.03 stable ive taken the vcore up to 1.4125v
mch upp to 1.30v
mem up to 2.2v
it freezes on me everytime i start IBT. linx will only pass the first 2 test then fail on the third one.
ive backed it down to 3.83ghz
and it has passed IBT but not linx which is a suprise.
its running Prime95 now so far all is well there.
these dominator sticks can they handle 2.2v factory setting is 2.1v
right now for 3.83ghz i have vcore at 1.325v in bios with the vdrop it is at 1.232v. should i take it higher?
here is what im doing now with prime95. should i be useing a different setting in prime95?
http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i1...3dominator.png
I'm going to receive a Q9550 EO Batch L847C208. Any results with this one? :shrug:
Quote:
Originally Posted by cincyrob
Try doing what I suggested to some one else. Leave your GTLs at auto and just set your Memory Voltage and and CPU voltage and Northbridge Voltage and see where you can get. My NB is currenty at 1.46v in order for me to run 485 x 8.5.
I believe my other voltages are like.
CPU Voltage 1.39v with Vdrop actuall is 1.32v~.
CPU GTL is like .84
1.34v Term
1.46 nbv
Auto for nb gtl because it kept giving me trouble trying to hone it in. I will probably hone it in soon but, took alot of time to hone everything else in so I was getting tired of tweaking for a while so I just started playing games for awhile.
I had, to hone in my memory gtl voltage because the board was acting flaky with out it being honed in. I think it is set to like .84 or .82 something like that.
I am getting some after market chipset / mosfet heatsinks this coming up week because the chipset is very warm compared to my P5Q Deluxe that I had and just sold on ebay actually. I put a little powerfull fan on it for right now.
The thing that seemed to affect me the most was the memory gtl and the CPU gtl. You can actually watch your whole system getting more stable and tuned in by using Intel burntest and watching the GFlops and how long it takes to finish a test. I fine tuned mine again last night and mind you, with out messing with the NB gtl and have managed to pull off my best Vantage score which is 17586 last night. Then I continued playing NFS Shift for awhile after that.
I think that once I get my NB GTL figured out and tuned in I wil probably push my system a little further FSB wise maybe, to 500 but I am thinking 495 at least.
Hi,
I have a Q9550 E0 to but i dont have a propper batch.... my VID is 1.275.
i can run 470 x 8.5 is 3.95 GHz @ 1.29v with vdrop. now i want to run 500x8 but if i do it no matter what i do it crashes so it sucks :P but my brother has a propper batch so maybe im going to switch since he's not realy a OCer ;)
BTW nice results all :O
Hi Guys
Sorry I Cant Found Thread About This Quad :D Q9400
But Always Post Some Resualt In Here :)
Some Record For My Friends Quad +My Mobo And Chiller :
First WR Q9400 On HWbot @ 4445Mhz
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/712825.png
First PiFast Record On HWBOT @ 22.02S
First SuperPi1M On HWBOT @ 11.610S
I Forget To Test In Vista 64Bit :D Maybe Can Some New Record In Wprime :)
Enjoy
first boot....
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...l/Dsc09814.jpg
Q9550 E0 L844C062
425x8,5 1.21v (@ full)
Around 50º max (TRUE lapped + 2x1000rpms)
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x.../Dibujo343.png
PD: 105€ ship inc. :O
5 times of linx ain't enough, run Prime95 or OCCT to make sure of the stability.
Very nice vcore :up: Congrats on the new chip. Try running max mem, select " ALL" and see how it does.Quote:
Originally Posted by Unrealer
I know, i did that screenshot for a ranking :)Quote:
Originally Posted by lordmagnum
Im still testing it...
temps @ 3.8 (TRUE lapped + 2x1000rpms)
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...unreal/232.png
Great temps?
PD: i set that vcore randomly ....
http://www.abload.de/thumb/clipboard02mkiq.jpg
My Q9550 on air. :)
Great job on the Extreme board with 500x8.5.Quote:
Originally Posted by funkflix
Nice i didnt knew that bords are that good. i nearly bought that mobo when i bought my DFI. but my batch sucks to xD
I just got passed a virus from that site that is hosting the pic.:down:Quote:
Originally Posted by funkflix
Thanks guys, really nice results from u too! :toast:
"Everybody" in germany use this host since more then over a year and never heard something about any viruses or something else from that website! :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
Here I have a log from my Trend,Quote:
Originally Posted by funkflix
Possible_Hifrm-5 from C:\Documents and Settings\##\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\4K1MLM3X\view[1].htm
I would have to dig down in to the app logs and log in as admin and all kinds of :banana::banana::banana::banana: to show more info on it but, yeah as soon as I went there bam.. Funny thing is now I think about it the other week on GTAForums, I seen some one posted a pic at this same site and the same thing happened to me for that poster as well. Except some guy started yelling at me and calling me an idiot and blah blah and the orginal poster removed the pic and said sorry.
I was like god damn just warning people, sorry. I host websites at my work and some times it will be the middle company that helps the main website or company pass traffic that gets infected and hackers insert the code from that companies servers when they go to pass you to another page. Hackers are slick.
Can somebody tell me which e-tailer can guarantee the Q9550 E0 stepping in US? Who is providing the cheapest price?
OC NubMy is better !!Quote:
Very nice vcore
Quote:
Originally Posted by rurik
I want change my Maximus Formula@Rampage to Rampage Extreme x48. Somebody can tell me,is this good idea or not? can I with my q9550 do more FSB,than 465 with my Maximus?
just buy yourself a Gigabyte UD3R/UD3P for high fsb on quads
in Estonia I can`t buy UD3P or UD3R,because they out of stock :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by kagula323
Rampage extreme is beter mobo,what I can buy,but too expensive :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by askimo
http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/6581/q9550deal.jpg
Cheapest price in Town at your Local Micro Center Store There Selling EO stepping all Day That's where..I got mine at :yepp:
Q9550 EO Link!
http://www.microcenter.com/single_pr...uct_id=0299412
Processor Page and More link!
http://microcenter.com/specials/cata...roadsheet.html
Hope you got a Store near you :shrug:
Yeah... I have TRUE with NF-12P + AS5, actual vcore at ~1.23v and it's almost 70c with OCCT. Fun... Ambient temperature is about 26c, but still...Quote:
Originally Posted by Unrealer
Btw, could someone say what the normal voltages with P35 are for MCH and FSB? Thanks to Gigabyte, I have no clue about them.
The price is awesome, but it seems that I don't have a Microcenter store close to me. I'm in FloridaQuote:
Originally Posted by bigwill68
you can order them online. shipping wont be that much.
Just trying to know this chip better :)
EP45C-UD3P
Q9550 L844B782 1.225 Vid.
Xigmatek 1283 Single (stock) fan
2x 1GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 @ 1000 1.6v (1:1 PL 9)
Windows 7 x64
3.75GHZ (7.5x 500)
http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...c5b01b5bd7.jpg
3.8GHZ (7.5x 507)
http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...99f4d31120.jpg
4.31GHZ (8.5x 507)
http://www.hostthenpost.org/uploads/...42bd57de9d.jpg
I don't think you can; the e-store says that it is only available for pickup in the storeQuote:
Originally Posted by cincyrob
What other options do I have?
still testing...
I think the temperature is good, when i bought it i expected around 60-70º at 4Ghz :yepp:
Q9550 E0 L844C062
DFI LanParty P35 Dark
TRUE lapped & 2x1000rpms (around 22º of ambient temp)
471x8,5 (4Ghz)
vcore 1.33v (@ full)
NB 1.50v
VTT 1.47v
GTL 0/2 0.61v
GTL 1/3 0.61v
NB GTL 0.67
OCCT 30mins test LARGE DATA SET
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...unreal/534.jpg
I need to lower the vcore till gets stable.
I confused about GTLs and NB/VTT (when i have E4300 and E5400 i let these on AUTO :p:) so im trying all the posible values... :rolleyes:
PD: i have paid 105€ (shipping included) for it, and im waiting another one for the same price....
I just picked a SLB8V today (1.25v VID, Bah...), and fully expected it to go to 4ghz. Unfortunately, I didn't know about the X38 FSB wall with yorkies. So it's not stable at anything over 400mhz fsb... bleh. I'll pick up a UD3P or something sometime soon, but in the mean time, I'm seeing how low below stock VID I can run it. Here is my best power-sipping undervolt/overclock:
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/1684/46519476.jpg
400x8.5 at 1.18275 set in bios. Have to love my load temps, Big Typhoon in a cramped case with a GTX275, with an 81 Degree Fahrenheit ambient (~27c) :P
@ rurik
What vcore you get under load? 1.264v?
4.25H Stable (i stopped the test)
Q9550 E0 L844C062
DFI LanParty P35 Dark
TRUE lapped & 2x1000rpms (around 22º of ambient temp)
471x8,5 (4Ghz)
Vcore 1.34v (@ full)
NB 1.50v
VTT 1.47
CPU GTL 0/2 0,61
CPU GTL 1/3 0,61
NB GTL 0,67
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...eal/423423.png
Still testing...
yep.In bios @1.275 or something...Quote:
Originally Posted by phsinc1
@Unrealer
my chip do 20 loops of Linx at lower voltages,but Prime95 have a error at 5min.Try Prime too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rurik
If you can see what the GFlops that your CPU is putting out with Linx, or use Intelburntest which I know you can see the GFLops the CPU is pushing in that program "I just haven't used Linx mind you". You will be able to probably see that your FSB Term is set to low and your GFlops being put out by the CPU when cold or when it has been shut down all night or all day, are probably half of what they should be with your chip.
I am pushing 58.5 GFlops with my CPU @ 490 x 8.5 @ 1.296v under load, this is with utilizing 3084MBs of my Ram~ for the test and the test finish in around 86s a piece~. I had noticed this because when booting my system cold from being shut down all day or all night, I noticed that when running Intelburntest the GFlops being put out by my CPU were half of what they are when the system has been warmed up or after being rebooted a few times because of me tweaking settings. You can also use it to fine tune your GTL settings as well.
I noticed that if the GTLs are off then two of the cores on the CPU will get hotter then the other two while running Intelburntest or all cores will not get hot enough. This can significantly cut time you spend tweaking these settings because you don't have to finish the test you can just go ahead and stop the test reboot and tweak some more until you see the temps are even and about the right temperature under load taking in to consideration your cooling ofcourse.
Then once you think you have the cores hitting good temps and evenly for that matter, let the test finish and see what the GFlops being pushed out are and if the time finished is fast enough as well. If you get everything set just right BIOS setting wise, all cores will stay about the same temperature all the way through the test nice and stable like. I just caught on to this and was able to tweak mine to perfection landing me the following.
3DMark Vantage Score 17719
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1441908
Here is what my bandwidth is with Everest as well. This is the best I have been able to get this board to do in Everest, at this speed that is.
http://img121.imageshack.us/img121/2548/bestever.png
I had to set my FSB Term to 1.44 with a GTL Reference of .84 "on my motherboard mind you, your's might be different from mine GTL setting wise so be carefull there" to get everything to act correctly when first firing my PC up from being shut down all night or all day and the results speak for them selves. Hope this helps people because if I had known this awhile ago I could have saved my self some serious time tweaking BIOS settings.
Testing...Quote:
Originally Posted by rurik
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...h_Dibujo-8.jpg
Can you see what kind of GFlops you are pushing with Linx? Thank you for your time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Unrealer
XP 32Bits SP3Quote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
http://i770.photobucket.com/albums/x...nreal/3423.png
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unrealer
Your FSB Term is set to low, or Intelburntest is better optimized one of the two. I would look into that. Look at my numbers compared to yours. There shouldn't be that big of a difference in speed between me and you. Your CPU can be stable and still not be performing the way it should be. Bump up your FSB Term and fine tune your CPU GTL and test again and I bet it goes up. Not only that, your system will act alot more responsive once you hit the right FSB Term voltage for what speed you are at.
Edit: Sorry I just noticed that I didn't post a pic of my testing with Intelburntest but, I am hitting 58.5 GFlops compared to your 42 and we are pretty close speed wise. I think you should be hitting 55 GFlops.
nvm testing
Are you sure because I swear if, I remember correctly mine was pushing the same GFlops no matter what amount of memory I was doing the only thing that changed was the time spent testing. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm not I'm not near my PC right now.Quote:
Originally Posted by -n7-
Don't swear so fast, ram-size (problem-size) does affect g-flops.Quote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
As soon as i said it's a RAM thing, i doubted myself lol, hence the previous post edit.
It does make a difference though.
You also have a higher FSB & likely higher RAM speed than he does, & have tweaked it properly (like lowered tRD, etc.).
Okay, this is just quick testing of different RAM sizes, which in turn increases problem size.
1024MB
http://ense7en.com/pics/LinX%20GFlop...sting/1024.jpg
2048MB
http://ense7en.com/pics/LinX%20GFlop...sting/2048.jpg
4096MB
http://ense7en.com/pics/LinX%20GFlop...sting/4096.jpg
6144MB
http://ense7en.com/pics/LinX%20GFlop...sting/6144.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by -n7-
Ok but, that was not that big of a difference though right? Like a tiny difference there compared to the 10GFlops I am thinking he is losing. Thank you for checking by the way. Not only that but, going from 470ish to the 490 I am sitting at now I think increased it only by 2 at the most I beleive.
Do you mean VTT? what value should i use then?Quote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
And im confused about GTLs, i tried 0,67 (on both) and it was stable during 2mins, i tried 0,63 and it was stable during 8mins.... i tried with 0,61 (also on both) and is OCCT stable for 5 hours or more (i stopped the test).
The last value i need to test is 0,57 and i also need to test North Bridge GTL, cause i let it default (0,67).
What I did was get it semi stable or boot-able then tweak one setting up and down until I could see / feel what spot was more, stable again just by watching my temps while running burntest for the most part then leave that setting at the best spot and go to the next one and do the same thing. The FSB Term has different names, it depends on the board. I'm sorry I don't know all the names.
It was the fastest I have ever been able to set all my settings, honestly. So, if your CPU GTLs were the most stable say at 63 because .67 was 2 minutes and lets just say you went to .59 as well and it was one minute then stay at .63 and move to the next one. I think if you were to watch your temps while benching you would see what I am talking about.
Edit: Here I am home now, this is at 490 x 8.5.
http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/7274/myset.png
This is at 470 x 8.5. I didn't feel like doing the big one again so I just did 1024. I think I could actually use some GTL tweaking again here since I changed the FSB and I could probably get better here as well I think.
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/5408/secondmyset.png
I know my temps are a little high but, this cooler can't handle much more. I need to get water. I figure no other programs or games get it this hot any way. Prime95 only gets it to 75C tops I believe.
Thanks for this tip, I just tried and found my GFlops was a bit low, increased CPU Termination to 1.30v from 1.28v and GFLops are now normal. I also played with GTL, I was using 0.848, I increased it to 0.863 and my temps are more even now.Quote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
using 475x8.5
CPU Termination 1.30v
CPU Ref 0.863
MCH Core 1.32v
MCH Ref 0.863
CPU PLL 1.50v
I just happened to be watching my temps and started noticying the annomaly and was like wow and started utilizing it and it was so easy to tweak everything this way, I figured I just had to tell every one. Your welcome. I was expieriencing a little, tiny, lag when playing NFS Shift as well before noticying this and now it is gone and my system is a lot more snappy.
Can I know what is your settings for your current OC?Quote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
CPU Termination
CPU Ref
MCH Core
MCH Ref
Thanks
Ok I will ramble them off and just assume I am hitting close here because I might be off a little but, surely not to much.Quote:
Originally Posted by phsinc1
Robust Graphics Booster - Turbo
CPU Clock Ratio - 8X
Fine Clock Tune: .5x
CPU Host Frequency - 490
PCI Express Frquency - 101
C.I.A.2 - Disabled
CPU Clock Drive - 1000mV
PCI Express Clock Drive 1000mV
Clock skews are all set to 0PS.
****DRAM Performance Control****
Performance Enhance - Turbo
Extreme Memory Profile - Disabled
(G) MCH Frequency Latch - 333MHz
System Memory Multiplier - 2.40B
Memory Speed: 1176MHz
DRAM Timing Selectable - Manual
>>>Sandard Timing Control<<<
CAS Latency Time - 5
tRCD - 5
tRP - 5
tRAS - 15
>>>Advanced Timing Control<<<
tRRD - auto
tWTR - auto
tWR - auto
tRFC - auto
tRTP - auto
Command Rate - auto
>>>>Channel A Timing Settings
Static tRead Value - 8
Everything else is Auto.
>>>>Channel A Driving Settings
Driving Strength Profile - Auto
Everything else is Auto.
>>>>Channel B Timing Settings
Same as Chanel A.
>>>>Channel B Driving Settings
Same as Channel A.
****Motherboard Voltage Control****
>>>>CPU
Load Line Calibration - Enabled
CPU Vcore - 1.3475V "Load is actual 1.296 and 1.312 idle"
CPU Termination - 1.42V "I think I actually bumped this down one notch because my CPU liked it better at 1.42. I was going to look last night but was to busy testing and then playing NFS Shift, then I went to bed."
CPU PLL - 1.57V
CPU Reference - .83 or .84
>>>>MCH/ICH
MCH Core - 1.52V
MCH Reference - .912
MCH/DRAM Refence - 1.000v
ICH I/O - 1.50V
ICH Core - 1.10V
>>>DRAM
DRAM Voltage - 2.100V
DRAM Termination - .75v
Channel A Reference - Auto
Channel B Reference - Auto
truehighroller
http://pic.ipicture.ru/uploads/090927/TVP9o4yOx2.png
is this normal?system running 7days without restart. but my temp too high.@3952 at moment vcore is 1.280V(Im too lazy to lower it :)) 75 is max with my IFX-14+Noctua NF-P12 in closed case
That's not to high of temps for air cooling and when you run games etcedera your temps will not be nearly that high, no program tortures CPUs like Linx code. I think if you hone everything in a little more you will be suprised about how your temps go up, I'm guessing you will hit 80C~. I think you might have some settings off a little but, you are pretty close to honed in though. I am basing this off just looking at that screen shot though. You need to watch your temps like I had mentioned earlier, they speak volumes.Quote:
Originally Posted by rurik