Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: [News] Microsoft patches Windows XP to fight 'WannaCrypt' attacks

  1. #1
    Join XS BOINC Team StyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Tropics
    Posts
    9,468

    [News] Microsoft patches Windows XP to fight 'WannaCrypt' attacks

    https://www.engadget.com/2017/05/13/...ypt-NHS-patch/

    Microsoft officially ended its support for most Windows XP computers back in 2014, but today it's delivering one more public patch for the 16-year-old OS. As described in a post on its Windows Security blog, it's taking this "highly unusual" step after customers worldwide including England's National Health Service suffered a hit from "WannaCrypt" ransomware. Microsoft patched all of its currently supported systems to fix the flaw back in March, but now there's an update available for unsupported systems too, including Windows XP, Windows 8 and Windows Server 2003, which you can grab here (note: if that link isn't working then there are direct download links available in the Security blog post).

  2. #2
    Join XS BOINC Team StyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Tropics
    Posts
    9,468
    http://hexus.net/tech/news/software/...es-across-nhs/

    NHS England's local NHS systems and IT services have been buckling under "a suspected national cyber attack", according to reports coming through this afternoon. Areas noted to have been affected include; London, Blackburn, Blackpool, Nottingham, Cumbria and Hertfordshire.
    In Blackpool, for example, phone and IT systems used by GPs have been shut down with doctors resorting to pen and paper. Similarly phones and IT systems in at the East and North Hertfordshire NHS trust which are reportedly out of action. Even more concerning are reports that people are being asked to stay away from A&E departments at hospitals in the two affected regions mentioned above. I'm sure most people would prefer not to go to A&E but are simply compelled to due to emergency… Computers working or not.


    Microsoft has been working to issue patches in light of the large scale ransomware attack that affected some 99 countries yesterday. It has issued patches for WIndows XP and other custom support platforms. A TechNet blog post is available explaining the move and providing guidance.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    687
    Probably 90% of these sorta attacks could be prevented if people were using vmboxes for their mail, or better yet some email client thats separated from os.
    Most of the time someone gets an email with an exe, a pdf with injected virus or a direct link to a virus with hoax name like fedex or something.No wonder people like free stuff and are stupid.
    "oooh a tracking number for a thing i never ordered and never payed, better check out what im getting!" ...
    Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
    Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB

  4. #4
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    As much as I like the idea of forcing users to sandbox everything, it's unrealistic. They balk enough at having to press ctrl+alt+del to log in or having their screens auto-lock after 10 minutes of inactivity. Getting them to jump through hoops would be difficult. It would need to be seamless from their perspective.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  5. #5
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    I wonder how hard it would be to have the email client have an auto-sandbox mode.

    Of course, that breaks any and all integration with other systems, and that would cause mass hysteria too.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  6. #6

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •