Anvil it seem that the SF drives are really not benefiting from the 46% compression setting.
As an example the MWI exhaustion for the Chronos was worse than the M225 and only marginally better than the M4. The F3 did really well but that was a 120GB drive so it’s hard to compare with the other drives being tested. For the SF drives using 46% how did the WA come out?
Also it seems that the ability to write past MWI has more to do with the NAND rather than the controller. The NAND that Micron and Intel are using seems to be in a league of its own. Unlike other Intel models I notice that the 520 is using exactly the same IMF NAND that is being used by other SF vendors.
Bookmarks