Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Multiple F@H-GPU clients on multiple ATI cards

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Esbjerg-Denmark
    Posts
    334

    Multiple F@H-GPU clients on multiple ATI cards

    Just reciewd my X1950XTX, and then went to DL the GPU F@H client, and then i saw a new version 5.91, and a FAQ multi GPU link.

    So for those of you running two X19xx cards there is now hope foreward.

    http://fahinfo.org/gpu/multi_gpu_howto.html

    This FAQ doesn't say anything about, if it is possible to run two GPU clients on a CF setup, so if anyone can test this, it would be great.
    Laptop: i5 3230 @ stock, 2x4GB RAM, 240GB SSD (Kingston SSD now), nVidia GT640M + Intel HD4000 GFX.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Bandwith Whore
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    2,361
    Well its a step in the right direction for those of us who do DC projects. Im not a F@H guy, but there is light at the end of the tunnel.

  3. #3
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058


    Is it just me or has AMD/ATI just found another way to add value to old hw

    Though if the G80 comes out doing stream processing for F@H...X1950XTX will get owned by more than 2x performance.

    Perkam

  4. #4
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    umm Perkam the reason that the 7900 isn't used for F@H is because they can only do 24bit Floating point. You need 32bit floating point for scientific calculations
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  5. #5
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step
    umm Perkam the reason that the 7900 isn't used for F@H is because they can only do 24bit Floating point. You need 32bit floating point for scientific calculations
    Hence why i pointed towards G80 not G70

    Perkam

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    192
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam


    Is it just me or has AMD/ATI just found another way to add value to old hw

    Though if the G80 comes out doing stream processing for F@H...X1950XTX will get owned by more than 2x performance.

    Perkam
    Actually the 1950XTX will not get owned by a G80. If anything it might be 20% better but not the kind of owning I am guessing that you are thinking.
    Q6600 @ 3.0 | 8GB G-Skill @ 800 Mhz 5-5-5-20 | ATI 3870 Stock 1 x 500 GB Seagate 7200.11
    1 x 1TB Seagate 7200.11 | 2 x 320GB Seagate 7200.10
    Seasonic S12-550 Energy +CM Stacker

  7. #7
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikesta
    Actually the 1950XTX will not get owned by a G80. If anything it might be 20% better but not the kind of owning I am guessing that you are thinking.
    Yields on GPGPU are dependent on the software that utilizes it. If F@H guys worked with NV as hard as they did with ATI, I'm sure G80 would be ahead by a bit.

    Apples to apples here gentlemen.

    Perkam

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,696
    Ive heard rumors that the 8800 might not run f@h, cant remember where i read it but it hinted that they might not let it run on the 8800. (thats not saying it cant)
    It needs to think you have 2 screens so it wont work on xfire, if i have time i will get round to trying it out, need to find a second screen though.....
    Workstation:
    3960X | 32GB G.Skill 2133 | Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    3*EVGA GTX580 HC2 3GB | 3*Dell U3011
    4*Crucial M4 256GB R0 | 6*3TB WD Green R6
    Areca 1680ix-24 + 4GB | 2*Pioneer BDR-205 | Enermax Plat 1500W
    Internal W/C | PC-P80 | G19 | G700 | G27
    Destop Audio:
    Squeezebox Duet | Beresford TC-7520 Caiman modded | NAD M3 | MA RX8 | HD650 | ATH-ES7
    Man Cave:
    PT-AT5000E | TXP65VT30 | PR-SC5509 | PA-MC5500 | MA GX300*2, GXFX*4, GXC350 | 2*BK Monolith+
    Gaming on the go:
    Alienware M18x
    i7 2920XM | 16GB DDR3 1600
    2*6990 | WLED 1080P
    2*Crucial M4 256GB | BD-RW
    BT 375 | Intel 6300 | 330W PSU

    2011 Audi R8 V10 Ibis White ABT Tuned - 600HP

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    493
    The G80 can run F@H but will still not run it as well as a X1950XTX

    -Timmay
    Intel i5 2500k @ 4GHz || Gigabyte Z68 UD3 || Vengeance 8GB 8-8-8-24 1T || CM Stacker 810
    ATI 4850 || Samsung Spinpoint F3 x 2 || SilverStone ST60F
    Asus DVD RW +- || Logitech G15 || MS Intel-eye 1.1|| CMV 19" Wide-Screen || Scythe Ninja

  10. #10
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,825
    Man OC'd watercooled x1950xtx crossfire and phase cooled kents would be like having a small DC farm in one case
    Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
    3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    324
    My 3000+ can't fold...so why should anyone else fold !!!

    WHINE WHINE WHINE !!!
    Last edited by perkam; 11-04-2006 at 12:30 PM.
    E6600"L630A446"? @3600@1.?v cooled by Tunic Tower sitting on Abit AB9 Quad GT played on ASUS 8800GTX opperated by a lazy slacker!

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    1,196
    Quote Originally Posted by Pillo-kun
    why should anyone care about folding. i mean, i'm no scientist and why should i fold, not like mine pc would be of any help to a research of cancer or whatever. why do some of people at xs fold?
    Think of it as a benchmark program for forums.
    http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/...type=teamstats

  13. #13
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    its definately not going to help cure cancer or anything with that attitude.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  14. #14
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Certain member's post edited

    Perkam

  15. #15
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,825
    The reason people fold is for the stats and competition. They have been doing it for years and there have been no results. Maybe in a few more years they will get something done but as of now nothing is coming from it.
    Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
    3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250

  16. #16
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Quote Originally Posted by afireinside
    The reason people fold is for the stats and competition. They have been doing it for years and there have been no results. Maybe in a few more years they will get something done but as of now nothing is coming from it.
    That's like describing Cancer Run For the Cure annual marathon as "It's for buff people that like to show off...but they haven't cured anything yet"

    Quite resentful considering some of the dedication we've seen. I will admit that some of the stuff with Dr. Barker and XS did get very screwed up...but you can't discount ALL projects on the demerits of a few.

    Perkam

  17. #17
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    DR. Baker Basically said that we were not the type of help he wanted. So it is his loss, not the community's
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    324
    Returned home after a quite a misserable partynight. Maybe I´m to old now and find going out and drink and such too boring nowwadays, who knows? When I saw the that somebody(not mentioning any names here ,hehe) has edited my post i bursted out in laughs..Thanx ya just saved my night, hehe.

    Well i still dont see the point with folding. I rathed turn my pc off than fold to try and find some cure for a disease and not getting any credd for it. Even if i did get a thanx from a million persons i would not be happy cus it would not be my doing. Just a program and a machine doing what they are told to do.

    I have a friend that does real research on viruses and such at AstraZenica(never ending studying), and he said to me once that this kind of sysems are more or less worthless but still there is always a possbility that theirs folks and supercomputers have missed something small that folding can provide with, but that is a very small possiblity. His words.

    I know this seems hursh or harsh, eh whatever. But this is how i see it. And my 3000+ being to weak? Well i dont see any reason to upgrade yet, I feel that if ya wanna paly games at max ya just need a reasonable amount of ram and a good videocard.

    well time to go to sleep if i can.
    Last edited by Pillo-kun; 11-04-2006 at 08:58 PM.
    E6600"L630A446"? @3600@1.?v cooled by Tunic Tower sitting on Abit AB9 Quad GT played on ASUS 8800GTX opperated by a lazy slacker!

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Camping your spawn :)
    Posts
    1,732
    Your 3000 isnt to weak...
    Points isnt the only reason we do it, its for the science behind it..
    And your friend is wrong, every little pc helps alot more than one human can..
    Join the XS WCG team and do your part to help save the world..
    ^^^Click here to start folding for the soon to be number one team in the world..^^^

    Main rig: Gigabyte DS3/6300@3.2 7950 GX2/Server:Expert/165@2.9/PCI vid/Wifes:ASrock Dual SATA2/3800@2.4/X800XTAIW/Kids:165@2.7/X850XTPE

    "A computer beat me in chess, but it was no match when it came to kickboxing"
    -Emo Philips

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Stamford, UK
    Posts
    1,336
    Quote Originally Posted by Timmay
    The G80 can run F@H but will still not run it as well as a X1950XTX

    -Timmay
    Yeah the G80 has the same performance in this regard as the 7900 does... and so will not be able to beat the X1950/1900 in performance in this situation.
    FX8350 @ 4.0Ghz | 32GB @ DDR3-1200 4-4-4-12 | Asus 990FXA @ 1400Mhz | AMD HD5870 Eyefinity | XFX750W | 6 x 128GB Sandisk Extreme RAID0 @ Aerca 1882ix with 4GB DRAM
    eXceed TJ07 worklog/build

  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    881
    Didn't the human genome was decoded by a distributed computing project like F@H? So maybe we aren't seeing any results now, but in 10-20 years, we'll definitely see some results from all this computing. But with that said, I wouldn't buy a new comp or even run an old comp dedicated just for F@H, that's too extreme for me. I just let F@H run on my comp when I'm downloading or just web browsing. Too bad my vid card is too crappy for F@H, otherwise I would run a copy on my vid card too.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    271
    Simulating protein folding is a process. The cure for Cancer or any other disease will not come overnight, but misfolding simulations done by distributed computing ARE a valuable resource towards that goal.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA (or Lisbon, Portugal)
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by afireinside
    The reason people fold is for the stats and competition.
    True for most of us.

    Quote Originally Posted by afireinside
    They have been doing it for years and there have been no results. Maybe in a few more years they will get something done but as of now nothing is coming from it.
    False.

    I wouldn't call 45 peer-reviewed papers no results. Sure, they haven't found the cure for cancer. But things don't work like that. Their primary mission is to understand protein folding which in turn may help finding cure for a bunch of diseases.

    List of papers: http://folding.stanford.edu/papers.html
    Main results summarized for general public: http://folding.stanford.edu/results.html
    Quote Originally Posted by krille
    Ouchy, go die please, thanks.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •