bsod after 11/15 linx loops ......
Printable View
bsod after 11/15 linx loops ......
What was your stop code?
OK so I ran cinebench and it seemed to go fine. I did change Digi+ PWR Mode to [X-Power]. Everything else is the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLER_K
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22074005/Xtr.../Cinebench.PNG
Thanks for running the test but your score is way off. As i get 11.4 on mine at 4.5GHZ. and you're 100 more mhz and less 2.02 score points. I don't understand what is wrong with cinebench. ThanksQuote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
lol:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by KILLER_K
So disappointed. :shakes: 4.8GHz passed 11 loops linx and crashed.
So close, but no cigar. :down:
Here's my settings, any suggestions? I know my vcore is high. In fact I was a little scared about it. Of course this is not 24/7, can I go any higher on the vcore for a bench to see if I can get this 4.8 or anything else to try.
Code:Target CPU Frequency 4800MHz
Target DRAM Frequency 1539MHz
LN2 Mode [Disabled]***
QPI Loadline Calibration [Enabled]***
Sync Mode []
AI Overclock Tuner [Manual]
OC From CPU level Up [Auto]
2D Performance Booster [Disabled]
CPU Ratio Setting [23.0]
CPU Turbo Power Limit [Disabled]
>CPU Configuration----------------------------
CPU Ratio Setting [25.0]
C1E Support [Disabled]
Hardware Prefetcher [Enabled]
Adjacent Cache Line Prefetch [Enabled]
MPS and ACPI MADT ordering [Modern ordering]
Intel(R) Virtualization Tech [Enabled]
CPU TM Function [Disabled]
Execute Disable Bit [Enabled]
Intel(R) HT Technology [Disabled]
*Active Processor Cores [All]
A20M [Disabled]
*Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) Tech [Disabled]
Intel(R) C-STATE Tech [Disabled]
C State package limit setting []
C1 Auto Demotion []
C3 Auto Demotion []
----------------------------------------------
BCLK Frequency [192]
PCIE Frequency [105]
DRAM Frequency [DDR3-1539MHz]
UCLK Frequency [2887MHz]
QPI Link Data Rate [Auto]
Memory Configuration Protect [Disabled]
>DRAM Timing Control--------------------------
CAS# Latency [ 8 DRAM Clock]
RAS# to CAS# Delay [ 8 DRAM Clock]
RAS# PRE Time [ 8 DRAM Clock]
RAS# ACT Time [24 DRAM Clock]
RAS# to RAS# Delay [Auto]
REF Cycle Time [Auto]
WRITE Recovery Time [Auto]
READ to PRE Time [Auto]
FOUR ACT WIN Time [Auto]
Back-To-BackCAS# Delay [Auto]
Timing Mode [1N]
Round Trip Latency on CHA [Auto]
Round Trip Latency on CHB [Auto]
Round Trip Latency on CHC [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(DD) [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(DR) [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(SR) [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DD) [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DR) [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(SR) [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DD) [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DR) [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(SR) [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DD) [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DR) [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(SR) [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
CPU Differential Amplitude [Auto]
CPU Clock Skew [Auto]
IOH Clock Skew [Auto]
------------ Extreme Engine Digi+ ------------
Digi+ PWR Mode [X-Power]
PWM Volt. Control [Auto]
Load-Line Calibration [Full Calibration]
CPU Voltage OCP [Enabled]
CPU PWM Frequency [Auto]
Extreme OV [Disabled]
Extreme OC [Auto]
CPU Voltage [1.60000]
CPU PLL Voltage [1.6032]
QPI/DRAM Core Voltage [1.3625]
DRAM Bus Voltage [Auto]
>DRAM REF Voltages----------------------------
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHC [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHC [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
IOH Voltage [1.2]
IOH PCIE Voltage [Auto]
ICH Voltage [Auto]
ICH PCIE Voltage [Auto]
---------- Spread Spectrum Control -----------
CPU Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
PCIE Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
***on-board jumper dependant
don't know, i was not in front of the computer, when i wentt back i saw bsod a rebooting..... at the moment i've got my rig offline due to other upgrades, i'll try again next week coming! :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by skuldarin
let me ask ... due to cpu v core, must the cpu pll value be near cpu voltage? in this case cpu voltage is 1.60 and ppl 1.60 too, like if i had to set cpu voltage for example at 1.55v should i set ppl near to 1.55v?Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
No. You should find a sweet spot for CPU PLL. Every CPU is different. It should depend on frequency too.Quote:
Originally Posted by p3gaz_001
Guys how do i enable QPI Loadline Calibration its grayed out in the bios useing 1301
Thanks
There is a jumper near 24pin ATX power connector.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nunzi
Well, I got real, real close to 4.8GHz. How does 4.794 sound?
I think 4.794 is just not 4.8 so I will have to try again some time but not for a while. I don't think I can handle the stress watching my beloved cpu run for 40min on linx at a vcore of 1.6v :eek:.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22074005/Xtr...tems/4.794.png
I want to apologize for interupting the OC conversations going on, but this is the only good RIIIE owners thread I know of, lol...
Warning: Non-OC question here, so please dont have a stroke, lol... Over the last few weeks I have noticed my Logitech Bluetooth usb dongle with my diNovo has been disconnecting all its devices every time I go to connect something to the hub it is on. The hub is a high quality Belkin USB hub designed to be built into computer/office desks and I have been using it without fail for several years now. Well apparently either the hub is going bad OR my logitech dongle is, either way my RIIIE is just to far away for the Logitech BT dongle to work in one of the rear usb ports.
Here's my question: The RIIIE came bundled with a RC Bluetooth module that appears like it may have sufficient power, but the stack that Asus provides is Toshiba, and they are outdated, and if I go to the Toshiba site they actually want $ for their newer version 8 and well I think thats crazy. I am wondering if anyone has been actually using Asus RC Bluetooth with Mice/Keybaords and what stacks seem to work best with this device? ALSO, will the supplied BT Module allow my diNovo to enter bios, select OS Boot partitions etc, like the Logitech dongle does?
Any advice on what stack to use with the supplied module would be appreciated, and again sorry for any interruption.
EDIT: Just noticed that this BT module can not be installed without loosening all the mobo screws, lol, so now I really need to know if this module is worth it, or should I just go to Walmart and buy a new BT dongle and hope it lets me enter the bios?
Thanks..... do most people use it ?Quote:
Originally Posted by donmarkoni
well, personally i still have to fight with that... btw my qpi pll is enabled :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Nunzi
I have super low voltage ram :)
http://img863.imageshack.us/img863/110/129v.png
Nice summertime settings, its a shame it wont do Cas 8 with any amount of extra voltage though.
BT module will not allow you to enter bios with a dinovo. I keep my keyboard on the logitech provided usb module. i use a bluetooth mx revolution, and I pair that to the bt module. works great in windows.Quote:
Originally Posted by SkOrPn
On another note, does 1301 have tRL?
You mean QPI LLC, right? ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by p3gaz_001
Don't do that, there is no need. How much heat does your RAM emit?Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavv
Last time I've seen a guy ran super low voltages on RAM, he ended up with a dead CPU. Might be a coincidence, but you never know.
No tRL. Maybe next BIOS will have best from both worlds (0xxx and 1xxx).Quote:
Originally Posted by zoson
you're temps look fine to me... on the hot side.... but what you've got there in that image is what i ran for 4.710ghz and for 2 and a half hours straight. as long as you have consistant ambient temp going on, you should be prefectly fine for 40 minutes.Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
as Don said, that looks risky specially when running 24gigs of ram with OVER 2x uncore and mildly high QPI link with such low VTT. you're ratio between Dram and VTT is fine... but they seem almost scary low for the speeds they support.Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavv
do you guys think my temp little bit high for noctua d-14 at 4.2 ghz 1.4v
if i get water cooling do you guys think i can get 4.7 ghz
http://img52.imageshack.us/img52/8985/42bios1005.jpg
right thanks! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by donmarkoni
I've been running 1.275v QPI @ 200 BCLK and 1600 Mhz ram since the day I installed this board, its been rock stable with both my Cas 6 2 Gb modules, and Cas 9 4 Gb modules.Quote:
Originally Posted by skuldarin
These 4 Gb modules are working great at 1.3v Dram, but they dont get any better timings from more volts.
2000 Mhz ram wouldnt work even on 2133 Mhz rated 2 Gb sticks up to 1.5v QPI, so I simply stuck these 1600 Mhz 4 Gb modules in instead and leave the QPI at 1.275v.
I always thought that running at lower voltages is prefereable as long as the components are stable.
[QUOTE=donmarkoni;4826744]You mean QPI LLC, right? ;)
LOL Thanks Guys:)
1.4v is very high for 4.2GHz.Quote:
Originally Posted by lioncool
If you actually need 1.4v for 4.2GHz... You will never hit 4.7GHz without sub ambient coolant. That chip is horrible.
For 4.2GHz, my i7 970 needs 1.3625v.
Alright, so i've been still trying to get to my goal on 2000mhz for mem and i keep hitting the same wall... oddly enough the same wall on 2 different towers with the same hardware in them...
i can get it to boot to windows just fine at 2000mhz... even with uncore set to 2x (anything from 1.5 to 2x will boot just fine). problem is, it's ALWAYS 8 out of 12 gigs that comes up. it seems no matter what i try nothing seems to help so i'm hoping someone might see something i'm missing... here's what i've got so far:
i've tried different uncores, different RTL's (if i go up 2 or down 2 channel B drops all together), different tRL's (channels A and C do fine on normal, Channel B like -1 most of the time), different REF voltages for DRAM (seems to have best results with +0), different VTT (seems to like 1.4125v). i have mem timings to 11-11-11 even though 10-10-10 come up with the same results... alway 8 out of 12 on boot. BIOS and Windows see's 8 gigs, CPUz sees all 12... i'm gettin kinda stumped on this :shrug: for the time being i've just left the main timings set a little loose to try and help.
Code:Target CPU Frequency 3400MHz
Target DRAM Frequency 2004MHz
LN2 Mode [Disabled]***
QPI Loadline Calibration [Enabled]***
Sync Mode []
AI Overclock Tuner [Manual]
OC From CPU level Up [Auto]
2D Performance Booster [Disabled]
CPU Ratio Setting [17.0]
CPU Turbo Power Limit [Disabled]
>CPU Configuration----------------------------
CPU Ratio Setting [17.0]
C1E Support [Disabled]
Hardware Prefetcher [Enabled]
Adjacent Cache Line Prefetch [Enabled]
MPS and ACPI MADT ordering [Modern ordering]
Intel(R) Virtualization Tech [Enabled]
CPU TM Function [Disabled]
Execute Disable Bit [Enabled]
Intel(R) HT Technology [Disabled]
*Active Processor Cores [All]
A20M [Disabled]
*Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) Tech [Disabled]
Intel(R) C-STATE Tech [Disabled]
C State package limit setting []
C1 Auto Demotion []
C3 Auto Demotion []
----------------------------------------------
BCLK Frequency [200]
PCIE Frequency [105]
DRAM Frequency [DDR3-2004MHz]
UCLK Frequency [4009MHz]
QPI Link Data Rate [7212mhz]
Memory Configuration Protect [Disabled]
>DRAM Timing Control--------------------------
CAS# Latency [ 11 DRAM Clock]
RAS# to CAS# Delay [ 11 DRAM Clock]
RAS# PRE Time [ 11 DRAM Clock]
RAS# ACT Time [30 DRAM Clock]
RAS# to RAS# Delay [Auto]
REF Cycle Time [132 DRAM Clock]
WRITE Recovery Time [Auto]
READ to PRE Time [Auto]
FOUR ACT WIN Time [Auto]
Back-To-BackCAS# Delay [Auto]
Timing Mode [1N]
Round Trip Latency on CHA [71]
Round Trip Latency on CHB [73]
Round Trip Latency on CHC [74]
tRL - Channel A [normal]
tRL - Channel B [-1]
tRL - Channel C [normal]
WRITE To READ Delay(DD) [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(DR) [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(SR) [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DD) [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DR) [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(SR) [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DD) [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DR) [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(SR) [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DD) [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DR) [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(SR) [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
CPU Differential Amplitude [Auto]
CPU Clock Skew [Auto]
IOH Clock Skew [Auto]
------------ Extreme Engine Digi+ ------------
Digi+ PWR Mode [X-Power]
PWM Volt. Control [Auto]
Load-Line Calibration [Full Calibration]
CPU Voltage OCP [Enabled]
CPU PWM Frequency [Auto]
Extreme OV [Disabled]
Extreme OC [Auto]
CPU Voltage [auto]
CPU PLL Voltage [1.81]
QPI/DRAM Core Voltage [1.4125]
DRAM Bus Voltage [1.709]
>DRAM REF Voltages----------------------------
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHA [+0mV]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHA [+0mV]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHB [+0mV]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHB [+0mV]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHC [+0mV]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHC [+0mV]
----------------------------------------------
IOH Voltage [1.25]
IOH PCIE Voltage [Auto]
ICH Voltage [1.25]
ICH PCIE Voltage [Auto]
---------- Spread Spectrum Control -----------
CPU Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
PCIE Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
EDIT: here's some added mem details:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y71/Emobulus/mem.jpg
With them RTLS it's hardly worth running 2000mhz speeds... I'm getting weird results with the Sniper kit... 1600mhz is close to or as fast as 1866Mhz And 1600C7 is faster than 2133Mhz CL9 ( the latter requires RTL tuning to be stable )
http://users.telenet.be/OAP2/Snipers...pi2133B2B4.jpg
i can hit 1600 CL6 @ 6-8-6-21-72 T1 just fine... but anything over the stock 1866 just gives me problem after problem. at first it thought it was uncore issues but my cpu boots just fine even when i force uncore to 4200... but when it comes to the memory it just doesn't care to work with me.
Take the CAS 6 DDR3-1600 option. The CAS time is simply too slow at CAS 10/11 DDR3-2000 to compete with that on any level - the bandwidth won't make up for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by skuldarin
Since you guys are talking about memory, let me ask you this. Would it be better for me to run my ram at 8-8-8-24 / 2000 or 7-7-7-22 / 1900? It's stable either way with my vtt at 1.3v.
use aida64 benchmark and check the result yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
i don't mean to be rude... self help is good...left hand or right hand
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
7-7-7-22 @ DD3-1900 is faster on every read transfer than 8-8-8-22 @ DDR3-2000.
Beautifully said. I agree and encourage the same :) ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondacity
Not rude at all. Thanks, I'll download it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondacity
Awesome!Quote:
Originally Posted by Raja@ASUS
so i've got 1700 going at 6-8-6-23-72 T1 with RTL's at 60-62-63
i was trying for 1800 but as soon as i start hitting the 1765-1780 range BIOS starts to just freeze. any ideas on that?
EDIT: here'sthe bench results on this setup:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y71/Emobulus/mem2.jpg
Hi
Can someone please let me know whether these memory speed scores are prittay good for Corsair Dominator GT 6GB DDR3 PC3-16000C8 2000MHz
or not and if there's anything else I can do that might improve the speed a bit more.
Thanks.
http://oi51.tinypic.com/24bn5p5.jpg
http://oi56.tinypic.com/2uhqqvk.jpg
Nvm......
i'd say it's not bad when i compare it to my results...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylver123
your read is about 700mb/s faster but my write and copy are faster...
in this case:
1700mhz @ 6-8-6-23-72 T1 is faster than 1950mhz @ 7-7-7-18-(x) T1 for write / copy. roughly the same for read with favoritism to 1950 CL7.
Which is more important, read, write or copy?Quote:
Originally Posted by skuldarin
I`m sure I have read the lower your memory latency is the better.
Yes, lower is better. In your case after seeing the differences id go to cas6 and then get your highest stable speed then and bench. You'd probably blow my results out of the water sense your sticks are cl8 to begin with, mine start at cl9 and like stagered timings.
What's the difference between the Rampage III Extreme and the Rampage III Black Edition? Anything significant?
:confused:
My GT's suck big time. I see people with the same RAM (CMT6GX3M3A2000C8 ) showing some nice results. Mine doesn't even post with CR 1T or CL7 after ~1850mhz :(
Maybe bad revision :shrug: (Week 23/2010)
Here's my "sweet spot" for 24/7
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...7&d=1303577484
Mainly the plug-in NIC and Audio card (aka Thunderbolt) plus a couple of hardware changes to help attain higher stable QPI frequencies for benchmarking.Quote:
Originally Posted by traveler
That would be nice, would have expected better from the Rampage III Extreme though. My Rampage 2 Extreme could do better BCLK and higher QPI Data Link rate. IMO you guys should stop basking in the reflected glory of the one good Rampage Extreme you made (the original X48 board) and actually produce excellent board worth their price tag and that are a cut above the competition. Nothing could touch the original X48 REX and its looked back on as the best X48 made, but the R2E and the R3E can be easily beaten by other boards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raja@ASUS
nah you're not the only one. like i stated earlier, mine wont go higher than the stock 1866 without having issues. have you tried stagered settings?Quote:
Originally Posted by McDown
i've got 1800 @ 6-9-6-22-88 T1 and it's blazing pretty nicely
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y71/Emobulus/mem3.jpg
You could probably gain some bandwidth by lowering a few of your timings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylver123
Here are some settings for you to shoot for:
http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r...da64-42-20.jpg
http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r...hz-LL-CPUT.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raja@ASUS
Thanks. I also notice there is no PCI slot available on the Rampage III Black. I wonder why they did that.
So everything in this thread would apply then to the Rampage III Black then?
:cool:
The Thunderbolt card uses a PCIe slot. Most decent add-in peripheral cards are now available in PCIe flavor, so it makes sense to utilize the tech exclusively on a flagship product.Quote:
Originally Posted by traveler
Alright, is there any of the recent updated BIOS that has tRL's yet other than the beta 0003?
seems almost all the BSOD's i'm getting while trying to test for stability all have to do hardware aurguments. i keep getting stop code 024, 0F4, 03E and every once in a while 01A. i have a suspicion that it may be do to the beta BIOS + not having the updated raid controller. so does any of the more recent BIOS with the newer raid contolers have the tRL's put in it... or is ASUS still slacking about on that key point still?
Try BIOS 1301. The tRL fucntion was added to BIOS 003 at my behest as an experiment to see if manual offsets were required to prevent memory channels dropping out. By default the tRL values are auto set and should default to the correct value without the need for user intervention.Quote:
Originally Posted by skuldarin
1301 adds a memory rechcheck function at boot time to retrain clock skews. If everything works as it should, tRL won't be needed.
-Raja
awesome thanks
tRL's have been kinda useful, not a HUGE difference but it did help on a few settings. going over +3 or -3 would normally result in a complete drop of whatever channel it was set to, but it still helped on my channel B drop out issues.
Those dropout issues could also have been due to insufficient training duration or pushing the memory too far. Try 1301 with speeds your memory and IMC is capable of running and see how you get on.Quote:
Originally Posted by skuldarin
-Raja
OH! i may be missing it... but where is the PCH voltage control? ever since i built both my towers, i constantly have to unplug and replug my mouse back in piriotically and i was going to try increasing I/O voltages but i dont seem to see it. it also seems odd that my BIOS seems to always register 3 keyboards and 2 mice... when the only I/O connections i have are the ONE keyboard and the ONE mouse... sound goes through HDMI on my setup so i'm curious as to why it sees all these I/O connections.
ICH voltage control.Quote:
Originally Posted by skuldarin
Installed 1301 per Raja's comments about tRL and Memory Recheck. With 1301 and Memory Recheck enabled, my memory is detected correctly as if I manually set tRL to -1/-1/-1.
Now when are we going to see a bios with the new marvell firmware?
Just thought I'd comment re: my voltage measuring before of vdimm which I measured as high vs BIOS. Well after a new DMM battery, its actually reading spot on what I set in BIOS to the nearest 0.005v. Much better than I thought before! Also makes my new ram kits appear much better than I thought when I first tested too as I was only feeding them 1.61v :rolleyes:
Might be worth going back and editing that other post where you thought the voltages were high and it had something to do with reviews.Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
OK, I did it. Got my 4.8. Was with bios 1301.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22074005/Xtr...ms/4.812.8.png
1.6v + 80C temps + full load = degradation(fast or slow depending on your torture...)
stability tests on these newer cpus don't guarantee it will survive ...
1,6 volt is quite high for 4,8 ghz.
Cant you go any lower then that?
Not a 24/7 run. 4.5 @ about 1.43v with temps in the 60c's + full load are for my daily use.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondacity
Nope, can't pass linx without really high vcore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rasmus66
Here's my settings:
Code:Target CPU Frequency 4800MHz
Target DRAM Frequency 1539MHz
LN2 Mode [Disabled]***
QPI Loadline Calibration [Enabled]***
Ai Overclock Tuner [Manual]
OC From CPU level Up [Auto]
2D Performance Booster [Disabled]
CPU Ratio Setting [25.0]
CPU Turbo Power Limit [Disabled]
>CPU Configuration----------------------------
CPU Ratio Setting [25.0]
C1E Support [Disabled]
Hardware Prefetcher [Enabled]
Adjacent Cache Line Prefetch [Enabled]
MPS and ACPI MADT ordering [Modern ordering]
Intel(R) Virtualization Tech [Enabled]
CPU TM Function [Disabled]
Execute Disable Bit [Enabled]
Intel(R) HT Technology [Disabled]
*Active Processor Cores [All]
A20M [Disabled]
*Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) Tech [Disabled]
Intel(R) C-STATE Tech [Disabled]
C State package limit setting []
C1 Auto Demotion []
C3 Auto Demotion []
----------------------------------------------
BCLK Frequency [192]
PCIE Frequency [105]
DRAM Frequency [DDR3-1539MHz]
UCLK Frequency [3079MHz]
QPI Link Data Rate [Auto]
Memory Recheck [Enabled]
Memory Configuration Protect [Disabled]
>DRAM Timing Control--------------------------
CAS# Latency [ 7 DRAM Clock]
RAS# to CAS# Delay [ 7 DRAM Clock]
RAS# PRE Time [ 7 DRAM Clock]
RAS# ACT Time [22 DRAM Clock]
RAS# to RAS# Delay [Auto]
REF Cycle Time [Auto]
WRITE Recovery Time [Auto]
READ to PRE Time [Auto]
FOUR ACT WIN Time [Auto]
Back-To-BackCAS# Delay [Auto]
Timing Mode [1N]
Round Trip Latency on CHA [Auto]
Round Trip Latency on CHB [Auto]
Round Trip Latency on CHC [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(DD) [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(DR) [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(SR) [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DD) [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DR) [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(SR) [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DD) [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DR) [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(SR) [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DD) [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DR) [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(SR) [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
CPU Differential Amplitude [Auto]
CPU Clock Skew [Auto]
IOH Clock Skew [Auto]
------------ Extreme Engine Digi+ ------------
Digi+ PWR Mode [X-Power]
PWM Volt. Control [Auto]
Load-Line Calibration [Full Calibration]
CPU Voltage OCP [Enabled]
CPU PWM Frequency [Auto]
Extreme OV [Disabled]
Extreme OC [Auto]
CPU Voltage [1.59375]
CPU PLL Voltage [1.40450]
QPI/DRAM Core Voltage [1.36250]
DRAM Bus Voltage [Auto]
>DRAM REF Voltages----------------------------
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHC [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHC [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
IOH Voltage [1.2]
IOH PCIE Voltage [Auto]
ICH Voltage [Auto]
ICH PCIE Voltage [Auto]
---------- Spread Spectrum Control -----------
CPU Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
PCIE Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
***on-board jumper dependant
So am I reading this right? 2000 @ 8-8-8 is faster than 1800 @ 7-7-7.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22074005/Xtr...em%20bench.PNG
yep :)
*** EDIT: I found this thread on another forum, do you think this is safe?
http://www.bios-mods.com/forum/Threa...01-Mod-request
Is there a way to manually update to the newest Marvell BIOS firmware?
Check the asus bios thread. MrToad has been doing such mods and people are reporting good things.Quote:
Originally Posted by sprayingmango
Done, removed erroneous results and apologized for the insinuation. Seen it happen on older boards (P965/P45 era) but this one is spot on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raja@ASUS
Was your uncore the same for both runs? If not, this difference may be mostly attributed to it being higher for the DDR3-2010MHz CL8 run. You have to have the same uncore to really compare ram clocks and their effect on bandwidth and SPI32M etc.
This is DDR3-1600 6-6-6-18 | 1T | tRFC 60 | 3600MHz uncore (my 24/7 settings) - this has better bandwidth than your screen of DDR3-1800 7-7-7-22 1T and is getting close to your bandwidth at DDR3-2010MHz 8-8-8-24 1T.
http://i720.photobucket.com/albums/w...orenewkit1.png
Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
In his earlier screenshots we can see that he has been keeping Uncore at 2x. Maybe he's like me and can't get 4ghz uncore, but regardless... His bandwidth is very low for both of those settings.Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
I would guess that his subtimings are untuned.
tWR, tRFC, tRRD, tFAW, and tRTP are big ones! If I leave them on Auto, instead of 21k/19k/20k read/write/copy I get 18k/16k/17k with 2000MHz ram 3.6ghz Uncore.
AIDA , Everest readouts also depend a lot on how you configure the CPU bios settings ( C states and co ) Same when comparing different versions..; sometimes bandwith readouts are over 2K different :(
And strangely sometimes the gained boost by tweaking, hardly reflect in eg SuperPi 32...
Do you mean multiple, like 2x or 1.5x? Changing the bclk to get the diff. ram speed changes the uncore.Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
What am I missing here? Can you just key in the speed you want and I just never tried, thinking you had
to chose from what is available in the drop down menu? I can't go see at the moment cause my daughter
is using it for an online class.
Not quite 2x. I've been keeping it between 1.5x and 2x. Should I try to see if it will hold at 2x? As far as the subtimings,Quote:
Originally Posted by zoson
ya, those are on auto. I don't know enough about tuning the ram.
Bloomfield used to require that uclk be 2x memory speed. Gulftown only requires uclk to be 1.5x memory speed. However, uclk is the speed of the memory controller, so if you increase uclk you will see better memory performance. Some gulftowns can hit 2x uclk, others like mine can not. Finding your uclk should be a separate endeavor from finding max bclk and max memory speed, then you dial it in as close as possible with your max bclk.Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
CPU-Tweaker can reveal the multiplier in use for your uclk. For example, with 200 bclk and 3600mhz uclk, you're using the 18x uclk multiplier(or 1.8x memory speed). This is right in line with 200 bclk with 2Ghz ram because you would use the x5 memory multiplier(ddr speed = multiplier x2), making 2x memory speed the 20x multiplier or 4000mhz.
As for your sub timings, if you click the spd button on cput, it will show you the extended subtimings for your memory. All I did was individually change them one at a time from auto to their xmp setting, then run memtest to see if it was stable. If it wasn't I would increment that setting by 1 in bios and repeat until I was fully stable with all my timings tightened as much as possible. Lots of trial and error, but it was a single sitting on a weekend.
I didn't bother with any timings not listed on the spd xmp profile.
since the topic is memory, this are my settings for a bloomfield and diff mobo. how can i increase the read/write speeds.:shrug:
http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o...cap4500mhz.jpg
well that's good news:up:Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
I concur. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeghoofd
Here are my results with daily settings as example:
http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/1...000777201t.jpg
Code:Target CPU Frequency 4600MHz
Target DRAM Frequency 2005MHz
LN2 Mode: Disabled***
QPI Loadline Calibration: Enabled***
Sync Mode [Enabled] ** Gone since BIOS 0003/1301
AI Overclock Tuner [Manual]
OC From CPU level Up [Auto]
2D Performance Booster [Disabled]
CPU Ratio Setting [23.0]
CPU Turbo Power Limit [Disabled]
>CPU Configuration----------------------------
CPU Ratio Setting [23.0]
C1E Support [Enabled]
Hardware Prefetcher [Enabled]
Adjacent Cache Line Prefetcher [Enabled]
MPS and ACPI MADT ordering [Modern]
Intel(R) Virtualization Tech [Enabled]
CPU TM Function [Disabled]
Execute Disable Bit [Enabled]
Intel(R) HT Technology [Enabled]
Active Processor Cores [All]
A20M [Disabled]
Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) Tech [Enabled]
Performance/Watt select [Power]
Intel(R) C-STATE Tech [Enabled]
C State package limit setting [Auto]
C1 Auto Demotion [Enabled]
C3 Auto Demotion [Enabled]
----------------------------------------------
BCLK Frequency [200]
PCIE Frequency [105]
DRAM Frequency [2005]
UCLK Frequency [4009]
QPI Link Data Rate [7218]
Memory Recheck [Disabled] ** BIOS 1301
Memory Configuration Protect [Disabled]
>DRAM Timing Control--------------------------
CAS# Latency 7 [7]
RAS# to CAS# Delay 7 [7]
RAS# PRE Time 7 [7]
RAS# ACT Time 20 [20]
RAS# to RAS# Delay 4 [4]
REF Cycle Time 72 [72]
WRITE Recovery Time 10 [10]
READ to PRE Time 6 [6]
FOUR ACT WIN Time 20 [20]
Back-To-BackCAS# Delay 0 [Auto]
Timing Mode 1N [1N]
Round Trip Latency on CHA 53 [53]
Round Trip Latency on CHB 55 [55]
Round Trip Latency on CHC 57 [57]
tRL Channel A [-2] ** BIOS 0003
tRL Channel B [-2] ** BIOS 0003
tRL Channel C [-2] ** BIOS 0003
WRITE To READ Delay(DD) 8 [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(DR) 8 [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(SR) 19 [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DD) 8 [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DR) 8 [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(SR) 8 [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DD) 7 [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DR) 6 [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(SR) 4 [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DD) 7 [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DR) 7 [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(SR) 4 [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
CPU Differential Amplitude [Auto]
CPU Clock Skew [Auto]
IOH Clock Skew [Auto]
------------ Extreme Engine Digi+ ------------
Digi+ PWR Mode [T-Balanced]
PWR Volt. Control [Auto]
Load-Line Calibration [Full]
CPU Voltege OCP [Disabled]
CPU PWM Frequency [Auto]
Extreme OV [Enabled]*
Extreme OC [Auto]
CPU Voltage 1.415 [1.42500]
CPU PLL Voltage 1.349 [1.35150]
QPI/DRAM Core Voltage 1.376 [1.38750]
DRAM Bus Voltage 1.773 [1.77550]
>DRAM REF Voltages----------------------------
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHC [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHC [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
IOH Voltage 1.204 [1.20575]
IOH PCIE Voltage 1.508 [Auto]
ICH Voltage 1.111 [Auto]
ICH PCIE Voltage [Auto]
*QPI Voltage OCP [Disabled]
*IOH Voltage OCP [Enabled]
*DRAM Voltage OCP [Disabled]
*QPI PWM Frequency [Auto]
*IOH PWM Frequency [Auto]
*DRAM PWM Frequency [Auto]
---------- Spread Spectrum Control -----------
CPU Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
DRAM Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
***on-board jumper dependant
glad to see aida being used .... :D
i played around taking Zozon's advice of using memory's XMP settings and punching numbers manually and enabling C states.
i have to say i under estimated my memory.
http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o...00mhztimed.jpg
P.S.......:p:
sorry for posting here results of a diff motherboard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by donmarkoni
Isn't that voltage too high?
Edit: Oh ya, I remember now. Just have to keep the DRAM Bus and QPI/DRAM Core voltages within 0.5V
Yep, that's right. Also, I'm not afraid to run my Hypers up to 1.85V, but that's just crazy old me. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
EDIT: OH! PAGE 200! Congratulations to everybody! Lot of great info and results in this thread. :up:
When coming out of sleep my computer crashes every time. After reboot everything works fine, it happens only coming out of sleep. I have had many crashes while running stress tests and finding the best settings. Did most likely something get corrupted from the crashing or did I most likely damage something with voltages too high or something?
I think ima try those timings. I have the same set, and I've hit 2100 at 8-9-8 2T already.Quote:
Originally Posted by skuldarin
I'm running 2000 at 8-9-8 1T at 1.66V.
The tRCD is important to keep it at 9, or 1 level higher than your CL. C8-8-8 doesn't run no matter what, C7-8-7 doesn't always work. C7-9-7 works perfect.
I haven't tried 1600 6-9-6, but it looks nice.
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/1789915.png
Yeah. mine looks a tad just like that, a bit soft, but not overly soft.Quote:
Originally Posted by CryptiK
I have the same lens, and it performs great on my 5D mark II, I guess thats why its sharper. My other L's 70-200 f/4, 24-105's aren't as sharp. Prime ftw I guess :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Cornel
Waiting patiently for a 35 1.4 L to come from santa :)
Oh yes, lets do so.
Sorry for offtopic :P
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5206/...1eb1d054_z.jpg
5D II, 100 f/2.8 L IS
Do you have SSD's? Is your bios updated? My pc does the same sometimes, it doesn't crash, but rather it hangs.Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
It has to do with the sleep mode of the ssd's in raid, RST 10 fixes this I believe.
AND WHAT?
HOW 2 GET THESE?
http://www.abload.de/img/_dsc8200ko10.jpg
You have to enable either 'Extreme OV' or 'Extreme OC'. I forget which one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookiesowns
I had also asked earlier regarding what the different 'PWM Frequency' settings mean. I think they were Auto, 1x, 1.33x :confused:
It's actually Extreme OV, I believe those settings are for the ICH, QPI PWM settings.Quote:
Originally Posted by spoolindsm127
PWM frequency has alot more settings, in khz
It's Extreme OV.Quote:
Originally Posted by spoolindsm127
QPI PWM Frequency acts exactly the same way as CPU PWM Frequency. It increases the number of times the power FETs switch per second to generate the clock signal. I think intel spec is default 250KHz. But who knows what asus is using as base. We would need to measure it. It might be 500KHz. In any case. If 250 is base, that makes 1.33x 332KHz, or if it's 500KHz 1.33x is 665KHz.
A higher PWM Frequency lowers output ripple, but makes a lot more work for your FETs(lots more heat).
My guess is auto selects 1x below a certain BCLK and 1.33x above a certain BCLK. I played with QPI PWM Freq hoping it would allow me to lower my QPI voltage, but it did not help. Maybe at extreme bclk.
S3 suspends to RAM, if the memory isn't fully stable then it will crash coming out of sleep. Peg your OC back a little and see if that cures the issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
Back to default settings and still crashes coming out of sleep. It will bring the desktop up and sit there for a min than crash or when I try to open something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raja@ASUS
I booted from a live linux CD and put it to sleep. Coming out of sleep was no problem, but is that maybe because it's already running from the ram?
Yes, that is what I was referring to in regards to the Auto, 1x, 1.33x settings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookiesowns
I knew those PWM settings were in relation to some other setting. But I didn't know exactly what.Quote:
Originally Posted by zoson
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raja@ASUS
Found the problem. It's the new rst drivers. 10.5.0.1015 and 10.5.0.1022. Should have remembered that I recently updated to the 1015. Went back to 10.1.2.1004 and all is right with the world. Tried the 1022 and it causes the crashing too, so it's 1004 on my system.Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
10.1.0.1008 still works for coming out of sleep also.Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
EDIT: Oh, nevermind... I see that those versions you linked are 32bit and not 64bit... 10.1.0.1008 won't work for you unless you're running 64bit. ;)
Yes, 10.1.0.1008 will work for coming out of sleep. The one I went back to is newer than that one, 10.1.2.1004. I know it's easy to over look the "2" in 10.1.2.1004 and mistake the 1008 one as being newer than the 1004.Quote:
Originally Posted by zoson
They all are for 32/64bit.
Where did you find that? I only get 1008 from intel's site when I click on win7 x64 downloads...Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
http://www.station-drivers.com/page/intel%20raid.htmQuote:
Originally Posted by zoson
Oh, I see. They are non WHQL. I think I'll stick with 1008...Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
10.1.5.1001 and 10.1.2.1004 are WHQL and they are newer than the 1008, the 1015 and 1022 aren't WHQLQuote:
Originally Posted by zoson
It's also interesting that when I go to devise manager and update the driver by telling it to search the internet
to find the driver it uses 10.1.5.1015 which is not WHQL.
I just tried to do an update via searching the internet but it said i had the latest driver.Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
Ya, well, don't know what to say about that, but I think we have beat this one into the ground. lolQuote:
Originally Posted by zoson
I think your update may suggest 1015 because you installed it previously and it's still in your rollback cache.Quote:
Originally Posted by zinsco
According to intel 1008 is the latest WHQL... That's all microsoft should have for updates.
My pic was taken with a 24-105 F4L.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookiesowns
Nice 35mm, you'll have some fun with that. Primes are where its at :up:
Sorry for OT :cool:
WOOHOO! got DDR-2000 to finally work!
sitting now at 2010mhz @ CL8 (8-10-8-24-98 T1) and doing about 22-23k read, 20-21k write, 22-23k copy AIDA64. i'm also trying it at 2x uncore at 4019mhz.
i had to enable adjusting all the PWM points. had to put CPU PWM to 1000 and put QPI and DRAM PWM adjustments to 1.33 to get it to work but it worked...
Well it's about time. :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by skuldarin
Do you mind posting your bios settings?
I flashed to 1208 BIOS and get BSODs after 30 minutes or so of playing games, then get the CPU over temperature error, press F1 to continue !
When I get into BIOS I see 63-68 C CPU temp, what is wrong ?
your cpu heatsink is not installed properlyQuote:
Originally Posted by minaelromany