Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: [News] Philips 328M6FJMB WQHD 144 Hz VA Monitor

  1. 04-21-2017, 02:27 PM #1
    StyM
    StyM is offline
    Join XS BOINC Team StyM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Tropics
    Posts
    9,468

    [News] Philips 328M6FJMB WQHD 144 Hz VA Monitor

    http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/phi...a-monitor.html

    Philips will be releasing the 328M6FJMB which is a WQHD (2560x1440) monitor that comes with a 144Hz refresh rate. The panel used is a 31.5? MVA (Multi-Domain Vertical Alignment) model.

    That means they are probably using an AU Optronics panel. The monitor is curved at a 1800R bend. Obviously embedded into the VEA protocol is Adaptive-Sync and thus it is AMD FreeSync compatible. The range for that is 48 ? 144Hz. It is an 8-bit colour panel (16.7 million colours), whilst the flicker-free backlight supports a colour gamut of 120% sRGB (100% NTSC). The 328M6FJMB is listed with a 4ms grey to grey response time, a good 3000:1 static contrast ratio, Brightness of 300 cd/m? and 178?/178? viewing angles.

    The monitor has VESA mountings at 100x100mm and includes VGA, 2 DP 1.2a ports (supports Adaptive-Sync), HDMI 1.4 and HDMI 2.0 (the HDMI ports may support Adaptive-Sync as well), 3.5mm headphone jack and 3.5mm audio input. 2 x 5W speakers are also provided for audio.

    >>> Join XS BOINC TEAM Here <<<
    >>> Join XS WCG TEAM Here <<<


    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-21-2017, 08:10 PM #2
    Particle
    Particle is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    I wish they would stop bending perfectly fine panels.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules