AMD Phenom II 920 & 940 Full Review [UPDATED with more tests]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by justapost

Thanks for the details overclocker_gr. Jsut to be sure, you ran two instances of orthos together with the CB10 multi core test. Correct?
Have you had C1E enabled in the bios?

---

4,nop

Guys, if you're going to talk about voltages, never ever consider what the software is telling you.
Simply put, it's wrong in most cases if not all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BenchZowner

Guys, if you're going to talk about voltages, never ever consider what the software is telling you.
Simply put, it's wrong in most cases if not all.

---

That is something and others are trying to find an excuse that Phenom could consume less power
but interesting to note that PII/C2Q in Crysis uses 70+W more than CPU test while I7 uses 45W or less more on Crysis , i thought all 3D and CPU results should be linear , But i was wrong :)

excuse me?

If a mobo overvolts CPU, it consumes more power. Period. Thats a fact.
If a mobo undervolts CPU, it consumes less power. Thats another fact.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BenchZowner

Guys, if you're going to talk about voltages, never ever consider what the software is telling you.
Simply put, it's wrong in most cases if not all.

---

yea and really if all amd mobos are overvolting and this is not a fault then it should be taken into consideration. i find it odd that they all overvolt during load. my 9600 at stock on my m3a32 never overvolts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by roofsniper

yea and really if all amd mobos are overvolting and this is not a fault then it should be taken into consideration. i find it odd that they all overvolt during load. my 9600 at stock on my m3a32 never overvolts.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PetNorth

excuse me?

If a mobo overvolts CPU, it consumes more power. Period. Thats a fact.
If a mobo undervolts CPU, it consumes less power. Thats another fact.

---

guyz,read careful what benchzowner said.


Dont consider what you are seeing in windows or bios,its 99% inaccurate.

Take a DMM a measure the vcore ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PetNorth

excuse me?

If a mobo overvolts CPU, it consumes more power. Period. Thats a fact.
If a mobo undervolts CPU, it consumes less power. Thats another fact.

---

Yeap that is True , But changed Voltage in Bios then measured the Power consumption , this got nothing with the default Vcore the chip should run on, this just like i undervolt my CPU and say it consume less power on stock clocks You need to measure the real Vcore , my 3800X2 for example Stock Volt is 1.35V and i run it 1.2V all set in Bios but never measured and it consumes less power on custom settings but this got nothing to do with stock settings ,, It is similar to the fact that if you overclock your CPU it will run faster , next time we will ask power consumption test with CPUs at stock clocks and undervoltet to the max :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PetNorth

excuse me?

If a mobo overvolts CPU, it consumes more power. Period. Thats a fact.
If a mobo undervolts CPU, it consumes less power. Thats another fact.

---

im assuming you are talking about current (as in amperes) being constant, then both statements are true.
edit: or current increases with voltage in the first statement and decreases in the 2nd, if i may add.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kemo

but interesting to note that PII/C2Q in Crysis uses 70+W more than CPU test while I7 uses 45W or less more on Crysis , i thought all 3D and CPU results should be linear , But i was wrong :)

---

Seems reasonable, the amount of work the i7 needs to do in games is much less than the amount of work it does with 8 threads of CPU intensive applications.

I was wondering what benches I can post of my chip. I am in the USA, And don't want to violate NDA.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by charged3800z24

I was wondering what benches I can post of my chip. I am in the USA, And don't want to violate NDA.

---

if you didnt sign a NDA then you cant really violate it can you...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nunchucka

if you didnt sign a NDA then you cant really violate it can you...

---

HMM,, well I suppose not.. tho the person (president of my work) that gave it too me said I was alloud to post a picture or anything(noob). I though about doing some 3.0ghz bench's comparing my 9950 @ 3.0ghz. same BN HT and Ram settings. I only have the one board right now.. so I will have to swap CPUs to do so.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by charged3800z24

I was wondering what benches I can post of my chip. I am in the USA, And don't want to violate NDA.

---

Could you see how high it'll go please, just to get an idea of what to expect thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by charged3800z24

HMM,, well I suppose not.. tho the person (president of my work) that gave it too me said I was alloud to post a picture or anything(noob). I though about doing some 3.0ghz bench's comparing my 9950 @ 3.0ghz. same BN HT and Ram settings. I only have the one board right now.. so I will have to swap CPUs to do so.

---

well if your boss signed an NDA for that chip and you post benches he could get in trouble afaik

yea id just hold off on the benchies. we only got a week until phenom II's release, show us what you got then.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kemo

That is something and others are trying to find an excuse that Phenom could consume less power
but interesting to note that PII/C2Q in Crysis uses 70+W more than CPU test while I7 uses 45W or less more on Crysis , i thought all 3D and CPU results should be linear , But i was wrong :)

---

the reason for that is simple, artificial cpu tests are stressing the cpu to the max (eg. prime with 8 threads).

Games on the other hand dont stress all cores on Ci7 so the PCU shuts down not needed parts. :yepp:

I hope AMDs next cpu has something similar to intel PCU.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BrowncoatGR

well if your boss signed an NDA for that chip and you post benches he could get in trouble afaik

---

He was being pretty picky about me posting info..even a screenshot or 2. He won't even tell me how he got it..I guess I could block the info like everyone else..and post a screen shot.

Edit: I am loading Vista 7 and want to see how it is. Here is all I did. I only ran a 1M Pi..So I can't say for sure how stable it is...

http://3800z24.info/Phenom/Deneb/Pi_1M_4ghz_small.JPG

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr

So,this is the follow-up of the first thread regarding the new Phenom II processor series review that we did @ hwbox.gr.
here is again the link
http://www.hwbox.gr/showthread.php?t=3189

---

All are fake !:ROTF: You can see again ! special , benchmark in game !
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k...md_ph2_940.png
example with Crysis Warhead.
benchmark in http://www.hwbox.gr/showthread.php?t=3189&garpg=22
1280x1024 : FPS>125FPS
1680x1050 : FPS~~24FPS
benchmark in http://guru3d.com/article/top-10-gam...ore-216-test/7

Quote:

---

system
Mainboard
ASUS X58 ROG edition Rampage II Extreme
Processor
Core i7 965 @ 3750 MHz
Graphics Cards
GeForce GTX 260 core 216 896 MB
Radeon HD 4870 1024 MB
Memory
3072 MB (3x1024MB) DDR3 1800 MHz OCZ
Power Supply Unit
1200 Watt
Monitor
Dell 3007WFP - up to 2560x1600

---

1280x1024 : FPS<50FPS
1600x1200 : FPS ~~32FPS
-----------------------------------------------------------
Why ? who will explain ? thanks !:rofl:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vietthanhpro

All are fake !:ROTF: You can see again !

---

Cause you are a little bit a ****.


We run crysis with the lower details.

At guru 3d they run it @ 1280*1024 + 2xAA + Gamer Details.
@1600*1200 which is a higher resolution than 1680*1050 , they run it with Gamer Details and 2xAA
We run it @ 1280*1024 without AA + Performance Details.
@1680*1050 we run it at Enthusiast without AA

Ok now?



write my answer here too

http://vozforums.com/showthread.php?t=146108

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr

Cause you are a little bit a ****.


We run crysis with the lower details.

At guru 3d they run it @ 1280*1024 + 2xAA + Gamer Details.
@1600*1200 which is a higher resolution than 1680*1050 , they run it with Gamer Details and 2xAA
We run it @ 1280*1024 without AA + Performance Details.
@1680*1050 we run it at Enthusiast without AA

Ok now?

---

what kind of VGA do you use ?:shrug:
AND you can bring somes pictures !:( about games benchmark:yepp:
OK now ?

don't worry about him i swear he is related to lo squartatore.

When do clock-per-clock comparisons arrive? I don't mean to be impatient, I'm just excited! :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vietthanhpro

what kind of VGA do you use ?:shrug:
AND you can bring somes pictures !:( about games benchmark:yepp:
OK now ?

---

oh yes.

deneb
http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/11/shi11ub0.th.jpg

i7 @ 965 @ 940 turbo on speeds
http://img122.imageshack.us/img122/4489/sh1t2kv1.th.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YukonTrooper

When do clock-per-clock comparisons arrive? I don't mean to be impatient, I'm just excited! :D

---

Maybe today(for us in greece :p:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr

oh yes.

deneb
http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/11/shi11ub0.th.jpg

i7 @ 965 @ 940 turbo on speeds
http://img122.imageshack.us/img122/4489/sh1t2kv1.th.jpg

---

oh ! in DX9c, i7 run faster:clap:
But I don't see Deneb's score in resolution 1680*1050 ! NDA?:(http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/11/shi11ub0.jpg
in i7 benchmark, you can reduce QPI speeds.

it was a faulty run at that ss.

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/7709/shiftml3.th.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr

it was a faulty run at that ss.

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/7709/shiftml3.th.jpg

---

in DX10, Deneb run faster ! AMD come back ! good job !
I think that you shouldn't bench in DX9.:yepp: Yes !:clap:

but you said that all these tests are fake.
What changed now?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr

but you said that all these tests are fake.
What changed now?

---

NDA ? You still bench !:p:

Thank you, OverClocker_gr, for your hard work, :) but please ignore vietthanhpro. He doesn't want to believe your review simply because the NDA hasn't ended yet. :shrug: I guess nothing can convince him now. (And no, he's not lo squartatore. I can confirm it. :D )

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YukonTrooper

When do clock-per-clock comparisons arrive? I don't mean to be impatient, I'm just excited! :D

---

Based on OverClocker_gr's results, I have made a table comparing Core i7 920 2.66GHz with Turbo Mode on with Phenom 2 920 2.80GHz. With one more speed bin, the Core i7 should be at 2.80 too, so I think it's good for clock-for-clock comparison. :)

http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k...ph2_920_03.gif
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/k...ph2_920_04.gif

im happy with ph2 gaming results, good job amd!

Vozer, I think it is hard for any of us to believe what we see. Stock performance for my current 9850 is great but OC sucks not even 100mhz above stock is stable with 64bit OSes when AMD testers showed Agenas getting 3Ghz out of the box. I getting the 940 come hell or intel but I'm only cautiously optimistic it will get over 3Ghz.

Quote:

---

http://img224.imageshack.us/img224/7709/shiftml3.jpg

---

Good job :)

Eh...I wonder how a Q6600@2.66GHz can perform in this resolution :rolleyes: I don't want to flame, but I argue with a guy who says that a Q6600@2.66GHz can outperform Phenom II 940 in Crysis (naturally, he is a fan of Crysis and 3DMark :D)

@Vozer: Neverwhere đó à ;)

HEY! Finnish customers have got few cpu's on their hands today, some of them will get at monday so stay tuned, ill link some retail test from muropaketti when they post those... and theyre not even violating anything, PC shops selling cpu's :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vozer

Thank you, OverClocker_gr, for your hard work, :) but please ignore vietthanhpro. He doesn't want to believe your review simply because the NDA hasn't ended yet. :shrug: I guess nothing can convince him now. (And no, he's not lo squartatore. I can confirm it. :D )

Based on OverClocker_gr's results, I have made a table comparing Core i7 920 2.66GHz with Turbo Mode on with Phenom 2 920 2.80GHz. With one more speed bin, the Core i7 should be at 2.80 too, so I think it's good for clock-for-clock comparison. :)

---

thanks for the comaro.. only thing i the Cinebench scores for i7 are all wrong?? perhaps you've grabbed 64bit scores for i7, and 32bit for phenom as the i7 scores are higher than they should be if all 32bit.

cheers

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AlabamaCajun

<snip>Stock performance for my current 9850 is great but OC sucks not even 100mhz above stock is stable with 64bit OSes when AMD testers showed Agenas getting 3Ghz out of the box. I getting the 940 come hell or intel but I'm only cautiously optimistic it will get over 3Ghz.

---

Wow, that's disappointing considering your rig. I wonder if it's the board? FYI in my ~3.00 OC, my stability test was installing Vista 64. It's very stable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AlabamaCajun

Vozer, I think it is hard for any of us to believe what we see. Stock performance for my current 9850 is great but OC sucks not even 100mhz above stock is stable with 64bit OSes when AMD testers showed Agenas getting 3Ghz out of the box. I getting the 940 come hell or intel but I'm only cautiously optimistic it will get over 3Ghz.

---

Well I've seen on my own 2 940's hitting 3,6-3,7 GHz on air and 100% stable in Vista x64, and these are rather crappy parts.
So don't worry :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bedlamite

Well I've seen on my own 2 940's hitting 3,6-3,7 GHz on air and 100% stable in Vista x64, and these are rather crappy parts.
So don't worry :P

---

This is news I was waiting for!! :up:
Thanks bedlamite!

I'm using only 64bit OSes on my main RIG because I needed to relocate my XP MCE to HTPC BOX. Besides I'm planning upgrading my rig to 8GB of RAM soon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mAJORD

thanks for the comaro.. only thing i the Cinebench scores for i7 are all wrong?? perhaps you've grabbed 64bit scores for i7, and 32bit for phenom as the i7 scores are higher than they should be if all 32bit.

cheers

---

I got the scores from OverClocker_gr's website. Thanks, updated. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amdcian

@Vozer: Neverwhere đó à ;)

---

Ừ. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bedlamite

Well I've seen on my own 2 940's hitting 3,6-3,7 GHz on air and 100% stable in Vista x64, and these are rather crappy parts.
So don't worry :P

---

plus 1

sb600 here and xp at 3.7 with 1.46

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vozer

Based on OverClocker_gr's results, I have made a table comparing Core i7 920 2.66GHz with Turbo Mode on with Phenom 2 920 2.80GHz. With one more speed bin, the Core i7 should be at 2.80 too, so I think it's good for clock-for-clock comparison. :)

---

Thank you very much for taking the time to do that, Vozer; however, I was more interested in the clock-per-clock comparisons of Yorkfield to Deneb. I knew Deneb wouldn't catch i7. That thing is Godzilla on steroids. :p:

http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/6...nomii38zs8.png

HAH nice...................................... w0ot

Does AMD's OverDrive apply settings directly to BIOS?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YukonTrooper

Does AMD's OverDrive apply settings directly to BIOS?

---

when you reboot, bois setting take over. AOD can then reaply the settings on startup if set to do so..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YukonTrooper

Does AMD's OverDrive apply settings directly to BIOS?

---

some boards can override it in. bios other can't. like jetways 780gx and 780g can override it. while the s790fx boards I've had don't.

The Clock per Clock review/s should be out tomorrow ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by YukonTrooper

Does AMD's OverDrive apply settings directly to BIOS?

---

no of course not but you can load a profile at startup.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by charged3800z24

when you reboot, bois setting take over. AOD can then reaply the settings on startup if set to do so..

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by demonkevy666

some boards can override it in. bios other can't. like jetways 780gx and 780g can override it. while the s790fx boards I've had don't.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by biohead

no of course not but you can load a profile at startup.

---

Thnx, guys. So some boards can and some boards can't. Gotcha. :up:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BenchZowner

The Clock per Clock review/s should be out tomorrow ;)

---

Stop :poke: me. :D

HondaGuy I feel like your chips got alot left in it for that voltage.

Specially since your hypertransport and northbridge clock are at stock.

Not to mention you seem to have made skill's with phenom's getting a 9850BE to 3.7 :up:

oh Yea there is alot left, like I said just got the thing ,,still tweaking. just wanna make sure I have enough volts,, since Im on water

http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/5...nomii39ds4.png

Temps

http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/9...iitempssh9.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BenchZowner

The Clock per Clock review/s should be out tomorrow ;)

---

nice to hear. :up:

nice hondaguy

Another ? I just must ask

I noticed the NB multiplier seem's to only go to 9x is that really the limit?
I swore it was usually at 10x and had the option of up to 11x or so.

My bet is on you hitting maybe 4.3-4.4 core and 2.65 nb/core.

Thats it for tonight 3.9 is stable.. going out drinking now....Cheer Guys

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HondaGuy

Temps

http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/9...iitempssh9.png

---

Nice temp man. Great to see how PII clocks on air with that voltage and temps

@vietthanhpro: vozer là vozer, ko phải neverwhere

Nb multi only change through bios, not aod. In aod u just see what is set at.
Mine has at least x16 from what i remember(16x200=3200).;)

leoy umm 3.2.....am I smokin something?

But isn't that your core clock not northbridge?

Since motherboard's don't support 3.2nb yet...I have a feeling am3 will to catch up to i7's qpi interconnect and uncore clocks more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HondaGuy

Temps

http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/9...iitempssh9.png

---

And...how much is ambient temp :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Caveman787

leoy umm 3.2.....am I smokin something?

But isn't that your core clock not northbridge?

Since motherboard's don't support 3.2nb yet...I have a feeling am3 will to catch up to i7's qpi interconnect and uncore clocks more.

---

Just the possibilities my friend.
2.78 was the max i got with my 9950 agena ever.
Btw Charged managed to take the deneb's nb @ 3ghz(this will be smokin):D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leoy

Just the possibilities my friend.
2.78 was the max i got with my 9950 agena ever.
Btw Charged managed to take the deneb's nb @ 3ghz(this will be smokin):D

---

where did you see that at? i only saw 2.5ghz.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by leoy

Just the possibilities my friend.
2.78 was the max i got with my 9950 agena ever.
Btw Charged managed to take the deneb's nb @ 3ghz(this will be smokin):D

---

I no longer have a Asus M3A79-T board anymore either...:down: I also did not mean for that to be so high.. I also wondoer if AOD was having a glitch, my ram was above 1200mhz and is is 1066 ram LOL...I went to open CPU-z to see what it said and the system crashed..I never got to see. so it was either right and was not stable at all,,or a board fluke and AOD messing with my head.

I just had it set to just over 2.5NB and 2.2HT, 4ghz cpu in XP and it seemed stable.

I have been doin some 3ghz CPU, 2ghzNB and HT benches to compare against my 9950 at those same settings. I just ran a Cinebench run in Windows 7 on the CPUs..I can't say which chip this is tho

http://3800z24.info/Phenom/Deneb/windows7.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by roofsniper

where did you see that at? i only saw 2.5ghz.

---

there´s a screenshot of 4ghz/cpu anf 3ghz/nb somewhere in the m3a79-t thread.
it wasn´t very stable though.. his board went belly up after a few minutes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by roofsniper

where did you see that at? i only saw 2.5ghz.

---

It was a my first 2mins of OCing the chip and only 2 mins...then :smoke:
I set the primary OC in bios, then opened AOD and uped the HT ref...I hit Apply and eveything was wacked..I was using a 1:2 divider and ram was sky high..so was NB...I only had time to get a screenshot then then went to open CPU-z and well like I said.. no more asus. I am not using AOD anymore :p: I am scaries

Edit:

http://3800z24.info/Phenom/Deneb/AOD.JPG

http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/2...henomiiqb5.png

Holy crap charged no wonder the thing crappy out your voltages on the memory and nb are way high from what I've seen. 2.4 isn't insane but I can't imagaine how hot your mosfet's and northbridge must have gotten.

3000 nb boot and 670 is insanely high and gives more power to my theory of even higher nb possibility on am3...granted not a massive amount at this point but it's guaranteed there going to push these chips as hard as they can to try and get a good spot between yorkfields power consumption and nehalem's performance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HondaGuy

Thats it for tonight 3.9 is stable.. going out drinking now....Cheer Guys

---

:eek: Wow Awesome!! Looks like intel finally has some oc competition. I think everyone's gonna have a lot of fun this year. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nguoisaigon

@vietthanhpro: vozer là vozer, ko phải neverwhere

---

nguoisaigon///vietnamese///AMDCian hỏi chứ em có hỏi đâu.:yepp:
http://3800z24.info/Phenom/Deneb/AOD.JPG
WOW:shocked:

perfection.. ugg i want that LMAO

Here's the last teaser for now

http://i40.tinypic.com/11gq90k.jpg

All CPUs clocked at 3.7GHz

lol gpu limited in UT3. :D

Thanks for the teasers BenchZowner :) .Deneb performs really good and hangs pretty well with the blue horde :D.

http://img353.imageshack.us/img353/9...bench37xu7.png

I think that in high frequencys, phenom keeps up better.... there isn't any clock to clock deficiency.

just think if I had a M3A79-T Deluxe.....Once someone else gets a Phenom II on that board and I see the results I just might get myself one, as for now just going strong with the M3A32-MVP Deluxe

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HondaGuy

just think if I had a M3A79-T Deluxe.....Once someone else gets a Phenom II on that board and I see the results I just might get myself one, as for now just going strong with the M3A32-MVP Deluxe

---

Man i start to believe that your board is one of a kind....
Don't take the m3a79....:D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HondaGuy

Cinebench result

---

NB clock?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BenchZowner

Here's the last teaser for now

All CPUs clocked at 3.7GHz

---

Can you test with Agena, I know it can't reach 3.7GHz, but only for comparation :).
P.S. Thanks for the teaser.

@HondaGuy, is your Agena 9850 still yours? If it is, can you post some benches from it :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oliverda

NB clock?

---

Same 2200

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HondaGuy

Same 2200

---

Thanks. Could you please run a cinebench at 3.2GHz core clocks and 2GHz NB?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oliverda

Thanks. Could you please run a cinebench at 3.2GHz core clocks and 2GHz NB?

---

Yep brb

Ok first retail result from finland, you can buy 940 BE now :P
voltage unknown yet, user said he's tweaking more so stay tuned ill try to catch all of his results.

Phenom II 940 @ 3.8ghz and radeon 2900 pro
3Dmark 06

http://service.futuremark.com/result...eResultType=14

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KeZzZu

Ok first retail result from finland, you can buy 940 BE now :P
voltage unknown yet, user said he's tweaking more so stay tuned ill try to catch all of his results.

Phenom II 940 @ 3.8ghz and radeon 2900 pro
3Dmark 06

http://service.futuremark.com/result...eResultType=14

---

5580 pts CPU score is a good result at 3813 MHz. :up:

http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/5...bench32gf7.png

The Stock CPU---- NB/HT@2000
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/8...iistockuy3.png

Any of you guys care to report temps @ stock Vcore?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brother Esau

Any of you guys care to report temps @ stock Vcore?

---

Sure....H20 here

http://img370.imageshack.us/img370/41/stocktempsze8.png

Thanks HodaGuy;) I recon that High End Air Cooler will be about the same at Idle as Water.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HondaGuy

Sure....H20 here

http://img370.imageshack.us/img370/41/stocktempsze8.png

---

Thanks a lot :)

And how much are temps when full load :rolleyes:

Ive has this chip up to 1.55 so far under load was about 44....Room temp right now is 22

HondaGuy: Thank you

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oliverda

HondaGuy: Thank you

---

When you Cinebench yours at 3.2 NB@2000, what are your results?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HondaGuy

Ive has this chip up to 1.55 so far under load was about 44....Room temp right now is 22

---

Impressive :shocked:

What cooler do you use :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amdcian

Impressive :shocked:

What cooler do you use :)

---

He'd said he's on water :).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BenchZowner

Here's the last teaser for now

http://i40.tinypic.com/11gq90k.jpg

All CPUs clocked at 3.7GHz

---

BenchZowner, can you run x264 benchmark with a newer x264 version?
The included are too ancient :P (8 months old the newer).

I've adjusted the bat file (and the vbs file to launch the new bat) to run one of the latest (if not the last, I've not checked today), r1069. The only issue is that fps results don't write to the rtf file and I can't figured out why :shrug: Anyways, you can see the fps from the ms-dos window ;)

The settings are the unmodified Standalone-Blu-ray_fast profile from Megui (only adjusted the bitrate to 3959 from 8000, just like the bitrate used with original x264 benchmark, and I guess this standalone profile is the equivalent to the one used with original bench).

You have these files attached inside a zip.

And here the x264 r1069 http://rapidshare.com/files/17938606...-1069.rar.html
Thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Stuen4y

He'd said he's on water :).

---

Hi hi, I guess he used air cooling for that bench :)

Because at 3.8GHz with water cooling, the temps were similiar with 3GHz :rolleyes:

http://img117.imageshack.us/img117/9...iitempssh9.png

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=250

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Oliverda

5580 pts CPU score is a good result at 3813 MHz. :up:

---

In Vista, yes, but this was XP (according to Futuremark).
It's a little lower than my Q9450@3,7 - 5885(compare)
Still, I am more than convinced over PHII. This is a "must buy". :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HondaGuy

When you Cinebench yours at 3.2 NB@2000, what are your results?

---

I've managed to run 3103MHz on mine with NB@2354MHz and RAM@1140MHz:
CPU single - 3361
CPU multi - 12246

Run at 3001MHz, NB@2277MHz, RAM@1100MHz
CPU single - 3261
CPU multi - 11763

Vista x64

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by amdcian

Hi hi, I guess he used air cooling for that bench :)

Because at 3.8GHz with water cooling, the temps were similiar with 3GHz :rolleyes:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=250

---

When the room temperature is around 22*C(as he said) what delta T do you want to make the water? 0 degrees? :)5-6* are something normal, the load temps are more interesting than the idle :).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TL1000S

In Vista, yes, but this was XP (according to Futuremark).
It's a little lower than my Q9450@3,7 - 5885(compare)
Still, I am more than convinced over PHII. This is a "must buy". :)

---

Your card is much faster than 2900Pro, so the CPU score is higher because of it, not because the CPU itself.
P.S. I hate you, all that have already got their Denebs :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brother Esau

Any of you guys care to report temps @ stock Vcore?

---

http://3800z24.info/Phenom/Deneb/deneb.JPG

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TL1000S

In Vista, yes, but this was XP (according to Futuremark).
It's a little lower than my Q9450@3,7 - 5885(compare)
Still, I am more than convinced over PHII. This is a "must buy". :)

---

Updated my results.


Phenom I
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9391970

Phenom 2
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=9484910

All same except prosessor.