There is no tRD in DDR3, at least none that I have seen and for sure not in Gigabyte DDR3 BIOS.
Similar setting though is B2B CAS Delay
Printable View
There is no tRD in DDR3, at least none that I have seen and for sure not in Gigabyte DDR3 BIOS.
Similar setting though is B2B CAS Delay
I also thought that "Performance Enhance" affected the tRD. Is this not true, or is it just something that can't be 'read' by cpu-tweaker?
if "performance enhance" does affect trd timing....it'd sure be interesting to know what the "standard", "turbo", and "extreme" settings translated to numerically....
BUT, is there no utility to find this out?
hallo..i have a problem..when i try to change something and press aply it does not change..what can be the problem and what can i do to fix it? i have foxconn bloodrage motherboard with an i7 920 and corsair xms3 memory..
CPUTweaker work with the EVGA SR2?
CPU-Tweaker 1.5 is reading my HT reference clock wrong, which in turn skews all the calculated clock speeds. It also sees my X6 as a X2.:p:
http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...-Tweaker15.jpg
In addition the SPD tab is not working for me. Both installed DIMMs just say "Empty" and return no results while CPU-Z is able to display the SPD fine. Obviously CPU-Z only displays a limited number of timings which makes it less useful in that regards.
I have emailed you the register dump from CPU-Z and a copy of this post for reference.
=> bloody.k: it's not possible to change any timings with a Foxconn MBoard, bios locked.
=> Fitseries3: cpu-tweaker don't work on a bi-CPU system.
=> DedEmbryonicCe1: I got your dump. I'll try to find some time for fix these problem, but I am very busy for now.
B2B is for concurrent reads to same page, so not quite Performance Level version of tRD as we knew on 775.
Initial RAS~CAS plus read turnaround time gearing is what tRD on 775 pointed at. In that context, RTL (Round Trip Latency) is the tRD of the Nehalem architecture. Not too much room for manoeuvre on RTL as the gearing preset is fairly tight already and cannot be adjusted past a certain threshold without access to some of the gearing registers (there's not much left on the table anyway).
http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/7095/cputtrd.png
GA-P55-UD6 BIOS Setup screen
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/5771/trd.png
Doesn't appear to do much for Clarkdale but then it's memory controller doesn't appear to be very impressive to start with, at least on my system that is.
:confused:
Clarkdale is different.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...3&postcount=15
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/9...0216220841.png
Memory controller is integrated on the CPU die in Lynnfield/Bloomfield,
and in the chipset (on the same package that CPU) in Clarkdale.
The MCH registers is exactly the same that P45 chipsets on Clarkdale,
but I don't think that Static tRD is the same like the tRD we found on P45/P55.
Hello Felix,
i will ask you again for include this futures in Future, specialy for the C1E- and EIST Switch. :-)
If i enable C1E and EIST in the BIOS, the Performance of SSD's drops down
around >23% (tested on some hardware magazines, Toms Hardware etc.).
I use a Programm to detect if a user are on the PC or not. If not, i can
execute some Programms with my tool. Now, if a user are not on the PC
for a while (programmable Time), this Scheduler executes your CPU- Tweaker
with /C1E=ON, the vCore drops and reduce the Power consumtion. If the
User comes back to the PC, my Tool execute your Tool with /C1E=Off and
the full Performance on some SSD's are back. In combination with /EIST=ON/OFF,
it's possibile to reduce Temperature and Power consumption more than a bit on a
System, that are runnig 24/7/52. Powerconsumtion drops with EIST=ON round
about 30 WATTS or a bit more on my w3520.
The biggest winning Situation are on the Road, if the used Mainboard
are supports this -DVID Feature (Dynamik vCore) on overclocked Systems
,like the Gigabyte GA-X58-UD7 or others who uses DVID.
I will you donate 10€ 100%, if this Future are available in Futures.
This Features safes Power costs without loosing need max. Performance.
Will be happy, if there are a Tool, where can set C1E and EIST from comannd line.
Best regards
works with arrandale!!!!
http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/h...wnage/w00t.png
HeY Felix, can you raise the total amount of tRFC in CPU-Tweaker? Maybe to 150-175?
Once you set or auto goes above the included amount (127) you can no longer use CPU-Tweaker because it makes the apply button grey'd out.
This happens at higher ram speeds of course, but I assume if you set the tRFC manually, at any speed, to be above CPU-Tweakers values then the same would happen
http://img827.imageshack.us/img827/6971/snap4.png
=> Cumulonimbus: sorry, I haven't any time for do that for now.
=> Lsdmeasap: I added some values (255 now) for tRFC in the version below.
=> DedEmbryonicCe1: The version below read Core numbers and chipset ID correctly now,
but not the HT clock. I don't know when I will be able to fix it.
CPU-Tweaker 1.5
Thanks FELIX!
i get an application error with H55 and i7 875K with this new version
...could you post a screenshot.
The latest cputweaker 1.5 resets my computer on loading, plain and simple - so I can't use that version
Currently I'm using cpuTweak 1.4 Beta 8 in order to uncore my dual cpu setup opteron 8384 running on an tyan S4985 platform (nvidia nforce 2200) (Up to four(8) physical cpus).
I noted that increasing the the uncore multiplier in the cpu settings module only works for the cpu0 and not any of the other physical cpus.
Would be nice to have it working for all physical cpu's.
And changing the HT MHZ speed like in the old clock gen program - which dowsn't work in win7.
Anyway great program for those whoi can't modify their bios settings because of a server bios
I've been really enjoying this proggy since I've moved over to i7. It reminds me of the old A64 tweaker which was also very useful for finding out those memory setting niggles and saved lots of reboots and time. Also great for posting bench screens with temps and full timings on show, if it could validate like CPU-z does (and was accepted amongst the o/c community) then this could be a real contender.
Anyway, I just had one question - the bios version or date doesn't show on my EX58A-UD3R 1.0 (currently bios F6p). Any chance this could be looked into?
=>zippa: Could you make a registers dump (with cpuz->last table->Save report (.TXT))
and send it at memset@hotmail.fr .
=>In-Fluence: Could you run this soft , choose DMI-BIOS in the second combo,
click on dmibios.txt and send the dump at memset@hotmail.fr
Actually, I realised this board behaves the same as my old EP45-UD3P - it seems when you enable 'quickboot' in BIOS, the version/date dissappears, but when disabled, they become visible. Strange eh?
If you still want me to dump the bits, let me know ;)
Hi there, hoping someone could help me w/this issue:
A bit about my setup: I have a Foxconn 720MX mobo that hasn't had it's bios updated in ages, so does not recognize my new phenom ii 555 on bootup (dual core 3.2). As you can see from CPU-Z, that's not a problem since it works fine. However, this is causing me problems with overclocking programs. Infact, CPU-Tweak is the only program I've found that will let me OC properly (thanks!).
Problem: CPU-Tweaker does not load my settings on start-up despite me saving them and telling it to start in systray and apply at start-up. When I go in to change them, CPU-Tweaker has the voltage .35 lower than stock. I'm guessing this is some good programming that's been done so chips don't get fried if they've been swapped, but it's annoying to have to manually overclock every time and change the voltage. Is there any work around? Are there any command line type functions to this program so I could just tell it to start-up with a proper OC?
Apologies if these questions are answered somewhere else, I did look through the forums and used search for quite awhile but came up with nothing.
Another question but not necessarily relevant to this forum: Where would I find out default uncore voltage and multiplier for my chip? I am guessing I can't trust CPU-Tweak to tell me as it can`t detect default CPU voltage.
http://imgur.com/8BOnH.png
Hello, can someone help me how to change CAS timing on my notebook? I have a HP compaq nx8220 (i915pm, Pentium M dothan 1.73GHz, 2x1GB DDR2 667MHz running at 533MHz 4-4-4-12). MemSet is refusing to change CAS, and as usual in Bios can't be done any tweaking. Of course I would like to first test it if is stable before making this change permanent.
Use SPD Tool and change there the CAS. But not do it with both modules, just on one at a time, in order to have the second healthy, to use it if 1st fails to boot.
When using 2 modules with different CAS, bios will auto-assign the higher CAS so then you can change again the CAS with SPD tool (or restore original SPD file)
After about 2 hours I finally managed how to change CAS in SPDTool. Now are my modules running stable at 3-3-3-8. Thank you!
Well of course I didn't jumped straight from 4-4-4-12 to 3-3-3-8. First I found with MemSet that my memory is capable of running at 4-2-2-5, so I decided that there shouldn't be a problem to run it at 3-4-4-12. So I have set 3-4-4-12 in SPDTool and it was running fine, so I went back to MemSet and found that even 3-2-2-5 is running fine, which I found hard to believe, so I have set 3-3-3-8 in SPDTool and leave it that way. So far I have run only 2 hours of memtest, but it's stable. ;)
hi Felix,
just tried v1.5 with my new 875k setup, EIST disabled, ratio is x27, CPU-z, intel freqency display v2.20 correctly show 3600MHz for all cores, Cpu Tweaker shows 133x9=1200MHz. why?
see screenshot here:
http://www.mediafire.com/?xfbm19hais6gt16
=>Vincent: Could you make a registers dump (with cpuz->last table->Save report (.TXT))
and send it at memset@hotmail.fr .
done
I just tried CPU-tweaker 1.5 and every time i run it after a few seconds I get a "divide by zero" error (Exception EDivByZero in module CPU-Tweaker.exe at 000D9AA1) and program exits. Is this a known problem?
Also when I run Memset 4.1 the "Apply" button is disabled... does it not work on Rampage II board?
I had/have same problem and it looked like fixed once, but actually wasn't. Didn't want to bother FELIX any more about it, as it looked like I was the only one.
Anyway, program works (for me at least) even when error is displayed, I just move the window to the side and continue tweaking. :D
Felix seems that the clocks are reading incorrect on the new 95W 1055T's at least in my case.
Running Asus CH4 E , 1055T 95W, F3-16000CL7D flares
Nice app BTW!
Been using this for a while now & its been excellent so :up: Felix
On a non important side note ... the EIST box is always checked/ticked when I have EIST disabled in the BIOS.
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m...R1960CL81T.png
Edit.... Think its something to do with the BIOS fooling the chip to run on Turbo mode all the time so dont think its an issue.
.
Hi to all extrem systems overclockers! I often felt into your website when doing overclocking search with google, and often the answers were very interesting.
Now I explain briefly my situation:
Recently i had to do a clearCMOS with my Asus P5K Premium Wifi-AP, and so i lost my overclocking settings and i did not save it anywhere. (actually i did save it into OC profiles, but i was unable to restore it, the values were not the good ones). All i have saved before clear CMOS is a CPU-Z full dump (registers report). I'd like to restore the old timings i had at the time of this dump, but for this i'd need to parse the MCHBAR dump into cpu-z report. I'm unable to do this myself, but i think that somebody here could do. I was thinking about something that would be really cool: What if we could just open an MCHBAR dump (hex byte format from cpu-z or mchbaredit) into memset and then just read the parsed timings from it? Actually something that may be useful would be a SAVE/OPEN feature into memset, so that we could import/export the mchbar dump corresponding to the displayed timings. What do you think Felix?
Cfg:
Asus P5K Premium Blackpearl Edition (Intel P35)
Q6600@3.5Ghz
2x1GB Corsair DDR2@400 4-4-4-12 Perf Level7
Windows XP PRO SP3 32 BITS
MemSet 4.1
Felix: Great program, thank you for it and MemSet!
For AMD's UnCore, you do not have to restart for it to apply, so you could edit that part out for them. Also maybe a rename to CPU-NB? :D
Then is there perhaps a way to enable (un-gray out) the options to change the: tWR, HyperTransport multi/voltage, Driver Weak Mode and Power Down Mode? While the latter 2 aren't too much of interest, the tWR and HT would be really nice to have as it would mean I'd not need AMD OverDrive anymore!
As for an option that isn't in the program: There any way to add the ability to change the memory divider? A64Info for the S939 had that option and that was almost my favorite feature, as it let me do just about every bit of overclocking from Windows except for HT multiplier. I miss being able to change that on the fly for the option of changing timings lower if a program happens to be more responsive to them as apposed to clock speed :(
Anyways, thanks again! :up:
It might be in the Intel section, but it's always supported Phenoms too...
Great software. I've own a laptop for more than a year that the limiting factor for overclock was obviously the memory, and only today I had this idea to search if there was a software able to change timings on windows.
While I'm able to change tRCD, tRP and tRAS I can't change CL, I can choose some other number, but it just ignores and return to the default, I don't even have to apply the settings for that to happen. Does that mean that only CL is locked?
Edit: Nevermind, tried SPDTool but apparently my memory doesn't support CAS over 6, at least the only options there are 4, 5 and 6.
Well it might be that (lack of supported CAS), in my experience with other program, the programmers often lock that option out due to almost certain chance of locking the system if you try to change it.
Give Taiphoon (spelled as such) a go, it's like SPDTool, though sadly it has to be registered to program the SPD Tables :(
Felix, where the sandy/P67 version at...... im in pain here without it!!
You dont realise how good something is untill its gone/not working.
Same here!
Maybe we should ask which data he needs for Sandy-Bridge-support and show we would like to help and provide these data and do some beta-testing if necessary. ;)
Think hes good for data i sent him a cpu-z dump he just needs some time.
And ye im up for testing
he doesnt have to do anything for you guys, attitude not welcome in this thread imo
I agree, dinos22.
Perhaps FELIX is currently busy, or needs a SB setup to work on his software. Whatever it is, it is understandable, and I am sure he will let us know sooner or later.
...yes I'm very busy at this time (and probably for a long time :) )
but I try to take some time for make a SD update, simply the
Intel datasheet report nothing about memory timings and other setting. :mad:
and I can't do nothing without it.
Since we all know how it is to be busy, and we all appreciate the what you've provided us (regardless of if they express it)!!
I think this is the Datasheet you want (fullll of registers info!):
http://download.intel.com/design/pro...hts/324642.pdf (~4.8mb, 290 pages)
EDIT: Found an update as well which might be of relevance... One change in the update PDF states for one of the many Erratas listed: "Changing the Memory Type for an In-Use Page Translation May Lead to Memory-
Ordering Violations"
ftp://download.intel.com/design/proc...pdt/324643.pdf
I found this one from google, and I assume it is the same one you looked at:
http://download.intel.com/design/pro...hts/324641.pdf
THEN I found ftp://download.intel.com and went to the "datashts" directory, sorted by date, and checked out the first one. It had a ton of info, but was for different chip :( So I checked the one below it, which was ONE PDF number different, and it had to do with the same CPU... So I figured "why not, I'll see what "324642.pdf" comes up with in the link. Sure enough!
I don't have a Sandy Bridge, and no current plans for one, but maybe my dreams for AMD changes will come true :DQuote:
2nd Generation Intel® Core™
Processor Family Desktop
Datasheet – Volume 2
Supporting Intel® Core™ i7, i5 and i3 Desktop Processor Series
So yea, hopefully that's the one you're after! :up:
I dont know if this has ben asked before, I've searched in the last pages and found nothing:
Is there any plans for atom support?
I'm planning in purchasing a D510MO from intel and would love to be able to tweak and play arround with it.
Is memset out for sandybridge yet does anyone know!
hey guys, is there any update for the cpu tweaker that supports SNB?
I don't know about the other boards but on ASUS P8P67 EVO the timing registers appear locked by BIOS so that having access to them isn't going to help. :(
Hi,
FELIX could you take a look at this? There seem to be a problem with XMP profile2 in the SPD.
Timings set by bios correctly at post #13.
CPU Tweaker SPD at post #16.
CPU-Z SPD(also has a bug?) at post#18.
Link to CPU-Z test dump at post #20.
Thaiphoon XMP profiles at post #21.
EDIT: apparently these modules conform to XMP Rev. 1.2, which i can't find the specs for.
EDIT2: as far as I could find, bytes 210 and 245 defibe QPI voltage and the rules are the same as for VDD(bytes 185 and 220) in case you decide to add this to the SPD window.
WTB CPU-Tweaker for AMD Fusion APU :( Even if only for the memory timings, and not overclocking!
I see Asus are now allowing changing of mem timings by software for the MaximusIV. Hope the other SNB Asus boards are going to follow.
As you can see in the SS, H67 timings are locked (greyed out). Probably be the same for other Asus P67 too.
Thanks for these ones!
I first want to say thank you for a nice piece of software!
I would like to ask for Arrandale support on multi changing, when you have time to add it to cpu tweaker.
hello everyone,
I've a compaq presario V5009EA AMD Mobile Semprom 3000+ with 512 Mo ram DDR,i run windows xp pro.
I've used MemSet to configure my ram like this:
http://i40.servimg.com/u/f40/13/70/09/73/memset10.jpg
is this good or somebody can suggest me a better configuration?
Thanks
Those primary timings (top group) are pretty dang good (depending on what brand a model of DDR you have). If that Sempron has a K8 memory controller, then dropping that Command Rate to 1T should REALLY boost your scores. My Socket 939 K8 I was getting 7000mb/s in Sandra, which decimated my friend's AM2 system with DDR2 lol
TEST EACH SETTING ONE AT A TIME. Use something like Sandra Memory Bandwidth or MaxxMEM2 and run it BEFORE any changes for a baseline, then use it by comparing to find out if there are any performance gains after each change. If you want to really make sure things work then I recommend getting IntelBurnTest and set it to use as much memory as you can (might have to do Custom and enter just below what is "free), to stress your system for stability.
[Caution: IntelBurnTest, or any other stress test, will also greatly load up your CPU. This can cause it to get quite hot (more than typical use), so it might be good to take the side panel off, if it's a desktop.]
My suggestions:
- Lower Command Rate to 1T
- Rule of thumb is tRP + tRAS = tRC. So following that, your tRC of 7 should become 4.
- If you can drop that tRFC down too, that'd help.
- Refresh Mode Select set to either 7.8us or 15.6us (caution: systems I've tested newer than Soc939 may not like 15.6us)
- Try changing your Idle Cycle Limit to 16, even 32
- Read/Write Queue Bypass, crank it up as high as it can go (8x if I'm remembering?)
- Queue Bypass Max, also run it at the highest setting
When setting the tRC and tRFC, make sure to drop it one number at a time (testing each time), otherwise if you jump from 7 to 4 it may crash. So be aware that most of these can (and will) likely cause a system crash. I'm sure you've experienced them already through testing, but if not, just don't be surprised lol Biggest thing that gave me performance (again on Socket 939 K8s) was the Command Rate, so I'd focus on that. May need a bump in voltage if you haven't already :)
Good luck!
original (default) settings:
CAS# Latency (CL) = 2,5
RAS# to CAS# Delay (tRCD) = 3
RAS# Precharge (tRP) = 3
Precharge Delay (tRAS) = 7
Command Rate = 2T
Row Cycle Time (tRC) = 10
Refresh Cycle Time (tRFC) = 12
Ras# to Ras# Delay (tRRD) = 2
Refresh Mode Select = 7,8us
Idle Cycle Limit = 16
Write Recovery time (tWR) = 3
Write to Read Delay (tWTR) = 1
Read to Write Delay (tRTW) = 3
Read/Write Queue Bypass = 16x
Read Preamble = 6,0ns
Max. Asynchrone Latency = 6ns
Queue Bypass Max = 7x
tRC min value is 7
tRFC min value is 9
i can't set under this values
Refresh Mode Select -> 15.6 work it's the highest value
Idle Cycle Limit -> 16 or 32 work (i also have 0, 4, 8, 64, 128 or 256 value to set)
Read/Write Queue Bypass -> 16x by default (and is the highest value)
Queue Bypass Max -> 7x by default (and is the highest value)
you said tRP + tRAS = tRC it's bad if not?
i can change the settings and test settings with Sandra Memory Bandwidt without rebooting or i must reboot before test?
For Idle Cycle Limit i've read http://www.techarp.com/showfreebog.a...ng=0&bogno=440 it said :
"For general desktop use, it is recommended that you set this feature to 8T. It is important to keep the pages open for some time, to improve the chance of page hits. Yet, they should not be kept open too long as temporal locality dictates that the longer a page is kept idle, the less likely the next data request will require data from it.
For applications (i.e. servers) that perform a lot of random accesses, it is advisable that you select 0T as subsequent data requests would most likely be fulfilled by pages other than the ones currently open. Closing those open pages will force the bank to precharge earlier, allowing faster accesses to the other pages for the next data request. There's also the added benefit of increased data integrity due to more frequent refreshes."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
edit:
Sandra Memory Bandwidt is not reliable, for the same values, I have never the same results
Man. I don't know why I didn't think about it before, but your best option is to use A64Info. If you're using a S754 or S939 Sempron, that will work great (though intended for S939), in desktops or laptops! That is the only Athlon 64 tweaking utility I'll use since it does what MemSet can, but multiple things it also can not. :)
To address your questions anyways:
If you can't drop it lower than 7 and 9, then that's alright. It's not "bad", but it may hurt performance a little. How much? Not sure, sorry :\
I remember testing the different Refresh Mode Select and Idle Cycle Limit settings, and 15.6us seemed to work the best. Whether 3.9, 7.8 or 15.6 is the optimal choice is dependent on your memory speed, and you'll just have to test and compare since I don't remember the formula to find that out (sorry). Idle Cycle limit seemed to vary, but 16 or 32 usually worked best. The Queue Bypass options I always lost performance setting them any lower, so they were never changed on my system.Quote:
Refresh Mode Select -> 15.6 work it's the highest value
Idle Cycle Limit -> 16 or 32 work (i also have 0, 4, 8, 64, 128 or 256 value to set)
Read/Write Queue Bypass -> 16x by default (and is the highest value)
Queue Bypass Max -> 7x by default (and is the highest value)
If you end up using A64Info, there is a setting that replaces Refresh Mode Select, and offers a lot finer tuning (which is good). If you end up using that I'll try and get the numbers to try, as there are a lot in the list :P
If you restart the computer, the settings default back to the BIOS configured settings. So you need to Apply them, then save the configuration to a file, and tell MemTest to apply them at startup. Be aware though, I have encountered a time or two where my computer didn't like having them ALL changed at once :P I think it was Command Rate that needed to be done by itself, but it's been such a long time :\Quote:
i can change the settings and test settings with Sandra Memory Bandwidt without rebooting or i must reboot before test?
It is reliable ;) Most programs that test memory in real time and report fairly detailed results will have a margin of error. Sandra and MaxxMEM both have it. For Sandra it's usually ±10-20MB/s but can be upwards of 100MB/s, and MaxxMEM seems to be pretty much the same as well. If you run them after a fresh restart of Windows, and give the system like 5minutes to completely settle down (have everything loaded), then you should hit more consistent numbers. They'll still be different, but the variance shouldn't be as high. But yes, it can prove to be a difficult thing when trying to figure out if it was a gain in performance or just margin of error. I usually didn't consider it a worthwhile gain unless it was 100MB/s or more, both because it let me know it was likely above the margin of error, and also due to me not feeling 15MB/s increase being worth the system becoming potentially unstable :PQuote:
Sandra Memory Bandwidt is not reliable, for the same values, I have never the same results
Hope that helps more, and again, I recommend giving A64Info a try from my link above (uploaded myself to my personal webspace, since that latest version isn't as easy to find).
Some time ago, while I was playing with R3E, I thought CPU Tweaker was broken for not showing right value for tWR.
No matter which value below 12 is set, it showed 12.
Now, with OC Orange, I see I was wrong. It shows changes in tWR from 14 to 12 to 10 and even to 8.
Obviously R3E wouldn't let me set tWR lower then 12.
I hope this helps other R3E owners.
My apologies to FELIX, for thinking CPU Tweaker is broken.
Long time no news from Felix.
Are the application EOL or....?
I hope not. It was my main tool since golden days of Athlon64, when the fun started.
But he never claimed any copyright on CPU Tweaker and Asus made their own memory tweaker, which is widely used.
Maybe FELIX is just indisposed. If it helps, I would use CPU-Tweaker just for being the first and cause it reminds me of "good old days"
Any new versions?
Hoping for update @ X79 now!
Pm coming, hopefully you have a little spare time to look at a CPU-z dump and see if X79 is unlocked, and if so hope you have a little time to push out an X79 update sometime soon.
Hi Xtreme Forumers !
Where can I download the last Memset version that will run on Windows 98 SE please ? This is on an old DELL Dimension 4100, i815 chipset. I could find links only to dnld the latest and (?)greatest, but that is not for me :-(
CPUID has replacement for X79 and Ivy Brigde with CPUID Mem TweakIt 1.01.6:
http://www.mediafire.com/?enyauvt2fe75v1n
Hello guys :)
I found some time for make a little update:
http://www.tweakers.fr/download/CPU-Tweaker.rar
Only for reading timings on Sandy and Ivy Bridge for now.
Probably some bugs, let me know
=>donmarkoni: thank for your report.
New update: http://www.tweakers.fr/download/CPU-Tweaker.rar
Also, don't work on LGA2011 for now, and I don't know when I have time to do it.
Felix,
nice to see you back.
Multi error with Sandy....
http://i10.aijaa.com/b/00504/10534748.jpg
Thank guys.
I have some problems with CPU and memory ratio, I try to fix this as soon as I get info.
Hey good to see this is still being developed.
Made a screenie for you:
http://i.imgur.com/mrJgt.jpg
there are some odd things but it mainly look okay.
odd:
- socket
- memsize
- cpu speed
- cmd rate
- dram io lat.
Hope it helps to make it better.
One of the most necessary tools for benching gets an update, awesome!! :up::up::up:
Can you add tRC (Row Cycle Time) and correct the bug with tWR (Write Recovery Time) where it is not settable on some X58 motherboards (ie not settable on R3E, R3BE, Classified3 / Settable on X58A-OC).
Thanks again FELIX. No problems yet running smooth :)
=>DarkjeThe2nd: I send you an MP, but you can try this version: CPU-Tweaker.rar
-Fix Socket and Memory Size reading.
-Fixe Command Rate reading.
-Replace some timings by Round Trip Latency.
=>spoolindsm127: I never found tRC in LGA1366 CPUs datasheet, and is not possible to change tWR under Windows.
Thanks for the reply FELIX.
But with tWR if I remember correctly X58A-OC allowed it to be changed. Donmarkoni runs the same board (or atleast did at one point) so can you confirm?
...Yes, but only by the bios, not under Windows.
socket ok, memory size still at 12g (have 16g)
commandrate matches other readings/settings so is okay
the rtl's value's seem te be off (from memtweakit) 1 tick on the first pair, displaying 44 where mt shows 45, but mt could be wrong there too.
io latency also mismatches mt's readout and it looks like the pairs may be swapped too.
I've read the pm and send you the dumps requested. here's the current result as image: http://i.imgur.com/5zMQQ.jpg
regards, darkje
It has earned it's place in your sig ;)
I distinctly remember you mentioning how you always thought tWR was unsettable in Windows until you ran the X58A-OC. I had sold the one I originally bought, but just picked up another one recently :p:
@FELIX
Is there any way to have CPU-Tweaker start up with windows to load certain settings, but then self exit after doing so? Or is there any way the customized settings can be loaded at start up without the actually app CPU-Tweaker starting? Because I have experienced issues when returning from sleep mode; CPU-Tweaker crashes and memory timings are incorrectly displayed, as if they've been changed or something.
Ok, I did check A and B separately, but both show the same non matching (to mt) value's for I/O and RTL's.
image: http://i.imgur.com/4UdWH.jpg
ed: just spotted cpu-z showing wrong fsb:dram ratio of 1:8, should be 105:1120 = 1:10.66~
okay, thx for clearing that up... :)
Beta 7 fix my 2600K Multi.
Promoted Felix to Legend.
:toast:
well deserved