one would think, but maybe 775's can run two sockets.Quote:
Originally Posted by AllAgainstPaul
Printable View
one would think, but maybe 775's can run two sockets.Quote:
Originally Posted by AllAgainstPaul
No. CPU-Z is producing an error.Quote:
Originally Posted by RottenMutt
CPUs are socket 771.
1333 fsb? or have they added the 1600 multiplier to the bios :D :D :D :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
put the heatsinks shown on this post are 775, not 771 which are nearly identical to 604 (just lower).Quote:
Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan
Those are the stock heatsinks for the QX9775 which is a Harpertown Xeon based socket 771 processor.Quote:
Originally Posted by RottenMutt
the northbridge will run hot with the cpu orientation. will need a fan.
Not really.Quote:
Originally Posted by RottenMutt
What would need a fan if you water cool the CPUs is the RAM :up:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/dis...011211728.html
they claim 771
That's what I said :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by RottenMutt
especially packed that tight. I had to build a duct which leads to a 120mm fan to cool the ram and nb on my two dual 5000x sm systems.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan
i was really hoping for 775, cheap dual socket like the old days.
No...you can't say that -VaporQuote:
Originally Posted by Zytek_Fan
I'm loosing interest already, 3k retail a cpu!
You could use any regular Harpertown Xeon ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by RottenMutt
can someone post a link or explain to me what the difference between regular ddr2 and fb dimm (or fd whatever it was) ddr2 memory is?
Also this is just a truly sickening setup...really amazing too see, I want one even more now!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fully_Buffered_DIMMQuote:
Originally Posted by 7499richard
FB-DIMMs use what's called an AMB (advanced memory buffer) chip located in the center of the memory module. An FB-DIMM transmits data in packets, using a bi-directional serial bus. Also, a conventional memory controller requires 240 trace lines per channel, while an FB-DIMM requires only 70. This reduces the complexity of the circuit layout.Quote:
Originally Posted by 7499richard
come on FUGGER show us some nice pics of that system
http://forum.offstage.be/images/smilies/threadpics.gif
P.s put in 3 8800 ultra's and break your the 30K 06 record :D
Still would have been nice if this board had used DDR2/DDR3 normal memory. Quite a few here would have scooped one up.
If they were currently scoopable, alot of people would be scooping.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anemone
In another thread here, with the same 2 processors in a Skulltrail @ 4GHz, scored about 13k lower.
?? Link..Fugger shows 34K+..I got 22,564 with clovers at 3258Quote:
Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
A Harpertown at 4000 would put out like clovers at app 4400 so maybe on the 27-30K range but not 21,000 witch is 13K lower than Fugger's score.
The other one is running XP 32 bit, that's why the score is so much lower :up:Quote:
Originally Posted by MuffinFlavored
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...79#post2716379Quote:
Originally Posted by Movieman
http://www.overclockzone.com/zolkorn/Pic/r10.jpg
It was noted that the operating system was 32 bit and not 64-bit, and that is resulting in a large performance drop. Also, the RAM was noted to be running in single channel.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...3&postcount=76
Fugger - 34,839
ZoLKoRn - 25,004
800 megahertz difference.
32-bit operating system vs 64-bit.
RAM.
9,835 difference. I can't count. :P I apologize.
any word if Skulltrail will hit the retail shelfs this coming week?
It will release on February 4th (Monday). Problem is, very few stores will have stock since this is a premium quantity-limited product.
couldnt find these one anywhere, first one look very familiar ;)
http://www.jens.tauchclub-krems.at/d...skulltrail.jpg
http://www.jens.tauchclub-krems.at/d...kulltrail).JPG
source: http://www.jens.tauchclub-krems.at/d...enchmarks.html
here is how it scales:
2x4000 = 11.8
4x4000 = 23.43
8x4000 = 36,97 (Intel Yorkfield QX9775 @ 4Ghz 400x10)
from 2 to 4 is good, but from 4 to 8 for 98% Clock increase there is only 58% efficiency increase.