Yep for the reader:)
Hardware changed, but Zippy 850W and TTBT still follow
Printable View
Yep for the reader:)
Hardware changed, but Zippy 850W and TTBT still follow
here is some preliminary clocking
i had a buddy's 920 in my rig earlier(his board is out for rma), but my 940 came today via snail mail unexpectedly. got a quick clock out of it that it can probably run with lower volts:
http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/1...8088of4.th.jpg
the nb's on these new phenoms impress me. the 920 was good for 2.5, now 2.6 on this 940. i could boot at 2.8, but it would fail prime instantly with pretty much any voltage. 8gigs of 1066 with the NB at 2.6 required 1.325v
now, im going to push the CPU core higher. 1.55 is the limit of safety, correct? im afraid to push really high on volts because i've already blown up one of these mobos (dfi 790fxb-m2rsh, strangely everything was at stock settings). i do have another one as a backup, though.
***IMPORTANT NOTICE FOR MSI USERS***
Just checked their website today (just now) and it appears they released all Deneb related bios for their boards, I just updated mine and it seems to be QUITE a bit more stable than the bios I was using previously. Just wanted to give everyone the heads-up
Major update is about to be uploaded. Thanks a bunch for the program Particle, I'll get to moving everything over during next week. I have to finish packing and drive back to college tomorrow so no updates on the list from now till monday. Now I just need to figure out how to transport the computer since the front two screw holes to connect the vapo case to the other case were in the wrong place so it just hangs if I pick it up from the top. I also need to finish doing the wiring.
There were some issues with people popping their motherboard's FETs with too high a voltage with the 9950BEs is what he is refering to. Frankly I tend to agree with him as I'm having voltage stability issues on my particular motherboard around 1.55v give or take (or 1.65v on the 9950 I had from before)
Here ya go Oldguy.
I'm pretty sure this chip will do alot better. Actually primed it for about 1/2 an hour @ 3.87 using 1.525v, Prime never crashed but the board over heated and shut down. I'll probably move it to the 79-T and put it under water tommorow. The power section on this Biostar is pretty weak.. :rolleyes:
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c3...11_OCvalid.png
"Explosive issues" of the FETs is more due to power draw from the VRs than output voltage itself. At a given voltage, Deneb is easier for the VRs to feed compared to Agena.
If anyone is interested I've did quick NB/volt scaling test.
- 1.175V good up to 2.35GHz
- 1.225V good up to 2.5GHz
- 1.25V good up to 2.65GHz
- 1.275V good up to 2.7GHz
- 1.335V good up to 2.8GHz
- 1.4V good up to 2.94GHz for now ....
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/3...8ghznd8.th.png
All tests done using 11x multi for NB because 12x multi is no boot for me. I wonder when Gigabyte will add positive voltage adjustement for NB in their BIOS. It's retarded to have 20x NB multi and no option to increase NBvCore :shakes:
update for my new speed.
placed 3 130cfm blowers on the pa120.3.
all voltages at stock.
cpu 3616mhz with nb 2210mhz.
aod shows wrong values.
didnt thrust the temp, saw it go up, so i opened the window :D.
in holland its around 0 degree at the moment.
@BertM: If you want to fix AOD readings just load BIOS Defaults or clear cmos. :)
BTW very nice clocks indeed!
k i will do that today probably.
few minutes ago i saw that i ran it with cl 5 7 7 24. bah :mad:.
htt oc with cpu to 3654 or just multi up to 3700mhz is a crash in short amount of time.
you wouldnt expect that while 3600 is stable probably 6 degree higher.
there is a hard barrier at around 3650 i asume.
im now testing 3636. (edit: it crashed at 15 minutes to go)
Quick update done. Changed the name of the thread to a more recognizable one.
the NB is overclocked.
i popped my first board with everything at stock settings. im fairly certain that an OC'd deneb is going to draw more than a 9950 at stock, but i am also fairly confident that the first board was defective and not representative of the majority of these DFI boards.
Nice. Anyone hitting 4GHz have some advice?
Just got done some initial testing of my new toy :)
AMD Phenom II 940 CACVC AC 0850CPAW
3.840ghz
Vcore 1.52V
NB 2.40ghz
4x2gb Ram
All air cooled and running on my trusty DFI DK 790FX. Haven't given prime a run yet, still tweaking it a bit more but it does play Grid pretty damned well at 1920x1200 with all the goodies on.
AMD Phenom II X4 940
DFI Lanparty LP DK 790FXB-M2RSH - 12/26 Beta
Stepping: CACVC AC 0850BPDW
18.5x200x12x9 (CPU: 3.7GHZ, NB: 2.4GHZ, HTT: 1.8GHZ)
CPU VID: 1.41v, NB VID: 1.2375v
1066-5-5-5-15-20-195x4, 2x2GB, VID: 2v
Cooling: Water
http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/251...mii3724as5.jpg
http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/251...mii3724as5.jpg
http://img58.imageshack.us/img58/phe...pg/1/w1265.png
Still trying to find max. on air...
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/8...shot050uq0.jpg
http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/2...shot051eo9.jpg
agreed
TT big typhoon with 120 delta fan....http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=296
wow you guys keeping 24/7 or just suicide run?
Little Vapo run before I may sell her...
http://img66.imageshack.us/img66/456/superpiki7.th.jpg
Got my Deneb today:cool:
Not installing yet, I got to get my act together and still prepare the motherboard:shakes:
Anyway, stepping is 0849EPAW.
Must be a good stepping. Mine is 0849DPAW and 6GHz was a piece of cake...:D
I dont want to be greedy, 4Ghz on air is enough:ROTF:
Nah, I hope I get some good clocks from it, but I mainly hope everything just works fine now, so HTT of 300 and RAM at DDR1200, Hopefully running stable at 3.9Ghz and the NB at 2.4Ghz or so:rolleyes: But, time will tell:rolleyes:
[img=http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/7923/phenomiix49403675ghzstain5.th.jpg]
There's a stable setting. Updated list is about to get uploaded. I'm down at school now so I'm just going to waste all my time on updating this thread and making mine run faster:D.
3.675 cpu with 1.425v and phase cooling obviously
2.45 nb
980mhz ram @ 2.1v
1960 ht link
Windows Vista x86
I can't seem to get mine to even take a SS at 4GHz. Damn you, Thermal Monster! I can tell this chip is all about the temps. Adding voltage markedly increases stability until temps get too high--then it crashes. It's kind of like how the older chips used to behave years and years ago before we hit that period where voltage only mattered to a small extent.
First test run (barebones) mine did okay with AMD HSF - results so far:
Stock vcore = 16x200 = 3200
Added 0.1v = 17.5x200 = 3500
Well I have a dead stick of RAM (Corsair Dominator PC2-1066) so RMA today - have to wait for replacement........
I did just barely :D
http://www.jonspd.com/jonspd_uploads/screenies/4.JPG
Anyone Overclock yet on Windows 7 ? Soon here just installed....
http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/3586/windows7gb5.png
I'll be installing Windows 7 on it later today, right now its priming at 15x255=3825 @ 1.475v set, 2550 on the nb, and 1785 ht link. Don't have time to install it now since I have class in 15 minutes:(. But I will be getting 4+ghz stable by the end of this week no matter what, otherwise this phase unit is absolutely worthless.
Edit: I would recommend setting your own timings as sometimes it screws them up royally. I always go to the 800mhz divider and do 5-5-5-15-26 at 2t, and if anyone knows how to do a higher trc on my board in the bios it would be much appreciated.
so old guy you really want this darn stepping ?
280 is here :D
Windows 7 Beta ATI drivers: AOD not working this Windows 7
http://support.ati.com/ics/support/d...estionID=39069
Overclock results seem a bit more stable in windows 7. Occt seems to work fine. One of my overclocks would constantly fail at around 15-17min mark with occt in vista 64 SP2 and windows 7 could get to 23-25mins.
Other than that, starts up a bit faster and seems really snappy.
PS: ati beta w7 drivers are given me low fps in l4d vs mode but not single player ??!?!
I'm going to start the install in about 20 minutes, need to wait for my 2 hours of prime to finish. I really wish my network plug hadn't died at the wall, cause now I actually need a wireless card until I get it fixed.
By the way, has anyone noticed a newer version of aod than 2.1.5 yet?
PhenomII 940 3600Mhz 200 X 18
Stepping CACVC AC 0850BPEW
Voltage 1.42
Windows Vista x64
Zalman CNPS9500
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...opdog/OCCT.jpg
CACVC AC 0849CPAW and 3.8GHz @1.475Vcore, NB2820MHz, HTT 282, HT-link 2250MHz 24/7 stable with TRUE 120, load temps around 50C and idle 35C
mobo Asus M3A79-T Deluxe with one dead PCI-E slot :D .. also my HD4850 crapped itself because the heat(fan wasnt running in the bios and i did notice it a bit too late :(:D all sorts of nice artifacts popping here and there), now Ive got an 4870 512MB (790/1150MHz 24/7) And 3Dmark 2006 result 17100, CPU 5670 winxp, 2x2GB DDR2 1130MHz.
And hell yeah theres a big performance gain compared to 9950BE@3.1GHz.. all the games are running much better now.
Though the CPU cant do much better than that.. even for suicide shot, like not booting at 3.95GHz and above, no matter what voltage. BSODs immediately in windows load screen. .. also why my mobo says "CPU Voltage error" when I try 1.6V or above?
hey topdog whats your ambient? i have the same cooler as you and when i get my 940 soon i will be shooting for about a 3.5ghz overclock.
TopDog looks like you got a good one.
Faior nice northbridge clock.
Anyone been able to get high hypertransport like 2400+?
I've heard it increases gaming performance.
:) Rock solid, Ive noticed that too high HT-speed causes rebooting under load :/ same effect was there with 9950BE(though now the limit is higher).
High NB-speed increases memory speed like hell(IMC running faster?), now the speed with my clocks is very near of the latencies of DDR1@240MHz 1T-6-3-3-2.5CL settings, not bad at all. 44ns. Though the other speeds are in their own categories ;D
topdog, how is that board doing for you with your new phenom?
so going for 3.5/3.6 can both the 920 and 940 hit that speed pretty easy?
wooooo just got my phenom II and its pretty fresh. ill post numbers if i can.
Anyone got better than four hours of prime with their OC? I can't do more than 2 hours @ 3.7GHz on my Ph II 940.
I've made a modded version so yes it works. Here you go:
(French upload site, just click "telecharger")
http://www.partage-facile.com/151633...oddad.msi.html
This will also work on Server 2003 and Server 2008.
Dang it... I have to wait until tomorrow to get my fedex...
(NOTE: I couldn't order until this morning because I was out snorkeling in the Caribean Sea and cruising around for the last week... and imbibing the local beverage of choice. Ah the tragedy...)
DOUBLE DANG IT... just realized car insurance is due this month... so I have to wait to buy my Danger Den case and water cooling with their 4x120 radiator. And I even decided to pay the extra $50.00 for color in the plexiglas.
(I think I've talked myself into it for sure. Just have to hide the price from the wife.)
Just got it Today, waiting for my better memory sticks.
what cooling r u using and what temps?? supercoolin btw thats a nice chip:up:
[img=http://img70.imageshack.us/img70/3446/phenomx4940stable39ghzpw2.th.png]
My rock stable clock in Windows 7:p:
CPU - 3.9ghz - 1.5v set - 1.52 actual
NB - 2.6ghz - 1.4v set to make sure its not a problem
HT Link - 1.82ghz
I'll get an update of the list tomorrow morning. I'm going to go a little higher now.
his cooling is in his sig.
Oh and I don't know if this is just my settings or what, but I got a 3.62x speedup in cinebench with 3.975 cpu and 2.65 nb with windows 7 x86. That almost puts it back to the speedup in x86 with the original phenoms. Using the beta driver it also adds about 1600 points to my open gl score in cinebench. I haven't tried to do comparisons yet, still just clocking away.
I was wondering if by any chance people can tell where they got their procs from. I want to know whos getting the best so far.
THX but it says "ERROR
This file is neither allocated to a Premium Account, or a Collector's Account, and can therefore only be downloaded 10 times.
This limit is reached.
To download this file, the uploader either needs to transfer this file into his/her Collector's Account, or upload the file again. The file can later be moved to a Collector's Account. The uploader just needs to click the delete link of the file to get further information."
Guess i wasn't fast enough:shrug:
Ok guys, from now on I'm going to ignore posts that don't show the two cpu-z screens. Its annoying to not have information when I'm putting it in the table. At the very least you could take two seconds to at least just type it in underneath the screenshot. Also, there's no point in posting shots of prime that haven't gone for 2 hours, they won't get added to the stable list. It would also be nice if I had a few more steppings in the table, you guys should go take a look at the holes in it.
Thank you to those that followed the format.
And could someone running windows 7 show me if they get the same fluke or if I'm alone in getting the 3.62x speedup.
Never ran cinebench b4, i hope this is what you wanted.
http://i380.photobucket.com/albums/o...hw732bit-1.png
Windows 7 64bit
Ran it in 64 bit mode in w7 got 3.75 for speed up.
Also, ran it in 64 bit in vista 64 sp2 and got a speed up of 3.61 all same overclock.
Guys, been a while since I attempted to OC Phenom's so a prolly stupid question but better be sure.
My BIOS seems to set VID-NB to 1E, but everywhere I look this doesnt seem to be anywhere near 1.3V that used to be on Agena. Did those values change since Deneb, so 1E is the new 1.3V? Or is the VID-NB from Deneb a lot lower now? I dont want to screw everything up right from the start since I had a hell of a night yesterday installing all heat sinks:(
Also in BIOS my 'chipset' (whether this is northbridge, southbridge or what, I dont know) is in the high 40's, so I dont know what this cooling has done for me thus far but well:rolleyes:
So Windows 7 is even better at using multiple cores. I also noticed a big difference in time with wPrime on 1024k mode, about 10 seconds difference between vista and 7, and then another 5 seconds for the increase I had in clock speed. Right now the cpu is at 4.08 and nb at 2.8. 270htt is too much for my chip so I switched over to the 16x and 11x multis to go higher.
Edit: 1E should be 1.35v because thats stock voltage.
Originally Posted by pershoot View Post
HEX = Volts HEX = Volts
00 = 1.5500 14 = 1.3000
01 = 1.5375 15 = 1.2875
02 = 1.5250 16 = 1.2750
03 = 1.5125 17 = 1.2625
04 = 1.5000 18 = 1.2500
05 = 1.4875 19 = 1.2375
06 = 1.4750 1A = 1.2250
07 = 1.4625 1B = 1.2125
08 = 1.4500 1C = 1.2000
09 = 1.4375 1D = 1.1875
0A = 1.4250 1E = 1.1750
0B = 1.4125 1F = 1.1625
0C = 1.4000 20 = 1.1500
0D = 1.3875 21 = 1.1375
0E = 1.3750 22 = 1.1250
0F = 1.3625 23 = 1.1125
10 = 1.3500 24 = 1.1000
11 = 1.3375 25 = 1.0875
12 = 1.3250 26 = 1.0750
13 = 1.3125 27 = 1.0625
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=205593
I used that table for my cpu-nb vid and mine defaulted to 1E. Right now i have it set at 0F and I confirm if its right by looking at AOD.
Oh lol, contradicting posts for the win:p:
OldGuy, it would make sense that 1E should be 1.35V then, on the otherhand I know my 3 DFI boards last year and they all have this awesome preferance to default into weird speeds and Voltages (although always low), maybe some power saving stuff effects the BIOS now and then.
McRuff, so you say that the HEX values you set according to that list actually do match in AOD? Thanks for the list, I already found that along with others but since I didnt know how boards get along with Deneb I couldnt be sure if those tables were still accurate;) To be 100% sure, could you verify that indeed HEX values will result in those Voltages according to that list?
At this point Im testing purely the CPU. My first run was 3.4Ghz on stock Vcore but I got a BSOD, I assume it was because of a failed OC but this is my first time on Vista x64 so yeah, no clue. I added a bit of Vcore, Vnb to be sure and set my Vdimm to what it is supposed to run (on DDR1150 that is, but doing DDR800 for now).
So right now this are my settings;
3.4Ghz CPU, 1.8Ghz NB/HT, DDR800
Vcore + 0.025V (CPU-Z idle reads 1.36V), Vnb at 1C (or 1D, forgot:p:) and Vdimm at 2.16.
I just finished 5 runs of IntelburnTest x64 from AgentGOD, and it didnt crash and the results shown stability. My previous run where I got a BSOD was with all Voltages at default. I assume 5 runs would be more than enough to continue raising Mhz's, when I hope to get my final OC Ill do 10 runs to be sure:rolleyes:
Coretemp didnt get over 38C, so that looks pretty nice:cool: If the temp is right, no idea:rolleyes:
My further plan is not to push too hard, Im afraid to kill more MOSFETS:( I mainly hope after Ive done the CPU to achieve a stable HTT of 300Mhz max, at least 275Mhz so I can run my RAM 1:1 with that. Also I hope to get my NB around 2.4Ghz or maybe a tad higher. I dont want to touch the Voltages too much though.
it is alot lower now. no way hex values can change. i find it extremely hard to believe that it takes ~1.35v to do 1.8GHZ NB, and ~1.37 to do 2.0GHZ NB. the agena could do this without sweating at 1.3. on the DFI board, default is 1E (1.175) and it takes 1D to do 2.0GHZ NB (1.1875) @ 3.6'ish. the listed table should hold true (the one i posted here in another thread which was taken from polygon's thread at lejabeach) for all boards. whether the bios on that particular board adheres or +/- is another matter...
edit: stock CPU VID for the DFI board is ~1.31v for Phenom II.
new foxconn bios helped out stability a tad!
http://www.overclock.net/gallery/dat...a4250_158v.jpg
The next notch up with a stable prime.
[img=http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/1743/phenomx4940stable3975ghtt5.th.jpg]
Now I'm testing 4080 with 2.8ghz nb, hopefully it works well. I also did a 32m and it gives me third for the 940's over at hwbot.
NCspecV81 what are those clocks on air or water?
If air very nice probably the first to get that high.