4.5ghz for 200 bucks isnt good enough? lolQuote:
Originally Posted by mrcape
Anyway, goodluck with the 8500
Printable View
4.5ghz for 200 bucks isnt good enough? lolQuote:
Originally Posted by mrcape
Anyway, goodluck with the 8500
who will ship e8500 to NY, USA? I need one for Ln2. please pm a link.
For Maximus 2.0.b.16h PLL ICS9LPRS918BKL (919BKL fine as wel i thought).Quote:
Originally Posted by GLENBOY
Testing max FSB of me E8500. 32M time is horrible, slow mem, no tweaks and apps running. FSB not too bad though :D
Commando bios 1605
Tuniq Tower (room 20 C)
E8500 Q745A554
Ballistix 8500
8400GS
OCZ 520 mod
Boot 6x600 32M loop 12:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...op12600fsb.jpg
32M:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...done600fsb.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...20FSBE8500.jpg
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=304554
Just recieved my E8400 from the Egg.
FPO/Batch = Q746A489
Pack Date = 1/09/08
Will post results as soon as i get my loop back up and running
No. But i'm entitled to give my personal assumption on the subject.Quote:
Originally Posted by C-N
I still believe the cpu is not the culprit to this clock degration but some other factors.
I had this problem with DC opteron where it ran stable for days at 2.9ghz until i decided to push it further but came to dead end so when I set everything back the way it was it became unstable even at stock speeds. I did everything by the book-clearing the cmos, taking out the battery but nothing. At first I thought it was the cpu so I ran it on my older epox939 board and the cpu ran just fine. I poped it back in my dfi and decided to reflash the same bios and boom the opty ran at 2.9ghz stable again.
Sorry but I just don't buy the fact 1.4v would degrade this cpu in just a few days (unless you try it without the hsf). 1-2 years maybe but not 3-4 days..It's impossible. Did someone mention their cpu's blew up or something? Well there you go. Faulty PSU is the biggest killer to all components.
[QUOTE=loc.o;2732485]For Maximus 2.0.b.16h PLL ICS9LPRS918BKL (919BKL fine as wel i thought).
Testing max FSB of me E8500. 32M time is horrible, slow mem, no tweaks and apps running. FSB not too bad though :D
Commando bios 1605
Tuniq Tower (room 20 C)
E8500 Q745A554
Ballistix 8500
8400GS
OCZ 520 mod
I got the exact same batch as you loc.o
BUT in running it in Maximus Extreme, and i must admit, this board really sucks.. I got a feeling the cpu can do alot more, it craps out on about 500 in this board, but it boots without a glitch at 550, god damnit.. :)
what do you think, i got same batch as you, and my VID are as low as 1.0500
and 510 is a no go into windows, nomather what voltage on the important things... how was your experience with maximus?
regards.
This board was released more than 6 months ago, it will need a bios update to work with 45nm. You'll need a 65nm or older cpu to flash to latest bios before you can use it.Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticwizard
You may be lucky however, and the board might just come with support for 45nm. You should probably ask in the IP35 thread and see what folks say. Goodluck.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infa
Havent really tried much but sounds familiair. With maximus bios 0401 and E6600 550FSB air and 590FSB with dice was fine. Now using bios 0907 and an E8400 (can do 590 air on Commando). Simular settings for Maximus as with E6600 tests but not much over 500fsb now either. Rather sure were both missing a setting here and there because board shouldnt have a problem with it i guess..
nice FSB :DQuote:
Originally Posted by loc.o
I may have the worst Q748 there is... :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by mrcape
It needs 1.35v for 3.8ghz (which is the max stable oc). 4.00ghz is just out of the question regardless vcore...
Return it tomorrow ASAP! :p:
Tested on P5E. That's for ppl thinking that P35 is the problem. No Q748 is the problem... ;)
Is it Q748A102 by chance?Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBar
loc.o, nice cpu mate, i ordered an E8500 myself, could no longer stand this E8400. :p:
Quote:
Originally Posted by loc.o
Im really sick of it , what can that setting be? its not an unknown fact that x38 cant do very well, the only board ive seen getting good FSB are the P5E3 WS Pro..
maybe i should try a P35 board? and noo, no commando, im using ddr3 now.. :)
think im gonna sell this one, cant take this anymore making me nuts..
regards.
No it's a Q748A242. I'll try another 8400 (a Q746, if i can find one) cause it's for my 2nd rig.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
I'm reserving 8500 for my main rig. Still debating if i should ditch quad for a 8500 though... :)
I got 545fsb on my max formula; I'm pretty happy with that. I believe I can go higher with relaxed performance levels but max fsb is not what I'm after.Quote:
Originally Posted by Infa
The best way to judge the strength of what I consider to be "shoddy" overclocks is to ran some 3D benches with them for the following reasons:
1. the guy who did 600fsb with the p5b-deluxe had pci-e at 1x (a common problem with that board)
2. the performance levels get very relaxed past 400 progressively towards 500 and beyond. My P5B-D (C2) had performance levels around 11 with only 450 fsb.
I am running 9x500 with performance level at 7; something's gotta give - loosen permance levels = gain max fsb. Also, bioses still need to mature for x38, and remember, the strength of x38 is not necessarily just high fsb, but a combination of high fsb + performance (relatively lower performance levels).
Even though x38 is more or less a tweaked-for-performance derivative of P35 chipset, wasn't it meant to be the replacement for 975x? Or is it P45?
What I'd like to see, because I've done it on my x38 board, is a P35 chipset doing 9x545fsb with performance level 7; and pci-e @ x16
ok Tbh, i have forgotten the Booster ehhh... ive allways had it on strong, and booster lvl 3 ... couse when i did have my conroe in , it didnt mather what i did it sucked nomather what, but ok, ill try to lower it a bit and check. ..bbl
thanks..
EDIT: didnt change anything at all. still as crappy :)
This 1s all the way 4m Bombay, India :D
Got my E8400 with the Batch #Q746A447 Dated 7th Jan '08, last nite.
I'm on AIR (TRU120E) & ve a ASUS Blitz Formula board with 4x1GB PC2 6400 Crucials & a 8800GT. Trying 2 get is 24/7 stable at 4.32 (1.4Vcore).
Managed 2 boot @ 530x9 but I'm sure I can do better.
Here's a simple SS on XP with Spi1M, under 10s score (my 1st under 10s score) @ 4698MHz which I feel is not bad at all on AIR !!!
http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/3522/4698mu0.png
E8400 Q744A (ON AIR)
4.7Ghz 1.64V
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/444...erpiwq9.th.jpg
Can Boot at 5.0Ghz but cant get into windowa, mobo is the limiting factor, I think. I need 1.44V for 4.3. Seems like a good chip, but def not as good as weeks 45 and 46.
E8400
FPO/Batch = Q746A489
Pack Date = 1/09/08
MB P5B Deluxe Bios 1226
Testing 450 * 9
Bios Vcore = 1.350v
Idle Vcore = 1.320v
Load Vcore = 1.296v
CPU is on water with old DD TDX WB
Going to remount WB but I am concerned about temps.
CPU Idle = 41c / 36c
CPU Load = 56c / 55c
Ambient = 23c
Think I have a bad mount?
http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q...ZTestE8400.jpg
DFI P35-T2RL (Blood Iron)
#Q740A478 (no T even though I'm in Canada)
pack date 12/20/07
CPU-Z shows 1.440V idle, 1.408 load (vdroop ftl)
on water, ~22C ambient
http://s95367906.onlinehome.us/XS/42..._vdrooooop.png
E8400 SLAPL fpo/batch Q745A372 pack date 12/20/07 from Microcenter vid 1.1125
Sigh only good for 16hrs 15min on prime 95 and it crashed again core 0 runs at 1.304v just fine but core 1 always crashes even at my current 1.32V I guess its time to bump the voltage another notch or 2 for my 24/7 clocks, I can see its in reach now though. Can load windows and run 3dmark 06windows at 1.42V @ 4.6 but gets too hot w/ my Tuniq at only 1350rpm. will need to replace the rear fan in my P180 if I want to push it more /sigh
why does coretemp and orthos show 3780MHz and cpu-z shows 4247MHz?Quote:
Originally Posted by majestik
because some people up their CPU speed in windows instead of bios. CPU-Z shows speed in real timeQuote:
Originally Posted by dogsx2
Yeah boot at 420 then go up.Quote:
Originally Posted by dogsx2
Not true m8.
Windows and most apps inc Orthos will always read your DEFAULT MULTI.
Thats why when you lower Multi and Raise FSB you get a mad high reading.
CPU-Z however will read Multi/FSB and CPU Speed correctly.
:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by humeyboy
I don't understand who you are replying to.
Good overclocking Guide for E8400 is HERE
Thanks Zeus, I will keep my fingers crossed that you get an exceptional E8500 after your luck with the E8400. Same goes to MrCape and others who were unlucky first time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
It seems odd talking about bad luck when people are hitting well over 4GHz and not being happy, Intel really delivered with 45nm :up: You can tell the process is good when the standard heatsink is only half the height of the one for 65nm.....
Eventually I got the chip above 4.6 but the stock heatsink (stock off the 65nm X6800 that is ;) ) I am using as a temporary one could not really handle it.
Anyhow managed 4500Mhz for 3dmark rock solid at 1.5v.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9326402
I will see how it goes with the tuniq on it, I will be happy with this though especially as it will be going on a 780i eventually for SLI and I expect 475 to about the upper limit anyway, if not less.
Regards
Andy
thanks loco :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by loc.o
Can anyone share the reported temps on their motherboard if it is showing correctly?
I just came home only to find a note from mr Postman telling me i just missed him. :(
Why do these guys always come late except for when you're a little late yourself?
The last time i waited all day long for my EK waterblock when it was delivered at 19:00 on a saturday!
Now i was home at half past 12 and missed him...oh well.
Have to wait another day, let's hope it's worth the wait but from observations i have a feeling that all E8500's do 4GHz stable at below 1.3Vcore.
Another observation is that Q748 and Q750 E8400's are the worst clockers but if the topicstarter could make a nice spreadsheet we can see that in a glimpse.
Anyone already noticed degration of his Wolfdale yet?
What about the Q746's?Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
Mangaed to get mine to 4Ghz but only on an 8x multi :(
Demon^
my Q746 does 4GHz prime95 stable at 1.200vQuote:
Originally Posted by Demon^
It has to be my board then - Asus P5N32-E SLI with Beta 1302 BIOS with 2GB Ballistix 5300.Quote:
Originally Posted by X.T.R.E.M.E_ICE
Demon^
Q746 is quite a mixed bag with some average but also plenty of very good ones.Quote:
Originally Posted by Demon^
Week 40 and 45 seem to be best.
Q746A495 I have.
Demon^
mine is Q746A474Quote:
Originally Posted by Demon^
Quote:
Originally Posted by X.T.R.E.M.E_ICE
4GHz prime95 stable at 1.200v:eek: on air? wich pack date?
thanks
01/07/2008Quote:
Originally Posted by ztop
I've noticed that Wolfies that require lowish voltages to get stable at 4-4.4ghz don't clock as high as those that need more voltage to get them stable at the same frequency's for some reason.
Q746A477 Stepping...
VID : 1.0375v
4.2 Ghz @ 1.34 Prime Load...
http://forums.erodov.com/imagehostin...f2ff0e5329.jpg
4.2 Ghz @ 1.34 Prime Load... 15 mins screenshot, completed 1 hour, and I accidently shut it off. Bleh. More than stable enough for me.
http://forums.erodov.com/imagehostin...f2fef2e0ed.jpg
Im trying for 4.3-4.5Ghz for 24/7.
My current stable 24/7 is already 4.2Ghz @ 1.34
Watercooled (Specs in Sig), Quad Nozzle still in the Dtek, will change it to the 5mm Nozzle tonight. (Its 7.30pm here :P)
Bad temp's are most due to a bad mount, and surely due to the Quad Nozzle on the Dtek.
Ambients : 22-23C
are you sure that this is the right vid?
boot up with default settings without EIST / C1E and check it again. CoreTemp read
often wrong VIDs :)
But nice clock and good voltage :up:
i wait for a better bios to clock higher, my DFI cant do more than 510FSB stable
with wolfdale :( (with conroe 540FSB with def. NB voltage)
Regards
Chris
^^ K, Ill check it out :).
