Pi Wall Broken Sub 6 by GIGABYTE P55A-UD7

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-01-2010, 01:15 AM
railer

Epic man. :clap:
First 5's :up:
02-01-2010, 02:08 AM
Hampti

Really good work. Insane Results. A milestone is rechead!!
02-01-2010, 02:19 AM
junior-21-

amazing score!

Keep pushing man! :T:
02-01-2010, 06:40 AM
RPGWiZaRD

7043MHz superpi :eek: -192°C :eek: 2.11v :eek: sub-6 secs :eek: hicookie :up:

There's no word that can describe the awesomeness of this result. Wonder if the new UD7 is a part of the reason to this achievement.

I hope Gigabyte pays you well. :D
02-01-2010, 07:29 AM
WaterFlex

Unbeliveable. Amazing work man :up:
02-01-2010, 08:38 AM
Maduk

Cpu from space like Vcore
02-01-2010, 09:33 AM
Mad222

Hicookie, it works!
I did a fast CPU Pin Mod on my retail 670
Core Temp. could get down from around -110c to -150c:D
Assumed the pot temp. was under -180c

6.885G with UD6
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=990076

Will go for 7G after I get the regulator modded
02-01-2010, 07:58 PM
Kenji_Takeda

good good time. but not comprehend time of step. how this make possible?
02-01-2010, 08:37 PM
Benny Lodewijk

Just amazing Hicookie :toast:.... keep pushing !
02-01-2010, 08:37 PM
diezel

amazing Hicookie do you have backup :D
02-02-2010, 03:44 PM
Tom Holck

new member

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenji_Takeda

good good time. but not comprehend time of step. how this make possible?

Welcome to Xtreme Kenji
:toast:
02-02-2010, 06:15 PM
STEvil

Tom you need to make more noise! ;)
02-02-2010, 11:08 PM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEvil

Tom you need to make more noise! ;)

thanks Stevil, shortly I'll go out loud :)

just saw a newbee and nobody seems to care.
02-03-2010, 05:17 AM
In-Fluence

<6 seconds! The best - nuff said!
02-03-2010, 05:34 AM
[XC] Oj101

Jeez man, it wasn't that long ago that coolaler hit 9.000s and now you're more than 33% quicker, CRAZY :D
02-03-2010, 06:30 AM
GraduS

Quote:

Originally Posted by ceemic

True :yepp:

+1

42K:
http://hwbot.org/community/submissio...540_7sec_172ms
02-03-2010, 12:14 PM
Gautam

This thread is locked until one thing gets cleared up.

The timer resolution in Windows XP is 1/64th of a second, or 15.625 milliseconds. The last digit is either the floor or ceiling of the trailing digits. The times reported by SuperPi are all multiples of this minimum unit of time, which is why there are discrete steps in SuperPi as many of you have surely noticed. The smallest step after .000 is .015, followed by .016, followed by .031, etc. The largest step possible is .985, and the next smallest is .984.

Almost none of the loops in the time shown in this thread are multiples of 15.625, and certainly not the final value of 5.991. It would either have to be 5.985, or 6.000, without anything in between being possible due to this inherent constraint in Windows XP.

This thread will be reopened upon a suitable explanation for this being provided.
02-03-2010, 03:19 PM
Gautam

Actually, on second thought, it was a bit rash of me to have locked it, so I apologize for that. Reopened.
02-03-2010, 03:36 PM
Tom Holck

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

Actually, on second thought, it was a bit rash of me to have locked it, so I apologize for that. Reopened.

yes, a big mistake from you :down:

first because his score turned out OK:

http://www.youtube.com/user/hicookie.../0/cIlkJAigozA

But also because we live in the free world we can have different oponion and be open to say what we think.
If someone thought this bench was a fake, well then I think it is OK to say it.

sometimes you may explain how .944 match your calculations.

.985 minus something is .944

Let me add this program is old and the score is not the same every time, specially when OC to the edge. As a PI specialist I may say the runs can be weird.
Glad you gave it a second thought :up:
02-03-2010, 03:39 PM
dinos22

nice work cookie
nice 32M there too
maybe better of using XP or 2003 for 32M though heh :up: unless you are able to clock higher with this OS? is that why you are using it? :)

http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=3...se&iehack=.jpg
02-03-2010, 03:45 PM
zalbard

I heard XP Olive theme gives a decent SPI boost.
02-03-2010, 08:20 PM
nickshih

secret is 3.7G QPI LINK BIOS option (BCLK X 28)

higher QPI makes clarkdale faster ...

but other mobo BIOS only have 3.2G 4.8G 5.33G 5.8 6.4G for choosing

GIGA really did good job on P55

3.7G makes CPU easily to pull higher and more stable than 4.8G :up:
02-03-2010, 08:47 PM
dinos22

are you testing a giga board now Nick? Have you got any results with it?
02-03-2010, 08:54 PM
nickshih

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

are you testing a giga board now Nick? Have you got any results with it?

i dont have 1.x version here......

my P55A UD6 is REV 0.1 .... some issue with BCLK

trying to get one :shocked:
02-03-2010, 11:38 PM
hiwa

mmm cookie use 2k8 :) will test soon ... but seems a bit slower than good XP

nice to see 6.11 on clarky

Congrats dude:up:
02-04-2010, 01:22 AM
mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

But also because we live in the free world we can have different oponion and be open to say what we think.
If someone thought this bench was a fake, well then I think it is OK to say it.

sometimes you may explain how .944 match your calculations.

.985 minus something is .944

Let me add this program is old and the score is not the same every time, specially when OC to the edge. As a PI specialist I may say the runs can be weird.
Glad you gave it a second thought :up:

Always better to discuss things :up:

I think Gautam was only refering to XP where the timer resolution is limited to 1/64th of a second and any SuperPi result which shows times that are outside the mentioned "time brackets" have to be bugged somehow.

The .944 is certainly possible in Server 2008, which has a much finer resolution.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

nice work cookie
nice 32M there too
maybe better of using XP or 2003 for 32M though heh :up: unless you are able to clock higher with this OS? is that why you are using it? :)

http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=3...se&iehack=.jpg

WOW - that 32m time is scary fast :clap::clap:

Here I am trying to beat myself up running Bloomfield trying to accomplish some results! Looks like Clarksdale is quiet a powerful CPU with more uses than just SuperPi 1m in extreme overclocking!!!

Time to get my P55A rolling as well!
02-04-2010, 03:05 AM
tiborrr

@mikeguava: Pi1M, PiFast, Pi32M, but that's it. Maybe '03, don't know, I tried '05 and just laughed :lol:
02-04-2010, 03:53 AM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiborrr

@mikeguava: Pi1M, PiFast, Pi32M, but that's it. Maybe '03, don't know, I tried '05 and just laughed :lol:

that's it?
damn thats a lot of benchmarks hahahah
02-04-2010, 04:54 AM
miahallen

Quote:

Originally Posted by George_o/c

:confused: http://www.hwbot.org/result.history.do?resultId=953022 :confused:

Quote:

Originally Posted by tool_462

42k efficiency seems feasible on a good run :shrug:

I agree...very good eff...but not out of line :yepp:

As to Guatam's question about the system clock's resolution in XP...I'm at a loss :shrug:

http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t...en/Capture.jpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by tiborrr

@mikeguava: Pi1M, PiFast, Pi32M, but that's it. Maybe '03, don't know, I tried '05 and just laughed :lol:

It did alright for hiwa - http://www.hwbot.org/community/submi...70_52273_marks
Only 1 global beating that...and that's with Gulftown :rolleyes:
02-04-2010, 08:38 AM
mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by miahallen

I agree...very good eff...but not out of line :yepp:

As to Guatam's question about the system clock's resolution in XP...I'm at a loss :shrug:

From what I understand when Hicookie first submitted his 1m score, Hicookie had appearantly confirmed of having run it on XP.

With that the intital SuperPi 1m time is not making any sense at all.
02-04-2010, 10:09 AM
miahallen

Quote:

Originally Posted by mike

From what I understand when Hicookie first submitted his 1m score, Hicookie had appearantly confirmed of having run it on XP.

With that the intital SuperPi 1m time is not making any sense at all.

I understand that it doesn't make sense..."I am at a loss" means that I cannot make sense of it either ;)
02-04-2010, 03:15 PM
mike

Quote:

Originally Posted by miahallen

I understand that it doesn't make sense..."I am at a loss" means that I cannot make sense of it either ;)

Maybe just an isolated bug???

Don't know enough about SuperPi to make any guess here. Just learning 32m at the moment myself.

I'd love to see some 3DM05 done at those speeds!
02-05-2010, 12:41 AM
[XC] Oj101

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tom Holck

Welcome to Xtreme Kenji
:toast:

:shocked:

Welcome back Master Tom, get cracking at 01 again please:D
02-05-2010, 08:39 AM
hicookie

reinstall a clean XP, guys please check if my score is right if you say so
here is my another 661 run, if my score don't have problem, tomorrow
i will let super pi 32m into sub 6min:) with my 670

661 Super Pi 6mins 12sec.
http://f.imagehost.org/0795/6647untitled.png

a clear video to let you look 258MHz BCLK and high QPI, high memory
yup, its near to 2100MHz CL7-7-7-20 on Clarkdale
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btM1rP4B0g8
02-05-2010, 09:02 AM
Hazzan

Quote:

Originally Posted by hicookie

reinstall a clean XP, guys please check if my score is right if you say so
here is my another 661 run, if my score don't have problem, tomorrow
i will let super pi 32m into sub 6min:) with my 670

a clear video to let you look 258MHz BCLK and high QPI, high memory
yup, its near to 2100MHz CL7-7-7-20 on Clarkdale
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btM1rP4B0g8

awesome ....hicookie....:up::up:
02-05-2010, 09:03 AM
carpo93

awesome man
02-05-2010, 09:08 AM
miahallen

Amazing hicookie...I need your IMC :p: :up:
02-05-2010, 12:26 PM
M.Beier

Great stuff my friend :)
02-05-2010, 01:08 PM
Marco André

Bring on that sub 6 superpi 32m :D
02-05-2010, 03:40 PM
ME4ME

Great 32M result, Hicookie! :)

and lol @ bios version :p:
02-05-2010, 05:21 PM
Solid Snake

Quote:

Originally Posted by hicookie

reinstall a clean XP, guys please check if my score is right if you say so
here is my another 661 run, if my score don't have problem, tomorrow
i will let super pi 32m into sub 6min:) with my 670

661 Super Pi 6mins 12sec.
http://f.imagehost.org/0795/6647untitled.png

a clear video to let you look 258MHz BCLK and high QPI, high memory
yup, its near to 2100MHz CL7-7-7-20 on Clarkdale
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btM1rP4B0g8

WOW

great !!! :shocked::shocked:
02-06-2010, 09:01 PM
Mad222

Bro.
Take it ...to the limit.........one more time!;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by hicookie

reinstall a clean XP, guys please check if my score is right if you say so
here is my another 661 run, if my score don't have problem, tomorrow
i will let super pi 32m into sub 6min:) with my 670

661 Super Pi 6mins 12sec.

a clear video to let you look 258MHz BCLK and high QPI, high memory
yup, its near to 2100MHz CL7-7-7-20 on Clarkdale
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btM1rP4B0g8
02-07-2010, 12:32 AM
EXPANDER

awesome hicookie :up:
02-07-2010, 01:08 AM
FlanK3r

good man! Today we want see result with 670 :)
02-07-2010, 04:48 AM
bondhahnmrt85

OMG, amazing result on SuperPi!! :shocked::shocked:
Congratzz... :up::up:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page