Rig 1:
ASUS P8Z77-V
Intel i5 3570K @ 4.75GHz
16GB of Team Xtreme DDR-2666 RAM (11-13-13-35-2T)
Nvidia GTX 670 4GB SLI
Rig 2:
Asus Sabertooth 990FX
AMD FX-8350 @ 5.6GHz
16GB of Mushkin DDR-1866 RAM (8-9-8-26-1T)
AMD 6950 with 6970 bios flash
Yamakasi Catleap 2B overclocked to 120Hz refresh rate
Audio-GD FUN DAC unit w/ AD797BRZ opamps
Sennheiser PC350 headset w/ hero mod
Vapor
It is easy to read the results. +1
Alright, new chart is in then I'll figure out a way to fix the parts I don't like
Yeah Vapor I like the new chart...even I can read it and understand it!
24/7 Cruncher #1
Crosshair VII Hero, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420 AIO, 4x8GB GSKILL 3600MHz C15, ASUS TUF 3090 OC
Samsung 980 1TB NVMe, Samsung 870 QVO 1TB, 2x10TB WD Red RAID1, Win 10 Pro, Enthoo Luxe TG, EVGA SuperNOVA 1200W P2
24/7 Cruncher #2
ASRock X470 Taichi, Ryzen 3900X, 4.0 GHz @ 1.225v, Arctic Liquid Freezer 280 AIO, 2x16GB GSKILL NEO 3600MHz C16, EVGA 3080ti FTW3 Ultra
Samsung 970 EVO 250GB NVMe, Samsung 870 EVO 500GBWin 10 Ent, Enthoo Pro, Seasonic FOCUS Plus 850W
24/7 Cruncher #3
GA-P67A-UD4-B3 BIOS F8 mod, 2600k (L051B138) @ 4.5 GHz, 1.260v full load, Arctic Liquid 120, (Boots Win @ 5.6 GHz per Massman binning)
Samsung Green 4x4GB @2133 C10, EVGA 2080ti FTW3 Hybrid, Samsung 870 EVO 500GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Rosewill Rise, EVGA SuperNOVA 1300W G2
24/7 Cruncher #4 ... Crucial M225 64GB SSD Donated to Endurance Testing (Died at 968 TB of writes...no that is not a typo!)
GA-EP45T-UD3LR BIOS F10 modded, Q6600 G0 VID 1.212 (L731B536), 3.6 GHz 9x400 @ 1.312v full load, Zerotherm Zen FZ120
OCZ 2x2GB DDR3-1600MHz C7, Gigabyte 7950 @1200/1250, Crucial MX100 128GB, 2x1TB WD Red RAID1, Win10 Ent, Centurion 590, XFX PRO650W
Music System
SB Server->SB Touch w/Android Tablet as a remote->Denon AVR-X3300W->JBL Studio Series Floorstanding Speakers, JBL LS Center, 2x SVS SB-2000 Subs
I too like the new chart as it is much easier to read. The other chart made the Samsung look like a POS, in this new chart it shows that the MWI does indeed wear out faster on the top drives, yet they are still able to perform successful writes even after the SMART attribute is done.
Something interesting I noticed on that Samsung on top. You are testing a 60GB drive, and the MWI lasted pretty much right at 60GB. Coincidence?
According to that chart the drives look like they last significantly past the MWI value. I havent read every single post in this thread but I have been skimming it since the beginning so IDK if this has been asked yet or not. But with your program, are you actually checking to make sure the write that is done is able to be read back successfully? Or is it just writing data without verifying all the data is written properly?
Last edited by EniGmA1987; 07-27-2011 at 11:32 AM.
Rig 1:
ASUS P8Z77-V
Intel i5 3570K @ 4.75GHz
16GB of Team Xtreme DDR-2666 RAM (11-13-13-35-2T)
Nvidia GTX 670 4GB SLI
Rig 2:
Asus Sabertooth 990FX
AMD FX-8350 @ 5.6GHz
16GB of Mushkin DDR-1866 RAM (8-9-8-26-1T)
AMD 6950 with 6970 bios flash
Yamakasi Catleap 2B overclocked to 120Hz refresh rate
Audio-GD FUN DAC unit w/ AD797BRZ opamps
Sennheiser PC350 headset w/ hero mod
Yes its being taken care of by Anvils app.
As the chart is above....it only replaces "Host Writes So Far" because expected MWI Exhaustion is not included. New chart replaces both "MWI Exhaustion" bar graph and "Host Writes So Far" bar graph (and it has the spacing fixed, which was part of what was bugging me before)
While this is more complicated (3 sets of data per bar), I think it's still readable as there's never more than 2 active sets of data per SSD.
Great chart Vapor
I wondered what was bugging you with the previous chart, but this one is just great!
-
Hardware:
C300 Update
112.775TiB, 1905 raw wear indicator, 62 MWI, 62MiB/sec, MD5 OK, reallocated still at 1 event/2048 sectors.
Sweet chart Vapor, huge improvement over the other graph. Very easy to read.
-=The Gamer=-
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128Gig Crucial M4 SSD's
BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
-=The Server=-
Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
3 Gig PC2-6400 | 3x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 2x Samsung F4 2TB
Heat
i liked the other one
LOL
both are fine
"Lurking" Since 1977
Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]GomelerDon't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!
257.598 TiB, 705 hours, sa177: 1/1/21150
Average speed reported by Anvil's app has been steady at about 112MB/s.
The other two unknown SMART attributes, 178 and 235, are still at 72/72/276 and 99/99/2, just as they were when the SSD was fresh out of the box.
64GB Samsung 470.
Thanks for the graph updates Vapor !
1: AMD FX-8150-Sabertooth 990FX-8GB Corsair XMS3-C300 256GB-Gainward GTX 570-HX-750
2: Phenom II X6 1100T-Asus M4A89TD Pro/usb3-8GB Corsair Dominator-Gainward GTX 460SE/-X25-V 40GB-(Crucial m4 64GB /Intel X25-M G1 80GB/X25-E 64GB/Mtron 7025/Vertex 1 donated to endurance testing)
3: Asus U31JG - X25-M G2 160GB
I really have no business poking my nose in here, but I've been lurking on this thread since the start, and I must say it's fascinating to follow. I hope all you guys get the recognition you deserve for your efforts.
Question: What's the relationship between MWI exhaustion and PE cycles? When a drive's MWI is exhausted, does that mean the specified number of PE cycles for that type of NAND have been used? Is this a certainty or an assumption?
Cheers!
Last edited by virtualrain; 07-27-2011 at 11:18 PM.
If you look at the charts you should be able to spot the relationship between MWI and P/E count, it's pretty close to the typical 3K or 5K cycles for 25nm and 34nm NAND.
MWI looks to be set as a "worst case" scenario and the NAND might stay alive for a long time having exhausted MWI.
--
192.99TB Host writes
Reallocated sector count : 6
MD5 OK, 33.77MiB/s on avg (34.5 hours)
-
Hardware:
The really interesting bit will come when one of these drives fails and reports things like MD5 errors etc.
265.419 TiB, 726 hours, sa177: 1/1/21827
Average speed reported by Anvil's app has been steady at about 112MB/s.
The other two unknown SMART attributes, 178 and 235, are still at 72/72/276 and 99/99/2, just as they were when the SSD was fresh out of the box.
64GB Samsung 470.
WOW it really is incredible seeing the Samsung go on for so long !
Yeah, the Samsung is a real surprise.
So, just think about what the 128GB drive could be capable of doing.
I've been using my 128GB lately for benchmarks (and OS as well) and there are no signs of degrading performance.
-
Hardware:
1: AMD FX-8150-Sabertooth 990FX-8GB Corsair XMS3-C300 256GB-Gainward GTX 570-HX-750
2: Phenom II X6 1100T-Asus M4A89TD Pro/usb3-8GB Corsair Dominator-Gainward GTX 460SE/-X25-V 40GB-(Crucial m4 64GB /Intel X25-M G1 80GB/X25-E 64GB/Mtron 7025/Vertex 1 donated to endurance testing)
3: Asus U31JG - X25-M G2 160GB
C300 Update
118.378TiB, 60 MWI, 2000 raw wear, MD5 OK, 61.95MiB/sec, reallocation still at 2048/1.
Now I'm the only one with drives that haven't exhausted their MWIs
Cool and B.A.T is still at 0 reallocated sectors.
-
Hardware:
Bookmarks