Just got my E8400 today. Q744A761 and on the box VID is 1.225V and Coretemp reads 1.1125
Yes, I got home yesterday to find mine was busily downloading nude pictures of women rather than doing Prime.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
It's been severely chastised.
Regards
Andy
I just sold mine with that stepping, not even prime @ 4ghz with 1.45vQuote:
Originally Posted by Turbodream
/Grau
Man, that one got out of line! :nono:Quote:
Originally Posted by zakelwe
Did you punish it with some extra volts?
You really need to show it who's the boss or else your harddisk will be filled with pics of naked men before you know it! :D
And you should be chasing that mailman, looking forward to your results hope you get a good one :up:
bit off topic loco but whats the bottom slider for on setfsb thanksQuote:
Originally Posted by loc.o
ey guys, are your CoreTemps showing accurate temps? just noticed that my temps aren't moving... :(
http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o...lt05-temps.jpg
Got Q745A554, Doin 4ghz at 1.25, and 4.2 seems ok with 1.42.
VID 1.0500, E8500.
The board cant handle the FSB it seems, 500 is max boot into windows, 550 can post without problem... BOARD ISSUE!
gah, ive missed not being able to play with mine :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOESA
Strange, mine does 4ghz on 1.3vcore, havenīt tried orthos yet but i think itīs kinda good cpu....
It seems to let you adjust the PCI-E frequency independent of your FSB speed. If you are benching for a 3DMark WR it might come in handy.Quote:
Originally Posted by GLENBOY
emoners: There seems to be a few reports of the on chip digital sensors getting stuck at fixed values on the new E8x00 series. When overclocking it is kind of like driving with a blindfold. As long as you're stable and are getting some decent MHz out of it I wouldn't worry too much.
thanks unclewebb
here is my chip
Quote:
Originally Posted by trt740
A little more information would be usefull.
FPO#, motherboard, cooling, etc. ;)
My sweet E8400
Product code : BX80570e8400 S-spec : SLAPL
MM # 895733
Fpo/Batch # Q748A142
version # E27439-001 max 1.225v pack date 01/09/08
on air http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=303613
what voltage?Quote:
Originally Posted by PytonOrm
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=303613
holy crap! who said Q748 were bad clockers?!!!
:slobber:
e8400 Q746a328 is a good clocker?
Mine is Q746A777 and for 4.2Ghz Orthos stable, I need 1.46V (actual).
I can boot into Windows and do Super PI @ 4.4Ghz though but it isn't stable.
It makes me feel I have a poor overclockable chip when almost all of you guys here can do 4.2Ghz at a much lower voltage. Do they pass Orthos? Just to see if mine is really that bad.
Mine - Q748A115 - clocks high as funk but it takes a LOT of volts to be stable over 4.1ghz. For benching, quick runs it's great, but I wish I had just rented it. I have another one on the way and will report differences.Quote:
Originally Posted by trans am
Same with my 745. Seems the 740's are the best for 24/7 high clocks on lowish volts but don't clock as high for benching as the 745s and latter.Quote:
Originally Posted by mrcape
I use a program called RightMark CPU Clock Utility. It displays the (VID) voltage ID of your processor so you can compare to CoreTemp.
On the CPU info page it also reads the minimum and maximum voltage values that I think are built into the Intel C2D processor.
Here's how my E6400 looks:
http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/6674/vidnx2.png
I've been running my processor air cooled at 1.48 volts, 7 days a week for a year without any of the degradation that people worry about. It would be interesting to see how this program reads the new E8x00 processors.
There's no degration going on. It's just a rumor.Quote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
It'd be nice if there was a table showing everyones batch in the first column and then req'd voltages for highest prime stable clock in the next few columns. I guess it's too hard to say if each guy is doing the right thing with his settings etc..
It would be even better to see all batches on the same setup doing the same tests, but that may be idealistic thinking. Wait, wasn't there some thread from a guy who had like five different 8400s and was testing them on the same setup?
How do you know this? Do you have concrete evidence or is it because you just know?Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBull78
Apparently, it's based on one poster and "his five friends". Apparently all of their 8400's died after a week, if I'm remembering the story correctly. The thing that stands out most is the statement that even the guy with only 1.41Vcore had his die prematurely. That sounds like bull, cuz there are people putting far more than that on this very thread, and not a single one has complained of a dead chip.
oo i might have to have a look at thatQuote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
I think we have to wait and see for a couple weeks. If people are still throwing 1.5v+ at these and they aren't dying that's awesome.
it is stelios about which you speak!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mav451
When one only one cpu died, we could say that it's misfortune or human error!
When 1/2 cpus died and the others get degraded... i would care what he says!
Perhaps a bad series of Wolfy or real problem....
Product code : BX80570E8400 S-spec : SLAPL
MM # 895733
Fpo/Batch # Q748A142
version # E27439-001 max 1.225v pack date 01/09/08
P5B Deluxe, vdroop pencil mod.
1.328v idle, 1.336v load.
pretty weird temp though. 24C roomtemp. idling at 42C and loading at 58-62C. fuzion, mcw60, pa120.2, mcp655. thats hotter than my e6600 heh :rolleyes: ill try to remount the block a few more times.
http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/6...336loadnm2.jpg
Yup I agree, those guys are not noobs!Quote:
Originally Posted by rastaseb
That's why I think we must wait and see much more data to see if these things can really survive with 1.4v+. Thanks to all the guys who don't care because your data is worth gold.
It's right there in the spec sheet that max volts for e8000 series is 1.45v vs 1.55v for e6000 series. So people saying yeah I did so and so volts with my e6400 is irrelevant. 45nm may be more fragile. Time will tell but I hope it's not true.
Urban legends spreads fast.
It might even be that 45nm is more sturdy than older chips.
I never wrote that 8 CPU's died . They just degraded . You should read more carefuly next time !:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mav451
Mainly I reported less Mhz stable . 8 cpu's till yesterday ... 9 today , as another user in a forum here in Greece today reported that his CPU has lost Mhz also.
Also , 3 QX9650 (Hipro5 , Shamino , Victorwang) . You can find the posts here in XS for these CPUs. Also there is one 8400ES that died while benching (ln2) .
A new poll has been opened in thelab.gr today and already 38% voted that they noticed a degradation ... 33% doesn't tried with voltage so they don't know ... and 16% voted that the clocks are the same .
I'm still strugling with my Mobo and E8400
I need 1.368v to run 4GHz, but in BIOS I have to set 1.485v , so it means vdrop is 0.117 :eek:
New BIOS is needed!!!
Read the Micron datasheet for D9 DDR2 memory and you will see that it is only factory rated at 1.8 volts. When people are overclocking they usually start giving their memory voltages like 2.3 or 2.4 volts. In my experience, bad memory is usually the cause of most performance and stability degradation. It will be interesting to see some reports from XS users how the 45nm chips are holding up long term, like maybe a month or so at 4+ GHz. :D
Intel wouldn't have raised TjMax if they thought otherwise. TjMax represents the highest safe operating temperature for a C2D so a bump up in this rating is a sign that Intel is pretty confident in these new processors, even at extreme temperatures.Quote:
It might even be that 45nm is more sturdy than older chips.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackwhite
That is not vdroop, it is offset between what you set in bios and what is indicated by windows. What you need to do is launch P95 or Orthos and then look at the CPUz 1.368v. The amount it drops when the CPU is loaded is vdroop. Better yet, use a voltmeter and measure the REAL vdroop.
I really hope they are holding up well! I want to run these suckers hot.Quote:
Originally Posted by unclewebb
I understand that in the past overvolting has been fine if you can keep the temps down, it's just that there are conflicting reports about 45nm. Reports that come from the same guys who love to throw voltage at chips, not the conservative types.
:rofl: :ROTF: :clap: I've even pumped 1.6250v (bios) set, and on posting, I saw CPU Overvolt warning, still booted into windows fine and trying to determine max clocks. I tell ya, once you broach the subject, people are going to be pointing to the cpu instead of troubleshooting other things.
Q745a576
box date 1/4/08
lapped and ready to go!
breaking 4ghz at about 1.22v :up: orthos stable on x38
now playing with the fsb, pics later
0.117 This would give me 200mhz.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackwhite
My vdrop is .5 or so.
temps are off tho,
65c idle orginal e8400.
4ghz 68c.
orthos, 95c.
Looking for answers on the net shows, seems as either a bios issue or a temp issue with the e8400 series.
No clear winner yet ;)
No way!!!! Because you're saying your volts drop from eg. 1.500v to 1.000v? Impossible.Quote:
Originally Posted by flopper
You may want to update your sig. You're on a Wolfdale now :DQuote:
Originally Posted by flopper
humph,Quote:
Originally Posted by Zucker2k
correct, 1.400 to 1.350 would be acurate ;)
me and electronics dont adjust well.
VID in coretemp can be buggy i think
Look at mine
http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/3511/vide8500bh6.jpg
Can you give me a link , how can I measure CPU voltage using a voltometer please.Quote:
Originally Posted by sofarfrome
BTW my English is not so good (I'm Polish) - I understand this offset is bad, and looks like my CPU is crap?
In Windows i've got 1.4V - in orthos 1.368 - that means vdrop is 0.032v.
Anybody got a Q745A346 pack date 17/01/08? I can't test mind due to Asus Striker Extremes amazing ability to fubb:mad:
I returned my Q748A242 today (max orthos speed was 3.8ghz :p: ) just to realize that all other cpus (10 of them) were Q748's also... :mad:
I decided to grab a new one Q748A141 and at least it's a bit better that the old. Right now priming for 2 hours @ 4.0ghz with 1.39v under load. Still a very high vcore for 4.0ghz but at least it doesn't top @ 3.8ghz... :p:
Seems like Q748's constantly produce the worst results. Better avoid them if u can... :)
This is very interesting news, would you have a link to this thread by chance?Quote:
Originally Posted by Stelios
I have been watching my MHz and bench scores since this rumour/fact started. It will be 1 week Thursday and I have not seen any performance/stability loss......yet.
The poll thread ? It's in Greek btw . (http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?threadid=46871)Quote:
Originally Posted by Grnfinger
What voltages are you running ???
Faster way is to use orthos/prime95 . Write down your current numbers , and check them after some days .
Orthos run so far, 1.2875 bios, 1.28 CPUZ for 4.0, will let it run overnight. I have loadline enabled so voltage in bios matches voltage in cpuz, vdroop is still ~.008 to .01. My batch in sig.
Wonder if any way that a single post could be edited by all people. Be nice for each person to list handle (some accountability for accuracy) their cpu batch, and volts needed for 4, 4.1, 4.2, etc. and get some idea of how these scale. Too much work for one person, especially one with a new toy.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...re#post2389552Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackwhite
Post #1885 is a good pic of measure point on board. With beta 16.b04 uguru is real close to what my DMM reads. When uguru reads 1.32v to 1.34v my DMM reads 1.34v. I just wish abit would fix the damn bios. No doubt they have had access to engineering samples of wolfdale for quite some time. Good luck.
My chip is incredibely cool. I see some members on water at 60c+ low vcore :confused:
I'm at 50-51c loaded 4ghz 1.36v with a tuniq @ 800rpm in a lowcfm/silent case
Even at 1.45v, I barely hit 58-60c MAX
Uguru reports my temps as 33c idle and 50c loaded. Core temp on the other hand reports 51c idle 68c loaded. Thats a 17c spread on both but I think core temp is off because even at default vcore 1.1v core temp reports 48c idle. When I touch the base of my Thermalright it is barely warm while under orthos load.
Quote:
Originally Posted by higgins
Below is my E8400 running on a P5B Deluxe.
I feel my temps are a bit high as compared with yours for water. I however have not done a remount.
Maybe core temp is to blame for temps being off.
What bios are you using?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BooStFeD
Cortemp screenshot?. My tuniq fan runs at about 450rpm and my cores idle about 49c at 1.2vQuote:
Originally Posted by Supertim0r
you could start a spreadsheet on google docs, and link to it in the OP. like
FPO
BATCH
VID.... etc
then when everyones data is voluntarily put into the spreadsheet, 1 user at a time collaboratively, you could sort by any column like a database, and see which versions or mobo combinations are best with the e8400
This one is Q740A473TQuote:
Originally Posted by X.T.R.E.M.E_ICE
18-19c room temp
The tuniq is so cool to the touch, i might try running completely passive
I have an other Q740A553T running approx same oc 8-9c higher