Printable View
Well, it can, sort of. just click the tray icon once.Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBar
They fixed the tray icon. Only if it allowed to show the temp in tray...
that would be lovely
I do have another request though(probably already requested) .. an "Always on Top" option.
it would be very useful when switching load\idle on different apps.
An Alpha of system tray is already running. when I have some time I'll add some settings and options.
So hang on, have some patience.
Hi all,
Sorry if this is in the wrong group but i was going through them and could not find a suitable one.
Is there any decent temp program that can be used with vista, also a fan controller would be awesome.
Thanks everyone.
Steelsie
This program ROCKS...way better than asus probe and those POS softwares :P
I would really like a show temp in systray option...maybe alternate colors for each core: Core1 26c in green. Core2 26c in Yellow.
That would be awsome.
Try MBM 5 ;)
It doesn't work with C2D processors, and barely with NF4 based mobos...Quote:
Originally Posted by lawrywild
C2D is only MBM-compatiable with Kunaak's modded files, search for them on the forums, he's testing betas right now ;)
Best Regards :toast:
Look 2 posts above yours...Quote:
Originally Posted by VIctorj
Ok guys newish here and have a minor issue with both Core Temp and ITAT in the Core Temp gives me a "This processor does not Support DTS Readings " error and ITAT shows the wrong temps...
I have a E6400 ES A1 revision Stock Voltage running at 8*300 2.4ghz so nothing insane 2GB A-Data DDR800 Ram Silverstone 650W PSU
and the pic tells the story really EasyTune says about 17c @ idle and about 35 under 100% load using Itat to load it up
http://users.on.net/~akin//core_temp.PNG
Any ideas or is it just an issue with the ES CPU's
Cheers
Its an early ES revision, on which the DTS wasn't working properly, if at all.
This is the reason Core Temp doesn't even start up on it.
First processors to really support this were the B0 revision.
I gotta little question if thats ok...
What is the significance of VID ie is higher or lower better? and why would it be different in these two versions of coretemp?
http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q148/JAFFA22/ct.png
cheers
In 0.91 the VID wasn't read correctly.
Version 0.93 fixed that.
thanks coolest ;)
Hellow guys.
I just got my new rig, as an update for my old pentium d system.
The setup is following:D
Asus P5N-E SLi with 650i chipset
Conroe E6600, stepping6 B2 with both box and zalman 9500 cooler.
2gb kingston valueram pc4300
250gb maxtor maxline3 pata133
Raptor 36gb
2 Inno3d 7900gs in SLI mode
Hiper type R 580W
Raidmax sagitta chase with 120mm fan in front, 80mm in the side and 120mm behind in the chase.
I think that makes good airflow.... :)
But coretemp shows following temperatures when cpu running stock volt and fsb.
Box cooler - 52-55c idle and 59-62c full load
Zalman - 50c idle and 55c full load.
Can that really be true ? Omg i though the new core2 was a cool cpu ? :confused:
Hope for any help here.
sincerly Jenner from www.overclocking.dk from denmark. :rolleyes:
A good start will be to search "a few" threads regarding *reported* temperatures for Core 2 Duo systems.Quote:
Originally Posted by jennerOc.dk
Personally I am not too impressed by the Zalman 9500, but I think this is not the issue here.
Either software related (Bios/sensors).. or more likely, a 6600 with badly mounted IHS (from factory).
I take for granted that you've mounted coolers coorectly though.. :)
WOW , most be something wrong in ur cooling or cpu bro, are u using? thermal paste or artic silver? made a huge diferent when i change from thermal paste to artic silver. this is my temp running @ 3.4Quote:
Originally Posted by TL1000S
No possibility to add subzero temp.? report fixed at 7°C...
That's a problem with the DTS, nothing else. For whatever reason it doesn't like being cooled to very low temps, and just gets "stuck" reporting a certain temperature.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lane-k
The Coolest
Please Please Please host the fiel somewhere else as a secondary link since i live in Egypt and was never able to open the link to download the CoreTemp
YGPM.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaFrOuT
Program works OK on my Woodcrest system (although C1E made the application read the speed incorrectly). Disabling C1E resulted in the speed being displayed correctly...;)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
I see, thanks for your reply.
Yep, I live in Brazil and I'm also not able to go to you webpage or download the tool.Quote:
Originally Posted by SaFrOuT
Thanks,
[EDIT] Nevermind, I found a good proxy to download it :D thanks anyway.
Hi did you find an answer to the problem as mine is doing the same, have resated the heatsink so many times now but still the same, I have a 3 deg difference between cores that is using intel stock HSF and a Noctua NH-U9 overall temps are great but it's annoying not knowing what this is.Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
I have written a small guide about how to get Core Temp to run on Windows Vista, if anyone is wondering:
http://www.thecoolest.zerobrains.com...opic.php?t=211
Vista x64 or 32bit? The 32bit is just like xp in this regard, so I guess with UAC off it'll behave the same way.
this program is a bit scarey when you run orthos prime at 320 x 11 (3.52 GHz) @ 1.45v and it climbs above 70c :eek:
this is pretty much expected from core readings, correct?
Intel TAT gives me 17C more @ idel and 10C more @ load compared to Core Temp speed fan and Gigabyte Easy Tune :confused: I have a E4300 BTW
Got some funny readings with an E6600 and Gigabyte DS4...
CoreTemp 0.94:
#0: 20ºC
#1: 19ºC
Ambient according to a digital thermometer:
23ºC
Waterblock temp:
27ºC
Is it somehow possible to output the coretemp readings to samurize?
2 favouriites together Tetedeiench developer of OCCT has bta =
OCCT with Coretremp Support
works well.
http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~chsm...22h37-CPU1.png
&
http://homepages.nildram.co.uk/~chsm...22h37-CPU2.png
Version 0.95 - 17th March, 2007
- Fix: Revision F Turion/Turion X2 detected wrong.
- Fix: Core Temp fully loads one core on a dual core AMD CPU.
- Fix: Core Temp crashes on Dual Core Opteron 200 series systems.
- Fix: Core Temp misdetected certain Dual Core Opteron CPUs.
- Fix: Must set Core Temp to run as Administrator in Vista.
- Fix: Can't see Core Temp GUI if Core Temp was last closed minimized.
- Fix: C2D L2 rev. report very low temperatures. (Tjmax to 100C)
- Fix: Core Temp reported wrong temps after a while. (Driver conflict)
- Fix: Core Temp reported Max VID on Intel CPUs. (Now shows current)
- Add: Show temperature in System tray.
- Add: Manual refresh option by pressing F5 or "File" Menu.
- Add: Show "Delta to Tjunction" temperature for Core 2 CPUs.
- Add: Support for latest Intel and AMD CPUs.
- Add: Minimize/Restore option in system tray icon right click.
- Add: Save last window position.
- Add: Prevent 2 instances of Core Temp from launching.
- Change: Rewritten Intel CPU recognition code.
- Change: Core 2 Duo codename change to Conroe-2M from Allendale.
- Change: Pop up bubble-window with temperatures removed.
- Change: Not Beta status anymore.
Good stuff mate :clap:
Keep up the good work :)
Yes, same here. Both http://www.thecoolest.zerobrains.com/CoreTemp/ and http://www.alcpu.com/CoreTemp/ fail to open :shrug: :help:Quote:
Originally Posted by SaFrOuT
http://69.93.81.146/~thecoolest/CoreTemp/
I added the link in fine print at the bottom of first post too.
when will it work on phase?
Whenever Intel fixes the DTS. This is not a software glitch AFAIK.
Hi Arthur, I believe there exists some problem regarding name resolution and access to alcpu.com, but I'm not capable to identify where is it.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
Name servers here in Hawai cannot resolve alcpu.com or www.alcpu.com to 69.93.81.146. And 69.93.81.146 is completely inaccessible too. Tracing route to 69.93.81.146 stop at po1.car03.dllstx6.theplanet.com, so no luck following this approach.
Name server for alcpu.com is ns1.psk-dns.com (69.93.81.146). Trying to use that to resolve alcpu.com failed. By the way, ns1.psk-dns.com looks inaccessible too.
Talking to a UK friend last night, he reported the same problem now although he was capable to download the 0.94 version weeks ago directly from your website.
I know this doesn't help too much, but I'm reporting what I've discovered so far to let you know.
I get a BSOD with 0.95. :(
Never had any problems with previous versions.
Edited.
I'm investingating the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by qwerty69
Hit me on one of the IMs if you want to try and help me figure this problem out and we'll talk.
rbsmontemor:
YGPM
Thank you :)Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
BTW, works like a charm.
rbs
Thanks for all your work...
If anyone is having problems with Core Temp crashing on them, please look at the appropriate thread and post there your problem and system spec. I think this way it will be very effective at getting to the bugs faster.
Intel Thread
AMD Thread
I just registered and posted over at your forums "The Coolest", thanks for a place to post our issues with the program! Since I consider your program "CoreTemp" a nessessity I just searched and found CoreTemp v0.94 so I can use it in the meantime until v0.95 is working on my rig without shutting everything down! If anyone needs a linky for CoreTemp 0.94 just ask!
TheCoolest,
coretemp 0.95 now reads the correct temp on e4300/e4400s :) (and a different tjunction o0)
however, i have encountered a problem soon as i stop priming (this will happen every time i prime for a while with coretemp 0.95 open and then i stop)
FYI, I am 24 hours orthos stable at this clock
priming
http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/6960/coretempdc8.jpg
stopped
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/1...mperrorhz9.jpg
http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/1...perror2do9.jpg
http://img490.imageshack.us/img490/4...perror3uy5.jpg
That's quite interesting. I will investigate, thanks.
I may have found a solution(!) to the BSOD problem in 0.95.
My test system stopped crashing. I need more computers with this problem to confirm the fix is working.
If you want to test the fix, please contact me via one of my IMs.
Thanks,
Arthur
Version 0.95.4 - 22nd August, 2007
- Fix: Core Temp causes restarts/BSODs on start.
- Fix: Core Temp causes hard shutdowns on some AMD systems.
- Fix: System tray icons are black squares on less than 32bit desktops.
- Fix: Some other minor bugs fixed.
- Add: Support new Intel CPUs.
Anyone please could do a zip file with Version 0.94 and this newest 0.95.4 and make an alternative link (rapidshare) to me? Trying downloading direct from the site since version 0.94 but no way my server here in Brazil recognizes the site adress, dont know why, probably a proxy issue? Wathever i try always get the "page cannot be bla bla bla...." So, please anyone could do that for me? :(
Just out of interest, are you ever going to get driver signing so coretemp will run under Vista 64bit. The current workaround is just trash, would be nice to have it 100% supported and functional under 64bit vista thats for sure. :up:
GueD'S >> Could definately be a problem with your ISP. Try through a US proxy.Quote:
Originally Posted by lowdog
lowdog >> It is in the plans, but $400/year for a signature is a bit steep for me down here in Israel...
I understand, MS want their blood regardless. Hope you do get it happening though sooner than later.........I'm kind of lost without it under Vista 64bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
Thanks heaps btw for the great service and program. :up:
Thanks, got it ;)
Used a chinese proxy and works :)
At last i can use 095, thanks :up:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...coret0954b.jpg
the coolest, you should check , I´m from Brazil as well and it´s impossible to open your web page without using a proxy.
thanks
I know it doesn't work for some people, I am not quite sure why though. The server is in the US.
no problem , replied only to let you know.
thanks
ok im sorry im pretty sure this has been asked in here but i missed it. I've got .95 and .95.4 on my pc both have the tjunction ato 100*C is that were is should be at or how can i change it th e85*C? processor and board are in sig
~as a sidenote both read the cpu fsbxmultiplier wrong (states im doing 500x6 not 375x8) even with the system under load so i know its not throttle
Did you get the correct information about delta to tjunction from intel and is 100? not higher or lower ?
There was a thread that talked about that but some said nobody knew as intel has not released the info yet. Not trying to question your expertise at all just want to make sure so I do not burn my cpu trying to achieve higher overclocks.
Thanks for the great job
hlo
Thanks. This is great now I am showing realistic temps for my E6850 compared to 0.94 and 0.95.
Strange problem with me too. I can't download in two links on the first page of this thread. Can someone give me CoreTemp 0.95.4 via pm?
Thx, bros..
CoreTemp v0.95.4:
- File Version: 0.95.4.0
- EXE dated: 08/21/07 (182kB)
Q6700 G0 is identified as QX6700
thanks for the great utility!
My question still how do we know that the Tjunction is 100 and not another value ?
We don't, but I don't think it could be anything above 100C. That's the maximum Intel rates their mobile parts.
The link is broken for me :confused:
You may need to use a proxy server.
Why?!
ok thanksQuote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
Is there not just to email Intel and ask? maybe not couse you've allready done that i guess :) would they not tell? dont they self even know? and why not if so? and why dont they tell IF they knew? there have to be someone who know what tjunction there is! if they are so smart to integrate a DTS then they should want it to work correct to, why bother to put in there then?
Regards.
PS. Love the prog coolest :) used it since my day 1 of C2d :)
Actually there is, but I've tried that. Their response was that the desktop parts didn't have an actual way to read the Tjunction as they have an IHS, and thus use TCaseMax, which is the same for all steppings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Infa
So Intel wasn't very helpful :(
I don't know, some people in some contries can't get to my server for whatever reason :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by Viper.Br
I wonder if anyone have experience thermal throttling on the GO steppings.. If so at what temps?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
Thanks for your great tool
Cannot download 0.95.4.......
Bandwidth Limit Exceeded
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to the site owner reaching his/her bandwidth limit. Please try again later.
Yeah, thanks. I just found out myself. I'll update when it's back up.
The Coolest: do you know why the difference in temps between Smart Guardian and core temp? (nearly 7c-10c during full load)
It's back up now. Sorry for the downtime.
Thanks for this wonderful program.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
Smart Guardian doesn't read the die temp AFAIK.Quote:
Originally Posted by hlonipha
So CT is more accurate?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
Thanks
Now when you ask this i think the Tjunction is right?Quote:
Originally Posted by hlonipha
One time, i lapped my IHS, and it was so shiny and flat...i thought, yes stupid , but i had never tried that...i did mount on the block without any coolingpaste, and wow, the paste really does it job, but anyway..
the temp did hit 79c in load with the OLD coretemp...
so that'll be about 95c in correct temp, and it did NOT throttle...
sooo...i think we have our tjunction 100 correct anyway regarding this?'
Regards.
It shows for me.. 35-36-32-25 for my Quad 6600
Version 0.96 - 31st December, 2007
- Add: System tray icons configuration.
- Add: Support for Intel's latest CPUs.
- Add: ClearType font support.
- Add: Time\Date column to the log file.
- Add: Always on top option.
- Fix: Core Temp does not proprerly display temperature and CPU select fields.
- Fix: Log file layout.
- Fix: Hide\Show does not properly Minimize\Restore window.
- Fix: Core code names aren't properly detected. (Intel)
- Fix: Incorrect\Missing CPU rating when not using stock\maximum multiplier. (Intel)
- Fix: Wrong CPU clock is reported when using EIST\non-maximum multiplier. (Intel)
- Fix: Wrong detection of Merom based CPUs.
- Fix: Single core Athlon 64s and Semprons reading -49C constantly. (Rare)
- Fix: C2D M0 rev. report very low temperatures. (Tjmax to 100C)
- Fix: Layout and display of tool tip text in the system tray. (Now shows a core per line)
- Change: Log the start and end of a session even if logging is disabled.
- Change: Settings and Systray settings windows appear in center of main window.
- Change: Rename "Tjunction" field to "Tj. Max" to make things clearer.
Happy new year to everyone :)
Any chance we'll see a 64-bit version of CoreTemp in 2008?
Thanks,
-bZj
why am i getting a large difference in temps at idle????
core #0 reads 51C regardless untill i load it enough to go above that temp.
core #1 reads slightly below core #0 by a minus 7C.
cores #2 & 3 could be accurate...not really sure.
---------------------------------------------------
the load temps appear to be close except maybe core #3.
You should check out what programs are running in the background,
Core 0 often runs a bit hotter than the others. Shouldnt be that much though.
Nice programme, idling at 30 and load at 40 with my Q6600 at 3.2.
There is a fix for 64Bit : http://forums.erodov.com/local_links.php?catid=18Quote:
Originally Posted by down8
i have....there are just the ordinary apps associated with XP SP2: avast (AVG), comodo firewall, nvidia driver, HP printer driver, windows defender and diskkeeper pro.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Coolest
here are temps for idle and load at default (stock) speed (used wPrime 1024M bench to load cores).
still have core #0 at 51C and it won't budge even under load conditions.
The fix from .95.4 also works for .96, at least on Vista x64. Copy coretemp-startup.bat, ALSysIO64.sys and Atsiv.exe to the new coretemp directory, run the coretemp-startup.bat file and then run coretemp. It works great. This version matches Everest temps on my Yorkfield.:up:
how about posting your core temps to see what yours are for comparison for idle and then while benching with wPrime 1024M
I get the same major temp differences too...Iam on a 780i mobo not sure if that is the problem..
37/33/27/26
Im hearing alot that the 9650's temp problems are literally a problem on the chip itself. I wouldnt take much into it being wrong in core temp.
Oh no :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Spawne32
Perhaps that explains ACE's and my problem with Coretemp
Everything Idle and At Stock
http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/4...etemp96gk2.jpg
With anyluck a BIOS Microcode update will fix this?
(ASUS P5E3 BIOS 0703)
John
So far no temp problem with QX9650
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/7523/image1bk8.jpg
INTERESTING!...is your processor a boxed or OEM?Quote:
Originally Posted by TuKo
that would indicate that it is NOT a bios micro-code problem.
how about posting your batch code and pack date?
It's a boxed one.
L739 A646
Running on IX38-QuadGT with 12B06 BIOS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TuKo
will you post the pack date?
mine is L740A336 with a PACK DATE: 11/21/07
Pack Date is 11/29/07Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace-a-Rue
i'll probably persue a RMA with intel....i think intel had a manufacturing problem with getting the DTS readouts to work properly for my pack date.
thanks for your help!:)
You're welcome :) keep us to date when your RMA arrives
Ace a Rue what happens if you lower your OC to his ? just to try , kindda following this issue as my QX9650 should be with me the next week(s) I rather too have a decent read out with an eqal temp accross the cores then some erratic reading and smoke it (unconciously sort off lol)