Printable View
i have a q9450 and at the time i had it overclocked to 3.8ghz. i bumped it to around 1.36-1.4v to fix the problem. when i run it stock i keep it at 1.22v, because of this chart. i'm not sure what's correct for your cpu though, just try bumping it once or twice that should do it. if not then read up or experiment further.
Thanks.I will give it a a try
i know when i need to change bios :) yes my system is unstable on 1406 because i have 1200mhz transcend axeram so bioses before is not have good support of 1200 iani AXERAM-s :( i just need bios whith full suport of 1200mhz RAM s now im using my 1200MHZ rams on 1066 because 1200 is not stable especially when overclocking :( i have tested with all programs my rams 9memtest, everest stress, OCCT) RAMs dont have any problems together and not together i have tested it all day long no erorrs:)Quote:
Originally Posted by carepolice
sorry if i am being a bit of a 'tard but the "P5Q mBIOS 1501" set, is that for the P5Q-E also?
cheers
EDIT: YEP I AM A TARD !
Yep. As I said its very rare, but its known for some P45s to need a smidge of a voltage bump, likely nothing to do with the board itself being weaker than its counterparts, just a hardware config thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by masteripper
Hey guys, P5Q-E board here with a Q6600. Currently running m1402 bios, just wondering if other P5Q-E owners out there are on m1406, I've also read some people on here seem to be running an early mbios version but wasn't too sure why. Thanks!
Anyone tried the 1501m BIOS for the P5Q Pro yet ?
A bit sceptical until i hear some feedback
there is anew beta bios version 1611
wait for ket mood
For what Version of the Mother Board?Quote:
Originally Posted by hema
all of themQuote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
p5q non pro and pro and dlx
oh maaan only p5q-e bios is not updatet :(
New mBIOSes will be up later. I'll also see if some basic hacking will let -E users use a Deluxe BIOS on their boards, AFAIK there is no hardware differences between a -E and Dlx.
ED - Things are a little confusing with these new betas, the Premium has a smaller memory table vs. the other BIOSes. I'm not sure if asus have removed "junk" code or what, so I will probably do 2 types and people can report which version works best.
Ahead of time so I don't have to do it later, heres what the 1611 mBIOSes have changed.
- Added Premium memory table (v1) \ Added Pro memory table (v2)
- P6 microcode update, total number of supported CPUs up to 41. (39 in previous mBIOSes)
- Boot logo changed to the ever-popular dragon
The usual "wasn't intending but seemingly got fixed" things
- Pull-ins
- Couple other things I can't remember off the top of my head
Before anyone asks, heres the deal with v1 and v2 BIOSes, NOTHING apart from the memory table is different. V1 uses the Premium memory table (54100) whereas V2 uses the Pro memory table (58420). I have no idea why the memory table is larger in the P5Q\Pro\Deluxe BIOS code, I would guess at A: Asus have not yet updated the code for the Premium in the beta BIOS, or B: Asus have removed "junk" code from the Premium memory table, which one would think would lead to better OCs.
Oh yes, and of course anyone trying these mBIOSes tell us your experiences with them.
thx Ket
i have question
I falshed mBIOS to my P5Q-DLX i haven't bootlogo (dragon)
Quote:
- Boot logo changed to the ever-popular dragon
Thats a persistent anomaly, some users have it, others don't. I'm probably just going to attach the various logos for the BIOSes here so in the event someone isn't getting the logo, they can change it with the asus mylogo utility.
hey ket, i know you did a modified bios for the maximus II,which we all appreciate. but do you have the abilities and or tools to fix some of the major problems that the max II suffers from (make the pull in's work, clocking memory above +1333,voltage between vtt and vnb more than 0.011-0.015,memory drive strengths)or is this something we have to rely on asus for?
can you give me a image dragon?Quote:
Originally Posted by Ket
I can try mixing and matching some things, but to go into more detail than that would take a lot of time - something I simply don't have. Theres also the possibility I may not have all the tools I need to attempt some in-depth fixes on top of that.Quote:
Originally Posted by radaja
I'll upload the images in a bit.Quote:
Originally Posted by flywin
thats alright ket. i was just checking to see if it was possible,thats what i thought, that it came down to the tools. thanks for the quick reply though.
Can't boot 471x8.5 with m1611:( With normal 1611 i can, but i do not pass ram tests, that's why it is not stable.
Here are the boot logos for anyone having problems getting it to display. Try using the Asus mylogo utility to re-insert it. V2 1611 mBIOSes using the larger memory table will be up in a few mins.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...gonnon-pro.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1.../dragonpro.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...gonp5q-e-1.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1.../dragondlx.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...gonpremium.jpg
Just to be certain.
P5Q = P5Q Green?
Thanks and regards,
D
P5Q is indeed the non pro. Don't download any 1611mBIOS yet though, I noticed a small thing I'm fixing now so redoing V1 and V2.
hmm Maybe you add ASUS Republic Of Gamers LOGO ? Boot Logo? in next ver mBIOS?
No point in that at all. I just changed the logo for something half worthwhile looking at instead of the POST screen.
Mr Ket, do you think your bios will allow me to clock my Q6600 from 3.6 > 4.0GHz, if its memoryproblems i have =) And, does the bioses for P5Q Pro allow non-1:1 on the memory?
As in, I want to runt 445x4 FSB and keep memory at 800MHz
//ODDNAME
Its rare any quads hit 4GHz without VERY good cooling and highish volts, there are no extra dividers in these mBIOSes, I simply improve whats already there. Most people report being able to get a better OC with these mBIOSes, so you may be able to squeeze a bit more out of your quad, its all subjective.
Well the cooling isnt the issue, I think its when I go over 800MHz for the memory, I need to go atleast 890 or something for the 4GHz :)
Do you think your bios might improve or reduce memory-related issues that might be occuring when going +800?
//odd
Sounds like the issue may be a BIOS setting and not the BIOS itself. Whats the default speed for your memory and what manufacturer\model is it?
Thats my first thought, its Corsair XMS2 PC6400 2GB x 4
Not really superclockables, but I read that people make em tick faster all the times. So feel welcome to suggest some suitable settings to make em tick in around 900MHz =)
Well, your populating all 4 DIMM slots, thats going to stunt your OC growth right there. Set everything to stock and use the lowest multi you can, set memory timings manually to 5-5-5-15-45, TRFC 7 or 8, TRRD,TWR,TWTR,TRTP to 4. Performance level, try 8, if that doesnt work out try 10. Raise NB and SB voltage to around 1.3v, set your RAM voltage to 2.1-2.2v, and see how far you can take those Corsair sticks.
Rgr =) will try
Ty
oh thats would be great :) i'll wait it :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ket
Managed to OC my mem a little with your tips ket, but im pretty sure they are the issue atm with my clock.
I think im better off with some new 1GHz mem
//ODD
1611
P5Q Deluxe BIOS 1611
1. Fix chassis fan mode can't be saved after resume from S3.
2. Fix display priority is not correct when plugs two PCIE VGA cards.
anyone tested it ????.
cheers
brummie
Any plans on doing modified BIOSes for the P6T-series?
hello p5q owner.
i ve switched these days from nforce to pq5-e.
but i several issues to get it stable or run with standard settings :-/
with nforce my FSB was stable on 475. so the hw itself should work with standard or 400.
so my last hope is 2 try out one of the modded bios versions here.
cpu = e6850
mb = p5q-e
RAM 1= 4x1GB geil 6400 cl4 2.1v
or
RAM 2= 4x 1GB OCZ 8500 cl5 2.1-2.3
before i risk for nothing my warranty .. i have to say my combination wont run fine in any way. auto settings (with auto OC) cause application crashes.
but when i start define values wont boot correctly or vista spy out BS.
i ve already tried out a lot of suggest values in a german p5q thread.
nothing works.
should i try .. or should it be better to return the board cuz you think its damaged in any way ?
thx for suggestions ..
@ket were mBIOS ver 1611?
When will the new version? V2?
When I get chance to finish them :p: Christmas is fast approaching people I'm much busier than normal!
Update: 1611 has gone official now, so I'll use the final code for the mBIOSes. Still no update since 1406 for the P5Q-E. HOPEFULLY I can get the new mBIOSes up later today.
why there do not doing bioses for P5Q-E i don't undestand :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Ket
Hi ket,
Tried to search this thread if GTLvRef bios option will appear/work if I use your modded BIOS on my P5Q vanilla, but my search terms is a bit rusty,
I'm having problems with CPU 1 on my E7200 on anything above 400FSB and I think GTVref tweaking will solve it, would really love to get it to 3800MHz.
Thanks in Advance :D
TTimmy
hi Ket, excellent job
I don't know if it's been talk about the following issue, I've wrote many times to asus.com but nothing never happened:
on P5Q I could never obtain a unique IRQ for my fancy audio card [ASIO driver works better/cleaner when is on a unique IRQ, not shared with, for example, video card, or network]
I have moved the card around all PCI slots, but the IRQ is always 'shared' [in fact, that's why I've preferred P5Q, because it has 3 PCI, and I've thought that at least one will have a unique irq]
[I think is useless to mention how frustrating is spending those money on expensive hardware and not being able to use it on its normal parameter]
thank you
Hey. :)
Got my P5Q board a few days ago and so far I'm really happy with it. But, got quite a few questions regarding BIOS settings and overclocking. Thanks in advance! :D
First of all, how do I read EPP settings? Need to populate 2nd and 3rd settings in DRAM Timing Control, but not sure how to read them... I know 4-4-4-12 are my EPP settings for the 1st bunch of parameters, but that's it.
Additionally, not sure about good voltages to OC my E6400, will need some help here (huge settings difference from my old MB). Pretty sure it won't go far above 500Mhz FSB because of the memory, could get like 450-460 on my old board, though, so wanna see if I can make it to 500.
CPU Voltage (1.45 worked fine before).
CPU GTL Reference (no idea tbh).
CPU PLL Voltage (read that setting more than 1.35 was pointless, is that correct?).
FSB Termination Voltage (no idea tbh).
NB Voltage(any point going above 1.3?).
SB Voltage(any point going above 1.3?).
PCIE SATA Voltage (keeping default 1.5 I assume).
And some more stuff that confused me...
FSB Strap to NB (what's this anyway?).
AI Clock Twister (Stronger is the best, but not sure if it's gonna hurt OCing).
Load-Line Calibration (Enabled, I guess).
AI Transaction Booster -> Pull-Ins (Enabled?). And PL8 for 1:1 FSB: DRAM I guess.
CPU Margin Enhancement (Performance Mode or Optimized, does it affect OC much?)
CPU Clock Skew (normal?).
NB Clock Skew (normal?).
And weren't Spread Spectrum settings supposed to enhance overclocking (stability), not make it worse?
Probably should've looked longer for a good guide for this MB, but not much luck and figured it would be easier to ask actual owners. ;)
P.S. Really looking forward to modded 1611 BIOSes, great job so far. :)
I updated to mBios 1406 for my P5Q-E and was just wondering if there was any differentiating views or something to indicate that it was successful. My boot logo is still the standard ASUS P5Q-E logo and I didnt see any new or different options in the bios.
CPU-Z shows that its just bios 1406. Should the modded bios read just like regular ASUS bios except for the tweaks that have been added? It seems like the update was successful as I can now hit 460FSB whereas before I was stuck at 450.
If the flashing process went as expected then your BIOS was updated. AFAICT the only indication that your BIOS is modded is how your machine performs and/or OCs.
^ Yep thats pretty much it. its about 50\50 for people who can and can't see the different boot logo, not sure why that is. Other questions I'll let others field for me, I'm busy working on the 1611m BIOSes RIGHT NOW :D
thanks guys.... i kinda figured that was the case when i was reading through the posts in this thread. it does OC much better now considering i wasnt able to hit 460fsb with the voltages i am using now.
great job ket!
It depends also with memory and CPU.Quote:
Originally Posted by darklink
I have an E8300 and with my Asus P5Q-Pro with original bios (803 i think) I'm using 500fsb. (Din't try the fsb wall with the cpu...)
I'll instal the mbios 1501 to see if i can put less vcore and to see if it stables the memories at 1.2ghz.
so, as far as I understood, is impossible to "create" something where asus didn't put anything, all you can do (Ken) is to modify (modd) the asus codeQuote:
Originally Posted by lupo17
[I'm refering to IRQ management on PCI ]
from this point of view, for me this mobo it's a piece of crap
Im using 1406 Bios from Asus, what Bios do you guys think i should you for some good OC?
Thanks
Heres what the 1611 mBIOSes have changed. Their based on the final code not beta, P5Q Pro owners get something very special to try, a 1613 mBIOS! :D
- Added Pro memory table (larger than others should = more compatibility)
- P6 microcode update, total number of supported CPUs up to 41. (39 in previous mBIOSes)
- Boot logo changed to the ever-popular dragon
The usual "wasn't intending but seemingly got fixed" things
- Pull-ins
- Couple other things I can't remember off the top of my head
I have no idea why the memory table is larger in the P5Q\Pro BIOS code, I would guess at A: Asus have not yet updated the code for the Premium or Deluxe in the BIOS, or B: Asus have removed "junk" code from the Premium and Deluxe memory table, which one would think would lead to better OCs. I'll need as much feedback as possible for these, asus have complicated matters by using a memory table in their higher end boards which is smaller, doesnt make much sence. If people dont have much luck with these I'll switch the memory table for the Premium and people can give that a go. mBIOSes will be uploaded in a bit.
P5Q Series 1611 mBIOS pack
Now, seperate post for the 1613 mBIOS as its a new revision being worked on, keeps things tidy this way. There doesn't appear to be any significant changes for the P5Q Pro 1613, so I have left everything as-is and just replaced the CPU table, if Pro owners have better success with 1613 than 1611, BE SURE TO TELL ME! I will then make further changes. Remember, I need feedback on all of these mBIOSes in order to try and improve them! Its not good just saying xxxx BIOS sucks, xxxx BIOS is better. WHY is it better? Tell me what it does better another revision doesn't etc.
P5Q Pro 1613m
Thanks for the modding the new ones, will test them out tonight for you on my P5Q Pro. So far the m1501 works best for me, fsb caps out @ 540-545. Been playing with the vanilla and your versions, the m703 seems to work least for me (fsb caps @ 530), however I cannot give you scientific quality reasons as to why. If you want to let me know what specifically to test out with it, I'll do so :)
No scientific tests needed. The kinds of differences I'm taking about are things like FSB caps, memory max OC limits, stability, those kinds of differences :up:
Those are awesome results for P5Q PRO !
I kept telling people the P5Q Pro was no lightweight, would they listen? No :p:
The 1611 mBIOS is the latest bios for the P5Q Deluxe right?
thanks for the BIOS Ket, with m1406 on a P5Q Deluxe, I was able to lower my voltages significantly and get more stability than the Asus 1406. I just updated to m1611. Same results so far, gonna try and set my RAM back to the rated 1000Mhz instead of running at 888Mhz like I am now.
BTW, have you taken a peek at any of Gigabytes BIOSes? I have an X48-DS4 here that has to have the crappiest (and unsupported) BIOS I've ever dealt with
Just a random post with info for anyone that may be curious, since I started this thread all the mBIOSes combined there has been 6658 downloads :eek:! the most popular file so far being the 1406 mBIOS pack, getting 1416 downloads!
So 1611 might get 1621 downloads soon :D
I am going about the testing this time around a bit more accurately/recordingly. Results will have benchmark/setting data to support what I think. Currently trying the 1613m bios as I am impatient, runs stable at my standard settings, will verify head room once I finishing benching. The weird thing I've noticed is that the Chip is running hotter under linpack by almost 10C max (1.39V =76C max) over 703m, (1.39V = 66C max). It did pass linpack testing, but the temp bugs me. I haven't kept good vdroop records, so it may be to blame. Using load line calibration with 1613m, it idles at 1.368, loads at 1.384 when set to 1.39 I'll drop the voltage on the cpu a bit and leave it stability testing when I sleep tonight, see if I can figure out where it was before. Starting a spread sheet now to record track everything, running benches 3 times each to verify as well.
Looking forward to your findings :up:
same again no p5q-e bios :(
More Results: I was able to drop Vcore(-0.025), Vnb(-0.04) and Vfsb(-0.04) with the standard settings I use for 4.5Ghz and remain 10pass linpack stable. This is directly compared with the 703m bios I was running before, so I don't know when or if Asus fixed or improved this. Forgot to setup prime95 before I passed out so I don't have a long term test to go with this.
Playing with my OC more, it turns out that the 530-545 FSB cap I've been hitting is my RAM's fault >< (or atleast how I've configured the ram) dropping the multi to 6 the system is still crashing/not finding an OS install @ 540+. I Have a set of CellShock D9 being shipped in from Ireland, but its been over 2weeks since I ordered and they still have not arrived. I can't fault the Gskill Ram I have, It runs beautifully @ DDR2 1000 5-5-5-15 @2.0V (probably lower, but I don't know very much about tightening adv. timings)
Also, any suggestions for setting up this board for higher OC's would be appreciated, I'm still a nub with it, and my last ASUS Board was a P4C800-E with a P4C 2.4Ghz chip.
Damm... i even didn't get time to test the 1501 mbios.
Ill instal the P5Q Pro 1613m and test it.
Ken! Could you upload a .zip or .7p file? The proxy here just blocks all .rar files. :(
What Bios do you guys recommend for my P5Q Deluxe?
So, just tried 1611 BIOS and i think there are some improvements that i like, such as faster BIOS entry when i hit del and faster bootup... Still testing about some differencies in voltages needed...
So the 1611m BIOS should be better then the Asus 1406 from Asus right?
TEST & PROVEQuote:
Originally Posted by Godmyster
:up:
YES 1611 are better than 1406...
but there is no 1611 for P5Q-e :(
hey KET any chance of you modding up the new maximus 2 form bios or at least checking it for anything that would make the sata detection hang when configured in raid mode?? I have the file and would be willing to test.
Sorry no chance atm, my time is tighter than a chickens arsehole with christmas right around the corner :( Doesn't help I've just had to spend 13 (yes thirteen) hours setting up the puter I'm giving my parents for christmas, it had real teething problems. FYI I have done a little testing with 1611m on my P5Q Pro and it is AT LEAST equal to 703m so far :up:
Well 1611 booted and so far so good, but its not been without hiccups.
BIOS 1402 got rid of the BSOD on boot, and 1611 seems to have reintroduced it.
Now, i usually get one of two BSOD's - 0x00000009C MACHINE_CHECK_EXCEPTION or * HARDWARE FAILURE - PLEASE CONTACT YOUR VENDOR *
Now i'm getting 0x000000124 constantly.....ARRRRGH!
BIOS or Vista Issue? I've reinstalled Vista several times before, and still it does this crap. And right now, i'm running Orthos for stability and no problems so far. Sometimes it just doesnt want to boot, but if you turn it off and on enough times, it'll boot and be stable for days on end....
Hi !
I'd like to use these bios but I'm afraid. I heard advices from forums not to use unofficial bios.
Any advice ?
I have Asus-P5Q and Intel-Q9550.
please do something for P5Q-e maybe delux bios mod can help. because asus forget about P5Q-e bios releases :(
Theres only been a few releases since 1406 (1501, 1611) I'm sure Asus will release something for the -E soon enough.
I'd wager a Vista thing somewhere, running XP Pro here and no probs :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai Robinson
I am sure you heard that, but i can tell you i use only KET moded BIOS-es since he started to craft them... I do not had any issues with mBIOS-es at all...Quote:
Originally Posted by tompravi
We fear what we do not know.Quote:
Originally Posted by tompravi
Sort of off topic, but to give an example.........if you go to any cooking website regarding the cooking of say a Pork Loin.......you will read that you MUST cook the meat to an internal temp of like 150 degrees or else you risk a sure fire death from tricinosis. ( exact temp and spelling probably difffer :D)
However, no one ever asks why? The TRUTH of the matter is this: If you cook it to USDA recommended temps, you will not have a pork loin, you will have pork toast. There are two things to consider....1) Tricinosis in pork was a very common problem WAAAAAAY back in the early days of our country when food processing was becoming it's own industry. Due to un-standardized ways of doing things, yes, it was a problem.
Jump forward to the year 2008, things in the food industry are a billion times cleaner, more efficient, and STANDARDIZED. Tricinosis today is extremely rare in pork.
2) The bacteria itself dies when it reaches a temp of around 132. (don't quote me on that but you get the point)
So with this knowledge, you can put 2 and 2 together. Very rare these days to run into tricinosis, combined with the fact that if you cook a loin to an internal temp of say 125, and let it rest, the temp WILL GO UP on it's own after pulling from the heat another 10 degrees.
125 + 10 = 135 = tricinosis dead......and you have a nice pink in the middle, juicy pork tenderloin. Not shoe leather.
There's nothing wrong with Kett's bioses. I've used them since the day after I got this board. Is it a risk? Yes and no. I would say there's a much better chance of screwing up your board simply by flashing your bios (REGARDLESS OF OFFICIAL VS UN-OFFICIAL bios)
KETT....Maybe you answered me before, but I'll ask again, is there a way to make the Bios Splash screen stay up longer?
I know that may sound like a silly question, but I made a custom splash screen and I like it, but it's gone far too quickly for my liking.
