Yeah, when you posted that information it got me thinking... when D. Wang published his summary information from the 2007 IEDM (
http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cf...1608222300&p=6) I missed the info about him taking the ITSA NMOS numbers from the VLSI Symposium in June. The 2007 IEDM proceedings have been published, but I could not find anything on current state of ITSA 45 nm, thinking I just simply passed over it I took the RTW data at face value.
So, prodding a little, I noted the footnote, looked up the VLSI paper and wolla .. D. Wang is quoting intial HK/MG data from the IBM paper I linked above -- to date we only know that AMD will not initially use HK/MG so that data is irrelevant in that regard. Weird also in that data was generated before last Jan. so using his information is terribly in error ... we don't know diddly squat, that data is simply too old, too much can change and is different.