this was w/o slowmode
http://i51.tinypic.com/2qc2suh.png
I have just switched back to my UD7 the other day and I haven't had the time to run vantage on it yet
Printable View
this was w/o slowmode
http://i51.tinypic.com/2qc2suh.png
I have just switched back to my UD7 the other day and I haven't had the time to run vantage on it yet
can anybody please confirm if you used this dominator series with this board ?
Corsair 12GB Dominator Series Memory Kit for Intel Triple Channel Memory Solutions with Corsair Airflow Fan - DDR3 2000MHz - 9-10-9-27 Latency (CMT12GX3M3A2000C9)
http://www.dandh.com/images/prodlarg...GX3M3A2000.jpg
also anobdy recommened 1600Mhz over 2000Nhz i read its better for OCing !!!!
combination of d14 and this corsair modules won't fit!
in my situation, i rotated the d14 by 90degrees so airflow is now pushed from the top of the case through the d14 down to the vga card. did not want to push hot air from the top of the vga card through the d14, so i decided to go the physically not so optimal direction.
anyway, in order to install the memory module in the 2nd slot of channel a, i also removed about 10mm of the bottom two fins of the d14 with a dremel!
have read reports from ppl who were able to install this combination (memory/hsf) but i was not able to do this here without the described modifications ...
pm me if you are interested in pics ...
Hi guys.
I am maybe considering buying the Kingston HyperX KHX2250C9D3T1FK3/6GX 2250MHz Triple Channel Kit to replace my current Corsair Dominator GT 6GB (3x2GB) DDR3 16000C8 2000MHz Triple Channel Kit
but before I decide, I was wondering if anyone knows how the good this memory is on performance and overclockability etc? and is it worth it over the Corsair Dominator GT memory I have already?
I have also read this ram has the same problem as the Corsair Dominator when using a Noctua NH-D14, and as far as i`m aware the fins on the Kingston can`t be removed like the Corsair ones, so i`m
wondering if there is any other way to use the Kingston HyperX 2250MHz memory when using the Noctua NH-D14?
I did have a idea of possibly cutting the heat sink fins on the Kingston HyperX down thought this wouldn`t damage them but would void the warranty as a lot of sites say the hight of the heat sink fins
are a bit overkill anyways but should I do this?
Thanks for responding.
Sylver123.
Hey thanks for sharing, actually I'm upgrading the system and I'm watercooling the new build (CPU n video cards ) infact I got all of the new build parts n I'm also selling my Kingston 1333mhz n planning to get something better, I was thinking either corsair Dom gt 2000mhz or the dom 1600mhz cause the current one I have is 1333mhz 9-9-9-24 max vol is 1.5v best latency i was able to get from it is 8 8 8 22 with 1450mhz it's the last part I have after selling all the previous buildQuote:
Originally Posted by fgw
My plan is to get decent dimms with 1.65v n at least 1600mhz 8 8 8 24 to be able to overclock the new 980x
I can try to work with the Kingston Ram on the asus rampage iii ex n the 980x for now but as I mentioned I am hopping to get the best 12gb 3x4g available that's why I was wondering if anybody using the ram above on the board already
Once again .. Thanks for sharing
The heatsinks on the kingston are bigger then on the corsair gt's..I would not cut the heatsinks..Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylver123
Here is some info on this ram
http://i4memory.com/f83/anyone-try-k...6gx-yet-26166/
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...78#post4604378
Dominator GT 2000 CL7 rev 1.2
http://hostthenpost.com/uploads/b250...6cf492d9a3.jpg
HyperX T1 2250
http://hostthenpost.com/uploads/96d1...43b10c8f25.jpg
Awesome !! Thanks for that, Low latency with high frequency, problem is, finding a memory from Kingston or even corsair that is 12g ( not 6g)to achieve something close to that gonna be hard, I believe the 12g (3x4g) dominator 1600mhz can run at 8 8 8 24 and easy 1.65v .. Also Kingston produced a hyper x model which is similar to the corsair's ram ... question is, is there any memory can do better that with 3x4g on this board ? From my understanding! It's not possible to see large 12g with high frequency that could at least run at 7-7-7-22 or close so farQuote:
Originally Posted by AceBaran
Correct me if im wrong, Would love to see more feedback
I’m having some trouble with the memory detection on my system, and I need some help.
I have trawled the net in search of a resolution and I have tried various things listed below.
Unfortunately they have had no effect, so I’m looking for some suggestions, I do however have a feeling that the motherboard could be faulty.
I am also encountering the problem with the CPU temperature reporting only sometimes working.
Problem
Bios and windows only seeing 2GB of the 3GB of memory.
CPU-Z sees all 3 sticks of memory.
System installed without problem and runs fine even though some memory is not detected
Each memory stick passes memtest OK individually
i haven't encountered this before, i've tried to flash to the latest 1005 bios, but it seems not working too..
any idea..?
In CPU-Z under the memory tab, which # Slots (out of the 6) are occupied by memory?Quote:
Originally Posted by kaka_89
I have had this issue of memory detection and it was simply a problem with the way the CPU was seated. The first time I ever put together my R3E rig it fired up perfectly with 6GB ram. I switched coolers and for some reason decided to pull out my 920...D'OH! After putting it back in and turning system on Bios detected a new CPU was installed, and bam only 4088MB showing. I noticed though that in CPU-Z when you're having memory detection problems it shows the memory installed in the first three slots (#1, #2, #3) instead of #1, #3, #5 (for 6GB). As soon as this happened I had a strong feeling it was an improperly seated CPU. Just after finishing putting it all together perfectly (I'm a perfectionist) I had to pull off the cooler again to re-seat the CPU. But afterward all 6136MB were being detected and never had that issue reoccur.
I think you're best bet is to re-seat the CPU. I know, it's a :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana: but what are you gonna do..
Have you tried clearing cmos ?Quote:
Originally Posted by kaka_89
Clear cmos, close your psu with the button (so take the power off your motherboard) wait a bit.. power up, just to be sure clear cmos again and boot..
Worked for me
Yes. I think I have the problem same as you are. CPU-Z detects my rams in slot (1-2-3 instead of 1-3-5). But, as you said that you have changed the cooling hsf, maybe you have accidentally moved/touched the cpu to an incorrect position..but for my case, i have never change/ replaced the cooling solution. Sometimes, i do get BSOD too..Quote:
Originally Posted by spoolindsm127
@acebaran
i have cleared the cmos( doing all the steps you have mentioned, plus i even took out the batt), but is still doesn't work for me
If that is the case, i'll try to take out the cpu and do some cleaning..
I just dumped my GTX 295 + GTS250 (for PhysX) for a pair of EVGA Superclocked GTX 480s - Im well happy :up:
I thought they were supposed to be noisy? No worse than the GTX295 for sure.
Really enjoying gaming with these - at last a super smooth gaming experience with Just Cause 2 and Crysis Warhead all maxed out. Been playing games like mad all evening - room feels like a furnace! :D
No power to second card in the pictures :confused:
Anyone have any settings for 1600mhz on CMT6GX3M3A1600C7 s? They are basically 1600 C7 Dominator GTs.
I know - forgot to plug em in before I took the pictures :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by spoolindsm127
Luckily I remembered before I fired the rig up! :)
Phew glad you remembered :)
The 480 is a beast of a card. The nickel plated heatpipes sticking out the side of the 480's reminds me of tubular headers on a car :p. What was the stock VID on both of them?
Also how do you like that soundcard?
Pics look amazing by the way very professional ;)
can someone give me some tips to pass 222bclk wall on my r3e ?
i have tryed 3 cpus and all blocks at 222-223....i really want to hit 230.
i ahve tryed w and w/o slow mode but nothing changes!!
Have you increased your PCIe speed?Quote:
Originally Posted by KanGaXx
110
Quote:
Originally Posted by KanGaXx
You are probably using bloomfield I assume. That is the Bloomfield ( especially 920/930 ) wall in the R3E. If you go thru these posts about 95% of everyone here gets similar results.
i have tryed a 2x 920 and a 980X...all walls at 223...it's the board...
You most Raise Qpi volt to atleast 1.4v or 1.45v in range + pci-e to 115mhz mabe.. that help me to get 258 bclk in slow mode also :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by KanGaXx
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoolindsm127
Thanks :D
One card is 1.074 and the other 1.084. They’re running at 725, 1451, 1900 but I have no plans to overclock further - my 850w Corsair HX PSU probably wouldn’t be happy about me pushing them! The original plan was to buy them with the EK water blocks, but I’m not in any rush to watercool them now as they’re not as loud as I was expecting.
The Soundcard is an Asus Xonar D2X which is great - I fully recommend it. Had a Creative X Fi card for about 3 years, and it would suffer from random crackle & pops in XP, Vista and 7, so I gave up with it and grabbed the Xonar and I'm very happy.
I'm very happy with the Rampage board too, its been easy overclock to 4.3Ghz with the 930 so I think I'll be sticking with this setup for quite a few years now.
Hi
Has anyone set up RAID0 on SATA3 with this motherboard & Crucial C300 64GB drives.
I have been looking around but I am reading conflicting opinions regarding the Marvell controller.
I thought I would ask you good people, as you all have such a vast knowledge of this motherboard & I need educating.
Thanks in advance.
Ive run C300s on the marvell for a while, ok for gaming but the controller cant keep up with the throughput for big number benches, I ended up with 2 128 gb C300s on the intel and just one C300 64 gb on the marvell as a stand alone non raid boot drive.Quote:
Originally Posted by Piggin
using just 1 ssd on the marvell seems to be fine.
other ppl here may give different advice but I have actually tried both !
cheers and good luck
Rick
I agree...
RAID 0 on the Marvell Runs slower than a single drive... I'm Running the same thing as above poster... 2 Crucial Nova 128's in 0 on the Intel, and a Single OWC 240gb Drive w/Sandforce controller on the Marvell, and I'm getting really good speed.
Best,
Roydrage
http://www.snackstuff.com/drivebenchmark.jpg
Thanks fmsam & RoydRage for your input.
Do you think I will be better off just getting a C300 128GB version as my win7 drive and having the 64GB version for a few extra games.
No more Bios updates ? >_<
If you plan on using more than one C300, do yourself a favour and grab an LSI 9211-4i HBA as well. C300's used on ICH10R is crippling their performance. And the Marvel 6Gbps controller can not handle more than a single drive.Quote:
Originally Posted by Piggin
You mean a Crucial Drive Right? The only Sata III ssd out right now?Quote:
Originally Posted by Piggin
I would forget about those right now... The Write speeds suck Ass... 140mb?
Writing is just as important your better off getting a Force Series Corsair or similar... I have an OWC and Muskin makes a nice Drive that also uses the Sandforce controller.... OCZ does but I always found their products very inconsistant... I and used there stuff 10 years ago.
If you use the samsung or any of the Inilinix controllers you will run into severe slowdowns from Block contamination. The sandforce controllers have a block leveling feature... OWC calls it Durawrite that tidys up after itself.
It's better to put your Boot drive on the largest partition you can, and it won't slow down so fast cause it will always have a new place to write where blocks don't have any fragments left in them... It also increases the life of the drive as you arent erasing blocks needlessly.
I have 2X128gb RAID 0 for my Boot drive, and only have 70 of the 256gb used... That is good. And I use the OWC 240gb drive for my Games and Photoshop Sratch disk... Also I burn an ISO image of the games disk, and mount it using virtual clone drive... This way the game starts up Super fast, and I don't need a disk to play it... *Note you will need to install the game from this image/Virtual Drive.
I also have a 1TB WD Black Caviar for Archieve storage, and I keep my paging file on it as well... Since it's on a different controller, it really stops interference with your read writes, and saves wear on the SDD's as well!:up:
Best,
Royd RAGE
124 and 101 is usually Vcore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom7184
Wellll. high density chips are not at their peak now.. I think your best bet is to just pick out 2 3x2gb kits at 2000. I like the corsair ones, but without a 980x with the 1.5x uncore multiplier, you're going to be having some really hard times with QPI voltage.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightwoodwolf
I have had my R3E for quite some time now and im very happy, atleast after i updated the bios to 1102 :D
Now to my question, im thinking about getting a 3rd GTX470 and run a tri way sli setup.
Is my Coolermaster Silent Pro M1000 enough to run 3 GTX470 and a i7 930 overclocked to 4.2GHz (21x200 1.4V).
Second of all, the manual says to use slot 1,3,4 for tri way, but the bridge they added in the motherboard package suggests 1,2,3, any thoughts around this?
If the PSU i have aint enough, what should i go with? AX1200 seems to have alot of issues still even though some have been fixed in later batches.
lowfat & RoydRage
Thank you both very much for taking the time to help me.
I now think it could be a change of direction for me & go with Raid0 using OCZ Vertex 2E 120GB drives on SATA2.
I have a problem with my config, I have the computer freeze, often
I tested the OC with HyperPI 32M, LinX, OCCT, etc... is good (@stock is the same, while AUTO in the bios)
I tested the SSD Intel X25-E with the Intel Toolbox, no problem
what I could try to find the problem?
freeze it at any time, in IE, FF, Windows, etc. ...
bios 0011 and I feel that it may come long after the shift to 970 and ram @2000 (Dominator GT 2000 C7), I had a 920 before and the same ram but @1600
thanks ;)
I quote! :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by AceBaran
Last official BIOS is 1005 of two months ago.
1102 is newest @ the moment
...but not official. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire4Wire
i telephoned with asus germany the last 5 mins and they told me that 1102 is an alpha not an beta and it tooks a longer time for the next stable release bios
great..............
No more Asus BIOS engineers? Everyone ill, fired or in strike? :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire4Wire
Sorry for sounding dumb but what is the difference between alpha and beta and which one is a stabler release?Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire4Wire
Thanks for responding.
Alpha -> Beta -> Release Candidate -> Final ReleaseQuote:
Originally Posted by Sylver123
this is an internal bios changlog there you can see there are some days without working on bios see the right site
RampageIII-Extreme-ASUS-1102.ROM (HW:01h BB:45h EC:xx VGA:xx) 2010/09/23
================================================== =====================================
Bytes Reserved : F2000 Bytes Used : FC078 Bytes Free : 11F88 Checksum: 6610
PCB Version: 1.04GT
EC1 FW:60
EC2 FW:14
EC3 FW:09
RC Version: p2.70
OC Station configuration table version: 0007
================================================== =====================================
1. Updated CPU micro code(s):
* M03206C2_00000013: Gulftown i7-980X B-1.
************************************************** *************************************
RampageIII-Extreme-ASUS-1101.ROM (HW:01h BB:44h EC:xx VGA:xx) 2010/09/13
================================================== =====================================
Bytes Reserved : F2000 Bytes Used : FC074 Bytes Free : 11F8C Checksum: C128
PCB Version: 1.04GT
EC1 FW:60
EC2 FW:14
EC3 FW:09
RC Version: p2.70
OC Station configuration table version: 0007
================================================== =====================================
1. [E.E]Patch cpu temperature may display 0 degree issue by HW request.
************************************************** *************************************
RampageIII-Extreme-ASUS-1005.ROM (HW:01h BB:43h EC:xx VGA:xx) 2010/08/26
================================================== =====================================
Bytes Reserved : F2000 Bytes Used : FBFF8 Bytes Free : 12008 Checksum: E555
PCB Version: 1.04GT
EC1 FW:56
EC2 FW:13
EC3 FW:09
RC Version: p2.70
OC Station configuration table version: 0007
================================================== =====================================
1. [E.E]Removed XPANDER firmware update function.
2. [E.E]Updated EC1 firmware version form 56 to 60.
-Fixed CPU voltage incorrect issue, if user OC station and ROG connect.
[E-Service No: 4285211]
-Modified SMBUS interrupt function.
3. [E.E]Updated EC2 firmware version form 13to 14.
-Modified SMBUS interrupt function.
4. Fix some character not correct, if languages is set to japanese in BIOS setup menu.
[E-Service No: 4302070]
************************************************** *************************************
RampageIII-Extreme-ASUS-1004.ROM (HW:01h BB:43h EC:xx VGA:xx) 2010/08/05
================================================== =====================================
Bytes Reserved : F2000 Bytes Used : FE058 Bytes Free : FFA8 Checksum: F5D1
PCB Version: 1.04GT
EC1 FW:56
EC2 FW:13
EC3 FW:09
RC Version: p2.70
OC Station configuration table version: 0007
================================================== =====================================
1. [E.E]Supported ROG XPANDER by HW request.
Changing out my old Motherboard for a R3E produced these results with my Vertex SSD's (on an LSI controller)
The best I could ever reach with an old nvidia based motherboard
http://db.tt/4UluWbG
New R3E board with same windows install
http://db.tt/y3KylxW
I can't imagine the results upgrading to 120GB vertex's would bring !
Meanwhile, Boy am I happy :)
R3E Rocks!!
Had no problem booting to this. But it seems that my keyboard and mouse intermittently dropping out. Can't say I've ever had an problem with an overclock like that. Hell it even ran a few minutes of folding@home and did not crash.
http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/5936/capturemv.jpg
When experiencing a freeze the first thing I check is the memory http://www.memtest.org/ then video card (swap it out for another old card), also your SSD may be an issue (try using a HDD for a while)Quote:
Originally Posted by tistou77
more PCI-E remedied the stutter for me :)Quote:
Originally Posted by lowfat
I'll give that a shot, but if I remember correctly my ioXtreme drops out @ 107MHz :down:Quote:
Originally Posted by Splave
I just installed my REIII last night with a new i7 930 and no matter if I am running stock or overclocked, Vcore is blank in CPUZ.
Anyone have this problem or know why it's happening?
Still can't figure out why vcore doesn't show in CPUZ.
Just got everything put together last night and had some time today to play. Was able to get 4.2Ghz 21x200 and 4.4Ghz 21x210 LinX 5 runs stable but wanted to see how far I could push this new 930.
Core i7 930 Batch# 3019A730
REIII Bios 1005
Kingston HyperX 3x2GB DDR3-2000 CL8 w/KHX Fan
XFX HD5870 XXX Edition
Corsair TX850 PSU
WD Caviar Black 2TB
ApogeeXT~ek 360 Rad~D5~1/2"ID x 3/4"OD
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...I_1M_8799s.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...e32M_5462s.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...tageP22757.jpg
The new version of CPUz 1.56 seem to have some bug. Try the v1.55. Tested it working.Quote:
Originally Posted by deachus
I agree. You might seen me running 980X @ 39-42V according to CPU-Z 1.56. :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by borntowin
The only problem is that you can't validate with old version. Or can you?
IIRC, I downloaded new version when I was trying to validate.
I can validate with old version 1.55.Quote:
Originally Posted by donmarkoni
Good to know. I might revert back to it, until they fix voltage issues.Quote:
Originally Posted by borntowin
I will revert back to 1.55, thanks guys.
Did you happen to do any memory benchmarks at that clock of 4.6ghz and memory at 2200MHz 8-8-8-24? When you get the time do you think you can run a Everest or AIDA64 memory benchmark? I'd love to see how it compares to hypers at 2000MHz 7-7-7-20.Quote:
Originally Posted by deachus
Excellent overclock btw :up:
So what voltage are you using there?
The tests I posted were the only tests I ran last night. I have to install Everest and 3DMARK06 tonight. Will post those results tonight.Quote:
Originally Posted by spoolindsm127
Voltages were nothing pretty, vcore 1.46, QPI 1.56, vdimm 1.71, IOH 1.27
Thanks:up:
i have a fixed version of cpu-z 1.56
that problem occurs to ppl who have an ROG Board,an official update will come in some days/weeks
I love this Board! I could not get over 217bclk on my P6T Deluxe V2 and it also throttled at anything over 4Ghz. Was able to lower my SuperPI and wPrime32M times by going up to 21x222. Vantage keeps crashing in CPU Test 1 with 101 code which means it needs more vcore. I pushed it up to 1.53v but still crashes with 101 code. I am done with max clocks for today, going to work on lower volts for my 24/7 overclock, 21x210.
spoolindsm127, here is Everest memory benchmark at 21x210 DDR3-1683Mhz6-6-6-18-60-1T and 21x222 DDR3-2223Mhz 8-8-8-24-90-1T:up:
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...I_1M_8689s.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...e32M_5415s.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...-6-6-18-1T.jpg
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...-8-8-24-1T.jpg
The 31ns latency is probably because you lost/dropped a memory channel while trying over 2200mhz, it was probably running in dual channel despite what everest shows. At least thats what happened to me, a couple guys pointed it out when I posted in another thread. Second run was at higher mhz but didnt drop/lose a channel so latency was higher. Last run was trying cas6.
http://img607.imageshack.us/img607/9...a64fastest.png
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/131/cachemem1v.png
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/2203/x21c6.png
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Indeed, with my settings stable "LinX" etc. ... Memtest86 + (4.10) does not start, I was forced to put the vDIMM 1.667v (stable at 1.65V) and vQPI to 1.367 (stable at 1.35V)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian[Frozen]
with ram to 2000 and in 3800 uncore
in h24, put uncore to 3600 is affected or not (affects the performance)?
thanks ;)
2200+MHz on hypers with tRFC 8 is sick, excellent job deachus and OC Nub :up:
Thanks deachus for posting the memory benchmarks and OC Nub as well.
I too at first was shocked at the absurdly low latency of 30ns, but like you said the issue with one of the channels dropping seems to explain that. 35.6ns seems more realistic, and still insanely fast :cool:
Deachus, what was your Uncore for the 6-6-6-18 clock?
OC Nub, it seems you dropped a channel when you ran the memory at 8-8-8-24, but not at 8-8-8-20? :confused: Or is that also supposed to be 8-8-8-24 and AIDA64 is just buggin out?
Has anyone else being able to make it to 231bclk with or without slow mode? I haven't used slow mode yet but anything over 231blck usb starts to work intermittently. At 231blck it is pretty bad but the system is still useable. 232blck usb is off more than it is on. Just curious if anyone has had this and how they resolved it. I have cranked the PCIe up to 112 but it wasn't any better than it was @ 105.
The wierd thing is that 230 blck has no such issues.
Thanks!
I am still pushing it, just out of time for now, have a 8 month old boy so endless days and nights of overclocking is on hold for now. Will give it another go later tonight.
I will have to check if a channel is dropping out next time. I usually notice that because it will only show 4GB in Task Manager. Will check on next run.
Uncore @ 3786 ~ 6-6-6-18-1T @ 1683
Uncore @ 4446 ~ 8-8-8-24-1T @ 2223
I haven't gotten up to 231blck yet. Just got my REIII up and running yesterday. Will test it out and get back to you. When I experience those problems it either means PCIe is to high or I need more vcore.Quote:
Originally Posted by lowfat
Thanks, it was 8 8 8 20 but I raised the MCH Strap to 2133mhz from 1600 for that run, at that point it was very unstable and raising the strap seemed to help.Quote:
Originally Posted by spoolindsm127
More Vcore eh? I only tried up to 1.3V. I guess I could try more.Quote:
Originally Posted by deachus
Looks like you got a very good board. Mine would flake out after 215 and the same thing would happen, usb keyboard would turn on and off, mostly off, or it just wouldnt boot. But slowmode allowed me to boot at 236-237 no issues. Im curious to see how well your board does with slowmode seeing how well it does without having to use it.Quote:
Originally Posted by lowfat
I've never used slow mode before on any board. But I just tried it (without changing any other settings) and it would lock up during windows loading.
have u settled on 24/7 settings yet donmarkoni?Quote:
Originally Posted by donmarkoni
Yeah, hope to see your 24/7 setting too.Quote:
Originally Posted by donmarkoni
so it's not the settings for Memtest68+, I again tested with the parameters stable with LinX, etc. ... Memtest86+ starts and no errorsQuote:
Originally Posted by tistou77
My impression is that it comes from adjustments Round Trip Latency (in AUTO in the bios), the values change with time
:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by tistou77
thanks ;)
Hello!
sorry for not reading thru 135 pages but please anyone can help my why none of my 5970's boots in my R3E's 3rd and 4th pcie slot? both cards are good in slot 1 - 2 but none of them boots in 3 or 4. vga led lights near eatxpwr.
my 4870 just boots fine in every slot. tried plug ez plug 2 but no sucess. 5970 still does not work...
^^ Maybe the PCI-E slots have been turned off from the dip switches by the ATX power connector by mistake.
Best to check them first.
Cheers
no they turned onQuote:
Originally Posted by bito
as i said my 4870 boots without problem
Do you have the (2) aux power connectors on the MB hooked up as well as the molex connectors?Quote:
Originally Posted by subaruwrc
Might need them all connected for two 5970's.
your trying to run them in 3-4 slot ? cuz for CF they need to be in 1-3 for the pci-e @ x16Quote:
Originally Posted by subaruwrc
Thank you guys for your advices but I tried everything
two molex 4 pin plugged, 5970's in slot 1 - 3 - crossfire not runing
none of the 5970's is runing in slot 3 or 4 with 2 plugs hooked and pcie switches on .... vga led lights and no signal.
my 4870 512 just runs fine in slots 3 or 4 so not pcie slot broken
have you teted each 5970 if slot 1 ?Quote:
Originally Posted by subaruwrc
what bios are you on ?
each of them works in slot 1 or 2Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom7184
bios on mobo is 1005
i dont have a 5970 so cant help much besides you might have to rma itQuote:
Originally Posted by subaruwrc
the newest card i got now is a 4870 :P
rma is not an option now as I need the board next week.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom7184
thx anyway
Quote:
Originally Posted by facboy
Here they are, my current folding settings, stable, but still testing and trying out other combinations.Quote:
Originally Posted by borntowin
This is what I'm working on, but not folding stable yet...Code:Target CPU Frequency 4402MHz
Target DRAM Frequency 2277MHz
LN2 Mode: Disabled***
QPI Loadline Calibration: Enabled***
Sync Mode [Enabled]
AI Overclock Tuner [Manual]
OC From CPU level Up [Auto]
2D Performance Booster [Disabled]
CPU Ratio Setting [31.0]
CPU Turbo Power Limit [Disabled]
>CPU Configuration----------------------------
CPU Ratio Setting [21.0]
C1E Support [Enabled]
Hardware Prefetcher [Enabled]
Adjacent Cache Line Prefetcher [Enabled]
MPS and ACPI MADT ordering [Modern]
Intel(R) Virtualization Tech [Enabled]
CPU TM Function [Disabled]
Execute Disable Bit [Enabled]
Intel(R) HT Technology [Enabled]
Active Processor Cores [All]
A20M [Disabled]
Intel(R) SpeedStep(TM) Tech [Enabled]
Performance/Watt select [Power]
Intel(R) C-STATE Tech [Enabled]
C State package limit setting [Auto]
C1 Auto Demotion [Enabled]
C3 Auto Demotion [Enabled]
----------------------------------------------
BCLK Frequency [142]
PCIE Frequency [100]
DRAM Frequency [2277]
UCLK Frequency [3986]
QPI Link Data Rate [6833]
Memory Configuration Protect [Disabled]
>DRAM Timing Control--------------------------
CAS# Latency 9 [9]
RAS# to CAS# Delay 11 [11]
RAS# PRE Time 9 [9]
RAS# ACT Time 27 [27]
RAS# to RAS# Delay 7 [Auto]
REF Cycle Time 126 [Auto]
WRITE Recovery Time 18 [Auto]
READ to PRE Time 8 [Auto]
FOUR ACT WIN Time 32 [Auto]
Back-To-BackCAS# Delay 0 [Auto]
Timing Mode 1N [1N]
Round Trip Latency on CHA 58 [Auto]
Round Trip Latency on CHB 60 [Auto]
Round Trip Latency on CHC 61 [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(DD) 6 [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(DR) 6 [Auto]
WRITE To READ Delay(SR) 21 [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DD) 10 [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(DR) 10 [Auto]
READ To WRITE Delay(SR) 10 [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DD) 7 [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(DR) 6 [Auto]
READ To READ Delay(SR) 4 [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DD) 7 [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(DR) 7 [Auto]
WRITE To WRITE Delay(SR) 4 [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
CPU Differential Amplitude [Auto]
CPU Clock Skew [Auto]
IOH Clock Skew [Auto]
------------ Extreme Engine Digi+ ------------
Digi+ PWR Mode [T-Balanced]
PWR Volt. Control [Auto]
Load-Line Calibration [Full]
CPU Voltege OCP [Enabled]
CPU PWM Frequency [Auto]
Extreme OV [Ensabled]*
Extreme OC [Auto]
CPU Voltage 1.402 [1.40000]
CPU PLL Voltage 1.204 [1.20575]
QPI/DRAM Core Voltage 1.415 [1.42500]
DRAM Bus Voltage 1.654 [Auto]
>DRAM REF Voltages----------------------------
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHA [Auto]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHB [Auto]
DRAM DATA REF Voltage on CHC [Auto]
DRAM CTRL REF Voltage on CHC [Auto]
----------------------------------------------
IOH Voltage 1.151 [1.15275]
IOH PCIE Voltage 1.508 [Auto]
ICH Voltage 1.111 [Auto]
ICH PCIE Voltage [Auto]
*QPI Voltage OCP [Enabled]
*IOH Voltage OCP [Enabled]
*DRAM Voltage OCP [Enabled]
*QPI PWM Frequency [Auto]
*IOH PWM Frequency [Auto]
*DRAM PWM Frequency [Auto]
---------- Spread Spectrum Control -----------
CPU Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
DRAM Spread Spectrum [Disabled]
***on-board jumper dependant
http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/6...4ghz4ghz2g.jpg
At 40.5v i dont see why not :rofl:
with the 970, it was not possible with these settings?Quote:
Originally Posted by donmarkoni
You have this option enabled or not?Quote:
Originally Posted by donmarkoni
thanks ;)
Still nothing... Maybe if I raise it to 60V? :ROTF:Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom7184
http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/667...own980x57v.jpg
Nope. My 970 worked at 4.3 at similar settings.Quote:
Originally Posted by tistou77
Actually Disabled, but if I Enable it and change nothing, it doesn't matter.
ok thanks ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by donmarkoni
Tell the most stable BIOS for matherboard...:rolleyes:
:d:d
Very nice.:D
How is QPI PLL controlled on r3e? I couldn't find a setting for it...
Note, this is not the QPI/DRAM/VTT voltage. This is the voltage for the driving pll.
I have one think about this popular question, is very personal, but, i think the best bios for u, only u can know it, because, maybe one bios work perfectly with my combination of hard ( motherboard, cpu , memory ) and maybe with your hardware is not really good, or other bios works better, so , if u can try the bios your self, i think this is the best !Quote:
Originally Posted by James_on
Regards!
Any answers to this issue yet please ?Quote:
Originally Posted by kill_a_wat
Crazy chip tsan :up: Batch 13A472 ??
3012b109
Having issues with my new Build, i7 980X, Rampage III Extreme, 12Gb of Gkill RAM.
My problem is, with overclocking and stabilizing the system.
I've tried using the following: Prime95, LinX and Cinbench 11.5
Cinebench works always, (its quick)
Prime95 runs for hours (longest run was 9.5 hours)
Runs from 3333 all the way to 4300 without errors, after tuning
LinX, works something and yet not others.
On some boot it runs at 81Gflops, other times 51Gflops, this is regardless of the CPU/Memory speed, in fact at:
4200 with Memory at 1728MHZ, it does 81 on some reboots, when it does this LinX will run without issues for 20 runs, if after a reboot it is 51Gflops, then it normally dies with in 3 runs. This without change options only rebooting. In both cases Prime95 runs for hours without issues.
Cinebench shows no change in performance when I run it no matter the speed of LinX.
So I'm confused if it is a LinX issue, a MB issue or what as I am at a loss to understand why LinX only works sometimes and then returns far better results then when it does not work, when nothing has changed that should affect performance.
ERIC
I was able to push the blck a little further tonight. Lowered my Wprime32M, SuperPI 1M and 32M times. I have reached CL8 max mhz as it doesn't scale any further with vQPI or vDIMM. SuperPI and wPrime32M were faster when I changed strap to DDR3-1795 from DDR3-2244 and tightened timings.
I was able to get Vantage to pass video tests with 5870 at 1055/1325 but blue screen 101 vcore shortly into first CPU test. I tried raising but still crashed. I'm still working on that one:cool:
SuperPI 1M 8.674
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...I_1M_8674s.jpg
SuperPI 32M 7m52.041sec
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...M_7m52041s.jpg
wPrime32M 5.365sec
http://i580.photobucket.com/albums/s...e32M_5365s.jpg
Nice results mate! Have you try running them setting in Hyper pi 0.99b!
Hello
I have an Adaptec Scsi controller PCI-E 1x card that i would like to add to my PC.
It worked fine on my Asus P6T Deluxe v1 Motherboard.
But not on my Rampage III Extreme with 1005 bios, or any other bios for that matter...
I've tryed to disable all onboard controllers... USB3 etc etc.
The PC runs fine thrugh post and scan for SCSI drives.
But when it then should go into bios or boot windows there is just a black screen - and nothing happens.
I've head about this issue before on the Rampage II motherboard. And there the solutions seamed to be wating for a new bios?
Here at my curse i dont have the model number of my SCSI controller, but ill get that as soon as i get home.
Best Regards
Vejby
It seems a BIOS issue, like in some releases of R2E BIOS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vejby
My Adaptec 5405 (PCI-e 4X) is working regularly unless I put my ICH10r in raid mode. If the onboard Intel controller is in RAID mode, I have same issue like you.