Your page looks different. I don't think you guys ran the same thing.
Does Intel HD igp support Direct2D acceleration if yes than shame on AMD..
Bingo. You ran the wrong page. Click that "Try Hallucinogenic Mode" link at the bottom below your score.
I've got 599 points in the Hallucinogenic mode. No way my radeon 4850 is weaker than intel's GMA in i3.Something is not right here.
I would gladly try it but where do i set the window size?I have 19" Wide screen TFT monitor with native res. of 14x9.Originally Posted by kl0012
You cant stop this nonsense.
You can clearly see that anandtech has Phychedelic mode in one of them and Hallucinogenic in the other. How? In one it says "Try Again" And in the other it says "Try Hallucinogenic mode".
Anandtech messed up.
Psychedelic needs 2D GPU acceleration... I make a test here with no 2D acceleration (with OperA) and receive the 22 points.
Yeah AT seems to ran different tests :S.
kl0012 can you run the other tests that we can see in Youtube videos? Like the bookshelf one?
Resized the window to 1275x737 and got almost no change in results : 1779 and 599.
I've just ran the amazon book reading test and I've got lower score than Zacate .My score is around 27-31fps,50% slower than lowly Zacate .
Hmm,I wonder if CCC drivers have any impact.I run the older 10.6 ones.
Indeed. I'd reckon we'd see about 700 vs 200 if they were both in the same mode. Not quite the 10x he's spinning it as, but still clearly faster. Not sure about the magic i3 result we've seen here though since it's faster than discrete graphics solutions we know are clearly superior to i3's IGP.
Are we all running the same version of IE9 preview, for starters?
And Windows 7??? Because Direct2D just work on Windows 7 with DX10.1/11 graphic card compatible.
Of course,Windows 7 x64,4GB ram,CPU speed 1.6-3.1Ghz,Radeon 4850 @ def. with CCC 10.6
edit: I've just found out that IE9 requirement for hw acceleration is DX9,not DX10.1/11.At least this is according to intel.