I actually started a thread over in the water cooling section of EOCF. I'll try to bring this thread over to XS sometime this weekend.
Ok, we're here now: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=256162 :up:
Printable View
I actually started a thread over in the water cooling section of EOCF. I'll try to bring this thread over to XS sometime this weekend.
Ok, we're here now: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=256162 :up:
Now that hes banned this will never finish. I kind of that it wouldnt anyway. Who in their right mind would get tons of waterblocks to review and never finish. He obviously had the time. I think some sketchy stuff was involed and thus this never made a close. Too bad, soo many views, so little accomplished...
Uhm, dude, if you take a lot at the previous pages, you'll notice a lot of the results are already public. And Skinnee is also still writing the review, it's just so much information ;). For Skinnee, this is probably only a bit of bad publicity, and he might be deterred to do some OC'ing for a while. But he'll be back in two weeks anyway.
Wait, so he spends his own spare time and money to do these reviews for us, only for you to critisize him because he's taking so long?
If you're so unhappy about his working pace, why don't you go write your own extensive review with 8 different blocks, 10 different configurations, probably around 5 mounts per block, and a crapload of more stuff :rolleyes:?
The question is not acceptable.
There is no better resource on the net than Skinee labs for parting out your build, each review contains data and information that will not be found anywhere else... and he does it for us at no charge.
He should be commended, not questioned.
I understand though why some are frustrated, but that's due to a small miscommunication and a minor mistake by Skinnee. Originally, this thread was meant as an announcement that there would be a GTX480 block roundup, but because of the large discussion that started here, Skinnee decided to keep it to this thread. It's not uncommon for a review to take up to a month, especially when he's busy. This is the first time however that we've had a heads-up that he was starting testing. Which meant we had to wait untill he was finished, whereas usually, we would only know about the review until it was released. So it's understandable that some people get impatient, that's perfectly normal. We're just telling you, scottc, not to snap at Skinnee, because of your impatience.
I wonder how much those VRM temperatures you've measured with that probe correlate with the real tempeature of MOSFETs. If I were to make such a test of waterblocks I would get a pyrometer with laser pointer and measure the temperature on the back of PCB right under one of MOSFETs. It is also possible to measure the temperature of memory chips. Such a measure would strictly correlate with the real temperature of the component on the face side of PCB.
I can only hope that the other companies (EK etc..) start to design their VGA water blocks for TIM use instead of using thermal pads since it makes such a large difference on the RAM and VRMs!
Waterlogged: yet imho best results are reachable only with using TIM, and taking #1 or #2 position of performance might give extra boost to sales justifying a bit those risks.
Yet ppl automatically gravitate towards EK because of the bling factor so does it really matter? I'm not disagreeing about the lower temps to be gained but when you already get a fair share of sales, why risk that if ppl all of a sudden start bricking cards for marginally (if not negligibly) better performance?
It would be cool to throw in results of core only gpu and sinks for comparison. That will cut down the myth if any of core>fc for performance.
Or people could just use better performing thermal pads :shrug:
Investigation of that is for another test and another day (though nothing on either of our radar's), but the provided thermal pads are definitely not all equal among the manus.
That's for another test, which is being put into motion :)
The best tests I've ever seen on the matter are gabe's MCW80 vs. MCW60 vs. eVGA FTW block, where the core blocks + unisink were better for GPU temps. So I'd say that, until further notice, core blocks are probably better :yepp:
I don't want to drag it further, but i can't prevent myself from letting the community know that i don't like the time the results went public...