GeForce 9900 GTX & GTS Slated For July Launch

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-09-2008, 12:21 PM
Caparroz

Quote:

Originally Posted by AliG

wrong, the 9900gtx is a g92b card, meaning it's just a shrunken 9800gtx, same transition as 7800gtx to 7900gtx really

That's exactly what STaRGaZeR said... :confused:
06-09-2008, 12:25 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caparroz

That's exactly what STaRGaZeR said... :confused:

he was saying the contrary actually
06-09-2008, 12:33 PM
Milos-stancene

http://www.pczilla.net/en/post/35.html

GTX280 CRYSIS 1920*1200 VH Average FPS Reached to 36.81!
06-09-2008, 12:41 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by Milos-stancene

http://www.pczilla.net/en/post/35.html

GTX280 CRYSIS 1920*1200 VH Average FPS Reached to 36.81!

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1351

Did anyone catch a glimpse of the EVGA leak?
http://www.evga.com/community/articles/

it 404'd now
06-09-2008, 12:44 PM
GoldenTiger

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=1351

Did anyone catch a glimpse of the EVGA leak?
http://www.evga.com/community/articles/

it 404'd now

Nope, google cache has nothing either.
06-09-2008, 12:45 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldenTiger

Nope, google cache has nothing either.

damn, I was just about to search the archives :(
06-09-2008, 12:47 PM
STaRGaZeR

To AliG and Jowy:

1. Hu1kamania: 9900GTX is not new gen, but a 55nm shrink of old gen.

2. Milos-stancene: YES,it IS.

3. STaRGaZeR: No, it isn't. And you won't see them anytime soon.

I don't think it's that hard to understand :confused:

9900GTX IS G92b, and G92b is just a die shrink of G92. And you won't see it anytime soon. Caparroz got it right.
06-09-2008, 01:04 PM
AliG

you said it isn't a 55nm shrink of g92, and I corrected your statement on that, I don't see how I have it wrong, I know exactly what it is and that it won't be out until August from what benchzowner has said
06-09-2008, 01:06 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR

To AliG and Jowy:

1. Hu1kamania: 9900GTX is not new gen, but a 55nm shrink of old gen.

2. Milos-stancene: YES,it IS.

3. STaRGaZeR: No, it isn't. And you won't see them anytime soon.

I don't think it's that hard to understand :confused:

9900GTX IS G92b, and G92b is just a die shrink of G92. And you won't see it anytime soon. Caparroz got it right.

huh?

1. Hu1kamania: 9900GTX is not new gen, but a 55nm shrink of old gen.

That is true

2. Milos-stancene: YES,it IS.

also true

3. STaRGaZeR: No, it isn't. And you won't see them anytime soon.

That is not true

9900GTX IS G92b, and G92b is just a die shrink of G92. And you won't see it anytime soon. Caparroz got it right.

well why did you say "No, it isn't" to Hu1kamania and Milos-stancene?
maybe my poor english is the cause of my confusion
06-09-2008, 01:07 PM
STaRGaZeR

Quote:

Originally Posted by AliG

you said it isn't a 55nm shrink of g92, and I corrected your statement on that, I don't see how I have it wrong, I know exactly what it is and that it won't be out until August from what benchzowner has said

Actually I said it was...

1. Hu1kamania: 9900GTX is not new gen, but a 55nm shrink of old gen.

2. Milos-stancene: YES,it IS.

3. STaRGaZeR: No, it isn't. And you won't see them anytime soon.

Again: 1. 9900GTX is not next gen (correct), 2. YES,it IS (wrong), 3. No, it isn't (correct).

You get it now? I'm saying it's not next gen by any means. And BZ said around November, not August if I remember correctly. Too lazy to check.
06-09-2008, 01:09 PM
AliG

argh I'm getting more confused about what's happening, lets just leave it that we both agree the 9900gtx is a g92b card that won't be out for a while
06-09-2008, 01:11 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR

Actually I said it was...

1. Hu1kamania: 9900GTX is not new gen, but a 55nm shrink of old gen.

2. Milos-stancene: YES,it IS.

3. STaRGaZeR: No, it isn't. And you won't see them anytime soon.

Again: 1. 9900GTX is not next gen (correct), 2. YES,it IS (wrong), 3. No, it isn't (correct).

You get it now? I'm saying it's not next gen. And BZ said around November, not August.

...aaah, we were taking Milos-stancene's post as further confirmation of Hu1kamania's

Sorry Stargazer, we're only talking so much crap because we're bored to hell waiting for new info
06-09-2008, 01:16 PM
STaRGaZeR

Exactly, and don't worry :up:

Just wait for the real thing. This two stickies are boring with 10 users posting the same information, 20 fanboys saying "OMGWTF!!1 DO WANT!!111!" and no real info :p:
06-09-2008, 01:24 PM
Hu1kamania

:rofl:You guys are cracking me up! :rofl:
06-09-2008, 01:33 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hu1kamania

:rofl:You guys are cracking me up! :rofl:

we're here to provide light entertainment untill new stuff shows up :cool:
06-09-2008, 01:40 PM
Milos-stancene

:welcome:
06-09-2008, 01:43 PM
jaredpace

damn two pages of wasted thread.

"no it isn't" yes it is blah blah BOLD BOLD CAPS CAPS I LOVE you too, we win, yada yada yada wtf
06-09-2008, 01:54 PM
Luka_Aveiro

:rofl::rofl::rofl::ROTF::ROTF::ROTF:

This reminds of the multithreaded fest, XS is hilarious, love you guys.

Point is : STaRGaZeR was just saying 9900GTX is not a newgen, but just a refresh of older gens, so he contradicted Milos-stancene when he said "no it isn't"

Ok? :p:
06-09-2008, 02:02 PM
msgclb

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides

Did anyone catch a glimpse of the EVGA leak?
http://www.evga.com/community/articles/

it 404'd now

Why didn't you take a screen shot before it 404'd!
Attachment 80043
06-09-2008, 02:20 PM
Xello

Heheh,

I confess i lol'd at the madness of those posts.

So OBR is confirming that this is not the monster card we hoped for huh?

Could 3 of them max out Crysis @ 2560x1600?
06-09-2008, 02:22 PM
natty

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hornet331

rofl... beating sli 8800gtx/9800gtx by 30% at that res is to slow? :ROTF:

yea I don't understand why OBR keeps putting down the card. Those results are very impressive to me. What was he expecting? Ten times the performance of a single 8800?
06-09-2008, 02:24 PM
natty

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xello

Heheh,

I confess i lol'd at the madness of those posts.

So OBR is confirming that this is not the monster card we hoped for huh?

Could 3 of them max out Crysis @ 2560x1600?

From everything I've seen this IS the monster card we hoped for. He either had unrealistic expectations or someone from ATI is watching over his shoulder as he types :)
06-09-2008, 02:59 PM
y2kbos

Quote:

Originally Posted by natty

yea I don't understand why OBR keeps putting down the card. Those results are very impressive to me. What was he expecting? Ten times the performance of a single 8800?

Plus drivers for the cards are hardly top notch either, should see another rise there..
06-09-2008, 03:15 PM
sonofander

actually OBR is the biggest nVidia fanboy ever... the fact that he isn't excited has me quite worried :(
06-09-2008, 03:21 PM
Jowy Atreides

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaredpace

damn two pages of wasted thread.

"no it isn't" yes it is blah blah BOLD BOLD CAPS CAPS I LOVE you too, we win, yada yada yada wtf

This is a 60 page thread with like 6 noteworthy posts
(I claim 2 of them)

so a few posts reach offtopic status,
it's bound to happen

we're bored to tears

Quote:

Originally Posted by msgclb

Why didn't you take a screen shot before it 404'd!
Attachment 80043

I got there after the 404 sadly,
I always screencap new info just incase

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page