Page 51 of 91 FirstFirst ... 414849505152535461 ... LastLast
Results 1,251 to 1,275 of 2268

Thread: The ATI Radeon 5XXX Thread

  1. #1251
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    Quote Originally Posted by Vipeax View Post
    On Tweakers we had a discussion related to this around 10 september and I was playing around with some numbers a bit back then.

    4890 newegg was 195 USD, NL 180 euro = 92.3%
    4870 newegg was 150 USD, NL 135 euro = 90%
    4850 newegg was 100 USD, NL 90 euro = 90%
    ==========================
    90%
    HD5850 1GB $299 => €269,10
    HD5870 1GB $349 => €314,10
    HD5870 2GB $399 => €359,10
    ==========================
    92.3%
    HD5850 1GB $299 => €275,97
    HD5870 1GB $349 => €322,13 (319,99 @ Salland) ----> This is what I expect for the US ($349)
    HD5870 2GB $399 => €368,28
    ==========================
    95%
    HD5850 1GB $299 => €284,05
    HD5870 1GB $349 => €331,55
    HD5870 2GB $399 => €379,05

    Gotta love speculating .
    heh from me being bored and drunk i was about $1 dollar out from your prediction but like i said at the end these are all lame pre-order/inflated prices

    LMAOOOOO at that link for 5870 $650
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James

  2. #1252
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    84
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004 View Post
    heh from me being bored and drunk i was about $1 dollar out from your prediction but like i said at the end these are all lame pre-order/inflated prices
    Yep, I kinda forgot about that discussion we had when I made my post here earlier today, sadly we can only see what happens (not that it matters too much what the exact price is in the US, because that is not what I will be paying ).

    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004 View Post
    LMAOOOOO at that link for 5870 $650
    Go buy it while you can... It is the special "SEF-Edition". (Super Expensive Fail Edition)

  3. #1253
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    632
    Specs dont look that different from 4890, what gives?

    Still 256bit memory bandwith?

    Still 850mhz Core clock? I thought we were getting 1ghz+ core clocks?
    himynameisfrank
    Flickr

    i7 2600K @ 4.4Ghz
    Corsair Hydro H80
    MSI Z68A-GD80
    EVGA GTX580 x 2 SLi
    Corsair XMS3 1600 12Gb
    Corsair HX850w
    OCZ Agility 3 SSD x 3 RAID 0
    Creative X-Fi Titanium / Astro A40 Audio System
    Corsair Graphite 600T SE White
    DELL U2410 24" IPS Panel

  4. #1254
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    84
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCarLessDriven View Post
    Specs dont look that different from 4890, what gives?
    A nice boost in tflop...
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCarLessDriven View Post
    Still 256bit memory bandwith?
    Indeed.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCarLessDriven View Post
    Still 850mhz Core clock? I thought we were getting 1ghz+ core clocks?
    From what I heard you can easily get it running at 1GHz with the stock cooler... (going to try to find the link on this 1)

  5. #1255
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCarLessDriven View Post
    Specs dont look that different from 4890, what gives?

    Still 256bit memory bandwith?

    Still 850mhz Core clock? I thought we were getting 1ghz+ core clocks?
    don't need 512bit bus its why 4870 never really gained much of a boost even with an extra 200mhz + on the memory overclock hasnt saturated it yet.. I think there eventually will be a 5890 possibly with 512 if not then next series after the shrink might be..

    also memory will be at 5300 mhz so nice mem speeds just to make sure its not going to fail with it....

    you act as-if its the same core as the 4XXX series its not its like double everything pretty much so even at 850 it's impossible to compare as its a diff chip entirely
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James

  6. #1256
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Karachi, Pakistan
    Posts
    389
    Can anyone project the die size of HD5870 if made at 55nm. Suppose if 40nm was a really bad process then 55nm is the only other choice.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #1257
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by ubuntu83 View Post
    Can anyone project the die size of HD5870 if made at 55nm. Suppose if 40nm was a really bad process then 55nm is the only other choice.
    It's 40nm.

  8. #1258
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Karachi, Pakistan
    Posts
    389
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldenTiger View Post
    It's 40nm.
    That's why added if.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  9. #1259
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by ubuntu83 View Post
    That's why added if.
    I see, sorry I misunderstood your question. I'm not sure as to the answer myself.

  10. #1260
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    'Zona
    Posts
    2,346
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004 View Post
    don't need 512bit bus its why 4870 never really gained much of a boost even with an extra 200mhz + on the memory overclock hasnt saturated it yet.. I think there eventually will be a 5890 possibly with 512 if not then next series after the shrink might be..

    also memory will be at 5300 mhz so nice mem speeds just to make sure its not going to fail with it....

    you act as-if its the same core as the 4XXX series its not its like double everything pretty much so even at 850 it's impossible to compare as its a diff chip entirely
    512bit isn't possible with the diesizes were are planning on seeing from AMD/ATi, until they start stacking/staggering the MCs which is pretty far off.
    We might eventually see a small bump up to 384bit in the future but that will be when they actually have a need for +200GBps of bandwidth and GDDR5/6 stops scaling effectively.

    Quote Originally Posted by ubuntu83 View Post
    Can anyone project the die size of HD5870 if made at 55nm. Suppose if 40nm was a really bad process then 55nm is the only other choice.
    Well since RV870 die size is unknown at this point, somewhere around 330mm2 is the best estimate/rumor, these numbers won't be exact especially since there are way too many variables involved to calculate accurately.

    Assuming RV870 is about 2.1bil trannies and ~330mm2, it would be ~600-660mm2 on 55nm.
    Last edited by LordEC911; 09-17-2009 at 05:02 PM.
    Originally Posted by motown_steve
    Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.

    Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.

  11. #1261
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Karachi, Pakistan
    Posts
    389
    Quote Originally Posted by LordEC911 View Post
    Assuming RV870 is about 2.1bil trannies and ~330mm2, it would be around 560-650mm2 on 55nm.
    hmm so Cypress is possible at 55nm with average yields if made at 55GT.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  12. #1262
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    263
    What facts do we have regarding the 58XXX series so far?

  13. #1263
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by munim View Post
    What facts do we have regarding the 58XXX series so far?
    Wow.. why don't you try reading the thread? There's pages and pages of information here. There's also google.

    Sorry, but I can't help but be extremely annoyed by lazy people.

  14. #1264
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Nice to see ATi fixed their AF quality. One thing that's bugged me about my 4850 is that AF doesn't look as sharp as it did with my 8800GTX.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  15. #1265
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,074
    Quote Originally Posted by munim View Post
    What facts do we have regarding the 58XXX series so far?
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=234555

    i7| EX58-EXTREME | SSD M225 | Radbox | 5870CF + 9600GT

  16. #1266
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    214
    Hey guys, is it in my best interest to hold out until the 2GB version becomes available? I know neither card is out yet, but I'm more asking on the opinion of 1GB vs 2GB cards from previous generations. Has the extra 1GB made a huge difference in performance? I'll be playing mostly FPS's. I've been sitting on this 7900GT forever waiting for these cards to come out, but I don't want my impatience to get in the way of making the right decision.

    I suppose my question can be summed up with: "What would you do?"
    Gigabyte Z68X UD3H-B3 | Intel Core i5 2500k | 2x4GB Patriot Viper Xtreme DDR3-1600 | XFX Radeon HD5870 | Seasonic X760 | HT Omega Claro Halo XT| Intel X25-M G2 80GB | Samsung F3 1TB | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Klipsch Promedia 5.1 Ultra | Samsung 2333T |

  17. #1267
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by cmay119 View Post
    Hey guys, is it in my best interest to hold out until the 2GB version becomes available? I know neither card is out yet, but I'm more asking on the opinion of 1GB vs 2GB cards from previous generations. Has the extra 1GB made a huge difference in performance? I'll be playing mostly FPS's. I've been sitting on this 7900GT forever waiting for these cards to come out, but I don't want my impatience to get in the way of making the right decision.

    I suppose my question can be summed up with: "What would you do?"
    I know it made a difference with the x2 cards going 1gb to 2gb, but that's also technically going from 512mb to 1gb as both gpu's have to store the same information in the ram.

    Honestly, I'd think going 1gb to 2gb should make a difference with these newer cards at high resolution with AA/AF(who DOESN'T buy these and game at high resolution though), but it's too early to know.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  18. #1268
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,674
    one thing that's bad about such high mem frequencies is the latencies. I don't think graphic cards really care though.

  19. #1269
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Here's some foreign preorder listings:

    5870 http://tipidpc.com/viewitem.php?iid=4179631 19500 PHP Philippine Peso (PHP) = $408 usd

    5850 http://tipidpc.com/viewitem.php?iid=4179601 14500 PHP Philippine Peso (PHP) = $303 usd
    Last edited by GoldenTiger; 09-17-2009 at 05:51 PM.

  20. #1270
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    If they can keep the price of the x2 around 500-600(600 if the 5870 does indeed turn out to be a 399 part), consider me a new buyer.

  21. #1271
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    Was really hoping for lower prices, but they should come down by Christmas.
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  22. #1272
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    318
    Wow, now I'm debating getting one or two again. Damn cars, why they gotta cost soo much?!

    And to make things worse, I need a new board! Anyone else running an 16x/8x or 8x/8x board? Mine are stuck on 16x/8x.

  23. #1273
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by Boogerlad View Post
    one thing that's bad about such high mem frequencies is the latencies. I don't think graphic cards really care though.
    They care somewhat... The 4870, when ram is dropped to 4850 speeds the 4850 wins thanks to the tighter timings on the 4850's ram, even though the 4870 has 125mhz more on the core. Of course, that's a drastic downclock ram wise.

    I can hunt down the article if someone wants.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  24. #1274
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by Boogerlad View Post
    one thing that's bad about such high mem frequencies is the latencies. I don't think graphic cards really care though.
    higher mem frequencies mean lower latency and gpu's hide latency and maximize throughput.

  25. #1275
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by Vit^pr0n View Post
    Wow.. why don't you try reading the thread? There's pages and pages of information here. There's also google.

    Sorry, but I can't help but be extremely annoyed by lazy people.
    There was too much BS to wade through

    Thank you!

Page 51 of 91 FirstFirst ... 414849505152535461 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •