1. Support Conroe XE CPU(ES version) can adjust ratio to 13 (original is 11)
2. Patch OCZ2G8002GK-6400 can't boot issue
3. Fix memory 4:5
4. Fix FSB 395~399 stable
http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/P5B-ASUS-Deluxe-0609.rar
1. Support Conroe XE CPU(ES version) can adjust ratio to 13 (original is 11)
2. Patch OCZ2G8002GK-6400 can't boot issue
3. Fix memory 4:5
4. Fix FSB 395~399 stable
http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/P5B-ASUS-Deluxe-0609.rar
has any1 tested this yet
Thanks Andre
I flashed it 10 mins ago. Running SPi32M @ 400x9 4:5 as we speak. Next I will do 450x8 4:5 and post results afterwards.
thanks a lot Andre
retired computer enthusiast
Is this official or still a beta?
Originally Posted by aggybong
It's beta.
how about temps is it better now than before?
>> Lian-Li PC 7077<<<
>>Amd 4800x2@2700 storm G4::: Dfi nf4 sli-d<<<
>>Crucial ballistix 2gb 270x10<<<
>>ati x1800xt oc@750/800//maze4/ramsinks<<<
>>seasonic s-12 600w<<<
posted by:EvilCloudStrife
"Wow, nice dual 16x! MSI? no thanks"
thanks alot Andre
tomorrow i'll have this mobo shipped
hope it ocs well
also priming @ 400x9 DDR2 @ 1000
was impossible before
retired computer enthusiast
Is 4:5 a better (faster) memory divider than 1:1 ???
Mobo ASUS P6X58D-E
CPU Intel i7 950
Memory 6GB Corsair Dominator Kit
Video Sapphire 5850
HD Intel X25-M 160GB
DVD-RW Samsung SH-203B
Monitor 2 x Dell 2209WA
Case Antec Nine Hundred
PSU Corsair HX620
Yeah
E6400 @ 8x375 (1.39 vcore) w/ Thermalright Ultra-120
ASUS P5B-Deluxe 0614
2 Gigs Corsair XMS 6400C4 @ 936 4-4-4-12 (2.25v)
7950 GX2 @ 550/1400
Soundblaster X-Fi
Seagate 320GB 7200.10
Kingwin Mach 1 600 Watt Power Supply
Dell 2407WFP
I noticed that since BIOS 0607 (maybe 0605?), the temps reported by the Asus Utility are a lot closer to those reported by Coretemp and the Intel Thermal Analysis Tool.Originally Posted by thelostrican
OK, so check this out...
I'm on stock heatsink at this moment and my CPU maxes out at 3.60GHz, 32M stable. So, I first run SPi32M @ 400x9=3600MHz, DDR2-1000 (667MHz ratio, 4:5) and got 13:42.797.
Above result is about right, since at 400x9=3600MHz, DDR2-1200 (800Mhz ratio, 2:3) and same conditions I get 13:15.437.
Then I dropped multi to x8 and it appeared to boot at max 440x8. As it was not very stable, I lowered FSB to 432x8=3456MHz, DDR2-1080 (667Mhz ratio, 4:5) and got 14:40.641. Whoa, that's quite drasatic 58s loss! That's at lower CPU clocks, OK, but higher memory frequency (at least, according to CPU-Z). There would be drop, but this is a big one!
Now, this was for a comparison. I upped mulitplier back to x9 and decided to do one more 32M run at the same CPU clocks as above, therefore lower memory clocks. So, I'm at 384x9=3456MHz, DDR2-960 (667MHz ratio, 4:5) and got 14:11.250, wth
So, now the only thing that came to mind was to run 432x8=3456MHz, DDR2-864 (533MHz ratio, 1:1), which got me 15:11.266.
I repeated 432x8 run again and got the same result as the first time... Some more testing must be done, but it appears to me that perhaps past 400MHz and ratio 667Mhz selected from BIOS, performance really goes down the drain Would that be possible that internal chipset latency gets altered at this point, causing such a drop in performance?
Last edited by bachus_anonym; 08-31-2006 at 10:41 PM. Reason: images' links corrected!
Maybe past 400 Mhz the bios select the 1333 chipset strap and gives you an effective ratio of 5/6.Originally Posted by bachus_anonym
Asus P5W-DH
Conroe 6600 + Ultra-90
Patriot 667 LLK 2*1GB
ASUS 8800 gtx
Enermax 600w NoiseTaker
Hitachi 250 GB Sata II
Samsung SATA DVD-RW
TT Hardcano 13
DELL 22 LCD
Bachus check memtest bandwidth between the two
if you see a big drop you'll beed to investigate timings (i've noticed Gigabyte DS3 do that)
Unfortunately, this BIOS makes my previous dual Super-PI stable 3.4Ghz overclock (E6400 @ 8x425) totally unstable, it errors out within a minute or so.
I can't even get it stable at my previous 24/7 speed of 3Ghz (8x375).
I have a feeling that the new timings in this BIOS are messing with my crappy Samsung RAM. Arh well, I guess I will fall back to a previous BIOS, at least until I have some better RAM to try.
That's my suspicion as wellOriginally Posted by astarisI can't find my Memtest CD, so I decided to give Sandra UnBuffered Memory Bandwidth benchmark a try... I think it confirms loss of memory bandwidth at 667MHz ratio and past 400MHzOriginally Posted by dinos22
384x9=3456MHz, DDR2-960 (667MHz ratio, 4:5) --> 5537 / 5602 @ 45% / 46%
400x9=3600MHz, DDR2-1000 (667MHz ratio, 4:5) --> 5702 / 5785 @ 45% / 45%
432x8=3456MHz, DDR2-1080 (667Mhz ratio, 4:5) --> 4903 / 4965 @ 32% / 32%
400x8=3200MHz, DDR2-1000 (667Mhz ratio, 4:5) --> 5449 / 5488 @ 38% / 38%
It blows...
Last edited by bachus_anonym; 08-31-2006 at 10:41 PM. Reason: images' links corrected!
this bios also alows me 400x8 with 4:5 priming 1 hour now will let it go over night.
ram auto'd at 5-4-4-12 2.25vdimm nice ddr2 1000
Mpower Max | 4770k | H100 | 16gb Sammy 30nm 1866 | GTX780 SC | Xonar Essence Stx | BIC DV62si | ATH AD700 | 550d | AX850 | VG24QE | 840pro 256gb | 640black | 2tb | CherryReds | m60 | Func1030 |
HEAT
ran into some issues with this bios, flashing back to 0507, poor performance as well.
yeap it has to be something to do with >400 FSBOriginally Posted by bachus_anonym
just manually set ALL the RAM timings if you haven't already
maybe they are forcing 1333 strap somehow past XXXMHz fsb
you able to do some 6xmulti tests with different FSBs
Then the difference should be very visible between 9X399 and 9X400. Do a comparison with SPD enabled to take everything out of the equation. Theoretically, the difference shouldn't hardly be anything in either superpi or latency tests, but sandra might show a huge difference (as usual )
Problems with your OCZ product? Feel free to PM or email me here
Originally Posted by dinos22I have everything set in BIOS manually - all voltages, timmings, ratios, etc. Also, it's clearly happening past 400MHz. For now, I flashed back to 0507 becasue I have another OCing Report to finish up first. But I will come back to 0609 in a few daysOriginally Posted by mackanz
I'm actually now trying to remember If I haven't by any chance seen something similar on 0507 (and I guess earlier BIOSes) when using DDR2-800 ratio. I remember I run 16M @ 400x9 @ 2:3. Then I booted to 404x9 @ 2:3 and time was very noticeably slower than at 400x9... I was very surprised. I'll try to replicate that and post later.
Last edited by bachus_anonym; 08-31-2006 at 12:03 AM.
So this performance drop happens only with 0609?
Bookmarks