Its already been quoted twice, so I won't quote you again tompravi, just in case you start to feel "picked on" :p:
As kartoff and concretefire have said, the chances of messing your mainboard up come from tinkering with various things and upgrading your BIOS (again, it does NOT matter if the BIOS is official or unofficial, the risks are the same) If you have a read of even the last 5 pages you will see these modded BIOSes do wonders for people, and 95% of the very, VERY few reports of a BIOS getting fubar'd in this thread can easily be put under the "bad flash" category. I shall openly admit there was a BIOS I made that did not swallow well on some boards, however that BIOS has long since been removed and now burns in the eternal flames of hell for its crimes.
So, it all comes down to the following; do you want to eek that extra performance and get additional bugfixes? If the answer is "yes", then these mBIOSes are for you :up:
Concretefire; I don't think there is a way to have the boot logo display for longer, though if you want to look at the logo you could always hit the Pause\Break key on your keyboard, it'll halt the boot process and will only resume after you press the spacebar.
well im happy to say the 1802 bios for m2f work with raid!!!
Thanks for the new set, Ket. 1613m works great, only downside is that it needs +0,1v DRAM voltage to post when compared to 1501m (PRO memory table?).
Cool, did not know that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ket
Nother question sort of/sort of not involving bios. (BTW, I have P5Q-Pro too)
In the bios (official or yours) there are some options to enable a power on state via the keyboard.
However, I have a wireless keyboard / mouse. Does this matter? For some reason I just get the feeling that since mine are not "hard" wired, I cannot use these features. Got any pointers to get that stuff going? Thanks.
Now Getting a 0x0000000A error and a few IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL Errors.
These 1611's have a new memory table, right?
I have a pair of G.Skill PQ 6400's (2x2gb), and i'm wondering if they could be causing 'issues'.
I have 1611 (Ket's modified versions) on a P5Q Pro and P5Q Deluxe with ZERO issues. The errors you are getting appear to be memory errors. Did you run memtest and confirm that your sticks are OK?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai Robinson
Sadly not, the Kb\mouse power-on options are for PS\2 only, USB and wireless will not work, which sucks.Quote:
Originally Posted by concretefire
As P4spooky said, check your memory, looks like the 1611s worst-case do not like your G.Skills, best case you need to adjust timings. I had a similar thing with my Cellshocks, so I settled on 703m for a long time, with 1611m I can do the same as with 703m, but any BIOS between was useless for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kai Robinson
I'm also occasionaly getting similar errors with my G.Skill PC8500'sQuote:
Originally Posted by Kai Robinson
Maybe the new memory table is not friendly towards G.Skill mem.
NOOOOO!!!! I have this memory. I just noticed there have been a few revisions and now I see this. I think they are paying me back for tormenting them and making them look like idiots with the whole CME thing. :P:. Hello KET by the way. I have been busy lately. I have 2 4870 1GB cards now WOOT!!.
Jammy git :p: I'm happy with my 3870 512s tho, give them a CPU that can cope with their throughput demands and they still play games like crysis maxed out :up: If people want to experiment and let me know what mBIOS works best with their G.Skills I can tailor a 1611. (true I'm looking in your direction :p: )
Good to see you around again m8, this thread was getting strangely quiet :D
Hi!
Whichone is the best moded BIOS for P5Q, if it want to OC my RAM? What setting is needed to achieve the best OC? ( I mean these: static read control, dram read training, mem OC charger, AI clock twister, in transaction booster settings the pull in phases, CPU/ NB clock skew )
Its all subjective based on your hardware. We will need to know more details about your system before being able to say anything with some specifics.
I will have to try them out for you when I get a chance probably tomorrow night. I have been back in school and working and taking care of my daughter. Phew.. enough to make me sleepy every day let me tell ya, / messing with my new video cards ofcourse :p:. Good to be back. 3870s have alot of fight left in them by the way :up:.
specs:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ket
P5Q
E6300( max fsb & clock 520x7 ~1,52V ) watercooled
4x1GB CSXO CEC-800 cl4 ( the problem is the same with crucial ballistix 1066 )
Corsair HX620
8400GS
Samsung 250GB Sata HDD
[ 1702 ]
----------------------
1. Fix chassis fan mode can't be saved after resume from S3.
2. Fix display priority is not correct when plugs two PCIE VGA cards.
3. Enhance the compatibility with certain memory.
ftp://ftp.asus.com.tw/pub/asus/mb/so...ELUXE-1702.zip
No :banana::banana::banana::banana:, how funny is that another new one already.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjgr33n
This time there is P5Q-E too :DQuote:
Originally Posted by truehighroller
sorry but as i understand you meen that there is somware new p5q-e bios?Quote:
Originally Posted by carepolice