Page 107 of 138 FirstFirst ... 75797104105106107108109110117 ... LastLast
Results 2,651 to 2,675 of 3432

Thread: Core i7/X58 Overclocking Thread

  1. #2651
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    FYI - I just posted this in the ggbt mobo thread -
    I have a new toy to play with over the coming weeks.
    Need to insulate the mobo and cpu first, planning on going subambient, at least for testing.
    Flat out and sweating I expect the boreas to get cpu temps down close to single digit C at idle and ??? at load.
    I will probably start a new thread over in the tec cooling forum, first pics
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC02432.JPG 
Views:	1295 
Size:	149.9 KB 
ID:	94618   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC02436.JPG 
Views:	1309 
Size:	184.7 KB 
ID:	94619  

  2. #2652
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveRo View Post
    this looks pretty good depending on what speed you want to run your memory. don't be afraid to increase vcore provided your temps can take it.
    Even 1.55v in cpuz at idle should be fine provided temps are ok.
    Thank you for your response. I have DDR3-1600 and I am running it at 1600 MHz (DDR) 8-8-8-24 which is what they are rated for.

  3. #2653
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    1,434
    thanks for sharing your new toy with us stevero.

    Can't wait for results. Make sure you link us here once new thread is up!

  4. #2654
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveRo View Post
    FYI - I just posted this in the ggbt mobo thread -
    I have a new toy to play with over the coming weeks.
    Damn nice toy, kinda looks like a scale model of a module for the int space station.

    I'm definitely wanting to see how well that thing can tame a nicely oc'd i7!
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  5. #2655
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    537
    AFAIK 920/940 don't respond too good cold temps (cold bug they call it or something)
    Sig is under construction

  6. #2656
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tilburg, Netherlands
    Posts
    359
    @ Stevero

    What is that for a kind of thing?


    CPU: Intel Core i7 920 (4.02Ghz @ 1.35v) (3836A875)
    Mobo: Asus P6T-Deluxe (bios 1701)
    RAM: Corsair TR3X6G1600C8D (1700Mhz @ 8-8-8-24-1T)
    Videocard: Club3D HD7950 RoyalKing 3Gb
    Soundcard: Asus Xonar DGX
    HDD's: 1 x 256Gb Samsung SSD 840 Pro and 3 x 640Gb Samsung F1 Spinpoint
    PSU: Zalman 850W
    Case: Coolermaster CM690

    D-Tek Fuzion with 5,5mm nozzle | Swiftech MCP655 | Thermochill 120.2 | EK Reservoir | XSPC High Flex 7/16" ID - 10/16" OD | Scythe S-Flex SFF21F Fans

  7. #2657
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by Bludd View Post
    I am not an experienced overclocker, but I am not a complete newbie. That said, I'm not really comfortable with cranking the voltages.

    I would like someone to review my settings:

    BCLK 160 (x20 = 3.2 GHz, turbo on, HT on)
    CPU voltage 1.3
    QPI/DRAM core (uncore, I think) 1.33750
    CPU PLL 1.88
    ICH, IOH, ICH PCIe and IOH PCIe are at default 1.1, 1.1, 1.5 and 1.5 respectively
    DRAM bus 1.64

    Should I raise/lower any of these? If you need more info on my system, please let me know.
    I just downloaded the latest version of CPUID HW Monitor http://www.cpuid.com/hwmonitor.php (version 1.13) and it tells me my DRAM bus voltage is 1.67. I am concerned because of the 1.65 limit I've been reading about and even though I have heard people say that if QPI/DRAM is within 0.5 V of DRAM bus voltage, everything should be OK, I haven't found any documentation about it at Intel's websites.

    Is HWMonitor correct? Is my BIOS setting correct? I don't want to end up with a CPU that dies on me early.

    Edit: Okay, I am officially a chicken: I have reduced CPU PLL voltage to 1.82, CPU voltage to 1.28750, QPI/DRAM uncore voltage to 1.28750. (fold as in give in )

    Edit2: That wasn't stable so I upped CPU PLL to 1.84 and QPI/DRAM uncore voltage to 1.3 but I would ideally like to have it under 1.3
    Last edited by Bludd; 02-12-2009 at 06:44 AM.

  8. #2658
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,422
    Quote Originally Posted by anzial View Post
    AFAIK 920/940 don't respond too good cold temps (cold bug they call it or something)
    This cannot get the temps to sub-zero, or even close. Cold bug is a non-issue with this unit.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pisklink View Post
    @ Stevero

    What is that for a kind of thing?
    It is a liquid-Peltier hybrid cooler. Basically, chilled water.

  9. #2659
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    537
    Ah, OK, I didn't realize the difference
    Sig is under construction

  10. #2660
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2

    What different settings can I do?

    Hi all, been reading every page here but can't get my i7 920 to do 4ghz at all. I tried to do everyone's setting but it doesn't seem to work. Right now I'm running at 200x19 with HT on, CPU volt is set at 1.39375, QPI volt is 1.35, Dram volt is 1.64 and the timming is 8-8-8-24 1t. I left everything else on auto. My setup is i7 920 (batch 3839A588), P6t Deluxe, CoolerMaster V8, Antec 900, Corsair gold plated 3x2g ram, Corsair 750w PS. I would appreciate it if you guys can tell me what to do next to get it to 4ghz. Thanks

  11. #2661
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,422
    Vince, to save you some trouble, there is a very big chance that your chip just cannot do 4GHz.

    One thing you can try is using 211MHZ BCLK with 19x multiplier and setting the CPU voltage to 1.4V to start (should be plenty so later you can lower this), QPI/DRAM voltage to 1.43750V (also a start, you can lower this later as well through trial and error), and DRAM to 1.65681V.

    The high QPI/DRAM voltage is there to try to give you stable 211MHz BCLK.

    Try that and then report back.

  12. #2662
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by dejanh View Post
    Vince, to save you some trouble, there is a very big chance that your chip just cannot do 4GHz.

    One thing you can try is using 211MHZ BCLK with 19x multiplier and setting the CPU voltage to 1.4V to start (should be plenty so later you can lower this), QPI/DRAM voltage to 1.43750V (also a start, you can lower this later as well through trial and error), and DRAM to 1.65681V.

    The high QPI/DRAM voltage is there to try to give you stable 211MHz BCLK.

    Try that and then report back.
    Thanks for the help Dejanh. I load your sugguested settings but when I ran Prime 95 it crashed into the blue screen and the pc rebooted.

    The highest I had gotten to was 205x19 (3.8990) at the settings I mention above, ran prime 95 2x for 10 and 12 hrs respectively. Thought it worked but it was unstable so I lowered the base clock to 200 and now it's stable. I am thinking my cpu batch sucks and I am probably stuck at my current setting.

  13. #2663
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,422
    Quote Originally Posted by vincent6396 View Post
    Thanks for the help Dejanh. I load your sugguested settings but when I ran Prime 95 it crashed into the blue screen and the pc rebooted.

    The highest I had gotten to was 205x19 (3.8990) at the settings I mention above, ran prime 95 2x for 10 and 12 hrs respectively. Thought it worked but it was unstable so I lowered the base clock to 200 and now it's stable. I am thinking my cpu batch sucks and I am probably stuck at my current setting.
    Unfortunately, this is very likely true.

  14. #2664
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by Pisklink View Post
    Thanks Bludd for your fast reply. I'm running Vista Premium 64-bit and not Windows Server 2008.
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...postcount=3235

    Maybe you have this same problem? I don't know this APIC utility, but maybe you should investigate?

  15. #2665
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tilburg, Netherlands
    Posts
    359
    @ Bludd

    Many thanks for thinking with me and providing some information. Fortunately I found the solution yesterday.

    SOLUTION
    I found the solution and felt I needed to share this with you.

    I knew that HT worked in the beginning after I just installed Windows. I started figuring out what I could possible have changed that could cause this problem.

    I recalled that I changed the amount of processors (cores) Windows should use to start up. I set this amount to 4 processors in the "BOOT advanced settings" section of msconfig. Apparently this causes Windows to only recognize a total of 4 cores / threads regardless of what is set in the bios.



    CPU: Intel Core i7 920 (4.02Ghz @ 1.35v) (3836A875)
    Mobo: Asus P6T-Deluxe (bios 1701)
    RAM: Corsair TR3X6G1600C8D (1700Mhz @ 8-8-8-24-1T)
    Videocard: Club3D HD7950 RoyalKing 3Gb
    Soundcard: Asus Xonar DGX
    HDD's: 1 x 256Gb Samsung SSD 840 Pro and 3 x 640Gb Samsung F1 Spinpoint
    PSU: Zalman 850W
    Case: Coolermaster CM690

    D-Tek Fuzion with 5,5mm nozzle | Swiftech MCP655 | Thermochill 120.2 | EK Reservoir | XSPC High Flex 7/16" ID - 10/16" OD | Scythe S-Flex SFF21F Fans

  16. #2666
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tilburg, Netherlands
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by dejanh View Post
    ....QPI/DRAM voltage to 1.43750V (also a start, you can lower this later as well through trial and error), and DRAM to 1.65681V.

    The high QPI/DRAM voltage is there to try to give you stable 211MHz BCLK.
    Do you think it can do any harm for a 24/7 OC to use QPI/DRAM and DRAM voltages higher than Intel's max. recommended voltages (1.35v and 1.65v respectively)?
    Last edited by Pisklink; 02-13-2009 at 05:14 AM.


    CPU: Intel Core i7 920 (4.02Ghz @ 1.35v) (3836A875)
    Mobo: Asus P6T-Deluxe (bios 1701)
    RAM: Corsair TR3X6G1600C8D (1700Mhz @ 8-8-8-24-1T)
    Videocard: Club3D HD7950 RoyalKing 3Gb
    Soundcard: Asus Xonar DGX
    HDD's: 1 x 256Gb Samsung SSD 840 Pro and 3 x 640Gb Samsung F1 Spinpoint
    PSU: Zalman 850W
    Case: Coolermaster CM690

    D-Tek Fuzion with 5,5mm nozzle | Swiftech MCP655 | Thermochill 120.2 | EK Reservoir | XSPC High Flex 7/16" ID - 10/16" OD | Scythe S-Flex SFF21F Fans

  17. #2667
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warrenton, VA
    Posts
    3,029
    Quote Originally Posted by SteveRo View Post
    FYI - I just posted this in the ggbt mobo thread -
    I have a new toy to play with over the coming weeks.
    Need to insulate the mobo and cpu first, planning on going subambient, at least for testing.
    Flat out and sweating I expect the boreas to get cpu temps down close to single digit C at idle and ??? at load.
    I will probably start a new thread over in the tec cooling forum, first pics
    I started a new thread for the Boreas Assessent - http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post3649401
    Last edited by SteveRo; 02-13-2009 at 06:44 AM.

  18. #2668
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Quote Originally Posted by Pisklink View Post
    Do you think it can do any harm for a 24/7 OC to use QPI/DRAM and DRAM voltages higher than Intel's max. recommended voltages (1.35v and 1.65v respectively)?
    It will just degrade your parts quicker over time, but your parts will degrade at any voltage. Still, at those levels, I would expect your hardware to last longer than you'll have it.

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  19. #2669
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts
    1,422
    Posted this in the R2E thread earlier with the new R2E 1104 BIOS that now includes TDP override (finally!)...

    Here is a 4140MHz 20-pass LinX run with 1804MHz DRAM, 3600MHz Uncore, 3960MHz QPI. DRAM is 100% stable and has been extensively tested in both Memtest86+ 2.11 and Memtest HCI. The settings are as follows...

    TDP Override - Enabled
    BCLK - 180MHz
    Multiplier - Auto (22x, 23x with Turbo)
    DRAM - 1804MHz, 8-9-7-19-1T
    CPU Voltage - 1.36250V
    QPI/DRAM Voltage - 1.35000V
    DRAM Voltage - 1.65681V
    Load Line Calibration - Auto

    All else is on defaults...here is the screenshot...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	linx_4140_1352V_23x_100per_fan_new_fze_new_mount.jpg 
Views:	991 
Size:	166.0 KB 
ID:	94717  

  20. #2670
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tilburg, Netherlands
    Posts
    359
    My results at this moment

    CPU Freq.: 4020 Mhz
    QPI: 3812Mhz
    Multi: 18x
    LOAD vcore: 1.288v (CPU-z)
    CPU VTT: 1.90v
    QPI/DRAM: 1.35v
    Hyperthreading: OFF
    LOAD core temps: 57 / 58 / 60 / 55
    Cooling: Water



    On the short term I will try to get 210 x 20 stable. Then I will make a choice between 212 x 19 or 210 x 20 OC. The advantage of 212 bclk is that my RAM runs at 1700Mhz (8-8-8-24-1T) but on the other side with 210 bclk my CPU runs faster and RAM could get tighter timings. What would you suggest?

    Will also try to get a 4Ghz setting stable with HT enabled. Tried that today for a bit but seems it needs a lot more vcore then (like 1.42v under load in CPU-z). Should I try to increase QPI/DRAM voltage when enabling HT?


    CPU: Intel Core i7 920 (4.02Ghz @ 1.35v) (3836A875)
    Mobo: Asus P6T-Deluxe (bios 1701)
    RAM: Corsair TR3X6G1600C8D (1700Mhz @ 8-8-8-24-1T)
    Videocard: Club3D HD7950 RoyalKing 3Gb
    Soundcard: Asus Xonar DGX
    HDD's: 1 x 256Gb Samsung SSD 840 Pro and 3 x 640Gb Samsung F1 Spinpoint
    PSU: Zalman 850W
    Case: Coolermaster CM690

    D-Tek Fuzion with 5,5mm nozzle | Swiftech MCP655 | Thermochill 120.2 | EK Reservoir | XSPC High Flex 7/16" ID - 10/16" OD | Scythe S-Flex SFF21F Fans

  21. #2671
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    121
    I've got a question. I am starting to tweak my RAM, but I can't get it windows stable. I can run memtest all day long at 7-7-7-24 at 1528, but I can't get it windows stable (either linx or prime). I'm at 1.375 Vtt, 1.40625 CPU, and 1.65 VDIMM. I've also been able to hit 8-8-8-24 at 1910 in memtest with slightly different settings (don't remember off the top of my head), but again it wasn't stable in windows. What do I need to adjust? It's a 1600Mhz kit, so I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong.

    Here's a CPUz screen:

  22. #2672
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    9
    Hello, i have a similar problem... I have an i7 920 and a p6t deluxe and i want to run my ram at 1333 without overclocking so the bclk is 133. I have no problems in memtest (not even at 1600 dram) but i always fail linx unless i run the memory at 1066.

    I have all the values in auto in bios. Running 1333 dram the qpi becomes 3.2ghz and the uncore 2.66ghz.

    Can you help me with what might be causing the problem?? do i need to up some voltages to work? Changing the qpi clock is it considered a overclock in i7? ...

    THANKS!

  23. #2673
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Terra
    Posts
    337
    is this the cpu power limit ? TDP Override - Enabled
    Apple MacBook Air
    Apple IPad 2

  24. #2674
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,442
    Quote Originally Posted by AceBaran View Post
    is this the cpu power limit ? TDP Override - Enabled
    Yep. It should give the permanent multi of 21 when turbo enabled on i920 or 23 on i940. You can check and see if working by downloading everest trial version...download from stasio thread
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=216918

    go to computer>>sensor so it shows watts. And use cpuz/real temp to show multi/mhz.

    then overclock computer to 4 to 4.2 and run linx, just get TDP to 150W or so and see if still enabled, ie multi is still 21 for i920 or back to 20 or still 23 i940 or back to 22...like pic here, TDP is 263W (way over 110-120W where turbo kicks out on F3 bios on GB board which has TDP limits enabled, and temps 100C, current way over rated max)...http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...95#post3574895

    EDIT, just saw you have i965...irrelevant for you, if you want higher multi you dont need turbo.
    Last edited by rge; 02-14-2009 at 08:50 AM.

  25. #2675
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    121
    I tried looking for that option you were referring to in Bios and in Everest and don't see either one. Here is a screen:



    Maybe I need to adjust something else?

Page 107 of 138 FirstFirst ... 75797104105106107108109110117 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •