Ah, that makes things a bit clearer.
Printable View
Ah, that makes things a bit clearer.
Come on guys...
1 - Unwinder already said he wouldn't add voltage sliders to RT;
2 - He said he is not helping EVGA with their new software to control voltage;
3 - If you think he is lying, you have all the right to do so, but keep it to yourselves...
4 - If you are really willing to have voltage control sliders, you can do a program to attain such, now that all of us know how...
maybe you missed this part, I'm not trying to change unwinders mind.
Nice avoidance ;)
I'm not whining. All I said was he was lucky he didn't use a slider. UNWINDER told me sliders are dangerous. You're saying UNWINDER gave me wrong info? Sounds like it to me. The next time I tell someone they were lucky for not using a slider are you gonna say the same?
You avoided it for DAYS because on ONE DAY I posted 6 msgs in regards to sliders? That makes sense. Sounds more like you're trying to dramatise this and make XS mods think "oh no, we losing visitors 'cos of this dude".
Come on admit it, like you'd honestly stay out of a thread you're really interested in because one guy is asking a few questions. You really need to work on some better excuses mate :ROTF:
Besides which, all I see are worshippers trying to look cool infront of someone else by giving me a hard time. All I said was what UNWINDER told me, that sliders can cause fried cards and now you're all moving in for the kill again.
C'mon guys....I've taken UNWINDERS excuse and am accepting it.....why can't you lot do the same. Am I not allowed to agree with unwinder now is that it?
You really have some serious issue. If a person says no, that means no. He can say no without any reason. He is doing the program on his freetime without any charge. He can give any answer he wants without owing anything to anyone. He doesnt even need to give a reason when he refused the request.If he was to answer only no to you demand without any reason, would you whine this much too?
If a girl refused to go to bed with you, do you whine this much too or do accept the no answer?
when is this program cuming out ???
See this guys? This is lost in all the BS and people begging for something they've already been told NO. What part of NO did people not seem to understnad? That was not open for debate. He said no and that was final. Getting on somebody's last nerve is the best way to asure it will never happen even if he was on the fence about it which I am certain he is not. If it ever would've been considered in the future I can say without a doubt that it won't now.
A lone post is asking a question on topic and you can barely see it for all the arguing over something that is NOT gonna happen.
Yep, EVGA said soon, so we'll have one. At least for cards with EVGA BIOS's on certain cards that will support it. That's all this thread is concerned with. Knowing EVGA, and the fact that they said "soon", I'd bet it would be inside a month. We probably won't hear anything else until it's released since what was shown was a beta already. However long it takes to test it and work any bugs out, but from the looks of it, they are on it.
Lost???? no it wasn't. such a drama queen.
if you're so concerned with posts being overlooked and my asking questions....why do you need to wade in here hours after my last post (when other guys have told me to stop posting so I did) only to drag it up again, post the same comments as others and then hog up half the page with your paragraph and the other half with that repulsive sig?
Another "Look how I defend you unwinder" fan-boy...how pathetic :down:
I've clearly stated I accept unwinders reasoning. No need to repost asking me to accept it.
Anyone who posts any comment towards me again in this thread (except for a mod) will clearly be trying to extend this.
Does it even really matter that much what Unwinder does? Not to spur on any flaming or whatnot, but you have to think about this realistically.
The demand for a gui based voltage tuner is obviously high amongst enthusiasts. So one would have to reason that
someone will make such a tool or mod. Unwinder has said he doesn't want to, and nothing we do will change that.
Let it be, and give it some time. I'm sure you'll have a program that suits your liking sometime relatively soon.
I agree with Unwinder and thank him for all of his work on such a great program. Go to Guru3d forums and see what he has to deal with. Why should he have to deal with this crap from people that feel like he owes them something for releacing a great free app. :shrug:
It's just wrong. I mean really what the F.
Such a great thread completely derailed. :shakes:
Banhammer?
Didnt see it anywhere but will this support Cards like the G80,s and G92=8800gt?
At present no there isn't any support for these cards unless someone is willing to find the voltage reg datasheets if they are available and figure out whether there are writable voltage selection registers or not.
Right now support is mainly for cards with Volterra VT11xx VR's.
Well it looks like Evga Voltage Tuner is not going to be much help to me after all. After following justageek95 guide I've sucesfuly managed to change the vcore of my gtx 280 to 1.3V. Too bad it look like the shaders on this card fare rather poorly and top out at 1512 regardless of the voltage, I tried 1.3, 1.25 and 1.24 now and the shaders are the limiting factor to my max core speed of 756. Also even .1 increase to vcore really increased the temps even with a 100% fan, 78C is no joke.
Well at least I gained 20ish on the core, thats something.
How could I up the voltage on a pair of 9800gx2's???
Where is the logic in triggering OVP in this situation? As far as I understand VT1165 principles, the sense of OVP is preventing output voltage from going beyond Vnominal + OVP (hardwired and defined with configuration resistors). Vnominal is output nominal voltage, i.e. the voltage VRM is expecting to see on output, this is the value you are seeing at RT's hardware monitoring graphs and this is the value you're programming into VRM. So for example if VRM is programmed to give 1.4V on output and resistors define OVP of 200mV, OVP condition will be triggered when real output voltage goes beyond 1.6V. This makes sense for hardware voltage mods, when you change the voltage without altering programmed VRM's nominal voltage. In this case you change voltage by altering nominal voltage yourself. And VT1165 supports much higher voltages than 1.37.
It sounds more like and OCP for me. Maximum current for each VRM phase is also hardwired with configuration resistors.
I've already posted it in other thread: you can "ask" VT1165 to report OCP/OVP conditions by reading its register 13. Bits 0 and 1 are OCP/OVP states. Take a note that these bits are read-only status bits, you cannot change them.
Dear KELL5 and the Co, if you think that my reasons are completely illogical, please stop attacking me and prove it by actions. You have easy way to prove your words by writing your own tool doing exactly the same things you're demanding me to do. Wrting your own Windows MMIO driver is a question of 1-2 weeks. Writing your own HAL accessing ATI/NV I2C buses based on open source Linux ATI/NV drivers is a question of 1-2 weeks too. Having that in hands, you can use the information provided in this thread to implement VT1165 support layer. This is a question of 1 hour. Attaching the slider to it is a question of 5 minutes. Do it, if you can do something besides trolling. Easy money, you can even sell it to some vendor.
i set the clocks on both my stock gtx 280s (water cooled) to 713/1512/1296 and bumped the voltage up to 1.35 using rivatuner. after running ati tool for some time, the temps on either core don't exceed 52c, however the vrm phase 1-5 temps are a different story. on gpu0 the max vrm phase temp i saw was 83c, but on gpu1 max was 50c. i'm not sure why the phase temps have such a big delta.
i'm hesitant to try anything over 1.35v cause thats apparently the highest the evga voltage tool will let you go, but im tempted since the gpu core temps are still reasonable. do you guys think i should try bumping it up a little or leave it at this?
Try 1.3V or lower and bump up your core clocks. Even if one of your cards caps at 1512 shader you should still be able to reach 756 core on both of them.
so true, if you want something done, then do it yourself.
for what its worth, i cant wait till vendors implement this feature across the board, maybe under a Alt + F12 secret option for 'expert' mode.
and never had the chance to say it, but nice work on rivatuner Unwinder :up:
So you call it trolling. You call constructive criticism trolling. And then you play the ofended programmer game against people that you know they have 0 idea about programming. That's fine. I've already said, and this is pure logic, that RV is your software, and you can do whatever you want. Seach my posts and see if you can find anything that forces you in some way or something like that. Your negative is perfectly tolerated, allowed, blabla, but that doesn't change the fact that is illogical. I don't know if this will offend you, but you're acting as the typical open source programmer that receives a suggestion, and when you say no and then people tell you "please do it because of this, that..." you say "do it yourself troll". :down:
Now to the point, as I've said in previous posts, RV is already a dangerous tool that has a specific section for all the important stuff with a big warning directed for noobs. Because of this when you say "I won't put it there because people could fry their cards" is 100% illogical. If noobs fry the card by going there and then they complaint to you, just ignore them. They chose to ignore your warning, it's their responsability.
I'll have to look at little more closely. The load current is much higher in game than the resting load current at 3d, so I'm not sure its OCP. What I know for sure is that the vcore measured from the back of the card never exceeds 1.35v volts no matter what value I use. This is a trace from 'in game' loads compared to resting loads at different voltages. It doesn't pull any more current in 3d 1.52v than 3d 1.35v. And were it moves to 1.52v in resting mode the current is well under even the 1.26v stock load current.
http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/1585/55424494zm5.jpg
Is this the right OVP register etc? Not sure, returns the same 01 regardless of voltage selected.
Anyway 1.06v (2d register) to 1.55v gives ~1.35v. Upto 1.35v its very close to the DMM values in 0.0125v steps.
http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/533/87865169yv3.jpg
This thread is a great example of why parents don’t take their little kids to the grocery store.
Kid sees *NEW FACY CEREAL* they HAVE to have – Mom and Dad say no, it might be bad for you.
“BUT MOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!….”
Get over it guys, no means no. at the end of the day your opinion doesn’t matter in the fact at all, no matter how you try to sell it.
If the programmer doesn’t want to add a slider, that is 100% his prerogative – believe it or not, whatever you say isn’t going to help that fact. Might be hard to swallow, I know this IS the internet – but it’s the truth.
basically it's setup like shown in my sig (DDC3.2 w/ XSPC Res Top -> PA120.3 (3x YL D12SM) -> D-Tek FuZion GFX 2 -> D-Tek FuZion GFX 2). i don't have any fans blowing over the unisinks. i have a fan intake at the bottom of the case but i dont think that makes too much of a difference.
lower the voltage? i get artifacting otherwise, and in fact im not even ure 713 is stable at 1.35, i think i would need a lot more voltage to get up to 756. i may just have bad overclockers.
Drop it, all right.. you trying to be my Daddy or what? It's just fun beating on a dead horse that died for some illogical reason, that's all. Unwinder said that it was beating on his own dead horse, and some of us enjoy it for kicks and giggles, for a little while, at least.
Unwinder never responded to my last post asking him if we need permission to add a mod to RT, adding voltage sliders. Like with D3DOverrider and StatisticsServer, they're both "add-on's".. it would be nice if somebody could jump in and add this voltage slider add-on. I do not have the programming experience to do that, but if somebody could teach me real quick how to do it, I'd love to as long as it takes less than a week or so. Anybody? Maybe I should ask Ray Adams, since he already added voltage sliders to ATI Tray Tools, but it only takes 4850 cards to 1.35v, which is most likely due to the OVP kicking in at 1.35v. When I had an X1900XTX and HD3870, I preferred ATiTrayTools over RT anyways..
the comments in this thread are really sad and will help turning possible new freeware coders away from this scene
Exactly!
It's one thing if a coder is asking for feedback or requests for additional functions. It's also one thing to ask... once. But wrong to keep persisting, and not taking no for an answer; regardless of the reason the coder gives.
Most people who create freeware probably do it cause it is fun for them, and serves a general purpose to themselves and others. When it becomes a job, or when people complain, then I'm sure that weighs heavily on if they 'want' to continue building on what they already created.
Can you guys drop the silly Voltage sliders debate ?
If you can't, pick up your cellphone, call your friend and go out for a drink.
Well, I guess you have to play around a lot more with your system to figure out stable clocks for both cards. My GTX 280 can do 730 core, 1512 shaders at stock 1.19 vcore and at 1.24 vcore I can max out the core clock to 756.
There shouldn't be voltage sliders incorporated into RT for obvious reasons. Way to many people will try to overvolt their gpu to 1.6V and then try to crank up the core speeds to 1000 and beyond in the process possibly damaging their gfx. Plus doing it the way that was described in this thread isn't hard at all, if someone has a problem following a few simple steps they shouldn't even be messing around with overclocking at all.
I'm hoping support for the GTX285's does not take to long to develop. Something I found odd was (if the readout can be assumed to be correct) is the VRM current draw when the vgpu was increased. Under normal circumstances the current should increase with increased voltage, however it did not seem to do so beyond 1.35v. Fornowagain seems to say that if you set over 1.35v, rivatuner reports the voltage increase, but when measuring at Vgpu measure point the voltage never exceeds 1.35v. Is this correct?
You can see current draw increase from ~33A at 1.26v to ~41A at 1.35v, however going above that seems to cause a reduction in current to between 37 - 40A.
Since there are no datasheets available for the volterra VRMs, I was curious about what other registers might be; So I read them all at various conditions to try to figure out what each one is.
Here's what I found for 280gtx. Not really much... I was trying to see if there was a OVP/OCP register.. but didn't see any other registers change but the ones I marked in red. I only went as high as 1.44V w/o a load (3d app started, but not run - furmark).
My reasons for trying? I was just curious :p:
http://i327.photobucket.com/albums/k...increments.png
ok folks,
just to put some fuel into the fire ...
http://fg000005.host.inode.at/pub/104.jpg
http://fg000005.host.inode.at/pub/106.jpg
Funny how a person can come in here and tell a programmer that he doesnt approve of how they handle the software that they wrote.. um.. hello ?
Thanks unwinder for your contributions, many of us here appreciate it.. :up:
You rock, man!!! :D:D:D:up:
To others still playing with fire here, I'll start taking the lead by NOT playing with fire anymore. Hopefully you guys will follow and stop playing with fire (that is, either defending or criticizing Unwinder after he has insulted human intelligence by making awfully poor excuses) here in this thread. Started NOW.
What has playing with fire got to do with anything? He just wrote a simple c++ app to do the calculations. Same thing as doing it with a script or by hand, just a little less cumbersome.
this is my "new volt tool" in action
its 100 u.s.d to download (only note pad riva is free)
here at work...i'm still working on the sliders part but it copies and pastes well:rolleyes::p:
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/5084/lazyks7.jpg
I have no problems hard modding it, it's probably the easiest mod I have ever done in fact, and I'd also like to add some extra caps to the card, so if it doesn't happen I won't be too concerned. It just would be nice to be able to test voltages above 1.30v without triggering OCP.
Here ya's go, a GUI for ya's..with sliders for the folks that were obsessed with them :D
It's pretty simple, it doesn't read anything in realtime. It's not too useful, only eases finding the voltages you want @ your stable clocks. After that, it's alot easier to use rivatuners scheduler to apply settings at windows startup.
The GUI just increments the VID values via the slider, and shows the appropriate conversion in volts. Adjust the slider, and hit the Set Voltage button, and both 2D and 3D voltages are set. Nothing is applied until you hit the Set Voltage button.
And easy check to see if all is working good it to open furmark (no need to start it), check 3D voltage. close all 3d apps, check idle voltage
It works for 280gtx for IC2 Bus value of 3, and uses the following default registers:
Register 15 - 3B = 59 = 1.1875v <---3D voltage
Register 18 - 35 = 53 = 1.1125v <---2D voltage
Drop it in your rivatuner directory and run it.
Here's what it looks like:
http://i327.photobucket.com/albums/k...ageControl.png
I might play around with the code some more, and add some stuff.. But don't expect too much. I usually get bored and never go back to things lol It's more fun for me trying to get the program to do what I want, rather then using it. I teach myself C# as I figure out stuff.
Disclaimer: Use at your own risk! :p:
Edit: attachment removed, use one below.
Nice work and thankyou for sharing ! :)
Sweaaats it sliderzz has themmmmm
Wow, very quick indeed :)
Although, I don't even use it myself I'll say a big thankyou on behalf of everyone who find this add-on useful.
Thankyou for taking the time to create this and share it with the forum :up:
Since it was me who was "OBSESSED" with the slider idea though, I'll take credit for "HOUNDING" this into creation :p:
Thanks again for your efforts mate, I'm sure a lot of users find it very handy.
On my GTX280 Tri-SLI under 16`c chilled water with D-tek unisinks
Upped my voltage from 1.19 to 1.35v result : from 774/1593/1296 to 810/1647/1296 rock stable no artifacts.
Highest i could get was 820/1701/1296 @ 1.46v but after 10 mins the heat gave shader artifacts.
None the less I'm happy with the extra mhz thanks to this simple mod :D
Doesn't work on the GTX260:(
It's detecting wrong values for stock 2D and 3D voltages with a 4870.
it dont work for me either the fact im doing it wrong or watever with my gtx260-216 will wait... for proper program come out.
GTX 260 it works I can change voltage. But in RT monitor my voltage output never changes even under load.:confused: So no way of finding load voltage??
I'm taking the easy road too. They did say soon, so it's really not that big of a deal. My 280 already does what I need it to do, but the voltage tuner will be nice to get those xtra FPS out of my flight sims. To max out FPS and especially max out the min FPS is always a good thing. :yepp:
Sorry guys, it's not smart enough to figure out what card you guys have. it's only setup for 280 gtx, and the registers i noted up above. I'll try to add the ability to change the registers - but that would make it so you need to know which ones to set them to.
Or if someone wants to give me the default registers for their card, I can just make different versions. That would be a lot easier and quicker.
Would need 2D voltage register, and it's default value.
and same for 3D.
I made some modifications to my GUI. It now lets you input 2D VID addrees, and initial value; and the same for 3D. You change those values before moving sliders (if yours aren't same as my default ones). Once you move the sliders it doesn't read from those fields anymore, but displays the values in volts and hex.
1. change values if needed, as pointed out in top picture
2. adjust sliders, see voltages on right side.
3. hit press Set Voltage button. See changes in rivatuner hardware monitoring.
The background changes colors too, as you move the sliders up and down :D
Eventually I'll make it write your register values to a text file (ini), and then read them back next time you open the GUI - So you don't have to keep changing them everytime (if your registers aren't same as the default ones I have programmed).
Disclaimer: use at your own risk! (i'm programmng n00b lol)
Edit: I just realized that it might not still work for some of your cards. since it uses the I2C bus 3, and that's not changeable via the GUI right now. Can't do it now, gotta get ready for superbowl :p
evga powned by diverge :D
Thanks for info justageek95 as well as to Unwinder, been having fun with RT since years. Seriously sad that some guys dont know how to respect others work. :(
:up: Diverge, you rock!! Instead of constant complaining like few others, took it up as challange and now add-on which may come in handy to others.
Big Thanks to mods as well for keeping the thread moving forward.
Nice one mate, drag it all back up again why don't you.
Respecting peoples work has nothing to do with asking questions.....or complaining. Very little would be accomplished in this world without questions or complaints.
Besides, all this was done with days ago....why are you posting these comments...it's all been said many times before.
I've already stated mulitple times in this thread I accept UNWINDERS reasoning even though I don't agree with him. END OF. I ain't complaining anymore. I didn't slag the guy, I never called him any names...I never swore at him....I didn't shout at him...hound him with PM's etc. All I asked (on a few occasions) was why he wouldn't include this in RT. Where you guys get all this "disrespect" nonsense from is beyond me. You're all drama-queens, lol
Asif making RT gives you 100% immunity from ever being asked a question ever again. "How dare you question UNWINDER". "UNWINDER is teh LEET-ZORZ". "BAN the INQUISITOR he SUXORZ" is all you here from you lot.
Calm down.....accept reality (as in the slider apps been made, no-one is asking for it anymore) and move on. I know it's hard not to run in here and show unwinder how you love him by continually having a dig at me but really all your doing is the same thing you accuse me of.
LET IT GO
besides which, how do you know Diverge woulda made that add-on had it not been for me and my "hounding"? Maybe he got so fed up seeing me ask for it that he thought "bugger it, I'm gonna make the bloodmin' thing just to shut his cake-hole" lol
First, I was outta town... and you cant make me quit reading threads and posting.
Second, You dont know me and this is my first post in this thread. I can surely say what I feel about the situation in a very very public way without abusing. So no need to tell me to calm down. The way you have reacted to my post clearly confirms you as what others mentioned, a whiner!
One more thing, I dont think Diverge ever mentioned he made that add-on because of you. So untill he does that I think it is you who should stop being a drama-queen.
Most important thing of all, better start good work @ home. So I guess you should "Let it go first". But then I am sure all most everyone would expect even more lengthy reply from you. ;)
Signing out. Dont have time to waste :)
Who said to quite posting? Drama perhaps?
Sure, but really there was no need. If you read the thread you read others already tell me off so what need was there for you to bring it up again? YOU wanted to bring it up again. Can you see the sense in that? Some people might call that trolling.Quote:
Second, You dont know me and this is my first post in this thread. I can surely say what I feel about the situation in a very very public way without abusing.
The way you've reacted? I merely posted a reply. Drama perhaps?Quote:
The way you have reacted to my post clearly confirms you as what others mentioned, a whiner!
Can you read my last post? You see the LOL at the end yeah? What age are you? You seem very childish. It was meant in a humorous manner.Quote:
One more thing, I dont think Diverge ever mentioned he made that add-on because of you. So untill he does that I think it is you who should stop being a drama-queen.
I mean c'mon, please....grow up. Anyone with a pulse and a braincell would know my reference was made jokingly.....you really are trying to make something out of nothing aren't you?Quote:
One more thing, I dont think Diverge ever mentioned he made that add-on because of you
Do you? Weird, 'cos I coulda sworn I have already. Infact I'm positive I already posted TWICE saying I've LET IT GO already. I'm sure if you scan back the posts you'll see it. Kinda mad telling me to LET IT GO when I already have huh? Infact that's exactly what our conversation is about....the fact I ALREADY LET IT GO and how you've come in draggin' it all back up again!!!:confused:Quote:
Most important thing of all, better start good work @ home. So I guess you should "Let it go first".
That's really great advice mate.....:confused::rolleyes:
STOP with the flame fest you two (mostly KELL5) before I feed you both to the admins
omg this thread is like 30% useful on topic and 70% garbage... hopefully a mod will go pick up the vacuum cleaner and tidy this thing up.
Diverge´s tool works fine :)
It seems that it doesn't work with Vista 64... :rolleyes:
http://img66.imageshack.us/img66/8695/14444007vt0.jpg
arrrgghh.. i wish you rivatuner users would get a thread.. i keep thinking they released the beta or something for the evga voltage tool everytime i see this thread bumped
Does Diverge's voltage tuner work with all video cards? (i have a 9600gt would it work with that?)
Thanks, this program should be awesome!!
here's a new version of the GUI. it lets you select /sd0,1,2,3 and i2c bus 0,1,2,3 so it can be used on different cards, and setups with multi-gpus.
By default, its setup for 280gtx.
You can even use rivatuners launcher function, and assign it a hot key.. if you want :p:
btw, sorry for all the off topic post... since this is supposed to be evga voltage control thread.
Cheers dude! :up:
you sure you guys are putting it in the rivatuner directory? I only received that error when trying to start it from my desktop before realizing this.
Just checking is all.
I would have already if I knew how to get the values from rivatuner. As far as I know it only passes them into that window that pops up. Which I have no clue on how to grab the values from. If it passed them to the dos window it would be easy for me to get them... I even tried passing them to a text file at the dos window using "rivatuner /ri3,70,reg_address >text_file.txt".. no luck.
also, that error you guys are getting is cause it can't find rivatuner.exe. It only looks in the directory the GUI.exe is, so it needs to be in the same directory as rivatuner.exe as Rinaun said above - as was noted in the first post I made about the GUI.
how about an "apply at startup" option :yepp:
As opposed to almost everyone in here (:D), i was fiddling with RivaTuner trying to lower my idle VGPU so it would use less power while in Windows, but i didn't manage to reduce anything at all. I dropped the voltage to as low as 0.9 volts but the indicated current consumption is the same throughout the test, always at 2.42 amps. Oh well.
Diverge,
Use return values from Rivatuner. It should give them. I take it you are calling it with something like. In C I would do something like:
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
...
int rt_ret = 0;
sprintf(buf, "rivatuner.exe /ri%d,%s,%s\n", BUS_NUM, BUS_ADDR, REG_OFFSET");
rt_ret = system("buf");
switch(rt_ret) {
case 0: printf("Volterra VR detected\n");
goto next;
case 1: printf("Volterra VR not detected\n");
goto exit_fail;
}
next:
read_i2c_vr_reg(argv[0]);
...
exit_fail:
printf("You are unable to use this application because your hardware isn't supported\n");
return 1;
...
}
I just woke up so I'm still half asleep but something like that should work in theory. Unwinder would no doubt have return values :)
It's possible RT returns values, but it doesn't return them to the command line. If it did, i'd be able to get them using the following:
Problem is I'm not an experienced programmer, so I have no clue how to do this with applications that don't display values on the command line.Code:System.Diagnostics.Process proc = new System.Diagnostics.Process(); //create my process
proc.EnableRaisingEvents = false;
//String sMyPath = Environment.CurrentDirectory;
proc.StartInfo.FileName = "devcon.exe"; //name of file to run
proc.StartInfo.Arguments = " ";
proc.StartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput = true; //setup redirection
proc.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false; //redirect from shell to
proc.StartInfo.CreateNoWindow = true; //hide shell
proc.Start();
String cmd_out = proc.StandardOutput.ReadToEnd();
MessageBox.Show(cmd_out);
The above example is a piece of code I used to make a GUI for devcon, which is a microsoft command line utility that lets you manipulate devices in your computer - basically device manager, but via command line. Instead of displaying the info at the command line prompt, the code redirects it into a string, and then I can parse it, to read status, find device id's ect. In the above example it just displays it in a messagebox. (i made the GUI to turn off devices in my laptop to extend battery live... it's a lot easier then going to device manager to disable them).
Unfortunately this is the way I have the GUI run rivatuner to set the voltage control registers, and it doesn't redirect anything for me to parse, cause it doesn't display the info in the dos box (command line). it displays it in it's own GUI (rivatuner).
Like I said, I'm n00b at programming. So if you have any visual C# examples that work to return RT value, i'll be glad to try to make it work.
Heh we all gotta learn from somewhere right. For Visual C# examples have you checked Windows Platform SDK? and MSDN Library that comes with Visual Studio 2008 (if using that)?
I'll install Intel CPP Compiler on my Windows 7 and make up a small C app to see what Rivatuner returns and get back to you. I really should read SDK docs but don't have much time at the moment.
Personally I've never written anything in C#, even my C++ GUI abilities are poor, but I can write in C++ so so. Mostly I can write in C since it is more where I have spent my time learning.
Something weird is happening to me when I overclock and stability test after voltage adjustment. I have a XFX GTX280 XXX water cooled by my Coolit Boreas. I also have an awesome power supply, the Antec Signature 850. All temps are cool (water cooling). Power supply rails look good and don't really budge (even when stability testing).
I am using Furmark as suggested to test the voltage. After increasing the voltage to 1.30 and then running the Furmark stability test my computer shuts off. It doesn't even visually start the test yet and my computer powers down. It does not do this unless I increase the voltage. I noticed that the voltage regulator jumps to 92amps when starting the test. Is this normal for it to jump to such high amps? I played Crysis just to compare and it jumps to about 50 or 60 tops.
After I reduced the voltage to 1.25, the system doesn't shut off anymore... What do you guys think? Power Supply? Somekind of Voltage protection?
Hey, guys it's a chance for me tu use this voltage control from Rivatuner on a Palit 9600GSO 768MB, or it just for GTX series?:D