Probably 46% for static data and 67% for test data. With the E9/233 SMART value, I can see how NAND writes directly relate to wear, so no absolute need for 101% incompressible data for the test. Many pages back I found the 67% data had a compression curve similar to the types of data I would put on an SSD (apps, documents). The 46% is most similar to the OS and apps compression curve, but 67% is a more conservative version (less compressible than OS/Apps, but more compressible than documents), so I might do 67/67 or 46/67, not entirely sure yet.
That exact quote is what made me think it was just MWI counting upward and past 100
If anything, a 120 is too low a value for it to be MWI based...to maintain the 1.015x WA, it needs a value of 125 at 241TiB.
Bookmarks