Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: a 2x2GB DDR2-8500 (1066Mhz) CAS5 Kit that runs 4-4-4-12 @ 475FSB?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    299

    a 2x2GB DDR2-8500 (1066Mhz) CAS5 Kit that runs 4-4-4-12 @ 475FSB?

    Hey guys,
    I wanna get a 2x2GB Kit that will allow me to run 4-4-4-12 @ 475 fsb. The only CAS4 RAM that I see around tops out at 800Mhz and might have a hard time reaching DDR950 specs (475fsb)...

    I was wondering if it was plausible to get some 1066Mhz CAS5 RAM and underclock it to 950Mhz to get it to sit at CAS4...I want to maintain the 1:1 ratio, unless someone can enlighten me that q6600's like as much RAM bandwidth as they can get and being at anything higher than 1:1 (i.e. 5:6, etc..) has no effect on total system performance....

    Just wondering if sitting at 1066Mhz CAS5 is "better" for my 3800Mhz q6600 than 950Mhz CAS4 settings I currently run...

    I know with Core 2 Dual Cores, CAS latency and RAM bandwidth are not the most important settings with this architecture, based on benchies some have run, no noticeable losses in performance, or negligible, but Quads might like to fatter fsb, RAM Speeds, lower CAS, ....

    I run a P5K Deluxe.
    Thanks!
    MB: Asus P5Q Deluxe BIOS 1406
    CPU: Q9550 (L835B078) e0 2.83Ghz @ 4105Mhz so far (8.5x483) - 1.3625v vCore Bios, ~1.344v in CPU-Z
    RAM: 4GB (2x2GB) (5-5-5-15) 5:6@579Mhz (so far) 2.2v G.Skill F2-8500CLD5-4GBPK
    Vid Card: eVGA GTX 260 FTW
    Cooling: ThermalRight Ultra 120 Extreme w/ AS5 & 120mm fan blowing + AS5 on all factory pipes/HS
    Optical Drives: NEC ND-3540A and Lite-On LH-20A1H
    Drives: 750GB Seagate Barracuda SATAII 7200.10 - RAID0 2x320GB SATAII Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 - RAID0 2x320GB SATAII WD 7200.10 - 200GB SATA Seagate Barracuda - 2x160GB IDE WD1600JB (External)- 120GB IDE WD1200JB (External) - 80GB WD800JB (External) - 100GB IDE WD1000JB (External)
    Case: Antec p160 PSU: Antec TruePower Trio 650w Fans: 4x120mm

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    347
    From my mild experience and others more advance experiences.
    Having to keep 1:1 is utter bull.
    Take a look here: http://forums.extremeoverclocking.co...289882&page=10
    Keeping in mind the OP used to work in the memory industry.


    You can see the screenshotted results scattered through the pages.

    EDIT:
    And wow, I forgot to mention it only applies to Intel chipsets, not nvidia.
    Last edited by biftek.; 05-10-2008 at 06:24 AM.
    My new Intel build, logged here.

    WE GO PLAY HOOP
    -Barry

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    453
    You will be better off sticking with your 4 sticks of HZ. I see in you sig you are running them right now at 475 1:1 with 4-4-4-12.
    got to the 5:6 divider and run them at DDR 1140 instead of the 950 you are at now and set your timings at 5-5-5-5. You will gain 1000 cpu points in aquamark
    If you can't get it to run at 1140 5-5-5-5 then try 5-5-5-8. If any thing that high is out of the question then run your machine on the 9x multi at 423fsb again with your mem on the 5:6 divider with your timings at 5-4-4-5
    This will give you more speed then you are getting now at 4-4-4-12.

    WZ

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •